Just stating the obvious.
Looks like that's your answer to everything.
You guys are priceless. ....Agree with what I think or you are stupid and should be beat up.
Just stating the obvious.
Looks like that's your answer to everything.
You guys are priceless. ....Agree with what I think or you are stupid and should be beat up.
It has nothing to do with what the government is saying. Your comments on a day where so many that were killed should be honored is so disgusting it invokes anger......think about it. How low can a human being be.....honor them with a little respect at least for one day.
It has nothing to do with what the government is saying. Your comments on a day where so many that were killed should be honored is so disgusting it invokes anger......think about it. How low can a human being be.....honor them with a little respect at least for one day.
I've been personally assured by insiders that it really was an inside job
Blanket statement....no evidence
that is one of many that demonstrate that the gov't had ample opportunity to install the demolition explosives.
I was waiting for it, and you delivered. This is exactly what the conspiracy idiots do: Make statements in an attempt to create doubt, but provide zero evidence. "Had ample time to install the demolition explosives." LMAO. Hardly the same as "here is proof they did install the explosives.
How do you paranoid delusional people get through a normal day?
I've been personally assured by insiders that it really was an inside job
Blanket statement....no evidence
that is one of many that demonstrate that the gov't had ample opportunity to install the demolition explosives.
I was waiting for it, and you delivered. This is exactly what the conspiracy idiots do: Make statements in an attempt to create doubt, but provide zero evidence. "Had ample time to install the demolition explosives." LMAO. Hardly the same as "here is proof they did install the explosives.
How do you paranoid delusional people get through a normal day?
It's not a theory, it's a FACT that there was a power-down in the WTC prior to 911, as shown by this article
All that article does is state a lot of facts and then leaves it up to the reader to make that monumental jump to the fact that it was an inside job (another conspiracy theory technique).
Proves nothing except that there was a power down. I've also heard numerous stories from people who were supposed to be on those ill fated planes, but either missed the plane or had a change of plans...and it saved their life. It's called coincidence.
It's not a theory, it's a FACT that there was a power-down in the WTC prior to 911, as shown by this article
All that article does is state a lot of facts and then leaves it up to the reader to make that monumental jump to the fact that it was an inside job (another conspiracy theory technique).
Proves nothing except that there was a power down. I've also heard numerous stories from people who were supposed to be on those ill fated planes, but either missed the plane or had a change of plans...and it saved their life. It's called coincidence.
By the way, did you know that the head of security and recent FBI counterterrorism chief, Paul O’Neill was on the job at the WTC for only a few weeks after retiring from the FBI. He died in the south tower after reentering it to help with rescue efforts. I would think that the FBI’s head of counterterrorism might know of a massive conspiracy to take down the WTC, and would choose not to be in the buildings when the attack took place. Wouldn't you?
And Mozart, did you know that Securacom only provided a part of the security at the WTC? You would if you had actually done the research.
Another Conspiracy tactic....they only tell you part of the story....and leave out the part that shoots holes in all their theories.
By the way, did you know that the head of security and recent FBI counterterrorism chief, Paul O’Neill was on the job at the WTC for only a few weeks after retiring from the FBI. He died in the south tower after reentering it to help with rescue efforts. I would think that the FBI’s head of counterterrorism might know of a massive conspiracy to take down the WTC, and would choose not to be in the buildings when the attack took place. Wouldn't you?
And Mozart, did you know that Securacom only provided a part of the security at the WTC? You would if you had actually done the research.
Another Conspiracy tactic....they only tell you part of the story....and leave out the part that shoots holes in all their theories.
Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport
___________
Did you know that the UA contract was in the 1990's? You would if you had bothered to do the research.
Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport
___________
Did you know that the UA contract was in the 1990's? You would if you had bothered to do the research.
You know what, Mozart, I like you so I'll give you a chance to convince me. That article talks about security being down and that gave them ample time to plant the bombs.
Please post one opinion from a DEMOLITION EXPERT that says such a job (ie. wiring that building with explosives that would bring it down) would be possible in that short period of time (days) with a fully occupied building.....and without being detected.
Just one, please.
You know what, Mozart, I like you so I'll give you a chance to convince me. That article talks about security being down and that gave them ample time to plant the bombs.
Please post one opinion from a DEMOLITION EXPERT that says such a job (ie. wiring that building with explosives that would bring it down) would be possible in that short period of time (days) with a fully occupied building.....and without being detected.
Just one, please.
Despite hundreds of eyewitness reports of explosions throughout the Twin Towers by doomed victims, survivors, emergency service personnel, reporters, and bystanders, the 9/11 Commission Report contains virtually no mention of them and entirely ignores them in its conclusions.
______________
An FN plane ran into the building. Is it really that crazy to think that there are going to be secondary explosions throughout the building? Jet fuel running down the different elevator shafts....vapor explosions....electrical wiring all F-d up. What would have been news is if there were NOT additional explosions.
Still doesn't prove there were any bombs.
Again, typical conspiracy tactics. Making that broad leap from hearing explosions to just assuming those explosions were caused by bombs.
Despite hundreds of eyewitness reports of explosions throughout the Twin Towers by doomed victims, survivors, emergency service personnel, reporters, and bystanders, the 9/11 Commission Report contains virtually no mention of them and entirely ignores them in its conclusions.
______________
An FN plane ran into the building. Is it really that crazy to think that there are going to be secondary explosions throughout the building? Jet fuel running down the different elevator shafts....vapor explosions....electrical wiring all F-d up. What would have been news is if there were NOT additional explosions.
Still doesn't prove there were any bombs.
Again, typical conspiracy tactics. Making that broad leap from hearing explosions to just assuming those explosions were caused by bombs.
Hey, Mozart, do you know how complex and painstakingly labor intensive a controlled demolition is for a big building? You would if you did the research:
This is from Controlled Demolition, Inc.'s website. They are EXPERTS in demolition. It shows the work involved in their world record (in terms of building height – 439 feet, or 134 meters), demolition of the J.L. Hudson building in Detroit (note how this building isn't nearly as big as the Twin Towers were):
Homrich/NASDI’s 21 man crew needed three months to investigate the complex and four months to complete preparations for CDI’s implosion design. During that period, the lower two basements of the structure were filled with engineered fill and the perimeter basement walls bermed to 1st basement level with soil to support perimeter walls which would surely have failed under soil and hydrostatic loads once the horizontal support of the Hudson’s internal structure was removed by the implosion.
Double column rows installed in the structure between vertical construction phases, internal brick shear walls, x-bracing, 70 elevators and 10 stairwells created an extremely stiff frame. Columns
weighing over 500 lb/ft, having up to 7.25 inch thick laminated steel flanges and 6 inch thick webs, defied commercially available shaped charge technology. CDI analyzed each column, determined the actual load it carried and then used cutting torches to scarf-off steel plates in order to use smaller shaped charges to cut the remaining steel. CDI wanted to keep the charges as small as possible to reduce air over pressure that could break windows in adjacent properties.
CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty-four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.
____________
Yet that power down enabled the demolition folks to complete their job at the Twin Towers (which, by the way, were both THREE times as high as the JL Hudson building) in a handful of days.....without being detected?
Facts in the appropriate context....they is a bitch.
Hey, Mozart, do you know how complex and painstakingly labor intensive a controlled demolition is for a big building? You would if you did the research:
This is from Controlled Demolition, Inc.'s website. They are EXPERTS in demolition. It shows the work involved in their world record (in terms of building height – 439 feet, or 134 meters), demolition of the J.L. Hudson building in Detroit (note how this building isn't nearly as big as the Twin Towers were):
Homrich/NASDI’s 21 man crew needed three months to investigate the complex and four months to complete preparations for CDI’s implosion design. During that period, the lower two basements of the structure were filled with engineered fill and the perimeter basement walls bermed to 1st basement level with soil to support perimeter walls which would surely have failed under soil and hydrostatic loads once the horizontal support of the Hudson’s internal structure was removed by the implosion.
Double column rows installed in the structure between vertical construction phases, internal brick shear walls, x-bracing, 70 elevators and 10 stairwells created an extremely stiff frame. Columns
weighing over 500 lb/ft, having up to 7.25 inch thick laminated steel flanges and 6 inch thick webs, defied commercially available shaped charge technology. CDI analyzed each column, determined the actual load it carried and then used cutting torches to scarf-off steel plates in order to use smaller shaped charges to cut the remaining steel. CDI wanted to keep the charges as small as possible to reduce air over pressure that could break windows in adjacent properties.
CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty-four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.
____________
Yet that power down enabled the demolition folks to complete their job at the Twin Towers (which, by the way, were both THREE times as high as the JL Hudson building) in a handful of days.....without being detected?
Facts in the appropriate context....they is a bitch.
"There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers."
– Arthur Lerner-Lam, Lamont-Doherty seismic center, Palisades, New York.
This guy must be in on it too.
"There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers."
– Arthur Lerner-Lam, Lamont-Doherty seismic center, Palisades, New York.
This guy must be in on it too.
Complete bull! The mind is a wonderful thing, unless you use it to create your own warped reality...
So apparently Bin Laden was working with the US Gov't(whom he would demolish the entire organization given the opportunity) when he claimed respionsibility.. Damn how did I not see this?
Complete bull! The mind is a wonderful thing, unless you use it to create your own warped reality...
So apparently Bin Laden was working with the US Gov't(whom he would demolish the entire organization given the opportunity) when he claimed respionsibility.. Damn how did I not see this?
This is EXACTLY it.
These conspiracy theorists go through all this work to talk about how the government completely organized 9/11....yet they look the other way when it comes to Iraq. Here the government basically got up in front of everyone and flat lied to their faces....and suddenly we are in Iraq and no one seems to give a shit.
Apparently these morons only seem to care if the government lies to us AND attempts to cover it up.
This is EXACTLY it.
These conspiracy theorists go through all this work to talk about how the government completely organized 9/11....yet they look the other way when it comes to Iraq. Here the government basically got up in front of everyone and flat lied to their faces....and suddenly we are in Iraq and no one seems to give a shit.
Apparently these morons only seem to care if the government lies to us AND attempts to cover it up.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.