Smack what was up with the SEMO line....mistype? Saw it way different. Thanks for the picks, got home from work and was able to play about half. BOL
You were probably looking at the MS1 teaser lines which have 7 points added to them. SEMO +12 was the teaser line...SEMO +5 was the straight play line. SEMO was only on the MS1 list, not the SGS1 list.
PM for the skinny on the down low
0
Quote Originally Posted by Russ-SVTF150:
Smack what was up with the SEMO line....mistype? Saw it way different. Thanks for the picks, got home from work and was able to play about half. BOL
You were probably looking at the MS1 teaser lines which have 7 points added to them. SEMO +12 was the teaser line...SEMO +5 was the straight play line. SEMO was only on the MS1 list, not the SGS1 list.
Just got back in from the late movie and working on the recap for the day. The good news first...the MS1 went 14-1 on the day with the only loss by TCU by 1 point.......so close to a sweep...
Here are the results for the MS1
14-1
St. Bonaventure............outright winner by 2.........
Ball St..........................cover by 3.......................
TCU..............................loser by 1........................
South Alabama..............cover by 8.......................
FIU................................cover by 11.......................
San Jose St...................cover by 14.......................
Auburn..........................cover by 4.........................
UNC Wilmington.............cover by 6........................
California........................outright winner by 2...........
Florida...........................cover by 8..........................
SE Missouri St...............outright winner by 4.............
Furman..........................cover by 6...........................
Brown............................outright winner by 3.............
Southern Utah................cover by 7..........................
Idaho St.........................cover by 2..........................
The MS1 overall record now stands at a blistering 39-7-3!!!
That's 79.6%...and of course, that sounds good but my goal is to get it up to 90% +. A few more days like today and that could happen.
PM for the skinny on the down low
0
Just got back in from the late movie and working on the recap for the day. The good news first...the MS1 went 14-1 on the day with the only loss by TCU by 1 point.......so close to a sweep...
Here are the results for the MS1
14-1
St. Bonaventure............outright winner by 2.........
Ball St..........................cover by 3.......................
TCU..............................loser by 1........................
South Alabama..............cover by 8.......................
FIU................................cover by 11.......................
San Jose St...................cover by 14.......................
Auburn..........................cover by 4.........................
UNC Wilmington.............cover by 6........................
California........................outright winner by 2...........
Florida...........................cover by 8..........................
SE Missouri St...............outright winner by 4.............
Furman..........................cover by 6...........................
Brown............................outright winner by 3.............
Southern Utah................cover by 7..........................
Idaho St.........................cover by 2..........................
The MS1 overall record now stands at a blistering 39-7-3!!!
That's 79.6%...and of course, that sounds good but my goal is to get it up to 90% +. A few more days like today and that could happen.
Now for the not so good news...but not unexpected at all by me. The SGS1 experienced a rough day going 6-6-1. The overall record now stands at 17-9-1 which is a solid 63% but not anywhere near as hot as how it started out. It's a work in progress and that is why I always put the disclaimer on it. It should be cautiously used, if used at all, because the sample size is so small and I will be working on it every day to tweak and refine it in attempts to improve it.
Baylor +3.5............outright winner by 18....................
Temple +1...............winner by 1................................
Florida St................outright winner by 8....................
South Carolina........loser by 12................................
Syracuse................loser by 4.................................
Alabama.................loser by 7.................................
Texas St.................loser by 7.................................
SMU.......................outright winner by 11..................
UC Riverside...........outright winner by 5.....................
Harvard...................outright winner by 2.....................
Oral Roberts............loser by 4..................................
Belmont..................loser by 1..................................
Looking for the silver lining here, now I have enough losses to be able to do some in depth analysis and comparison looking for trends in the loss category.
It sounds good anyways...lol.
PM for the skinny on the down low
0
Now for the not so good news...but not unexpected at all by me. The SGS1 experienced a rough day going 6-6-1. The overall record now stands at 17-9-1 which is a solid 63% but not anywhere near as hot as how it started out. It's a work in progress and that is why I always put the disclaimer on it. It should be cautiously used, if used at all, because the sample size is so small and I will be working on it every day to tweak and refine it in attempts to improve it.
Baylor +3.5............outright winner by 18....................
Temple +1...............winner by 1................................
Florida St................outright winner by 8....................
South Carolina........loser by 12................................
Syracuse................loser by 4.................................
Alabama.................loser by 7.................................
Texas St.................loser by 7.................................
SMU.......................outright winner by 11..................
UC Riverside...........outright winner by 5.....................
Harvard...................outright winner by 2.....................
Oral Roberts............loser by 4..................................
Belmont..................loser by 1..................................
Looking for the silver lining here, now I have enough losses to be able to do some in depth analysis and comparison looking for trends in the loss category.
It was a very nice day on the teasers going 4-1 and +5.4 units. You could have played any combination of the games in 7 point teasers and come out smelling like a rose as long as you did not repeat TCU in any of them. If you had played them in 8 point teasers, you would have pushed on the TCU game...as long as a push was not counted as a loss, you would have had a perfect teaser day.
PM for the skinny on the down low
0
It was a very nice day on the teasers going 4-1 and +5.4 units. You could have played any combination of the games in 7 point teasers and come out smelling like a rose as long as you did not repeat TCU in any of them. If you had played them in 8 point teasers, you would have pushed on the TCU game...as long as a push was not counted as a loss, you would have had a perfect teaser day.
I managed to play EVERY losing play in either you or Rynos thread and although you guys did Great, I picked the turd out of the pile full of gold 5 DAYS IN A ROW.....
Well Im sure my luck will turn around, thanks for your plays, your killing it!
0
Thanks buddy for all the great plays!!
Unfortunately I think I'm cursed
I managed to play EVERY losing play in either you or Rynos thread and although you guys did Great, I picked the turd out of the pile full of gold 5 DAYS IN A ROW.....
Well Im sure my luck will turn around, thanks for your plays, your killing it!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
