Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
replied to
Is this what people really voted for? Trump doing a telsa sales in front of whitehouse
in Politics Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Remember when democrats licked Musk's feet and basically forced the govt to subsidies Tesla so they can drive the car yesterday? I do. Remember when TSLA was responsible and repaid their loan early? Remember when the govt basically forced electrical vehicles on everyone? I do. Remember when the dems flipped on Musk? I do. Are you done ranting for the day or do you still have more? My suggestion, turn off the TV and put the media away for the rest of the day before you blow a gasket. None of that has anything to do with what he is saying. |
cd329 | 17 |
|
![]() |
@justliketoplay All sounds great. I was about 22 or so the first time I saw Chicago so it doesn't sound that crazy actually. Youth will always find their way to classic rock. Glad your son did right by his lady. There are some real piranhas and barracudas in Vegas. As he gets older, this trip will only grow in meaning. I guarantee he will cherish it for his entire life. |
justliketoplay | 31 |
|
![]() |
@justliketoplay Chicago is great though it has been some bit of time since I saw them. Probably not the show I would take a kid to for his 21st birthday but a memory with dad is a memory with dad. If he doesn't appreciate now, he will appreciate it immensely 20 years from now. Pitbull also puts on a hell of a show. It's crazy to think about how many hits he has. Was just talking about this a few weeks ago. You forget about some because they have featured artists. Are he's the featured artist on some. He has been involved in a ton of hits though. Personally, I think you should've put some money in your boys pocket and let him sneak off for a different type of hummer tour but all and all, it sounds like it was a great trip. He might not realize it now but he will cherish it for a lifetime.
|
justliketoplay | 31 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers
I have repeatedly asked you to not refer to me as a member of a "group". You continue to harass me. Will you please stop. I don't fit into this "group", as yiu have defined it. |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers Just what reason do I have to deflect? I have no current beefs, and am not heavily invested in any of these current topics, though I have strong opinions on some, including Ukraine. Probably the only topic I have been extremely vocal on recently. I have nothing to deflect from. I am trying to establish consistent standards. You clearly have double standards. I use Midnight as an example much more than I already have for risk of it coming off as me calling out my brother. However, any past bet not withstanding, it's Slim's right and prerogative to still post if he chooses. There are no site standards for walk away wagers. You can call it poor character but he isn't violating any terms of service by coming back. With that said, as you have established your own standards for what you call "stalking", what Mid did would meet those parameters. He literally came into a forum in which he never even posts. Slim is my dude. Has been for a while now. We even share a bday. However, if you're making a comparison of relationships, the difference is Midnight and day. Midnight is my bro in a very real way. So this isn't defending one's "group" or "side". I agree with Slim on some issues, and disagree on some. Same with Mid. I am simply pointing out the very clear double-standards with which you moderate this site. You repeatedly make excuses for said double-standards because you can't deny them. |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers Slim creates a DOGE thread. It receives multiple posts from people taking a counter-stance to Slim. Does this not meet the criteria for stalking/harassment as you have defined it? Repeatedly bumping posts with emojis? Is this adding value? |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @wallstreetcappers Let me ask you a question I have repeatedly asked, that you have repeatedly refused to answer. What exactly is "my group"? What gives you the authority to categorize posters in such a way? There are plenty posts that don't add value, and plenty that could be considered antagonizing. You seem to only call out those from one "group". Your group is the one which member to member is not respectful and able to co-exist with another and do so within the TOS for the site. I dont care what content you post or what political side you are on INSIDE THE RULES of the site, the only concept of concern is member to member interaction. So how could you not understand this concept? I think you do and are seeking a reason for a retort instead of finding a reason to make things better and avoid the conflict and drama. This is an ill-defined explanation for "groups", as antagonizing posts exist on both "sides". By definition of creating said "groups", you are antagonizing posters. People are people. Sometimes there beliefs align. The doesn't give you the authority to categorize them. |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@StumpTownStu There is ONE standard, that is member to member interaction inside the TOS. Everything else you try and create in a partisan fashion is noise and nothing else as is the reply SS made that has no relevance to the situation. There are two groups here it is obvious and blatant, there are many posters and some are indifferent then there are two distinct groups. One group trolls and baits and seems unable to stop the member to member insults, the other group does not have that problem. THAT is the grouping of importance. Two groups divided inside the TOS. Anything else regarding political beliefs or threads have no importance INSIDE the TOS, so pointing out that one group made partisan threads, well the other does too and it matters zero. The TOS is regarding member to member interaction and rules on the extremes content wise, your contention is baseless and off topic. I am not a member of any group, and I feel harassed by you repeatedly assigning me to one, as if you are some Lord of Covers. I would imagine this could be interpreted as harassment. Will you please stop? How about we start there? Midnight came into Slim's last PB thread even though he rarely posts there. Is that not stalking by your definition? I don't aim to calk out Mid. I have genuine and sincere love for the man. I'm just simply establishing your very obvious double standards. |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers
Let me ask you a question I have repeatedly asked, that you have repeatedly refused to answer. What exactly is "my group"? What gives you the authority to categorize posters in such a way? There are plenty posts that don't add value, and plenty that could be considered antagonizing. You seem to only call out those from one "group". |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@StumpTownStu Read post 17 a few times, this question is quite perplexing because the concept of how to interact with other members is not that complex. I find this repeated question as reactive and defensive when someone is looking for an excuse for stalking/trolling etc and I have answered this like 50 times and yet again in post 17. You have answered nothing, and have only avoided the question. What's more, you are probably one of the most combative posters on this site. You constantly create this imaginary world where every poster has "a side". Youvtalk about, "your kind", "your side", as if that is the way the world, or this site works. People are just people. They have their individual believes on each issue, and sometimes those beliefs align. Obviously there is a liberal and conservative contingency on this site but that doesn't make each respective side some cartel. These are just people. You have clearly defined double standards, and a very inconsistent interpretation of the terms of service. For example, this "stalking" offense you are now accusing posters of. I'll ask you again, what defines "stalking"? Simply posting in the same thread as a poster of which you have had past disagreements? Disagreeing with said poster? |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
@wallstreetcappers What exactly did Slim do. Which post(s) are interpreted as harassment? What exactly are you interpreting as "stalking"? Your goal seems to be establishing echo chambers. You have mentioned "posting in X person's thread" multiple times, as if thread ownership is a thing. It isn't. Now you have repeatedly referred to stalking. What exactly are you defining as "stalking". I am not playing devil's advocate. I am genuinely interested. |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@UNIMAN Your group has been asked repeatedly to stop with the stalking and useless combative nonsense in those threads but you just dont stop. There will not be much more room for discussion when the words are ignored, the only recourse will be banning. Is it worth all this crap just to force yourself where you are not wanted? Move along and stop being childish, all of you. So now posting in the same threads as certain posters is stalking? I'm having a hard time understanding your interpretation of the TOS. Threatening sundance with banning now? For what? |
SarasotaSlim | 65 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Years ago had a Sheltie/Beagle mix that would crush cats. Lived on a farm. This dog would never go toe to toe, rather she would get the cat out in the open and charge it a full speed. Just run right through the cat. Wish I had videos, something to see. The cat would be all hunched up ready to fight and that dog would hit it like a linebacker. If it was part Sheltie, maybe it was simply trying to herd the cats. Just aggressively. |
masterkush | 11 |
|
![]() |
A cat would fuck my spoiled ass dog up. She's old now but even in her youth, she definitely didn't want the smoke. |
masterkush | 11 |
|
![]() |
@Zeus4par Who gives back annexed territory? That proves nothing. If you say six countries share a border with Russia, name them. Maybe i'm drawing a blank but I can only think of three bordering Russia proper, with another two bodering Kaliningrad. Kaliningrad would fall in a major conflict, and Russia knows it. An offensive is unlikely to come through Finland though I guess one could advance towards St.Pete via Finland/Gulf of Finland. |
Midnight1 | 854 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by soup-can:
@Raiders22 Newsom and Hochul would be very good candidates if they were to... Hochul won't be considered for anything, even her own job she has now after the way she fumbled the ball in this recent fiasco. Her own Lt. Governor won't even back her anymore. This wildcat strike of corrections officers with the NY prisons is a complete debacle to say the least. They don't even want more pay or benefits, it's all about the job safety and not having to work 4OT shifts back to back. Those shifts are true double shifts, double 8 hour shifts = 16 hour days(or nights) and then do 4 of those in a row. you go home and sleep for 6 hours and do another 16 hour day. For Hochul to fire these CO's because the strike was unsanctioned just shows how out of reality this Cuomo appointed reject really is. These prisons are Max prisons where all the worst scum on the planet are, she needs to spend a 75 hour work week in Dannemora for a life reality check. When the convicts have more rights than the guards do to control them, then the shithead governor that changed the law needs to call it a career and disappear into the horizon like Joe Biden is doing right now. She won't make another election, this was too big a bridge to burn Raiders and I both live in this state. I don't technically. My primary residence is in Oregon but I still have a place in the Bay. Newsom is a garbage candidate. The party would reach new levels of idiocy if they ran him. Personally, I have disliked the dude for two decades, from when he was first mayor of SF. He was the party darling though. It wad pretty clear that the game plan was to install him as Governor of Cali, then have him run for President. So what happens? This dipshit screws his homie's wife. What a dummy!? So the party had to pivot. They brought Jerry Brown back as governor. Made Gavin lieutenant governor first. Then he became governor. What happened in that time? The state went to shit. His former city went to shit. Now if he tries to run, it's like, "C'mon, bro. Your city crapped out. Your state crapped out. And you have a sex scandal in your past." Bro messed up so bad that his wife changed parties. Dated DJTJ for sone years. Side note: I always though Kimberly Guilfoyle was fugly. She looks real bad post plastic surgery. I hope DJTJ moved on. |
THEMUGG | 439 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:
@Raiders22 @soup-can Liberals are leaning toward a WALZ / CROCKETT ticket for 2028 we cant be that lucky ? !! ? Crockett is interesting. Walz is trash. |
THEMUGG | 439 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Here's the crazy thing that helps you understand why Democrats are off their rockers. Dems cheered when Trump mentioned how much money the US is sending to Ukraine but then stayed completely quite when Trump mentioned a letter from Ukraine wanting peace talks. Weather that letter was true or not, that was the moment for the Dems to stand and cheer because that is what they claim they want. But the cheers showed they just want more funding from the US TO FIGHT A WAR! Think about that. They don't want peace, they want money to move. They are war mongers. It's a scam. |
THEMUGG | 439 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
@StumpTownStu It's not about the food quality. Can't remember the last time I was in one of their stores. It's about leaving their home state where they became a huge brand in the country. It's YUM, not KFC. YUM has no connection to Kentucky. Probably kept their headquarters there because KFC was the biggest brand in the portfolio but Yum was a division of Pepsi and has no association with Kentucky. It does suck in a "times, they are a changing" sort of way but that's the sign of the time. We're all getting older. Things are ever changing. Usually for the worst. |
Midnight1 | 317 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Dems have created the "collage of idiots", compliments of Cory Booker. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14460399/chuck-schumer-elizabeth-warren-cory-booker-scripted.html Democrats are so cringe. And I didn't realize Cory Booker was still in office. |
THEMUGG | 439 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.