Rostos, I will use your own analogy to prove my point. I cannot possibly know what the water is like until I experience it by going in it. This is true. The problem with your analogy to god is that we cannot go to this alleged supernatural world. We cannot go there and see what it is like. Since it is not possible to go there (without dying I presume) there is no point in contemplating it at all. I don't care about what happens when I die because I'll be dead. As a living human being, I can't be concerned about "testing out waters" so to speak that I can't test out until I die. Surely you must understand this?
If Christ died on the cross for all of humanity
Rostos, I will use your own analogy to prove my point. I cannot possibly know what the water is like until I experience it by going in it. This is true. The problem with your analogy to god is that we cannot go to this alleged supernatural world. We cannot go there and see what it is like. Since it is not possible to go there (without dying I presume) there is no point in contemplating it at all. I don't care about what happens when I die because I'll be dead. As a living human being, I can't be concerned about "testing out waters" so to speak that I can't test out until I die. Surely you must understand this?
Rostos, I will use your own analogy to prove my point. I cannot possibly know what the water is like until I experience it by going in it. This is true. The problem with your analogy to god is that we cannot go to this alleged supernatural world. We cannot go there and see what it is like. Since it is not possible to go there (without dying I presume) there is no point in contemplating it at all. I don't care about what happens when I die because I'll be dead. As a living human being, I can't be concerned about "testing out waters" so to speak that I can't test out until I die. Surely you must understand this?
Theism = YES there is a god
Agnosticism = MAYBE there is a god
Atheist = There is NO god
So you've eliminated "NO"... That leaves us with YES there is a god or MAYBE there is a god...
So it is either definitely or maybe... interesting...
I said the KCA renders atheism false, because the KCA clearly points to a cause of the universe that is outside space, time and matter.The naturalists ONLY believes in the natural world, nothing outside it. The KCA gives naturalists one big head ache
The KCA is definitly one of the most powerful arguments for Gods existence.
Theism = YES there is a god
Agnosticism = MAYBE there is a god
Atheist = There is NO god
So you've eliminated "NO"... That leaves us with YES there is a god or MAYBE there is a god...
So it is either definitely or maybe... interesting...
I said the KCA renders atheism false, because the KCA clearly points to a cause of the universe that is outside space, time and matter.The naturalists ONLY believes in the natural world, nothing outside it. The KCA gives naturalists one big head ache
The KCA is definitly one of the most powerful arguments for Gods existence.
Maybe you will get what I am saying by post 4000 that rostos will not give up.
Dont you have better things to do like stealing money from broke woman or mocking senile old men?
Maybe you will get what I am saying by post 4000 that rostos will not give up.
Dont you have better things to do like stealing money from broke woman or mocking senile old men?
Your problem is you are ducking behind this concept of a supernatural realm. I understand that by definition god must exist there, but if that's the case, then the existence of the two go hand in hand, and neither can support the existence of the other. If I reject the existence of a world other than this one, how can I possibly accept the existence of a god?
If you wan to ask who made God then as a conclusion to my sentence that something cannot come from nothing, you are making an equivocation that the laws and physics of this world / universe/ dimension apply to that of another dimension (Gods realm). We dont know this, because we havent observed another dimension, therefore the question is ILLOGICAL.
In the ocean example, it is like me asking the person who saw the ocean for the first time, can i breath under water, can i float on the water? He is going to say, i dont know because he hasnt observed the environment of the water yet, until he does, he cant answer that.
I know we know the ocean exists because we have seen it but not the supernatural because we havent observed it. That is not my point, the point is about making CONCLUSIONS or asking questions about something we dont know or assuming one set of laws apply somewhere else.
Your problem is you are ducking behind this concept of a supernatural realm. I understand that by definition god must exist there, but if that's the case, then the existence of the two go hand in hand, and neither can support the existence of the other. If I reject the existence of a world other than this one, how can I possibly accept the existence of a god?
If you wan to ask who made God then as a conclusion to my sentence that something cannot come from nothing, you are making an equivocation that the laws and physics of this world / universe/ dimension apply to that of another dimension (Gods realm). We dont know this, because we havent observed another dimension, therefore the question is ILLOGICAL.
In the ocean example, it is like me asking the person who saw the ocean for the first time, can i breath under water, can i float on the water? He is going to say, i dont know because he hasnt observed the environment of the water yet, until he does, he cant answer that.
I know we know the ocean exists because we have seen it but not the supernatural because we havent observed it. That is not my point, the point is about making CONCLUSIONS or asking questions about something we dont know or assuming one set of laws apply somewhere else.
Dont you have better things to do like stealing money from broke woman or mocking senile old men?
Dont you have better things to do like stealing money from broke woman or mocking senile old men?
If you wan to ask who made God then as a conclusion to my sentence that something cannot come from nothing, you are making an equivocation that the laws and physics of this world / universe/ dimension apply to that of another dimension (Gods realm). We dont know this, because we havent observed another dimension, therefore the question is ILLOGICAL.
In the ocean example, it is like me asking the person who saw the ocean for the first time, can i breath under water, can i float on the water? He is going to say, i dont know because he hasnt observed the environment of the water yet, until he does, he cant answer that.
I know we know the ocean exists because we have seen it but not the supernatural because we havent observed it. That is not my point, the point is about making CONCLUSIONS or asking questions about something we dont know or assuming one set of laws apply somewhere else.
If you wan to ask who made God then as a conclusion to my sentence that something cannot come from nothing, you are making an equivocation that the laws and physics of this world / universe/ dimension apply to that of another dimension (Gods realm). We dont know this, because we havent observed another dimension, therefore the question is ILLOGICAL.
In the ocean example, it is like me asking the person who saw the ocean for the first time, can i breath under water, can i float on the water? He is going to say, i dont know because he hasnt observed the environment of the water yet, until he does, he cant answer that.
I know we know the ocean exists because we have seen it but not the supernatural because we havent observed it. That is not my point, the point is about making CONCLUSIONS or asking questions about something we dont know or assuming one set of laws apply somewhere else.
What if the supernatural world was ETERNAL? Ie, its past was infinity?
Afterall, prior to the discovery of the big bang and Einsteins law of relativity, atheists believed the universe was eternal, so why cant the supernatural be eternal?
What if the supernatural world was ETERNAL? Ie, its past was infinity?
Afterall, prior to the discovery of the big bang and Einsteins law of relativity, atheists believed the universe was eternal, so why cant the supernatural be eternal?
Actually rostos I was fibbing about focusing on you.....Not worth the effort.
Hi , my name is salty, i steal money from stoned broke woman, oh, i also laugh at and mock senile disabled old men.
Get out of here....
Actually rostos I was fibbing about focusing on you.....Not worth the effort.
Hi , my name is salty, i steal money from stoned broke woman, oh, i also laugh at and mock senile disabled old men.
Get out of here....
Once again Rostos - no matter how many times you say we believe "something came from nothing," 2 things are 100% indisputable facts.
You can't even see that your first statement is not equivalent as being the same as "something came from nothing"
God is not a being (something) that came from nothing.
That is not logical when God has always been in existence and so how does He come from nothing?...it is impossible for Him to come into being from nothing when He has always been in existence, or eternal...He has no beginning or no end.
Everyone knows from nothing comes nothing, but I guess except you...lol
Your second statement says you don't know how it started and so how can you say, "but it doesn't mean it is any god, let alone yours?
You make no claim how it started because you say you don't know but we have made a claim saying we do know how it all started, yet you refuse our claim which I might add has reasonable logical reasons to make it a valid claim.
Why do you refuse our claim? You said you don't know how it started...lol...but somehow you know it is not by what our claim says how it all started?...lol
All the more proof that you are confused and don't know what you are saying...lol
![]()
Once again Rostos - no matter how many times you say we believe "something came from nothing," 2 things are 100% indisputable facts.
You can't even see that your first statement is not equivalent as being the same as "something came from nothing"
God is not a being (something) that came from nothing.
That is not logical when God has always been in existence and so how does He come from nothing?...it is impossible for Him to come into being from nothing when He has always been in existence, or eternal...He has no beginning or no end.
Everyone knows from nothing comes nothing, but I guess except you...lol
Your second statement says you don't know how it started and so how can you say, "but it doesn't mean it is any god, let alone yours?
You make no claim how it started because you say you don't know but we have made a claim saying we do know how it all started, yet you refuse our claim which I might add has reasonable logical reasons to make it a valid claim.
Why do you refuse our claim? You said you don't know how it started...lol...but somehow you know it is not by what our claim says how it all started?...lol
All the more proof that you are confused and don't know what you are saying...lol
![]()
Hi , my name is salty, i steal money from stoned broke woman, oh, i also laugh at and mock senile disabled old men.
Get out of here....
No!...really!... did salty do those things?
If he had God in his life he wouldn't do those sinful things.
And he wouldn't create silly threads concerning boogers and moving one's bowels.
And he wants this thread to end...maybe he should think twice and end his threads. ![]()
![]()
Hi , my name is salty, i steal money from stoned broke woman, oh, i also laugh at and mock senile disabled old men.
Get out of here....
No!...really!... did salty do those things?
If he had God in his life he wouldn't do those sinful things.
And he wouldn't create silly threads concerning boogers and moving one's bowels.
And he wants this thread to end...maybe he should think twice and end his threads. ![]()
![]()
No!...really!... did salty do those things?
If he had God in his life he wouldn't do those sinful things.
And he wouldn't create silly threads concerning boogers and moving one's bowels.
And he wants this thread to end...maybe he should think twice and end his threads. ![]()
![]()
No!...really!... did salty do those things?
If he had God in his life he wouldn't do those sinful things.
And he wouldn't create silly threads concerning boogers and moving one's bowels.
And he wants this thread to end...maybe he should think twice and end his threads. ![]()
![]()
The supernatural world can be eternal. It's certainly a possibility. But so can this world.
The second law of thermodynamics and the law of relativity shows that the universe cannot be eternal.
The supernatural world can be eternal. It's certainly a possibility. But so can this world.
The second law of thermodynamics and the law of relativity shows that the universe cannot be eternal.
Good one...just testing if anyone would catch this not entirely true statement.
Because we are all sinners and even people who believe in God do sin from time to time but there are some who have sinned in the past but because they are so devout they do not sin anymore. So with that said, let me retract the statement I made earlier and say it this way.
Maybe if he had God in his life maybe he wouldn't have done those sinful things.
![]()
Good one...just testing if anyone would catch this not entirely true statement.
Because we are all sinners and even people who believe in God do sin from time to time but there are some who have sinned in the past but because they are so devout they do not sin anymore. So with that said, let me retract the statement I made earlier and say it this way.
Maybe if he had God in his life maybe he wouldn't have done those sinful things.
![]()
Good one...just testing if anyone would catch this not entirely true statement.
Because we are all sinners and even people who believe in God do sin from time to time but there are some who have sinned in the past but because they are so devout they do not sin anymore. So with that said, let me retract the statement I made earlier and say it this way.
Maybe if he had God in his life maybe he wouldn't have done those sinful things.
![]()
Good one...just testing if anyone would catch this not entirely true statement.
Because we are all sinners and even people who believe in God do sin from time to time but there are some who have sinned in the past but because they are so devout they do not sin anymore. So with that said, let me retract the statement I made earlier and say it this way.
Maybe if he had God in his life maybe he wouldn't have done those sinful things.
![]()
So, why have you been on here day in day out telling us that God doesnt exist if you think it leads to a better life? ![]()
So, why have you been on here day in day out telling us that God doesnt exist if you think it leads to a better life? ![]()
SJD - just because you claim to know and I don't doesn't add any credibility to your claim
Your questioning is like a forgery.
You ask one question as to who created God or the supernatural, when we say a possible explanation is that God is eternal , you then say who have no evidence? Accept that is a plausable explanation and move on. You asked for possible explanation, not 100% proofs.....but you are putting the 2 in the same thing.....
SJD - just because you claim to know and I don't doesn't add any credibility to your claim
Your questioning is like a forgery.
You ask one question as to who created God or the supernatural, when we say a possible explanation is that God is eternal , you then say who have no evidence? Accept that is a plausable explanation and move on. You asked for possible explanation, not 100% proofs.....but you are putting the 2 in the same thing.....
So, why have you been on here day in day out telling us that God doesnt exist if you think it leads to a better life? ![]()
So, why have you been on here day in day out telling us that God doesnt exist if you think it leads to a better life? ![]()
I accept that it is a plausible explanation. But it is unfair that you both refuse to accept that the universe or whatever it is that existed before the universe, or that which created the universe (not god) is eternal.
But if space, time and matter were created, then it would be LOGICAL to conclude prior to this moment of creation, something OUTSIDE of space, time and matter created speace, time and matter, otherwise are you believing space, time and matter created ITSELF out of nothing, by nothing for nothing.
What you have been doing is saying, "well if the second law of thermodynamics and laws of relativity apply in this world, then they must apply in another realm or dimension...."
That is flawed reasoning, we have no observation of another realm or dimension. My answer is not, the second law of thermodynamics or whatever does NOT apply in another realm because i dont have the evidence that this is the case, but rather it is a question which should be avoided because we dont know anything about another realm. Therefore, when i say, something cannot come from nothing in this world, it does not open a question frpm you about what caused God.......It is not a logical concluding question as you and many atheists try to make it out to be....
'
I accept that it is a plausible explanation. But it is unfair that you both refuse to accept that the universe or whatever it is that existed before the universe, or that which created the universe (not god) is eternal.
But if space, time and matter were created, then it would be LOGICAL to conclude prior to this moment of creation, something OUTSIDE of space, time and matter created speace, time and matter, otherwise are you believing space, time and matter created ITSELF out of nothing, by nothing for nothing.
What you have been doing is saying, "well if the second law of thermodynamics and laws of relativity apply in this world, then they must apply in another realm or dimension...."
That is flawed reasoning, we have no observation of another realm or dimension. My answer is not, the second law of thermodynamics or whatever does NOT apply in another realm because i dont have the evidence that this is the case, but rather it is a question which should be avoided because we dont know anything about another realm. Therefore, when i say, something cannot come from nothing in this world, it does not open a question frpm you about what caused God.......It is not a logical concluding question as you and many atheists try to make it out to be....
'
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,018
-
PART DEUX
244
-
Friday 09/18/2026
759
-
The Three-Day Money Train
4,064
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
258,450
-
Trump's legacy?
25,432
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
21,346
-
Week 3 Money
5,948
-
NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS***
6,952
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
29,073
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
