Apparently they want to wipe out religion, clealry you, i, SJD and co are going to go on a murdering rampage very soon because of our belief....
EVen though Hitler, Stalin and Pot didnt follow religion and murdered 100 mill people, that doesnt count, that is exempt..
Maybe if they did follow religion they might not have killed 100 mill people
Apparently they want to wipe out religion, clealry you, i, SJD and co are going to go on a murdering rampage very soon because of our belief....
EVen though Hitler, Stalin and Pot didnt follow religion and murdered 100 mill people, that doesnt count, that is exempt..
Maybe if they did follow religion they might not have killed 100 mill people
1. (And I can speculate that you are a moron)....Reply: I can honestly tell you that I'm not a moron.
2. (My parents aren't heartbroken at all)...Reply: Well, maybe they hid it from yall being the loving parents that I assume they are, not wanting to force their religion on yall and upsetting yall on yall's decision.
If up to now at this present time your parents are still practicing Christians, I would be more inclined to believe they must have been heart-brokened way back when their 4 childeren decided to stop believing in Christianity.
They were probably saddened by their thoughts that they aren't going to see their sons and daughter that they love so dearly in paradise with them someday. And are still heart-brokened today but on the otherhand if they themselves are not practicing Christians today then they got over being heart-brokened.
3. (You have some nerve telling me that we must have been around the wrong crowd)...Reply: Relax! Remember I was just speculating besides who are you to tell someone that they got some nerve telling you something, when if one looks back at most of your posts they would clearly see a guy that has a lot of nerves to say the things you say to others.
4. (You're implying the "right" crowd contains religious people)...Reply: No, not at all. There are lots of decent folks who have no religious ties.
5. (I'm sure you had religious freaks for parents)...Reply: No, you're wrong.
6. (I'm sure they're really proud of the closed minded moron they raised)...Reply: Again you're wrong...they're actually really proud of the fine, decent, humble son they raised.
1. (And I can speculate that you are a moron)....Reply: I can honestly tell you that I'm not a moron.
2. (My parents aren't heartbroken at all)...Reply: Well, maybe they hid it from yall being the loving parents that I assume they are, not wanting to force their religion on yall and upsetting yall on yall's decision.
If up to now at this present time your parents are still practicing Christians, I would be more inclined to believe they must have been heart-brokened way back when their 4 childeren decided to stop believing in Christianity.
They were probably saddened by their thoughts that they aren't going to see their sons and daughter that they love so dearly in paradise with them someday. And are still heart-brokened today but on the otherhand if they themselves are not practicing Christians today then they got over being heart-brokened.
3. (You have some nerve telling me that we must have been around the wrong crowd)...Reply: Relax! Remember I was just speculating besides who are you to tell someone that they got some nerve telling you something, when if one looks back at most of your posts they would clearly see a guy that has a lot of nerves to say the things you say to others.
4. (You're implying the "right" crowd contains religious people)...Reply: No, not at all. There are lots of decent folks who have no religious ties.
5. (I'm sure you had religious freaks for parents)...Reply: No, you're wrong.
6. (I'm sure they're really proud of the closed minded moron they raised)...Reply: Again you're wrong...they're actually really proud of the fine, decent, humble son they raised.
coward ('ka??d) | |
— n | |
a person who shrinks from or avoids danger, pain, or difficulty | |
coward ('ka??d) | |
— n | |
a person who shrinks from or avoids danger, pain, or difficulty | |
coward ('ka??d) | |
— n | |
a person who shrinks from or avoids danger, pain, or difficulty | |
coward ('ka??d) | |
— n | |
a person who shrinks from or avoids danger, pain, or difficulty | |
Ok, i am going to be as nice as i can here. I have seen a little door opening believe it or not.
So in this post you said "We don't hate god or the idea of god" then in the very next paragraph you said "we hate the christian's description of god".
You are confused, i dont think you know what is going on TBH.
Then you go and say "He is described as having qualities that logically a god should not have"
For starters these are 2 very very different arguments.....
By describing a characteristic of God, you have admitted he exists. You cannot use a characteristic of God as evidence that he doesnt exist. It is contradictory, because you have no basis or standard to compare how Gods should act.
Lets assume for one moment that as you described, God kills people and he is jelous. Does this prove God doesnt exists? As i said above, you ave described a characterisitc of God, you cant say that is proof that he doesnt exist......
Now, by describing characterics of God, you have admitted he exists, but hate his charatceristics.....
I will let you take over from here.......Let me ask you this, .What would a good God look like? ie, what characteristics should God have for you to love him?
Ok, i am going to be as nice as i can here. I have seen a little door opening believe it or not.
So in this post you said "We don't hate god or the idea of god" then in the very next paragraph you said "we hate the christian's description of god".
You are confused, i dont think you know what is going on TBH.
Then you go and say "He is described as having qualities that logically a god should not have"
For starters these are 2 very very different arguments.....
By describing a characteristic of God, you have admitted he exists. You cannot use a characteristic of God as evidence that he doesnt exist. It is contradictory, because you have no basis or standard to compare how Gods should act.
Lets assume for one moment that as you described, God kills people and he is jelous. Does this prove God doesnt exists? As i said above, you ave described a characterisitc of God, you cant say that is proof that he doesnt exist......
Now, by describing characterics of God, you have admitted he exists, but hate his charatceristics.....
I will let you take over from here.......Let me ask you this, .What would a good God look like? ie, what characteristics should God have for you to love him?
Ok, i am going to be as nice as i can here. I have seen a little door opening believe it or not.
So in this post you said "We don't hate god or the idea of god" then in the very next paragraph you said "we hate the christian's description of god".
You are confused, i dont think you know what is going on TBH.
Then you go and say "He is described as having qualities that logically a god should not have"
For starters these are 2 very very different arguments.....
By describing a characteristic of God, you have admitted he exists. You cannot use a characteristic of God as evidence that he doesnt exist. It is contradictory, because you have no basis or standard to compare how Gods should act.
Lets assume for one moment that as you described, God kills people and he is jelous. Does this prove God doesnt exists? As i said above, you ave described a characterisitc of God, you cant say that is proof that he doesnt exist......
Now, by describing characterics of God, you have admitted he exists, but hate his charatceristics.....
I will let you take over from here.......Let me ask you this, .What would a good God look like? ie, what characteristics should God have for you to love him?
Ok, i am going to be as nice as i can here. I have seen a little door opening believe it or not.
So in this post you said "We don't hate god or the idea of god" then in the very next paragraph you said "we hate the christian's description of god".
You are confused, i dont think you know what is going on TBH.
Then you go and say "He is described as having qualities that logically a god should not have"
For starters these are 2 very very different arguments.....
By describing a characteristic of God, you have admitted he exists. You cannot use a characteristic of God as evidence that he doesnt exist. It is contradictory, because you have no basis or standard to compare how Gods should act.
Lets assume for one moment that as you described, God kills people and he is jelous. Does this prove God doesnt exists? As i said above, you ave described a characterisitc of God, you cant say that is proof that he doesnt exist......
Now, by describing characterics of God, you have admitted he exists, but hate his charatceristics.....
I will let you take over from here.......Let me ask you this, .What would a good God look like? ie, what characteristics should God have for you to love him?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.