ok Eli i see it on 5Dimes so if the game goes into OT its the same as pooping my pants on the golf course ,,,, lol i am done for ... lmao am i right ,,?
Well, yeah, I would not put it in those words but that's what regulation lines do. Although, expert is only playing these when the ML when the line is worse than -200. So, those are the heavy favorites. Not sure if Vancouver is a play like this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kingofny:
ok Eli i see it on 5Dimes so if the game goes into OT its the same as pooping my pants on the golf course ,,,, lol i am done for ... lmao am i right ,,?
Well, yeah, I would not put it in those words but that's what regulation lines do. Although, expert is only playing these when the ML when the line is worse than -200. So, those are the heavy favorites. Not sure if Vancouver is a play like this.
Van is -175 all over no matter where i look.. but i will start that chase tonight ... i guess if the line is worse that -200 i will just wait for the next chase ... thank you very much guys and enjoy your day ,,, talk to you soon .....
0
Van is -175 all over no matter where i look.. but i will start that chase tonight ... i guess if the line is worse that -200 i will just wait for the next chase ... thank you very much guys and enjoy your day ,,, talk to you soon .....
Actually, Expert, I think it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win. Not only did you pick Vancouver to win on the road, Edmonton is almost dead last at home (although they have not played that many games at home).
So, basically everything was pointing in Vancouver's direction unless anyone was basing their decisions on the initial list you give at the top of the thread.
Perhaps, we should put the record at 52-0 and chase Edmonton to keep some integrity and being transparent.
BOL with the play today , I like the pick .
Do you agree expert?
0
Quote Originally Posted by elithepunk:
Actually, Expert, I think it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win. Not only did you pick Vancouver to win on the road, Edmonton is almost dead last at home (although they have not played that many games at home).
So, basically everything was pointing in Vancouver's direction unless anyone was basing their decisions on the initial list you give at the top of the thread.
Perhaps, we should put the record at 52-0 and chase Edmonton to keep some integrity and being transparent.
nice win tonight guys ... i came of the chase alittle and played a parlay ... Van and over for 2 to 1 ... the Detroit line right now is - 345 are these guys on crack rock??? i think i am going to sit this one out and wait for the next one .....Montreal on the 18 th ,,,,, happy Monday ....
0
nice win tonight guys ... i came of the chase alittle and played a parlay ... Van and over for 2 to 1 ... the Detroit line right now is - 345 are these guys on crack rock??? i think i am going to sit this one out and wait for the next one .....Montreal on the 18 th ,,,,, happy Monday ....
No problem seahawk, glad I could help Today MAKE SURE YOU PLAY -.0.5 puck line on Detroit Redwings because I believe its like-250 and who wants to risk that. -.0.5 puck line is -154 Take Detroit tonight Good luck as always
0
No problem seahawk, glad I could help Today MAKE SURE YOU PLAY -.0.5 puck line on Detroit Redwings because I believe its like-250 and who wants to risk that. -.0.5 puck line is -154 Take Detroit tonight Good luck as always
Detroit did not win, It happens in any sport that why we do a chase on these home teams, so we will chase them at home their next home game WE have a game tonight December 16 Chicago Edmonton +105
I will take the loss if Edmonton loses, seems like whenever I take this team they lose and when ever I fade this team they win, so I do not know
Good luck guys
0
Detroit did not win, It happens in any sport that why we do a chase on these home teams, so we will chase them at home their next home game WE have a game tonight December 16 Chicago Edmonton +105
I will take the loss if Edmonton loses, seems like whenever I take this team they lose and when ever I fade this team they win, so I do not know
Detroit did not win, It happens in any sport that why we do a chase on these home teams, so we will chase them at home their next home game WE have a game tonight December 16 Chicago Edmonton +105
I will take the loss if Edmonton loses, seems like whenever I take this team they lose and when ever I fade this team they win, so I do not know
Good luck guys
Next will be the two home series starting on the 12/18 (Montreal and Atlanta) and also the 2nd Detroit game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by expertcapper:
Detroit did not win, It happens in any sport that why we do a chase on these home teams, so we will chase them at home their next home game WE have a game tonight December 16 Chicago Edmonton +105
I will take the loss if Edmonton loses, seems like whenever I take this team they lose and when ever I fade this team they win, so I do not know
Good luck guys
Next will be the two home series starting on the 12/18 (Montreal and Atlanta) and also the 2nd Detroit game.
Yeah expert, I'm confused why Edmonton would be a play. They already gave us a win during this homestand. Please explain if you can. Thanks again for all of your work!
0
Yeah expert, I'm confused why Edmonton would be a play. They already gave us a win during this homestand. Please explain if you can. Thanks again for all of your work!
Actually, Expert, I think it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win. Not only did you pick Vancouver to win on the road, Edmonton is almost dead last at home (although they have not played that many games at home).
So, basically everything was pointing in Vancouver's direction unless anyone was basing their decisions on the initial list you give at the top of the thread.
Perhaps, we should put the record at 52-0 and chase Edmonton to keep some integrity and being transparent.
I think this is why Expert is continuing to chase Edmonton. I felt it was not right to count Edmonton as a win. Hopefully we close this series to avoid any more confusion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by elithepunk:
Actually, Expert, I think it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win. Not only did you pick Vancouver to win on the road, Edmonton is almost dead last at home (although they have not played that many games at home).
So, basically everything was pointing in Vancouver's direction unless anyone was basing their decisions on the initial list you give at the top of the thread.
Perhaps, we should put the record at 52-0 and chase Edmonton to keep some integrity and being transparent.
I think this is why Expert is continuing to chase Edmonton. I felt it was not right to count Edmonton as a win. Hopefully we close this series to avoid any more confusion.
Hey guys ... you know i think i like the OT SO chase ... if the team goes to OT or has a Shootout i take the over .. I would chase these games until they win ... I know there is another thread on this ..The home chase is really good but those money lines are a killer ... -160 - 170 - 185 and so on ..they just seem like you have to always looking around for the lowest money line ... tonight one matchup fell into this chase is Calgary and Edm. so far so good ... what do you guys think ? this chase or the over chase ..??
0
Hey guys ... you know i think i like the OT SO chase ... if the team goes to OT or has a Shootout i take the over .. I would chase these games until they win ... I know there is another thread on this ..The home chase is really good but those money lines are a killer ... -160 - 170 - 185 and so on ..they just seem like you have to always looking around for the lowest money line ... tonight one matchup fell into this chase is Calgary and Edm. so far so good ... what do you guys think ? this chase or the over chase ..??
Actually I think Expert starts the chase after an OT game and plays the under on both teams .. Which works as well . I think that any kind of chase can work as long as you dont have a team that has a streak of 5-6-7 under games ,, which i dont think that will happen much at all .... But i would loke the opionion of the others on here.. thank you so much .... I am not a huge better but like to make 600 to 800 a month ,.. things are expensive here in the big city ,,, I am good with NBA but it takes to much time to research and i like the chase because its very mechanical ...
0
Actually I think Expert starts the chase after an OT game and plays the under on both teams .. Which works as well . I think that any kind of chase can work as long as you dont have a team that has a streak of 5-6-7 under games ,, which i dont think that will happen much at all .... But i would loke the opionion of the others on here.. thank you so much .... I am not a huge better but like to make 600 to 800 a month ,.. things are expensive here in the big city ,,, I am good with NBA but it takes to much time to research and i like the chase because its very mechanical ...
Yeah expert, I'm confused why Edmonton would be a play. They already gave us a win during this homestand. Please explain if you can. Thanks again for all of your work!
Ok I think we got things messed up with Edmonton. I want to try to clear things up.
First off, Edmonton was part of the bottom 8 home teams when they started off their home stand on December 11th against Florida. I had not posted the updated bottom 8 home team list before that game and so I did not say anything when Expert posted his play as being on Edmonton at home (I'm assuming he is still playing with the original bottom 8 home team list). So, Edmonton loses which means we continue the chase as usual.
Expert then chooses to fade Edmonton on their second home game against Vancouver on December 13th now that I have posted the updated list of bottom 8 home teams. Edmonton won the game and since some guys following here had continued the home chase by betting on Edmonton, this had closed their chase. For us, I said it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win since expert had posted Vancouver as the play.
This leads to the 3rd game of the chase against Chicago. I had not noticed that Expert had posted Edmonton as being the play even though we should be fading the bottom 8 home teams. It's now 7-1 for Chicago so I'll count it as a loss hehe. I think that we should count this as being the first loss of the system since the plays being posted would lead to a 3 game chase loss although I don't think the system would have lead to the same result.
If I am not clear enough, let me know.
0
Quote Originally Posted by seahawksanders:
Yeah expert, I'm confused why Edmonton would be a play. They already gave us a win during this homestand. Please explain if you can. Thanks again for all of your work!
Ok I think we got things messed up with Edmonton. I want to try to clear things up.
First off, Edmonton was part of the bottom 8 home teams when they started off their home stand on December 11th against Florida. I had not posted the updated bottom 8 home team list before that game and so I did not say anything when Expert posted his play as being on Edmonton at home (I'm assuming he is still playing with the original bottom 8 home team list). So, Edmonton loses which means we continue the chase as usual.
Expert then chooses to fade Edmonton on their second home game against Vancouver on December 13th now that I have posted the updated list of bottom 8 home teams. Edmonton won the game and since some guys following here had continued the home chase by betting on Edmonton, this had closed their chase. For us, I said it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win since expert had posted Vancouver as the play.
This leads to the 3rd game of the chase against Chicago. I had not noticed that Expert had posted Edmonton as being the play even though we should be fading the bottom 8 home teams. It's now 7-1 for Chicago so I'll count it as a loss hehe. I think that we should count this as being the first loss of the system since the plays being posted would lead to a 3 game chase loss although I don't think the system would have lead to the same result.
Ok I think we got things messed up with Edmonton. I want to try to clear things up.
First off, Edmonton was part of the bottom 8 home teams when they started off their home stand on December 11th against Florida. I had not posted the updated bottom 8 home team list before that game and so I did not say anything when Expert posted his play as being on Edmonton at home (I'm assuming he is still playing with the original bottom 8 home team list). So, Edmonton loses which means we continue the chase as usual.
Expert then chooses to fade Edmonton on their second home game against Vancouver on December 13th now that I have posted the updated list of bottom 8 home teams. Edmonton won the game and since some guys following here had continued the home chase by betting on Edmonton, this had closed their chase. For us, I said it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win since expert had posted Vancouver as the play.
This leads to the 3rd game of the chase against Chicago. I had not noticed that Expert had posted Edmonton as being the play even though we should be fading the bottom 8 home teams. It's now 7-1 for Chicago so I'll count it as a loss hehe. I think that we should count this as being the first loss of the system since the plays being posted would lead to a 3 game chase loss although I don't think the system would have lead to the same result.
If I am not clear enough, let me know.
Well, I can not cap this team and I do apologize, for those that were smart enough to take Edmonton, congrats. I do not want to say this but this is the chases first loss. WE are moving on 53-1 for the chase and chasing Detroit, i was very hot for a while then just like anything else you will cool off..
yes kingofny its called the NHL spoiler , which we tweaked it for certain teams its in my NHL spoiler part 2
0
Quote Originally Posted by elithepunk:
Ok I think we got things messed up with Edmonton. I want to try to clear things up.
First off, Edmonton was part of the bottom 8 home teams when they started off their home stand on December 11th against Florida. I had not posted the updated bottom 8 home team list before that game and so I did not say anything when Expert posted his play as being on Edmonton at home (I'm assuming he is still playing with the original bottom 8 home team list). So, Edmonton loses which means we continue the chase as usual.
Expert then chooses to fade Edmonton on their second home game against Vancouver on December 13th now that I have posted the updated list of bottom 8 home teams. Edmonton won the game and since some guys following here had continued the home chase by betting on Edmonton, this had closed their chase. For us, I said it would not be fair to count Edmonton as a win since expert had posted Vancouver as the play.
This leads to the 3rd game of the chase against Chicago. I had not noticed that Expert had posted Edmonton as being the play even though we should be fading the bottom 8 home teams. It's now 7-1 for Chicago so I'll count it as a loss hehe. I think that we should count this as being the first loss of the system since the plays being posted would lead to a 3 game chase loss although I don't think the system would have lead to the same result.
If I am not clear enough, let me know.
Well, I can not cap this team and I do apologize, for those that were smart enough to take Edmonton, congrats. I do not want to say this but this is the chases first loss. WE are moving on 53-1 for the chase and chasing Detroit, i was very hot for a while then just like anything else you will cool off..
yes kingofny its called the NHL spoiler , which we tweaked it for certain teams its in my NHL spoiler part 2
Yeah, nice to see you understood what I was talking about Expert. I think this is the best way to move on with things. People following probably didn't even suffer from this 1st official system loss. The record still stands at an impressive 53-1 (and it was just a 3 game chase) so nothing to get worried about now.
To be clear , will you be respecting the new updated list of bottom 8 home teams or are you still handicapping these special cases?
0
Yeah, nice to see you understood what I was talking about Expert. I think this is the best way to move on with things. People following probably didn't even suffer from this 1st official system loss. The record still stands at an impressive 53-1 (and it was just a 3 game chase) so nothing to get worried about now.
To be clear , will you be respecting the new updated list of bottom 8 home teams or are you still handicapping these special cases?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
.
. Can now say record stands at an impressive 53-0 (with a chase on Edmonton). 
Hot Forum Topics
