New YPPT Method

Obviously. If you used statfox stats, then it will be different from my numbers. Statfox stats are inaccurate. Are these results accurate?

What I mean, did you increase/decrease predictions to make it more "realistic" final score?

For example, you have Chicago 17, Atlanta 23 (I have Chicago 18, Atlanta 23). Since 18 is not not score that often, did you decrease it to 17 points for Bears?

Also, Buffalo 10, NY Jets 24 (I have it at Buffalo 11, NY Jets 26)

Did you decrease Buffalo and Jets?

It appears all your scores and predictions with "realistic" final numbers, but I doubt a system will produce results for ALL games.

The difference is 3.7 and you are giving it a 3 point difference? Shouldn't be a 4 point difference?

How does 14.6 projected score go all the way up to 17 points?

I'm just curious.

One more thing, at first I gave the full 3 points to Tulsa and that would of been a score of 20 and Boise would of had 28. But then I realized it seems these formulas consist of dividing up the factors so i did it that way.

Oh yeah I won too

Interesting roughshod31.  After you split the difference you would divide the difference by 2, as usual?  If so, isn't this treating it the same way as a positive and a negative?  Just curious.

Not sure why I'm getting 17.6 and you are getting 18.3. My formulas are programmed in excel so I won't have any mathematical error. Unless you are doing some double negative splitting or whatever. I kept it pure.

I will be using my original formula for the foreseeable future.(less confusion).

Tonights Game

Cincinnati      131.9 (R)   280.8 (P)   412.7 TYDS    22.5 YPPT

South Fla.       110.2 (R)  202.1 (P)    312.3 TYDS   21.4 YPPT

Cincinnati          20  (18.3)

South Fla.          17  (14.6)

GL

I will be playing th UNDER tonight 48.5.

Pretty much use roughshod formula and get the score. From there either -1.5 for the away team and add 1.5 for the home team. Or just add 3 points for the home. Like I said Ive only done it once. I think using SOS for college football would be really tough. HFA maybe the better factor.

I get Cinci  17  USF 20, so thats different from others. It'll be interesting. But one thing I do agree is the under.