the legend himself, lots of fuckery in this thread and I love it
was reading your Hawaii info and threw up in my mouth slightly
my fave read each week, cheers old friend
We didn't even mention our Hawaii weather research report prepared by our own John Cocktoastin - part time weatherman - part time gigolo for older discreet women.....A summary is that it is very rare to have three cat 4 hurricanes in the pacific at one time.........but the big one should pass to the north of the island and only leave isolated rain systems by Thurs night
0
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
the legend himself, lots of fuckery in this thread and I love it
was reading your Hawaii info and threw up in my mouth slightly
my fave read each week, cheers old friend
We didn't even mention our Hawaii weather research report prepared by our own John Cocktoastin - part time weatherman - part time gigolo for older discreet women.....A summary is that it is very rare to have three cat 4 hurricanes in the pacific at one time.........but the big one should pass to the north of the island and only leave isolated rain systems by Thurs night
We didn't even mention our Hawaii weather research report prepared by our own John Cocktoastin - part time weatherman - part time gigolo for older discreet women.....A summary is that it is very rare to have three cat 4 hurricanes in the pacific at one time.........but the big one should pass to the north of the island and only leave isolated rain systems by Thurs night
hawaii games haven't been kind to me over the years except when Colt was there slinging it around the yard, these recent teams have been dreadful
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
We didn't even mention our Hawaii weather research report prepared by our own John Cocktoastin - part time weatherman - part time gigolo for older discreet women.....A summary is that it is very rare to have three cat 4 hurricanes in the pacific at one time.........but the big one should pass to the north of the island and only leave isolated rain systems by Thurs night
hawaii games haven't been kind to me over the years except when Colt was there slinging it around the yard, these recent teams have been dreadful
Another one where the line looks just about right....Hard to back Marshall here as stinky as Purdue has been - Marshall not only has to replace star QB Cato but also light on the returning starters on D including their top 2 tacklers........Purdue showed improvement last yr on offense and on defense and have a much more experienced team this year...MEGALOCKS spies have determined that Appleby gets the start this wk at QB and he should fare better with an exp OL.
Summary - no leanage.
mega
0
Marsha Marsha Marsha 7.5 Purdue (64)
Megalocks line 7
Another one where the line looks just about right....Hard to back Marshall here as stinky as Purdue has been - Marshall not only has to replace star QB Cato but also light on the returning starters on D including their top 2 tacklers........Purdue showed improvement last yr on offense and on defense and have a much more experienced team this year...MEGALOCKS spies have determined that Appleby gets the start this wk at QB and he should fare better with an exp OL.
Be careful on WM +18.5. Michigan State has one of best OLs in nation (and one of best QBs obviously) ... WM starting DL weighs at: 241 - 291 - 262 - 250.
GL
0
Be careful on WM +18.5. Michigan State has one of best OLs in nation (and one of best QBs obviously) ... WM starting DL weighs at: 241 - 291 - 262 - 250.
Not much to say that you guys don't know. Line looks about right and so does the total. Should be a very entertaining game with two dynamic run/pass threats at QB - Here is hoping T Hill doesn't have his leg snapped in 37 pieces this yr really enjoy watching him play.....BYU D looks avg at best again this yr and gave up 90 pts last 2 games of 2014 season including 2 OT bowl loss....lookahead to Boise?....Nebraska with M Riley at HC will be very interesting....not sure what to expect from their offense (more passing?) but their D is down to 5 RS - lost RB Abdullah....#2 WR out.....Better games on the board IMO so we did not dig too deep on this one want to see how this game plays out and go from there.
Summary - no leanage
mega
0
Thanks a lot guys Really appreciate it !
Nebraska 6 Cougars (65.5)
Megalocks line - 6
Not much to say that you guys don't know. Line looks about right and so does the total. Should be a very entertaining game with two dynamic run/pass threats at QB - Here is hoping T Hill doesn't have his leg snapped in 37 pieces this yr really enjoy watching him play.....BYU D looks avg at best again this yr and gave up 90 pts last 2 games of 2014 season including 2 OT bowl loss....lookahead to Boise?....Nebraska with M Riley at HC will be very interesting....not sure what to expect from their offense (more passing?) but their D is down to 5 RS - lost RB Abdullah....#2 WR out.....Better games on the board IMO so we did not dig too deep on this one want to see how this game plays out and go from there.
We see a bit of perceived value in the home dog - but - can't play NW with a freshman QB going up against a well coached D - now Stanford has quite a few new faces on D esp on the DL but we think they will be just fine....maybe a bit less stingy than normal early but we just do not know....On offense they look very good with solid OL senior QB....Now one thing that we did like a lot about NW but it is a bit of a leap is that their D looks to be sneaky good this yr - DL will be better and secondary is very good - exp and 55% completions last yr allowed without generating much pass rush....hmmmm.....Gonna pass for now but will look into this one a bit more if time later in the week.
Summary - not sure about leanage yet 90% sure gonna pass this game but stay tuned
mega
0
Stanford 12 Northwestern (45)
Megalocks line 10
We see a bit of perceived value in the home dog - but - can't play NW with a freshman QB going up against a well coached D - now Stanford has quite a few new faces on D esp on the DL but we think they will be just fine....maybe a bit less stingy than normal early but we just do not know....On offense they look very good with solid OL senior QB....Now one thing that we did like a lot about NW but it is a bit of a leap is that their D looks to be sneaky good this yr - DL will be better and secondary is very good - exp and 55% completions last yr allowed without generating much pass rush....hmmmm.....Gonna pass for now but will look into this one a bit more if time later in the week.
Summary - not sure about leanage yet 90% sure gonna pass this game but stay tuned
Be careful on WM +18.5. Michigan State has one of best OLs in nation (and one of best QBs obviously) ... WM starting DL weighs at: 241 - 291 - 262 - 250.
GL
McGuire
I think we are on the same page - like I said - that is a major factor that has us debating the play.
One thing MEGALOCKS followers know - is one of our key philosophies - wrong or right - we believe ANY team against ANY opponent is worth a play if the number is right. I mean some guys would lay 52 pts with Baylor against SMU.....at some point they are a play....So the Mich St talent and adv on the lines - it is real and significant - but at SOME point you would have to take WM....18 is probably not enough....20 ? 24 ? 30 ? We have the fair line around 15/16 and would absolutely play them at 21 maybe even 20 because that is where we believe you are paying too much for Sparty IMO
GL McGuire keep up the solid work in your threads and others'
0
Quote Originally Posted by McGuire87:
Be careful on WM +18.5. Michigan State has one of best OLs in nation (and one of best QBs obviously) ... WM starting DL weighs at: 241 - 291 - 262 - 250.
GL
McGuire
I think we are on the same page - like I said - that is a major factor that has us debating the play.
One thing MEGALOCKS followers know - is one of our key philosophies - wrong or right - we believe ANY team against ANY opponent is worth a play if the number is right. I mean some guys would lay 52 pts with Baylor against SMU.....at some point they are a play....So the Mich St talent and adv on the lines - it is real and significant - but at SOME point you would have to take WM....18 is probably not enough....20 ? 24 ? 30 ? We have the fair line around 15/16 and would absolutely play them at 21 maybe even 20 because that is where we believe you are paying too much for Sparty IMO
GL McGuire keep up the solid work in your threads and others'
I was hoping for a Hot Carl crackpipe John Ann Arbaugh money line special in Utah, but oh well.
GL buddy. Good to see you around
Our Priorities at MEGALOCKS Enterprises
1. Quality research to help peeps make their own picks or frankly just read about the matchups. To serious NCAA junkies - it never sucks to read about the games.
(way down)
2. Well researched selections that may ...or .....What we do know is that at the end of the year we fully expect to have made a bit of money - but we always know there will be losing weeks - just no avoiding that.
3. Try and be mildly entertaining.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TonyaHarding:
Dude - you get funnier every year my man...
I was hoping for a Hot Carl crackpipe John Ann Arbaugh money line special in Utah, but oh well.
GL buddy. Good to see you around
Our Priorities at MEGALOCKS Enterprises
1. Quality research to help peeps make their own picks or frankly just read about the matchups. To serious NCAA junkies - it never sucks to read about the games.
(way down)
2. Well researched selections that may ...or .....What we do know is that at the end of the year we fully expect to have made a bit of money - but we always know there will be losing weeks - just no avoiding that.
thanks everyone for stopping in really appreciate it
jpurdy - I cannot wait for the first instalment of Crowd Will Be Rocking Guy
Boise 11.5 Washington (56.5)
Megalocks line 14
Mugg - if you have input would love it
We have a very strong lean to Boise in this one....Just sizing up all the betting options you know how bad we are at picking DD fav so need to do a bit more digging when I have time
Boise D is going to be excellent. They were drilling everyone at the end of last yr capped off by a win over Az in the bowl game....The OL should also be freaking great so the loss of star RB Ajayijijjiyiyi and his 28 rushing TD should be minimized - Not thrilled about the inexperience at QB but its not like they got stellar QB play last yr - Overall this team looks ready to crush again
Washington looks like a team we will fade at least early on....now down to 8 RS with the only RS on the OL out - inexperience at QB and a reload at DL and those 52 sacks from last yr? Not this yr....Lost their 2 TD K-O return guy....Just overall do not like the look of this team and when is the last time an inexperienced DD dog did not get their teeth kicked in at Boise?
Washington 8 wins last yr were vs haw ewash illin ore st ga st cal col and wash st? and keep in mind Petersen's last 3 yr at Boise ATS he was 5-8 6-7 6-7 and LY Harsin was 8-6 FWIW
Summary. Strong lean Boise - not sure how we are gonna play this game yet stay tuned.
mega
adding
Washington TT under 22
In addition to the above - cannot see Washington scoring on that Boise D too often. QB decision is still not announced - but rumor has it that the freshman Jake Browning will at least get the start. Boise offense missing some but the D looks loaded. Green QB and OL for Huskies
GL ...mega
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
thanks everyone for stopping in really appreciate it
jpurdy - I cannot wait for the first instalment of Crowd Will Be Rocking Guy
Boise 11.5 Washington (56.5)
Megalocks line 14
Mugg - if you have input would love it
We have a very strong lean to Boise in this one....Just sizing up all the betting options you know how bad we are at picking DD fav so need to do a bit more digging when I have time
Boise D is going to be excellent. They were drilling everyone at the end of last yr capped off by a win over Az in the bowl game....The OL should also be freaking great so the loss of star RB Ajayijijjiyiyi and his 28 rushing TD should be minimized - Not thrilled about the inexperience at QB but its not like they got stellar QB play last yr - Overall this team looks ready to crush again
Washington looks like a team we will fade at least early on....now down to 8 RS with the only RS on the OL out - inexperience at QB and a reload at DL and those 52 sacks from last yr? Not this yr....Lost their 2 TD K-O return guy....Just overall do not like the look of this team and when is the last time an inexperienced DD dog did not get their teeth kicked in at Boise?
Washington 8 wins last yr were vs haw ewash illin ore st ga st cal col and wash st? and keep in mind Petersen's last 3 yr at Boise ATS he was 5-8 6-7 6-7 and LY Harsin was 8-6 FWIW
Summary. Strong lean Boise - not sure how we are gonna play this game yet stay tuned.
mega
adding
Washington TT under 22
In addition to the above - cannot see Washington scoring on that Boise D too often. QB decision is still not announced - but rumor has it that the freshman Jake Browning will at least get the start. Boise offense missing some but the D looks loaded. Green QB and OL for Huskies
In addition to the above - cannot see Washington scoring on that Boise D too often. QB decision is still not announced - but rumor has it that the freshman Jake Browning will at least get the start. Boise offense missing some but the D looks loaded. Green QB and OL for Huskies
GL ...mega
Thanks for posting wasn't even looking at this line really because Boise State lost so much offensively in RB Ajayi and QB Hendrick. Washington lost soooooo much class on defense - 4 players drafted in top 50. That's incredible. OL and DL and LB corps for Washington must be completely retooled.
Most tempting # for me is the under of 56 ... but Also Wash TT of 22 is probably the best player considering the uncertainty of Washington D...what if Boise just blows up their green F7?
I see a game with one great OL (Boise), one great D (Boise), and really not much we know about now in terms of skill position talent. I see Boise grinding out a win and using the clock to their advantage and running the ball A LOT to limit t/o's.
The play for me is total of 56 or Washington TT of 22 like you mentioned. Might add this to my card.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
adding
Washington TT under 22
In addition to the above - cannot see Washington scoring on that Boise D too often. QB decision is still not announced - but rumor has it that the freshman Jake Browning will at least get the start. Boise offense missing some but the D looks loaded. Green QB and OL for Huskies
GL ...mega
Thanks for posting wasn't even looking at this line really because Boise State lost so much offensively in RB Ajayi and QB Hendrick. Washington lost soooooo much class on defense - 4 players drafted in top 50. That's incredible. OL and DL and LB corps for Washington must be completely retooled.
Most tempting # for me is the under of 56 ... but Also Wash TT of 22 is probably the best player considering the uncertainty of Washington D...what if Boise just blows up their green F7?
I see a game with one great OL (Boise), one great D (Boise), and really not much we know about now in terms of skill position talent. I see Boise grinding out a win and using the clock to their advantage and running the ball A LOT to limit t/o's.
The play for me is total of 56 or Washington TT of 22 like you mentioned. Might add this to my card.
Will have all the rest of the Thurs/Friday games up today
Baylor 35.5 SMU (75)
Megalocks line 35
Not much to say here. We have the fair line right about where it is now. If you managed to jump on this puppy and get it early - congrats - you are more than likely sitting on free money. Baylor should be able to name the score and we cannot justify a bet on SMU....But it was only 45-0 last yr despite a 574-67 yd edge and SMU will be better this yr - got better last yr and even finished with a road win. We see QB Davis running for a few first downs and keeping Baylor off balance at times but it should be a senseless slaughter nonetheless. Maybe the SMU experience of seeing these guys before matters? Uh. Well Baylor has covered 11 straight vs SMU. We DO smell an under in here somewhere - the implied score is essentially 55-20. Jeez. Taking a TT over 55 means you have big ......Baylor D is gonna be better finding it hard to believe SMU will score 20. hmmmm.
Summary. No play on side. Best play for those who want action may sadly be under 75 or SMU TT under. Baylor -35 seems about right.
mega
Mega,
Love the write ups. With SMU going with their new "warp speed" offense, you still think this will fall below 73.5? Even if SMU scores 10-14, those quick possessions from SMU will give Baylor more chances to score. Appreciate the input.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
Will have all the rest of the Thurs/Friday games up today
Baylor 35.5 SMU (75)
Megalocks line 35
Not much to say here. We have the fair line right about where it is now. If you managed to jump on this puppy and get it early - congrats - you are more than likely sitting on free money. Baylor should be able to name the score and we cannot justify a bet on SMU....But it was only 45-0 last yr despite a 574-67 yd edge and SMU will be better this yr - got better last yr and even finished with a road win. We see QB Davis running for a few first downs and keeping Baylor off balance at times but it should be a senseless slaughter nonetheless. Maybe the SMU experience of seeing these guys before matters? Uh. Well Baylor has covered 11 straight vs SMU. We DO smell an under in here somewhere - the implied score is essentially 55-20. Jeez. Taking a TT over 55 means you have big ......Baylor D is gonna be better finding it hard to believe SMU will score 20. hmmmm.
Summary. No play on side. Best play for those who want action may sadly be under 75 or SMU TT under. Baylor -35 seems about right.
mega
Mega,
Love the write ups. With SMU going with their new "warp speed" offense, you still think this will fall below 73.5? Even if SMU scores 10-14, those quick possessions from SMU will give Baylor more chances to score. Appreciate the input.
McGuire. Was debating EXACTLY same thing. I took team total only because I have seen so many decent teams get blown out there things just snowball in that stadium. Defense. ST. Turnovers. I think under is also solid tho just only make one pick /game to manage my risk.
From researching it appears Huskies will be decent - better as season goes on maybe - and lack star power on offense. At least experienced on paper talent. Locals seem to think team more deep than top-heavy like last yr. GL !
0
GL D8 !
McGuire. Was debating EXACTLY same thing. I took team total only because I have seen so many decent teams get blown out there things just snowball in that stadium. Defense. ST. Turnovers. I think under is also solid tho just only make one pick /game to manage my risk.
From researching it appears Huskies will be decent - better as season goes on maybe - and lack star power on offense. At least experienced on paper talent. Locals seem to think team more deep than top-heavy like last yr. GL !
And thanks for the update on UW QB race.... Been on the under early and often in this UW / Boise State game since it came out. Took under 62.5, 61, & 60.
Appreciate all the detailed hard work.
TD
0
Mega,
Best of luck this season!
And thanks for the update on UW QB race.... Been on the under early and often in this UW / Boise State game since it came out. Took under 62.5, 61, & 60.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.