What's going on big Mega? Hope all is well in the number crunching wacky world full of degenerates and Crowd will be Rocking guys.
Looks like we got G.Tech down to -3 as of right now....is that going to change your view or possibly make that one of your top plays for this mighty fine upcoming week of College pigskin ?
Holla back!
0
What's going on big Mega? Hope all is well in the number crunching wacky world full of degenerates and Crowd will be Rocking guys.
Looks like we got G.Tech down to -3 as of right now....is that going to change your view or possibly make that one of your top plays for this mighty fine upcoming week of College pigskin ?
did georgia game a couple posts back ....here is other one GL
Ga Tech 4.5 Duke (58)
Gut told us duke - further analysis has given us a slight lean to the GT side....Raise your hand if you knew GT was undefeated.... .....They also own Duke winning 10 str by over 20/game yes this is not your daddys duke team but this is one of those rare trends we find that you maybe do not automatically play on - but cant play against it IMO.....We have the fair line closer to 1/2 but maybe we have underrated GT??? Like we said lean GT but we are worried about their run D - duke is bad too - but that is always a red flag - plus duke is 60% last 10 yrs as a road dog - always seem to get a couple extra points in the line and they are so well coached that you never know ....summary - lean to GT on side - ML - not using duke - total - actually like the under quite a bit - may revisit later that seems to us to be the way to go here. GL guys
(Hand Raised)
I was on duke +7 when they played @MIA
my first thought was to take duke TW.
GT beat MIA by DD
No way im siding with duke here
After week 1, all i heard was how bad GT's DEF was...4 weeks later they are still winning games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
did georgia game a couple posts back ....here is other one GL
Ga Tech 4.5 Duke (58)
Gut told us duke - further analysis has given us a slight lean to the GT side....Raise your hand if you knew GT was undefeated.... .....They also own Duke winning 10 str by over 20/game yes this is not your daddys duke team but this is one of those rare trends we find that you maybe do not automatically play on - but cant play against it IMO.....We have the fair line closer to 1/2 but maybe we have underrated GT??? Like we said lean GT but we are worried about their run D - duke is bad too - but that is always a red flag - plus duke is 60% last 10 yrs as a road dog - always seem to get a couple extra points in the line and they are so well coached that you never know ....summary - lean to GT on side - ML - not using duke - total - actually like the under quite a bit - may revisit later that seems to us to be the way to go here. GL guys
(Hand Raised)
I was on duke +7 when they played @MIA
my first thought was to take duke TW.
GT beat MIA by DD
No way im siding with duke here
After week 1, all i heard was how bad GT's DEF was...4 weeks later they are still winning games.
bleedncrimson glad to see a guy with a Sooner avatar like the analysis - best of luck this wk - Very interested to see how the Tex/Okla game plays out - not much talk about it but i always love watching that game
highoctane .....if sooners get up a TD+ early we are gonna be very sorry we bet Texas !
JP - GT is a no play for me.....strong lean tho - GL
Joe - Re: Fla St game - its Fla St or nothing - no idea what the Cuse QB situation is gonna be like and they are just baaaaad....Fla St beat up and laying too many but gut feel is a no play stay away - GL buddy !
0
you guys crack me up
bleedncrimson glad to see a guy with a Sooner avatar like the analysis - best of luck this wk - Very interested to see how the Tex/Okla game plays out - not much talk about it but i always love watching that game
highoctane .....if sooners get up a TD+ early we are gonna be very sorry we bet Texas !
JP - GT is a no play for me.....strong lean tho - GL
Joe - Re: Fla St game - its Fla St or nothing - no idea what the Cuse QB situation is gonna be like and they are just baaaaad....Fla St beat up and laying too many but gut feel is a no play stay away - GL buddy !
Can you say sharp anti-public reversed square sharp action ?? Wow line down from 7ish to 3 ......Holy schnikees....We have the fair line at Iowa at 5/6 range.....line movement made us dig deeper - nothing shocking except - just confirmed Iowa has really struggled against crap teams and even the Pitt win looks so-so now - indiana has a good road win at Mizz this yr - their D is ranked 43 vs the run which is pretty decent.....Ind also has 6 wins or so on the road going back to last yr so they can get it done and Kinnick has not been the house of horrors recently for visiting teams......So strong lean iowa but we think upon further analysis our ratrings may be off on this one....A good example of when we see line moves we dont think TRAP we think WE ARE IDIOTS what are we missing.....In this case we may or may have not saved ourselves a unit....What put it over the top to not play iowa maybe we are just too careful but all we read on the iowa boards is 1/2 people saying long live HC - 1/2 the people saying fire him - big QB controversy as it seems JR is getting back in even tho CJ has more perceived upside....In any case - no read on total - strong lean to Iowa - so therefore no ML play on indiana especially now that it is significantly lower than it was just a day or two ago.....
0
Iowa 3 Indiana 55.5
Can you say sharp anti-public reversed square sharp action ?? Wow line down from 7ish to 3 ......Holy schnikees....We have the fair line at Iowa at 5/6 range.....line movement made us dig deeper - nothing shocking except - just confirmed Iowa has really struggled against crap teams and even the Pitt win looks so-so now - indiana has a good road win at Mizz this yr - their D is ranked 43 vs the run which is pretty decent.....Ind also has 6 wins or so on the road going back to last yr so they can get it done and Kinnick has not been the house of horrors recently for visiting teams......So strong lean iowa but we think upon further analysis our ratrings may be off on this one....A good example of when we see line moves we dont think TRAP we think WE ARE IDIOTS what are we missing.....In this case we may or may have not saved ourselves a unit....What put it over the top to not play iowa maybe we are just too careful but all we read on the iowa boards is 1/2 people saying long live HC - 1/2 the people saying fire him - big QB controversy as it seems JR is getting back in even tho CJ has more perceived upside....In any case - no read on total - strong lean to Iowa - so therefore no ML play on indiana especially now that it is significantly lower than it was just a day or two ago.....
ok, so our jr QB rudduck is OK, but he's king of the checkdown... plays pretty conservative... he did OK for us last year (8 wins), this year, he was only able to lead the iowa offense to 17 points against ball state and then 17 against Iowa State which is pretty sh*tty IMO. we have a lot of weapons back on and supposed to have a decent OL. We put in our soph QB at Pitt (who was closing to winning the job in the first place) when ruddock gets hurt and he comes in and sparks the offense, i think 8-9 and offense scores 17 points in 3-4 drives while he's in there... he follows that up with decent game at purdue, road win.
so, ruddock is now healthy again and ferentz is talking QB by committe.. most iowa fans don't get it. Ferentz is very loyal, but it it can be to a fault. he's done this before several times with QB where each time it turned out that the younger player was better (a few of the QBs that had to wait turn include brad banks, ricky stanzi). for an iowa fan its enough to want to pull your hair out
couple that with iowa being on a terrible home ATS streak (goes back 5 games for sure, probably more) and it makes sense that sharps are jumping on Indiana here. no way i touch iowa as a favorite, especially at home (shouldn't they be better at home?).
0
iowa fan here...
ok, so our jr QB rudduck is OK, but he's king of the checkdown... plays pretty conservative... he did OK for us last year (8 wins), this year, he was only able to lead the iowa offense to 17 points against ball state and then 17 against Iowa State which is pretty sh*tty IMO. we have a lot of weapons back on and supposed to have a decent OL. We put in our soph QB at Pitt (who was closing to winning the job in the first place) when ruddock gets hurt and he comes in and sparks the offense, i think 8-9 and offense scores 17 points in 3-4 drives while he's in there... he follows that up with decent game at purdue, road win.
so, ruddock is now healthy again and ferentz is talking QB by committe.. most iowa fans don't get it. Ferentz is very loyal, but it it can be to a fault. he's done this before several times with QB where each time it turned out that the younger player was better (a few of the QBs that had to wait turn include brad banks, ricky stanzi). for an iowa fan its enough to want to pull your hair out
couple that with iowa being on a terrible home ATS streak (goes back 5 games for sure, probably more) and it makes sense that sharps are jumping on Indiana here. no way i touch iowa as a favorite, especially at home (shouldn't they be better at home?).
BIZZO - thanks man really appreciate it - This is what Covers can be great for - unbiased intel .......Fond memories of some great Iowa fans treating us to good eats at the tailgate for Orange Bowl vs USC so many yrs ago
fritz - no take yet - have not looked at that one but W Michigan is much better than we thought - will try and check it out GL
0
BIZZO - thanks man really appreciate it - This is what Covers can be great for - unbiased intel .......Fond memories of some great Iowa fans treating us to good eats at the tailgate for Orange Bowl vs USC so many yrs ago
fritz - no take yet - have not looked at that one but W Michigan is much better than we thought - will try and check it out GL
Started to look at this one just giving us a headache - so many Q marks - how good will the new Cuse QB be ? Can he be much worse? (insert joke here) Will Florida St care with ND on deck ? Florida St also with a boatload of key injuries other than QB - Cuse has half their team listed as questionable and sadly the bozo HC is listed as "probable".....Must say however - Cuse is our lean in this one - racked up 370 rush yds vs Maryland - played ok vs ND with help of 4 turnovers but maybe ND is actually really good - then played another great D vs Louisville....There is no doubt this line is jacked up and you are paying a Fla St premium yet again even tho they are banged up.....Finally - Louisville was 3 pt fav - now Fla St 23???? Fla St 20 pts better?.....Summarize - lean Cuse , non take on total with field filled with scrubs.
0
Florida St 23 Cuse
Started to look at this one just giving us a headache - so many Q marks - how good will the new Cuse QB be ? Can he be much worse? (insert joke here) Will Florida St care with ND on deck ? Florida St also with a boatload of key injuries other than QB - Cuse has half their team listed as questionable and sadly the bozo HC is listed as "probable".....Must say however - Cuse is our lean in this one - racked up 370 rush yds vs Maryland - played ok vs ND with help of 4 turnovers but maybe ND is actually really good - then played another great D vs Louisville....There is no doubt this line is jacked up and you are paying a Fla St premium yet again even tho they are banged up.....Finally - Louisville was 3 pt fav - now Fla St 23???? Fla St 20 pts better?.....Summarize - lean Cuse , non take on total with field filled with scrubs.
BIZZO - thanks man really appreciate it - This is what Covers can be great for - unbiased intel .......Fond memories of some great Iowa fans treating us to good eats at the tailgate for Orange Bowl vs USC so many yrs ago
fritz - no take yet - have not looked at that one but W Michigan is much better than we thought - will try and check it out GL
glad some iowa fans treated you well. that orange bowl was kinnick
south. too bad we ran into great
USC team. some great pro's played in that game (palmer, polomaolu, steinbach,
dallas clark, bob sanders to name a few)
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
BIZZO - thanks man really appreciate it - This is what Covers can be great for - unbiased intel .......Fond memories of some great Iowa fans treating us to good eats at the tailgate for Orange Bowl vs USC so many yrs ago
fritz - no take yet - have not looked at that one but W Michigan is much better than we thought - will try and check it out GL
glad some iowa fans treated you well. that orange bowl was kinnick
south. too bad we ran into great
USC team. some great pro's played in that game (palmer, polomaolu, steinbach,
dallas clark, bob sanders to name a few)
Not a game that gets us very excited - have the fair line closer to 21 but not interested in taking some free points with a D like Illinois - given up 34 44 35 45 38 to FBS squads - what in the SAM HELL is going on with Wiscy ? two straight stinkers really - struggle with so flo and then lose to nw with a ton of errors ? qb play erratic - Gordon is a MAN but really this team starting to worry us - no lean on side - slight lean to over
0
bizz
Wisconsin 25.5 Illinois (58)
Not a game that gets us very excited - have the fair line closer to 21 but not interested in taking some free points with a D like Illinois - given up 34 44 35 45 38 to FBS squads - what in the SAM HELL is going on with Wiscy ? two straight stinkers really - struggle with so flo and then lose to nw with a ton of errors ? qb play erratic - Gordon is a MAN but really this team starting to worry us - no lean on side - slight lean to over
Another one that is just too risky from both perspectives - Sorry guys - but we know that if you find nuggets anywhere in our analysis that helps you make your own plays - that is what we want.....ND D has been lights out and even tho we all want to run over their mascot with a bulldozer and then pee on him - have to admit - this team looks pretty good rock solid at QB and HC as well....Problem is that little game with Fla St next wk preceded by a last second win vs Stanford - sandwich situation....UNC ? Cant call their name - they look to us like a team going nowhere burning money left right and center what exactly is there identity? riddle me this - how does a team give up over 50 pts a game over a 3 wk stretch and not be named E Michigan ?? Just a disaster dont think the back door will be open in this one....still lean ND for sure.....lean to the under.....prob 21-3 mid 2Q then zzzzzzzz
0
N Dame 16.5 UNC (65)
Another one that is just too risky from both perspectives - Sorry guys - but we know that if you find nuggets anywhere in our analysis that helps you make your own plays - that is what we want.....ND D has been lights out and even tho we all want to run over their mascot with a bulldozer and then pee on him - have to admit - this team looks pretty good rock solid at QB and HC as well....Problem is that little game with Fla St next wk preceded by a last second win vs Stanford - sandwich situation....UNC ? Cant call their name - they look to us like a team going nowhere burning money left right and center what exactly is there identity? riddle me this - how does a team give up over 50 pts a game over a 3 wk stretch and not be named E Michigan ?? Just a disaster dont think the back door will be open in this one....still lean ND for sure.....lean to the under.....prob 21-3 mid 2Q then zzzzzzzz
Started to look at this one just giving us a headache - so many Q marks - how good will the new Cuse QB be ? Can he be much worse? (insert joke here) Will Florida St care with ND on deck ? Florida St also with a boatload of key injuries other than QB - Cuse has half their team listed as questionable and sadly the bozo HC is listed as "probable".....Must say however - Cuse is our lean in this one - racked up 370 rush yds vs Maryland - played ok vs ND with help of 4 turnovers but maybe ND is actually really good - then played another great D vs Louisville....There is no doubt this line is jacked up and you are paying a Fla St premium yet again even tho they are banged up.....Finally - Louisville was 3 pt fav - now Fla St 23???? Fla St 20 pts better?.....Summarize - lean Cuse , non take on total with field filled with scrubs.
I beg to differ, and I am only going to provide the games scores at the moment. If I have to provide other pertinent info. to back up my thoughts I will. Now they are going against No.#1 and do not even have a QB.
SNITCHES end up being bitches, or end up with stitches, and in ditches! #REALITY
0
Quote Originally Posted by MEGALOCKS:
Florida St 23 Cuse
Started to look at this one just giving us a headache - so many Q marks - how good will the new Cuse QB be ? Can he be much worse? (insert joke here) Will Florida St care with ND on deck ? Florida St also with a boatload of key injuries other than QB - Cuse has half their team listed as questionable and sadly the bozo HC is listed as "probable".....Must say however - Cuse is our lean in this one - racked up 370 rush yds vs Maryland - played ok vs ND with help of 4 turnovers but maybe ND is actually really good - then played another great D vs Louisville....There is no doubt this line is jacked up and you are paying a Fla St premium yet again even tho they are banged up.....Finally - Louisville was 3 pt fav - now Fla St 23???? Fla St 20 pts better?.....Summarize - lean Cuse , non take on total with field filled with scrubs.
I beg to differ, and I am only going to provide the games scores at the moment. If I have to provide other pertinent info. to back up my thoughts I will. Now they are going against No.#1 and do not even have a QB.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.