All Forums | College Football

**** Cast Your Heisman Vote ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5906
Posts: 171
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 136
Posted: #26
Dark Horse: LaGarrette Blount
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #27
Timmy Chang
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by Whodeysb09:

Timmy Chang
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #29
Kliff Kingsbury
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #30
So Far

Ingram - 5

Spiller - 3

Gerhart -2

Keenum  -3

K . Moore -1
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 14372
Posted: #31
Alright I'll give you a real vote...

Golden
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #32
So Far

Ingram - 5

Spiller - 3

Gerhart -2

Keenum  -3

K . Moore -1

G. Tate -1
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by Get_the_Money:



Yeah we're crazy for thinking Mark Ingram will win the Heisman! Seriously, you're going to bash people for voting for a great player like Ingram, who is putting up tremendous stats like everybody else. Get a clue. It's not like we are the only ones. Many people involved in college football will agree. Go call them crazy too.

Never said anyone was crazy and never said Ingram wasnt good or wouldnt win

The question wasnt "who do you think will win?" ...its "who should win??" .....

so if Bama loses to Tenn or the refs dont fuck LSU out of a chance, Ingram slides to the middle of the pack....but they are undefeated so his name stays up there....

Stats

Ingram

175 rushes for 1148 yards

24 receptions for 216 yards

0 punt return yards

0 kickoff return yards

11 total tds

Spiller

135 rushes for 739 yards

21 receptions for 334 yards

191 punt return yards ( 31 yards per avg)

530 kickoff return yards ( 35 yards per avg)

12 total tds

 

Did I miss the part where Ingram was better? I must have cuz I dont see it and I aint buying it....

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 3733
Posted: #34
I'm going to get him on the board.

Timmy Tebow.  Without him UF has 3 losses, he holds the offense together and has made 14 must have, clutch first downs by my count.  He means so much to that team.  In Harvin's sideline interview Saturday all he could say was "tebow, tebow, tebow".

I love you guys, keep it nice.   
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 16738
Posted: #35
Ingram

BAMA is still undefeated because of him. They are one dimensional offensively and everyone who play them would play the run first.

Still, Ingram is performing week in and week out
The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 129
Posted: #36
Spiller
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1553
Posted: #37
Spiller, love this kid, on and off the field
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2011
Posted: #38
Ingram.


CJ gets his stats padded b/c his team is not as versatile. If he played on Florida he prob wouldnt be returning kicks or punts. And he would get half the carries he gets now. So for people to say, "if he was on Florida he would be a shoe in." Is just wrong.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 12074
Posted: #39

Ingram Spiller or Keenum would all be worthy, but Keenum is in a system like a Tech qb who never wins heismans....

 

I would say Ingram

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #40
Ingram.

(have him +950 to win it, so I'm sure as hell rooting for him )
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 2724
Posted: #41
Barack Obama. If the guy can win the Noble peace prize for doing absolutely nothing my money is on him for the heisman!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1287
Posted: #42
I agree that Ingram means more to his team but Spiller gets my vote as of right now.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1956
Posted: #43
colt mccoy wins guaranteed
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1916
Posted: #44
Gerhart, everyone else is posing, except for maybe Ingram.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 7697
Posted: #45

TEXAS!!!!!!!!

COLT WILL PROB. WIN BUT MY VOTE IS ON SHIPLY

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #46

Spiller!!!!

Yes I am a Clemson fan, but you can't deny his talent!

He has played at less than 100% all year, yet has continued to pull one big play after another.

I was at the FSU game. He was clearly not 100% and made play after play. They knew his history and he still got over 300 apy. He is a stud!

McCoy is good, but I can't stand when players like Keenum get votes in pass-happy offenses, like . Remember Ware, Klingler, any TT qb?  If you attempt 40 passes a game, you will have the stats! Spiller does the most with minimal touches. He doesn't get enough credit IMO! 

I do think McCoy is good. He would be my second! Ingram third!

I think big stat players in small schools must win out for those guys to have a realistic shot. I don't have a problem with that. Ingram and Spiller face much harder teams.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 66896
Posted: #47

Stolen from inside slant ...

NOTES, QUOTES

• TB Mark Ingram continues to be at his best in the biggest games. The sophomore has accounted for 712 yards rushing (178.0 average) with three rushing touchdowns in four games against opponents ranked in the Top 25 at game time. He also has caught 13 passes for 104 yards and a touchdown, giving him 816 all-purpose yards in those four games.

BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by nyduccie:

Ingram.


CJ gets his stats padded b/c his team is not as versatile. If he played on Florida he prob wouldnt be returning kicks or punts. And he would get half the carries he gets now. So for people to say, "if he was on Florida he would be a shoe in." Is just wrong.

I disagree. Who would Florida give his returns to? What does versatility have to do with returning kicks? Do you mean depth?CJ is only averaging 15 carries a game. It's not like when Ron Dayne got 100 yards every week because he had 35 carries a game. Have you seen Florida play this year? Who at running back would take carries from him.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:

Stolen from inside slant ...

NOTES, QUOTES

• TB Mark Ingram continues to be at his best in the biggest games. The sophomore has accounted for 712 yards rushing (178.0 average) with three rushing touchdowns in four games against opponents ranked in the Top 25 at game time. He also has caught 13 passes for 104 yards and a touchdown, giving him 816 all-purpose yards in those four games.

Ingram is good. I think his chances ride on his performance against Florida.

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #50

Greg Paulus   JK

Spiller gets my vote....he dosent get enough credit, he is going to be a top 10 pick.

Spiller

 

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.