Imagine being a new gambler with a huge bankroll and listening to this guy.
Its called a suckers bet...Books love these type of bets..and they don't care if it wins..because the risk vs payout is so little.. and the more u do this kind of bets/parlays laying heavy juice...you will end up losing. Its not if but when...
Mayweather bet 450000 on
1
Quote Originally Posted by Puerta2Puerta:
Imagine being a new gambler with a huge bankroll and listening to this guy.
Its called a suckers bet...Books love these type of bets..and they don't care if it wins..because the risk vs payout is so little.. and the more u do this kind of bets/parlays laying heavy juice...you will end up losing. Its not if but when...
147-1 overall yet Kansas is -3500 and Houston is -2600 and both Purdue and Alabama will be similar. 147-1 overall yet so many can't see these are mad +EV. I get it if you have a small bankroll you don't want to tie your $250 up on Kansas to win $7. That doesn't mean it's not positive EV. It just means small bankrolls can't exploit it. 147-1 and it will probably be another 100 games before another 16 seed gets lucky. 147-1. You simply can't argue with facts. You would think #1 seeds would be -7500 or -10000 against the 16, but they never are. The -3000 is enough to scare most action away from a pretty much guaranteed win. Yes I know, once every 37 years one of them loses.
Wait for it.......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
2
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999:
147-1 overall yet Kansas is -3500 and Houston is -2600 and both Purdue and Alabama will be similar. 147-1 overall yet so many can't see these are mad +EV. I get it if you have a small bankroll you don't want to tie your $250 up on Kansas to win $7. That doesn't mean it's not positive EV. It just means small bankrolls can't exploit it. 147-1 and it will probably be another 100 games before another 16 seed gets lucky. 147-1. You simply can't argue with facts. You would think #1 seeds would be -7500 or -10000 against the 16, but they never are. The -3000 is enough to scare most action away from a pretty much guaranteed win. Yes I know, once every 37 years one of them loses.
Wait for it.......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I hope he bet big on Purdue M.L.---but he'll probably say he bet FDU M.L., now.
The nice thing is though I know for a fact he wasted money on Purdue lol. Just by how convicted he was in his child like speech hahahahaha. Omg I love this. I love when know it alls go down
1
Quote Originally Posted by warrenator:
I hope he bet big on Purdue M.L.---but he'll probably say he bet FDU M.L., now.
The nice thing is though I know for a fact he wasted money on Purdue lol. Just by how convicted he was in his child like speech hahahahaha. Omg I love this. I love when know it alls go down
The good thing is the loss is out of the way now and we have 36 straight years of winning ahead of us, all in on 1 seeds in the first round for next 36 years, free money Im told.
1
The good thing is the loss is out of the way now and we have 36 straight years of winning ahead of us, all in on 1 seeds in the first round for next 36 years, free money Im told.
The good thing is the loss is out of the way now and we have 36 straight years of winning ahead of us, all in on 1 seeds in the first round for next 36 years, free money Im told.
No really
It is the 2nd time in the past 5 years
And with big conference schools not loaded with as much talent as years past because players leave early it is more likely to happen'
But I am sure someone will post a Purdue future to win the 2024 National Title because Virginia won it all the year after losing to the 16 seed
1
Quote Originally Posted by jtoler:
The good thing is the loss is out of the way now and we have 36 straight years of winning ahead of us, all in on 1 seeds in the first round for next 36 years, free money Im told.
No really
It is the 2nd time in the past 5 years
And with big conference schools not loaded with as much talent as years past because players leave early it is more likely to happen'
But I am sure someone will post a Purdue future to win the 2024 National Title because Virginia won it all the year after losing to the 16 seed
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: @bluecompass Lol. I hadnt read your reply. Agree 100%. The -800 should have been more like -2000 to be equal EV. 2 games already in and I dont see Houston or Purdue having any troubles in the first round. Hope you realize now that you aren't as smart as you think you are. This was the dumbest thread ever trying to tell people -8000 moneylines are a good way to bet.
Certainly beat his "No way KC loses against the Bengals, hammer the chalky ML!" the other year by leaps and bounds
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: @bluecompass Lol. I hadnt read your reply. Agree 100%. The -800 should have been more like -2000 to be equal EV. 2 games already in and I dont see Houston or Purdue having any troubles in the first round. Hope you realize now that you aren't as smart as you think you are. This was the dumbest thread ever trying to tell people -8000 moneylines are a good way to bet.
Certainly beat his "No way KC loses against the Bengals, hammer the chalky ML!" the other year by leaps and bounds
Danny - with this strategy did you consider what would happen if the loss occurs near the beginning of the trend, instead of near the end like in 2018?
If you bet say $8k to win $100 on Purdue, it will take you 20 years (20 * 4 games * 100 = $8k) - just to get back to even. And that’s assuming the trend continues.
So - what are your thoughts on the strategy now?
1
Danny - with this strategy did you consider what would happen if the loss occurs near the beginning of the trend, instead of near the end like in 2018?
If you bet say $8k to win $100 on Purdue, it will take you 20 years (20 * 4 games * 100 = $8k) - just to get back to even. And that’s assuming the trend continues.
at least we can bump this thread in a year or so when someone floats this dumbass idea again
Davemush: Purdue 2H is a Lock
DannyDildo: hey guys, I found an -800 ML Parlay full of +EV and value
I'll have to create a few more burner accounts to bump this thread everytime either one of these henchwomen attempt to post a sports take with the covers agenda of leading the sheep to slaughter
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
3
Quote Originally Posted by tito40:
at least we can bump this thread in a year or so when someone floats this dumbass idea again
Davemush: Purdue 2H is a Lock
DannyDildo: hey guys, I found an -800 ML Parlay full of +EV and value
I'll have to create a few more burner accounts to bump this thread everytime either one of these henchwomen attempt to post a sports take with the covers agenda of leading the sheep to slaughter
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.