Why are they not going for 2 with 7 mins left in the game up by 19?
Just curious.
My first post was before the penalty.
I thought for sure they would go for 2 from the 1 yard line. What could possibly be the reason? I cant even come up with one.
My first post was before the penalty.
I thought for sure they would go for 2 from the 1 yard line. What could possibly be the reason? I cant even come up with one.
Moo - I took Tulsa at HT - couldnt believe that I was getting +7.5 +118.
This was a game (like S Miss) that I feel great for not betting - I was close to betting Hawaii - but just didnt pull the trigger.
Moo - I took Tulsa at HT - couldnt believe that I was getting +7.5 +118.
This was a game (like S Miss) that I feel great for not betting - I was close to betting Hawaii - but just didnt pull the trigger.
Honestly - When I kept hearing "tulsa offense only has 94 yards" I kept getting excited - because nobody was taking in to account that they had very little chances to move the ball because of the INT's - that was reflected in their offensive yardage - and I had a feeling that would effect the HT line....
Honestly - When I kept hearing "tulsa offense only has 94 yards" I kept getting excited - because nobody was taking in to account that they had very little chances to move the ball because of the INT's - that was reflected in their offensive yardage - and I had a feeling that would effect the HT line....
You cant be serious.
You cant be serious.
Honestly - When I kept hearing "tulsa offense only has 94 yards" I kept getting excited - because nobody was taking in to account that they had very little chances to move the ball because of the INT's - that was reflected in their offensive yardage - and I had a feeling that would effect the HT line....
They were outgained 6.7 - 2.5 yards per play in the 1st half. Completely went beserk in the 2H against an underrated hawaii defense unexpectedly. Maybe Hawaii showed their true colors. You punch in tcu yet?
Honestly - When I kept hearing "tulsa offense only has 94 yards" I kept getting excited - because nobody was taking in to account that they had very little chances to move the ball because of the INT's - that was reflected in their offensive yardage - and I had a feeling that would effect the HT line....
They were outgained 6.7 - 2.5 yards per play in the 1st half. Completely went beserk in the 2H against an underrated hawaii defense unexpectedly. Maybe Hawaii showed their true colors. You punch in tcu yet?
OK. I would expect nothing less from you.
Nor would I from you. You asked a question and got the only logical answer and laughed at it. Pretty much your MO.....you think you know more than everybody.
Being correct is kinda my curse.
OK. I would expect nothing less from you.
Nor would I from you. You asked a question and got the only logical answer and laughed at it. Pretty much your MO.....you think you know more than everybody.
Being correct is kinda my curse.
They were outgained 6.7 - 2.5 yards per play in the 1st half. Completely went beserk in the 2H against an underrated hawaii defense unexpectedly. Maybe Hawaii showed their true colors. You punch in tcu yet?
Yeah - but moo - look at the situations.
Off the top of my head - 2 INTS for TDs. One punt that left them at the 25. One INT to the 2 yard line. And Tulsa fumbled on a play that was either going to be a TD, or on the next play or two. It was a stat mindfuck.
Im in for 3 of my 5 units on TCU - the other 2 were saved for when the line got to 1.5 or so - but apparantly nobody but me got that memo that the line was supposed to go down.
They were outgained 6.7 - 2.5 yards per play in the 1st half. Completely went beserk in the 2H against an underrated hawaii defense unexpectedly. Maybe Hawaii showed their true colors. You punch in tcu yet?
Yeah - but moo - look at the situations.
Off the top of my head - 2 INTS for TDs. One punt that left them at the 25. One INT to the 2 yard line. And Tulsa fumbled on a play that was either going to be a TD, or on the next play or two. It was a stat mindfuck.
Im in for 3 of my 5 units on TCU - the other 2 were saved for when the line got to 1.5 or so - but apparantly nobody but me got that memo that the line was supposed to go down.
Nor would I from you. You asked a question and got the only logical answer and laughed at it. Pretty much your MO.....you think you know more than everybody.
Being correct is kinda my curse.
I despise both of you (Van and Train), for reasons that are abundantly clear just from your statements here alone, thanks guys (yet alone the bullshit you've spewed over the years)..........yet here I agree w 165 (and thus w Train)......2 TDs, 2 2pts and a FG is easier to achieve than 3 TDs....and that "book" that those moron coaches consult backs this up
Nor would I from you. You asked a question and got the only logical answer and laughed at it. Pretty much your MO.....you think you know more than everybody.
Being correct is kinda my curse.
I despise both of you (Van and Train), for reasons that are abundantly clear just from your statements here alone, thanks guys (yet alone the bullshit you've spewed over the years)..........yet here I agree w 165 (and thus w Train)......2 TDs, 2 2pts and a FG is easier to achieve than 3 TDs....and that "book" that those moron coaches consult backs this up
I despise both of you (Van and Train), for reasons that are abundantly clear just from your statements here alone, thanks guys (yet alone the bullshit you've spewed over the years)..........yet here I agree w 165 (and thus w Train)......2 TDs, 2 2pts and a FG is easier to achieve than 3 TDs....and that "book" that those moron coaches consult backs this up
Merry Christmas to you too pal!
I despise both of you (Van and Train), for reasons that are abundantly clear just from your statements here alone, thanks guys (yet alone the bullshit you've spewed over the years)..........yet here I agree w 165 (and thus w Train)......2 TDs, 2 2pts and a FG is easier to achieve than 3 TDs....and that "book" that those moron coaches consult backs this up
Merry Christmas to you too pal!
You cant be serious.
You cant be serious.
I despise both of you (Van and Train), for reasons that are abundantly clear just from your statements here alone, thanks guys (yet alone the bullshit you've spewed over the years)..........yet here I agree w 165 (and thus w Train)......2 TDs, 2 2pts and a FG is easier to achieve than 3 TDs....and that "book" that those moron coaches consult backs this up
By the way dipshit - and to your dipshit butt buddy Train - here is the chart. In fact, I challenge you to find any chart out there that says not to go for it up by 19 with 7 mins left.
I dont expect a response, but it is hilarious that you two morons know so little about probability.
I despise both of you (Van and Train), for reasons that are abundantly clear just from your statements here alone, thanks guys (yet alone the bullshit you've spewed over the years)..........yet here I agree w 165 (and thus w Train)......2 TDs, 2 2pts and a FG is easier to achieve than 3 TDs....and that "book" that those moron coaches consult backs this up
By the way dipshit - and to your dipshit butt buddy Train - here is the chart. In fact, I challenge you to find any chart out there that says not to go for it up by 19 with 7 mins left.
I dont expect a response, but it is hilarious that you two morons know so little about probability.
Honestly dude - just google the chart. Any chart.
Look at the one I referenced above. You wont find many percentages under the one for 19 with 7 mins left. Just check it out.
It is really a no brainer.
Honestly dude - just google the chart. Any chart.
Look at the one I referenced above. You wont find many percentages under the one for 19 with 7 mins left. Just check it out.
It is really a no brainer.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.