All Forums | Website Promotions

Ridiculously absurd MLB System!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 275150
Posts: 2223
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3549
Posted: #676
Quote Originally Posted by drewsmooth:

Hat, I've been winning, thanks.

we all have

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 13070
Posted: #677
Quote Originally Posted by Bart_:


we all have


what's the play tonight Bart_? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 271
Posted: #678

What's the plays tonight Jeff.

First time here & MLB first time.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 1507
Posted: #679
I think he said philly+1.5 a few pages back
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 271
Posted: #680
okok thank you!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8152
Posted: #681
Quote Originally Posted by drewsmooth:

Hat, I've been winning, thanks.
Isn't it all that matters? Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3549
Posted: #682
PHI +1.5 today
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 373
Posted: #683
if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase

a) $220 / to win $100 L 220 + 100 = 320.00 move dec 2 to the left [3.20 * 220] (for play B) = 704 vvv
b) 704 / to win 100 L 704 + 100 = "     "      "     "
c) 1,768.80 / 100 L
d) 4,111.36 / 100 L
e) 9,264.99 / 100 ?
+
------------------------------
$16,069.15 

if you look to profit just 10 dollars a series chase you would need $1,606.92 bank roll to play through 'E' in the strategy & a lot is at risk. playing these straight up without a chase could give you less anxiety 
best of luck hat and others looking to profit. the very best!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 27
Posted: #684
I dont understand why some One gives a fu%# if someone else here wins or loses? Why doesnt everyone just tail or fade at their own risk ? Why do u care how he decided on a certain wager? You trolls are fkn annoying! They do this to all winners so u must be doing something right hat !
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 861
Posted: #685
Quote Originally Posted by jdbf23:

I dont understand why some One gives a fu%# if someone else here wins or loses? Why doesnt everyone just tail or fade at their own risk ? Why do u care how he decided on a certain wager? You trolls are fkn annoying! They do this to all winners so u must be doing something right hat !
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1472
Posted: #686
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


You first time posters crack me up. I did create this if you know the name of this supposed tout say it or be silent. Another thing sir I never was using AL system so get your facts straight please. It hasnt lost anyway by the way! Really dude get your facts straight. 
You didn't create garbage. Don't lie to the sheep.  Guys way smarter than you tried this nonsense 50 years ago and went bust.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 1283
Posted: #687
Quote Originally Posted by KEV_BO:

if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase

a) $220 / to win $100 L 220 + 100 = 320.00 move dec 2 to the left [3.20 * 220] (for play B) = 704 vvv
b) 704 / to win 100 L 704 + 100 = "     "      "     "
c) 1,768.80 / 100 L
d) 4,111.36 / 100 L
e) 9,264.99 / 100 ?
+
------------------------------
$16,069.15 

if you look to profit just 10 dollars a series chase you would need $1,606.92 bank roll to play through 'E' in the strategy & a lot is at risk. playing these straight up without a chase could give you less anxiety 
best of luck hat and others looking to profit. the very best!

Actually it's a lot easier than that to calculate. 

Since you are effectively risking $16,069 to win $100, you need to win 99.38% of the time to break even!

This scumbag HAT will tell you the system is 92% or 95% like it was a good thing. And of course, being a 161:1 favorite (laying the same kind of risk), as much as we'd love to see OP lose a play 5 or 6 games deep and be in the streets sucking d|ck,  he's likely to go 100% over a sample size of a handful of games. Because he is risking 161:1. Sort of like a reversed parlay, except the juice accumulates from one game to another. 

And for something that can happen only 0.62% of the time to break even, if it even happens 1% or 2% of the time, the result can be devastating. This is like a player luckboxing at a parlay 161:1 and the books never being able to recoup their losses. Except this time you are taking the risk of paying out the parlay AND the juice. 

I can believe Covers hasn't moved this MARTINGALE scam into the Penalty Box yet. It's not even like OP picks his games based on Amy intellectual factor.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #688
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:


Actually it's a lot easier than that to calculate. 

Since you are effectively risking $16,069 to win $100, you need to win 99.38% of the time to break even!

This scumbag HAT will tell you the system is 92% or 95% like it was a good thing. And of course, being a 161:1 favorite (laying the same kind of risk), as much as we'd love to see OP lose a play 5 or 6 games deep and be in the streets sucking d|ck,  he's likely to go 100% over a sample size of a handful of games. Because he is risking 161:1. Sort of like a reversed parlay, except the juice accumulates from one game to another. 

And for something that can happen only 0.62% of the time to break even, if it even happens 1% or 2% of the time, the result can be devastating. This is like a player luckboxing at a parlay 161:1 and the books never being able to recoup their losses. Except this time you are taking the risk of paying out the parlay AND the juice. 

I can believe Covers hasn't moved this MARTINGALE scam into the Penalty Box yet. It's not even like OP picks his games based on Amy intellectual factor.



If your a hater and you know it clap your hands  If your a hater and you know it clap your hands if your a hater and you know it, then your broke and your bankroll will show it ,if your a hater and you know it clap your hands! 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #689
Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

You didn't create garbage. Don't lie to the sheep.  Guys way smarter than you tried this nonsense 50 years ago and went bust.

One part of your statement is quite clear, I didn't create you! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 2691
Posted: #690

Great start tonight boys. Phillies scored 2 runs in the bottom of the 1st inning.


HAT I wanted to ask you, how many years back did you check on this system and saw it work when you checked it?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3549
Posted: #691
Quote Originally Posted by KEV_BO:

if every play was -220 odds for +1.5 you would need $16,069.15 to chase those odds thru play E to win a hundred $ profit every series chase

a) $220 / to win $100 L 220 + 100 = 320.00 move dec 2 to the left [3.20 * 220] (for play B) = 704 vvv
b) 704 / to win 100 L 704 + 100 = "     "      "     "
c) 1,768.80 / 100 L
d) 4,111.36 / 100 L
e) 9,264.99 / 100 ?
+
------------------------------
$16,069.15 

if you look to profit just 10 dollars a series chase you would need $1,606.92 bank roll to play through 'E' in the strategy & a lot is at risk. playing these straight up without a chase could give you less anxiety 
best of luck hat and others looking to profit. the very best!

please show me where you saw an average line of -220

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #692
Quote Originally Posted by JoeMahirap:

Great start tonight boys. Phillies scored 2 runs in the bottom of the 1st inning.


HAT I wanted to ask you, how many years back did you check on this system and saw it work when you checked it?


5 so far, but remember all the genius'  said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row! 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 818
Posted: #693
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


5 so far, but remember all the genius'  said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row! 

nah , wont take 20 losses in a row..just 1 loss..to wipe out a whole seasons profit.and then some..guy comes in this thread earlier with just the facts of why this won't succeed long term, and you can only call him a hater , and the sheep, most of whom dont have the bankroll to chase this past a c game let alone an e game..all pile on....its comical how " the greatest system player in the world" cannot understand simple probability and statistics, and can only refute sound logic with insults...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3095
Posted: #694
neilsy accept my friend request.




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 2691
Posted: #695
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


5 so far, but remember all the genius'  said it wouldn't work. We must be due for 20+ losses in a row! 

I wonder if we reverse Martingale system it (of course need to figure out how many times to double down though), what would be the result. I'll take a look at that some time this season when I have a chance, and see the result of the last 5 - 6 years or so.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 373
Posted: #696
Quote Originally Posted by Bart_:


please show me where you saw an average line of -220


i said 'if'
i did some math and was curious to see, at worse with heavy juice, what kind of a roll you need to start 5 game chase. detroit is -230 +1.5 today and although not a play, very high vig. if you like the chase great. its just something to consider if you are planning to play that way. no disrespect toward the thread or intent. example; if the juice is -170 you would need $6,500ish to profit 100 per series. again best of luck to everyones success making money. all the best.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 1283
Posted: #697
Can't* believe
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 1283
Posted: #698
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


If your a hater and you know it clap your hands  If your a hater and you know it clap your hands if your a hater and you know it, then your broke and your bankroll will show it ,if your a hater and you know it clap your hands! 

Is that all you have to say for yourself for being a fraud? 

There are "systems" based on what color of jersey a team is wearing, how long ago since the last rainfall and if the moon is a wanning or waxing crescent. Today we discover a MARTINGALE system that picks games by the time they start at 

Covers is becoming a joke. Threads like that belong in the dumpster. It makes me happy to know what type of suckers exist out there and what they'll do for attention, and it's going to make me even happier when the OP loses a 161:1 ahead shot, goes broke chasing a unit and somehow tries to convince the forum he has enough money to go 7 or 8 games deep. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3549
Posted: #699
Quote Originally Posted by Easyfeller:

You know what me hat I accept your challenge I'll post my bets starting with tomorrow. I'll give you a sure thing orioles alternate run line +1.5 lol but seriously


try again, seriously
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #700
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:


Is that all you have to say for yourself for being a fraud? 

There are "systems" based on what color of jersey a team is wearing, how long ago since the last rainfall and if the moon is a wanning or waxing crescent. Today we discover a MARTINGALE system that picks games by the time they start at 

Covers is becoming a joke. Threads like that belong in the dumpster. It makes me happy to know what type of suckers exist out there and what they'll do for attention, and it's going to make me even happier when the OP loses a 161:1 ahead shot, goes broke chasing a unit and somehow tries to convince the forum he has enough money to go 7 or 8 games deep. 

What's really a joke is clowns like you coming into threads with nothing to say! 
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.