Monday Recap
1-0
Strange card today as I found some underdogs that are all on the road and with less ats success than their opponents.
Tweaking the treaks.
Since it seems like I should be making a better argument for these plays, I'm loosening up the standard to include qualifying teams that either have, 1) overall winning ats records or SU records or, 2) have winning ats records in either L5 overall or Road/Home category whatever the situation may be. I'll explain the qualifier in (parentheses)
TUESDAY
Sides
N Ill 59
Min 75 = -16/-26 = PLAY N ILL +26 (2-1 Road ATS, 3-2 L5)
La Laf 67
S Miss 68.5 = -1.5/-8.5 = PLAY LA LAFAYETTE +8.5 (1-0 Road ATS)
Port St 74
St Mary’s 83 = -9/-15 = PLAY PORTLAND ST (5-4 overall)
Totals
Murray St 73
La Tech 73.5 = 146.5/139 = PLAY ON UNDER 139**
Monday Recap
1-0
Strange card today as I found some underdogs that are all on the road and with less ats success than their opponents.
Tweaking the treaks.
Since it seems like I should be making a better argument for these plays, I'm loosening up the standard to include qualifying teams that either have, 1) overall winning ats records or SU records or, 2) have winning ats records in either L5 overall or Road/Home category whatever the situation may be. I'll explain the qualifier in (parentheses)
TUESDAY
Sides
N Ill 59
Min 75 = -16/-26 = PLAY N ILL +26 (2-1 Road ATS, 3-2 L5)
La Laf 67
S Miss 68.5 = -1.5/-8.5 = PLAY LA LAFAYETTE +8.5 (1-0 Road ATS)
Port St 74
St Mary’s 83 = -9/-15 = PLAY PORTLAND ST (5-4 overall)
Totals
Murray St 73
La Tech 73.5 = 146.5/139 = PLAY ON UNDER 139**
tuesday recap
0-3 sides
1-0 total
yup, trying to force these projections into plays did backfire. With larger cards, these would not have been plays. I'll think stick to playing teams that don't have losing ats records, unless their home/road record AND L5 record tell me otherwise...
WEDNESDAY
best plays
Clemson 73.5
ECU 69 = +4.5/+14 = 9.5 pts PLAY ON ECU +14 (at home, 4-2 ats, 4-0 L5)
WF 73
UNC-W 71 = +2/+8 = 6pts PLAY ON UNC-W +8 (at home, 4-3 ats, 2-1 ats L5)
other plays
LA Monroe 66
N Col 68.5 = -2.5/-11 = 8.5 pts PLAY ON LA Monroe +11 (3-3 ats)
Loy Ill 66.5
Bradley 72 = -5.5/-12 = 6.5 pts PLAY LOY ILL +6.5 (3-3 ats)
Best Fade
N Az 66
NM 81 = -15/-22 = 7pts = PLAY AGAINST N AZ (on the road w/losing SU and ATS records)
should have the best totals posted later...
tuesday recap
0-3 sides
1-0 total
yup, trying to force these projections into plays did backfire. With larger cards, these would not have been plays. I'll think stick to playing teams that don't have losing ats records, unless their home/road record AND L5 record tell me otherwise...
WEDNESDAY
best plays
Clemson 73.5
ECU 69 = +4.5/+14 = 9.5 pts PLAY ON ECU +14 (at home, 4-2 ats, 4-0 L5)
WF 73
UNC-W 71 = +2/+8 = 6pts PLAY ON UNC-W +8 (at home, 4-3 ats, 2-1 ats L5)
other plays
LA Monroe 66
N Col 68.5 = -2.5/-11 = 8.5 pts PLAY ON LA Monroe +11 (3-3 ats)
Loy Ill 66.5
Bradley 72 = -5.5/-12 = 6.5 pts PLAY LOY ILL +6.5 (3-3 ats)
Best Fade
N Az 66
NM 81 = -15/-22 = 7pts = PLAY AGAINST N AZ (on the road w/losing SU and ATS records)
should have the best totals posted later...
THURSDAY
FL Int 66
Den 74 = -8/-16 = PLAY ON FL INT +16+ (4-1 road ats, 3-0 L5 ats)
Total
CAL D 66
FRESNO 71 = 137/144.5 = 7.5 pts = PLAY UNDER 144.5
Cal D would qualify as a side pick, but upon further review, injuries to several players and starters appear to be the cause of the line adjustment. NO PLAY
Fade
Aub 65
FSU 68 -3/-10 = 7 pts = FADE AUBURN (on the road, losing ats records) Auburn has a starter that is injured is ? for tonight. This fade is not a strong opinion as FSU also has losing ats records, so player beware...
THURSDAY
FL Int 66
Den 74 = -8/-16 = PLAY ON FL INT +16+ (4-1 road ats, 3-0 L5 ats)
Total
CAL D 66
FRESNO 71 = 137/144.5 = 7.5 pts = PLAY UNDER 144.5
Cal D would qualify as a side pick, but upon further review, injuries to several players and starters appear to be the cause of the line adjustment. NO PLAY
Fade
Aub 65
FSU 68 -3/-10 = 7 pts = FADE AUBURN (on the road, losing ats records) Auburn has a starter that is injured is ? for tonight. This fade is not a strong opinion as FSU also has losing ats records, so player beware...
FRIDAY
NMST 74.5
Pep 70 = +4.5/-3 = 7.5 pts = PLAY NM ST +3
Total
UC SB 71
MON ST 74 = 145/135 = PLAY OVER 135
Only 2 plays. the fade play would have been against unc-g, but akron offered no ats reasons to back them.
FRIDAY
NMST 74.5
Pep 70 = +4.5/-3 = 7.5 pts = PLAY NM ST +3
Total
UC SB 71
MON ST 74 = 145/135 = PLAY OVER 135
Only 2 plays. the fade play would have been against unc-g, but akron offered no ats reasons to back them.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.