Thank you sir.....
You're correct X, the Caps, Pens, and B's were all more-or-less the same price when I placed the wager. I chose WSH because I felt they had the easiest matchup/weakest opponent
You're correct X, the Caps, Pens, and B's were all more-or-less the same price when I placed the wager. I chose WSH because I felt they had the easiest matchup/weakest opponent
TUESDAY 2/27 results:
Play1 (a) WSH ML winner +1U
Play2 (a) BOS ML winner +1U
(a) SJ ML winner +1U
Original BR: 20U
Current BR: 67.5U (+47.5U)
ROI: +238%
TUESDAY 2/27 results:
Play1 (a) WSH ML winner +1U
Play2 (a) BOS ML winner +1U
(a) SJ ML winner +1U
Original BR: 20U
Current BR: 67.5U (+47.5U)
ROI: +238%
in my haste yesterday i got my teams with blue logos confused and put the (a) play on STL, and i had it in the back of my head that you didn't like plays over -300. oh well.
i did chase STL also on the (b) play the other day into game 4 last night, fortunately games 2 and 3 the blues were dogs so it wasn't too pricy. so my errors were fortuitous this one time - usually that's not the case.
in my haste yesterday i got my teams with blue logos confused and put the (a) play on STL, and i had it in the back of my head that you didn't like plays over -300. oh well.
i did chase STL also on the (b) play the other day into game 4 last night, fortunately games 2 and 3 the blues were dogs so it wasn't too pricy. so my errors were fortuitous this one time - usually that's not the case.
in my haste yesterday i got my teams with blue logos confused and put the (a) play on STL, and i had it in the back of my head that you didn't like plays over -300. oh well.
i did chase STL also on the (b) play the other day into game 4 last night, fortunately games 2 and 3 the blues were dogs so it wasn't too pricy. so my errors were fortuitous this one time - usually that's not the case.
way to play em Dutch
I have to occasionally remind myself why exactly I steer clear of over -300, and Tampa reminded me last night...NO team in this league is THAT much better than any of the others. Also played STL, but only as a B.
in my haste yesterday i got my teams with blue logos confused and put the (a) play on STL, and i had it in the back of my head that you didn't like plays over -300. oh well.
i did chase STL also on the (b) play the other day into game 4 last night, fortunately games 2 and 3 the blues were dogs so it wasn't too pricy. so my errors were fortuitous this one time - usually that's not the case.
way to play em Dutch
I have to occasionally remind myself why exactly I steer clear of over -300, and Tampa reminded me last night...NO team in this league is THAT much better than any of the others. Also played STL, but only as a B.
Sorry for the delayed response Smurph, I'm in travel for the week so my posting may be spotty. Unfortunately, VGS was both plays...ouch!
Sorry for the delayed response Smurph, I'm in travel for the week so my posting may be spotty. Unfortunately, VGS was both plays...ouch!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.