September 11, 2001 (long read)

from that distance that "Dot" would have to be 5-10ft to be visable?

with this being the only camera how do we not know that this isn't a classic youtube photoshop job, theres alien videos on the same page

and waiting for an answer from someone that has done zero research looking into it will not go far

Scalabrine....That computer video is comical....Do you really think it is possible for even the best pilot in the world to fly a huge plane like that 2 feet off the ground for that amount of distance?.....let alone a guy who could barely fly a 2 seater?  Impossible.

And NO....I can't explain the lamp poles.

Why not just release a video of the plane near the Pentagon?  Maybe like the one they snatched from the hotel across the street within minutes.....They don't have to show impact.

Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Smdio,

Although I believe you have constructed a very convincing argument in this thread (in addition to a spending a great deal of time and energy for a credible 9/11 conspiracy possibility ), I was never sure about Flight 77 being a missle. I am also not averse to examining evidence contrary to my opinion to allow for the possibility of an alternative stance on a matter. 

This is pretty compelling evidence Flight 77 was in fact a plane.

How can one explain away the fallen lamp posts? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&feature=related

scalabrine

I expect this kind of concern.  I'd love to try and convince you that it was a missile, if you'll do me the curtesy of viewing this video.  I understand it's over an hour long, and I understand if you don't have time right now to view it.  But after you view it, please tell me your thoughts.  I also ask that you view it with an open mind.

After viewing it, take a look at this cruise missile.  It is an Boeing ALCM cruise missile used primarily in the USAF.  Although the one in this picture is a smaller version, there are others of this variety that have a larger wing diameter, very much capable of downing the light poles on the southern approach to the Pentagon.

Whatever hit the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 took a southern approach.  Dozens and dozens of people saw Flight 77 take a northern approach, and most of them testified to that in the video posted above. 

If a northern approach was taken by Flight 77 (and by normal approach, we mean North of the Citgo Gas station, and directly over the Navy Annex building.  This will be more clear to you after viewing the video above), then it is physically impossible judging by the downed light poles and physical damage to the Pentagon that Flight 77 crashed into the building.

There are also dozens of people who claimed they saw a large commercial plane (possibly Flight 77?) flying over and away from the Pentagon shortly after the explosion.  This is also in the video I posted.

Are these people all lying?  Come on guys..

I've explained the downed light poles for the 9th time in post #970.  I will quote the previous post #'s as well which I explained the downed light poles, if you want me to.  Maybe you should start reading and contributing to the discussion instead of just tailing the thread and unsuccessfully attempting to bait people who are 10x+ smarter than you into a shouting match.  I've dealth with you kind for almost 10 years now and there's no way you can get under my skin.

If you have something interesting to say pertaining to any event that occured on 9/11/2001, I'd be more than happy to engage in a debate with you.  You have thus far, in over 40 posts in this thread, said absolutely anything worthwhile that requires more than 60 seconds of my time, and hardly any of my thinking or debative skills. 

YUP....A computer generated video proves everything....All that was missing was the Roadrunner and Wile Coyote.

Your Government count on people like you....BEEP-BEEP

  42 Total posts...All in this thread...All meaningless.