Here are 2 trends that have occurred over and over this year... 1. We can't bet on Vegas because they'll lose. 2. We can't bet against Vegas because they'll win.
LMAO, yep ,Washington however has forever been my kryptonite lol
Rust never sleeps
0
Quote Originally Posted by BlueStar57:
Here are 2 trends that have occurred over and over this year... 1. We can't bet on Vegas because they'll lose. 2. We can't bet against Vegas because they'll win.
LMAO, yep ,Washington however has forever been my kryptonite lol
Here are 2 trends that have occurred over and over this year... 1. We can't bet on Vegas because they'll lose. 2. We can't bet against Vegas because they'll win.
Same treatment we endured from Nashville last season if memory serves me correctly
0
Quote Originally Posted by BlueStar57:
Here are 2 trends that have occurred over and over this year... 1. We can't bet on Vegas because they'll lose. 2. We can't bet against Vegas because they'll win.
Same treatment we endured from Nashville last season if memory serves me correctly
Any thoughts on playing the PL for dogs? NYI, fade ARI, WSH, and fade VGS were all PL winners. I realize it reduces the odds on ML winners, but it might also get you more wins and fewer reset/abandoned plays.
I have, and there's certainly merit to it Blue. Especially after you add STL to that list as well. I've not been comfortable with that kind of juice in a chase where there's only 50U to work with, but perhaps expanding BR to 100U ($200 initial wager as opposed to $400) would make it less daunting. Definitely on the drawing board
0
Quote Originally Posted by BlueStar57:
Any thoughts on playing the PL for dogs? NYI, fade ARI, WSH, and fade VGS were all PL winners. I realize it reduces the odds on ML winners, but it might also get you more wins and fewer reset/abandoned plays.
I have, and there's certainly merit to it Blue. Especially after you add STL to that list as well. I've not been comfortable with that kind of juice in a chase where there's only 50U to work with, but perhaps expanding BR to 100U ($200 initial wager as opposed to $400) would make it less daunting. Definitely on the drawing board
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.