I believe #2 seeds are 135-9. Throw a couple of them in there and you might have something of a parlay that would pay something and keep the "blowout" games interesting. Obviously would have lost last year tho with the peacocks and their run.
I believe #2 seeds are 135-9. Throw a couple of them in there and you might have something of a parlay that would pay something and keep the "blowout" games interesting. Obviously would have lost last year tho with the peacocks and their run.
I believe #2 seeds are 135-9. Throw a couple of them in there and you might have something of a parlay that would pay something and keep the "blowout" games interesting. Obviously would have lost last year tho with the peacocks and their run.
Smellybunty, go ahead and tell us your plays BEFORE the games since it's so easy with 32 games. Lol. 90% will be net losers for the tournament if not more.
Smellybunty, go ahead and tell us your plays BEFORE the games since it's so easy with 32 games. Lol. 90% will be net losers for the tournament if not more.
Thanks man. I found a prop at MGM. Will any 16 beat a 1 it's no -800, and I pounded it.
-800 means 88.88% break even. It's like 98% that no 16 beats a 1
Thanks man. I found a prop at MGM. Will any 16 beat a 1 it's no -800, and I pounded it.
-800 means 88.88% break even. It's like 98% that no 16 beats a 1
No, you missed his point I think.
People bet the coin toss which I believe is -115 both ways or maybe even -120. And a lot of other stupid prop bets which are nothing but guesses. (Total points, even or odd, Total pass completions even or odd, etc ). Point is, no matter how you slice it, those are huge -EV and whether someone gets lucky and wins or not, those type of plays are absolute guaranteed long term bankroll killers.
Now these big -3500 bets. There is only one question that matters. Is it +EV ? And the answer is Yes. I get that you are scared today might be the day it blows up in your face and you lose $3500. Doesn't matter what happens today. Long term you are going to win $100 way more than 35 times per loss. Long term it wins. That's what matters.
Just like the stupid prop guesses that amazingly no one here seems to have a issue with people betting those. You might guess right tonight. Does it matter at all though ? Long term is all that matters and they have no chance of being long term winners for the simple fact that they are -EV
147-1. Plain fact right there but these too seeds are average -3000.
You lose 1 every 37 years. I think I can stomach a loss once every 37 years.
No, you missed his point I think.
People bet the coin toss which I believe is -115 both ways or maybe even -120. And a lot of other stupid prop bets which are nothing but guesses. (Total points, even or odd, Total pass completions even or odd, etc ). Point is, no matter how you slice it, those are huge -EV and whether someone gets lucky and wins or not, those type of plays are absolute guaranteed long term bankroll killers.
Now these big -3500 bets. There is only one question that matters. Is it +EV ? And the answer is Yes. I get that you are scared today might be the day it blows up in your face and you lose $3500. Doesn't matter what happens today. Long term you are going to win $100 way more than 35 times per loss. Long term it wins. That's what matters.
Just like the stupid prop guesses that amazingly no one here seems to have a issue with people betting those. You might guess right tonight. Does it matter at all though ? Long term is all that matters and they have no chance of being long term winners for the simple fact that they are -EV
147-1. Plain fact right there but these too seeds are average -3000.
You lose 1 every 37 years. I think I can stomach a loss once every 37 years.
I got all the #1s first round parlay at -800. Prop bet MGM. Might get a better price doing an actual 4 team parlay. Either way, it's going to win.
I got all the #1s first round parlay at -800. Prop bet MGM. Might get a better price doing an actual 4 team parlay. Either way, it's going to win.
Lol.
A -3000/+1500 ML has far less juice that a -110/-110 bet.
Would you like me to send you some yarn ?
Lol.
A -3000/+1500 ML has far less juice that a -110/-110 bet.
Would you like me to send you some yarn ?
147-1
Keep on arguing with facts.
147-1
Keep on arguing with facts.
Yeah I know, all these other bettors are getting better than a 3% return each day
Thanks man, best laugh I have had in a long while.
Dude, if a bettor/investor takes $3500 and gets a 3% return every other day for a year, he would have almost a million dollars. So NO a "wise" bettor does not get returns anywhere like that. Almost all bettors get negative returns. There is a reason that probably 99% of this board doesn't even have close to $3500 and it's this warped way of thinking.
Wow. A 3% return even over a month is an AMAZING return.
Yeah I know, all these other bettors are getting better than a 3% return each day
Thanks man, best laugh I have had in a long while.
Dude, if a bettor/investor takes $3500 and gets a 3% return every other day for a year, he would have almost a million dollars. So NO a "wise" bettor does not get returns anywhere like that. Almost all bettors get negative returns. There is a reason that probably 99% of this board doesn't even have close to $3500 and it's this warped way of thinking.
Wow. A 3% return even over a month is an AMAZING return.
Hey at least you know I am going to win. Lol. I won't be calling you a hater, I will be calling you broke. Because you are.
Hey at least you know I am going to win. Lol. I won't be calling you a hater, I will be calling you broke. Because you are.
Looks like you are 0-1.
SE +3.5 lost by 4
Don't worry, Guesses tend to only hit at about 50%. But look on the bright side, at least you didn't lay -600 on a winner
Looks like you are 0-1.
SE +3.5 lost by 4
Don't worry, Guesses tend to only hit at about 50%. But look on the bright side, at least you didn't lay -600 on a winner
Wow. I knew #2 seeds had a great record too, didn't realize it was that great though. That is just more FACTS for Dave to argue with. I guess people get so used to losing they just accept it. People always resist change.
Wow. I knew #2 seeds had a great record too, didn't realize it was that great though. That is just more FACTS for Dave to argue with. I guess people get so used to losing they just accept it. People always resist change.
@Danny9999
The lines I am seeing are Kansas -7000..Houston -4300.. I have no ml yet for Bama, which will be in the -7000/8000+range based on a higher spread than Kansas. Your lines are way way off. U ain’t making shiit on these parlays. Keep dreaming buddy and remember to tip your ticket writer when they smirk at this parlay
@Danny9999
The lines I am seeing are Kansas -7000..Houston -4300.. I have no ml yet for Bama, which will be in the -7000/8000+range based on a higher spread than Kansas. Your lines are way way off. U ain’t making shiit on these parlays. Keep dreaming buddy and remember to tip your ticket writer when they smirk at this parlay
Pretty sure this was attempted a month ago taking high precentage win chance teams and the guy crapped out and blew the bank roll on the 3rd attempt. Just not my cup of tea but it's your money BOL
Pretty sure this was attempted a month ago taking high precentage win chance teams and the guy crapped out and blew the bank roll on the 3rd attempt. Just not my cup of tea but it's your money BOL
So the replies need to be respectful, but the OP can continue being a jerkoff to anyone who doesn't agree with him, and basically invite hatred towards himself based on acting like a child with every passing comment.
Sounds about right given today's left handed societal agenda & norms in murica.
Got it, thanks fam
FWIW, a mod would know on their own that nonsensical threads like these belong in the abyss of the strategies and systems forum
that's why a special place was created for special threads like these created by special people like the OP who deals with special needs like attention whorring while mocking the same people they are so desperate to have admire the.
https://www.covers.com/forum/systems-strategies-79
So the replies need to be respectful, but the OP can continue being a jerkoff to anyone who doesn't agree with him, and basically invite hatred towards himself based on acting like a child with every passing comment.
Sounds about right given today's left handed societal agenda & norms in murica.
Got it, thanks fam
FWIW, a mod would know on their own that nonsensical threads like these belong in the abyss of the strategies and systems forum
that's why a special place was created for special threads like these created by special people like the OP who deals with special needs like attention whorring while mocking the same people they are so desperate to have admire the.
https://www.covers.com/forum/systems-strategies-79
The problem is mainly psychological. Assuming a lower end ML say 3500…you’re betting $3.5k or whatever to win $100. Win….ho hum. Lose that one time?
The problem is mainly psychological. Assuming a lower end ML say 3500…you’re betting $3.5k or whatever to win $100. Win….ho hum. Lose that one time?
@Petyr_Baelish
curious what the juice would be if you parlay'd all 4 #1 seeds together... guessing it might come out to a -500 lol
@Petyr_Baelish
curious what the juice would be if you parlay'd all 4 #1 seeds together... guessing it might come out to a -500 lol
"Yeah I know, all these other bettors are getting better than a 3% return each day! Thanks man, best laugh I have had in a long while."
And this is why I very rarely read replies here, and almost never respond. The staggering degree of immaturity displayed by the attention-seeking perpetual adolescents here is surpassed only by the pathetic level of insecurity. And ignorance.
Even when prefaced with, "I'm NOT saying right or wrong", and closing with "to each his own" it still triggers keyboard warriors with internet muscles to hurl childish insults in a desperate effort to convince others to join in their illusion of superiority: "I'm smarter than everyone! Especially anyone who doesn't agree with me! Now kneel before Zod!!!"
So insecure. So needy.
"Yeah I know, all these other bettors are getting better than a 3% return each day!"
I specifically referred to, "Wise bettors" not "all these other bettors."
I lived in Vegas for 15 years, R & S Director at a center strip casino. I know people who bet sports for a living, wise bettors, the exception to the rule. Some known to the public, some not. None of them lay $3500 to get a return of $100. I know because I had to approve their bets and track their play, and hung with some of them socially, asked questions, got to know some of their methods and practices.
They don't lay $3500 to gain $100 because they don't have to. They're sharp.
But like I said, "to each his own." Or not.
Done with you, I'll grant you the last word. I know you need it.
"Yeah I know, all these other bettors are getting better than a 3% return each day! Thanks man, best laugh I have had in a long while."
And this is why I very rarely read replies here, and almost never respond. The staggering degree of immaturity displayed by the attention-seeking perpetual adolescents here is surpassed only by the pathetic level of insecurity. And ignorance.
Even when prefaced with, "I'm NOT saying right or wrong", and closing with "to each his own" it still triggers keyboard warriors with internet muscles to hurl childish insults in a desperate effort to convince others to join in their illusion of superiority: "I'm smarter than everyone! Especially anyone who doesn't agree with me! Now kneel before Zod!!!"
So insecure. So needy.
"Yeah I know, all these other bettors are getting better than a 3% return each day!"
I specifically referred to, "Wise bettors" not "all these other bettors."
I lived in Vegas for 15 years, R & S Director at a center strip casino. I know people who bet sports for a living, wise bettors, the exception to the rule. Some known to the public, some not. None of them lay $3500 to get a return of $100. I know because I had to approve their bets and track their play, and hung with some of them socially, asked questions, got to know some of their methods and practices.
They don't lay $3500 to gain $100 because they don't have to. They're sharp.
But like I said, "to each his own." Or not.
Done with you, I'll grant you the last word. I know you need it.
Okay, I'll break my "Don't waste time reading or responding" rule just one more time (I was just proofreading my post, hadn't left yet when I saw your reply, so . . .): coincidentally, I had one last night: sausage, pepperoni and onions.
But with wine, not beer (forgive me beer-lovers, I'm Italian, love a nice cab with my pie.)
Good luck to you in the tournament, EW. Wishing you continued success. Hope you start off on a 10-1 run (not just for the ten wins but so we can all enjoy the entertainment provided by the entitled and ungrateful little shites who will inevitably shoot arrows at you after the one lone loss.)
Okay, I'll break my "Don't waste time reading or responding" rule just one more time (I was just proofreading my post, hadn't left yet when I saw your reply, so . . .): coincidentally, I had one last night: sausage, pepperoni and onions.
But with wine, not beer (forgive me beer-lovers, I'm Italian, love a nice cab with my pie.)
Good luck to you in the tournament, EW. Wishing you continued success. Hope you start off on a 10-1 run (not just for the ten wins but so we can all enjoy the entertainment provided by the entitled and ungrateful little shites who will inevitably shoot arrows at you after the one lone loss.)
Draftkings at this moment has Kansas -4000 and Houston -2800. Where are you getting those lines??
I put my plays in at the kiosk. Window ticket writers get it wrong at least 30% of the time.
Draftkings at this moment has Kansas -4000 and Houston -2800. Where are you getting those lines??
I put my plays in at the kiosk. Window ticket writers get it wrong at least 30% of the time.
Thank you. Dave is sticking to his 12 team parlays
Thank you. Dave is sticking to his 12 team parlays
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.