All Forums | MLB Betting

The one and only MLB System!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 94253
Posts: 504
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted: #126
Why isn't Milwaukee a play also? Even?  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 66013
Posted: #127
 Impatient people = gamblers.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 724
Posted: #128
I have big doubts you can make 70,000 making $50 bets
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 724
Posted: #129
Quote Originally Posted by duby:

I dont want to bash but something doesnt add up....

 

Since playing this and no other sports betting whatsoever since 2005 I have profited somewhere in the $70 000 - $80 000 neighborhood. I wager $50 on all qualified plays no more no less

 

 By doing math $70 000/6 seasons/50$ units = 233 units

 

Which means you would have made an avg of +233 units per year??!!??!!

 

Am I missing something here

 

Best of luck this season

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 477
Posted: #130
Guys, I cant believe ya!

This system is tony stoffo's worthless, bs underdog system. It doesnt work. You will end season breakeven or loss. Dont believe in 70k hoax!

also, even if you're using system, you can't start now because top20 list is not available. (last season's list is available) you should wait at least every starter has 3 games under belt.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 724
Posted: #131
[Quote: Originally Posted by bostonmike]
Click here to add new friend.  if you want

Changing the parameter from +150 to +125 would take the final from 14 to 455. The parameter was changed on 07/01 this was for the 2009 season.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 105
Posted: #132
The books clearly know about this system. Though I've never heard of it before today, apparently it's all over the internet.

Go a head and check for yourself...

Just type in "Baseball Underdog System" into Google and just look at all the articles and forum threads - not far off from this thread as well - that feature this "system".

You'd think with a system this widely known, more people would make money off it and more of us would have heard of it before. But that doesn't seem to be the case.

I'm not implying anything, just saying...

Tread carefully with this.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2514
Posted: #133

I don't have time to figure out the underdog part of the system so if i were to play the under system tomomorows plays would be.......

Houston (Myers) vs. Philly (Halladay) - Under 7 -125

San Fran (Sanchez) vs. LA (Billingsley) Under 7 -115

Boston (Lester) vs. Texas (wilson) Under 8.5 +105

Seaatle (Hernandez) vs Oakland (Cahill) Under 6.5 -115

That's according to last years ratings. I think it's only those 4 games. Lets see how well it works

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 8
Posted: #134
thanks it seems to be a system that is benn around for some time and is provent to work, thanks to pointed out GL
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 984
Posted: #135

First...he said dont play anything that opens above +150...if you were going to try it now...hers a suggestion for a couple of weeks and should be relatively easy to decipher...don't make a play is the pitcher could legitimately be a top twenty pitcher in two to three weeks...Safe plays for a pre system tommorrow would be....Cleveland...KC...San Fran.

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 984
Posted: #136

Houston (Myers) vs. Philly (Halladay) TOP TWENTY STUD NO PLAY(you gotta know that)- Under 7 -125 NO PLAY

San Fran (Sanchez) vs. LA (Billingsley) Could be top twenty but I don't think so.Under 7 -115 I'd PLAY

Boston (Lester) STUD..HELLO.vs. Texas (wilson) Under 8.5 +105 HELL TO THE NAW

Seaatle (Hernandez) vs Oakland (Cahill) STUD!!!!Under 6.5 -115 HELLLLLLLLL NO

That's according to last years ratings. I think it's only those 4 games. Lets see how well it works

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 984
Posted: #137
Cleveland...KC...San Fran. and San Fran is iffy but its a good bett any way.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 4
Posted: #138
I ve made some math,
regarding the 50$ stake and 70k of profit.

If Maglio has made 10% return of his investment, which is great yield, he needed 14000 of picks.
For 15% roi, which is fantastic, he needed 9334 picks.
For 20% roi, which is almost unbelievable, he still needed 7000 picks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 354
Posted: #139

I would disagree with the Royals... Dan Haren is still a top 20 pitcher.  He had a bad first half last with Arizona, but his post trade stats with the Angels were off the charts.  Given his history of excellence, especially early in the season, I don't think he is someone to fade.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 2128
Posted: #140

Then lets start with The Mets

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1390
Posted: #141
its a tool an angle that you use and adjust to your own knowledge its not easy folks people want to tail or put in little as possible
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2696
Posted: #142
Quote Originally Posted by zlajci:

I ve made some math,
regarding the 50$ stake and 70k of profit.

If Maglio has made 10% return of his investment, which is great yield, he needed 14000 of picks.
For 15% roi, which is fantastic, he needed 9334 picks.
For 20% roi, which is almost unbelievable, he still needed 7000 picks.


Haha guys you really can't be that retarded lol! He said he has made this amount since 2005. lol Try to keep up and actually read the whole thread because this has been covered over four times!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 333
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by rev9246:

Then lets start with The Mets      



against Josh Johnson whos one of the best pitchers in all of MLB and sporting a 7-1 record against the mets...i dont think so lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 4357
Posted: #144
Quote Originally Posted by juveunits:

I don't have time to figure out the underdog part of the system so if i were to play the under system tomomorows plays would be.......

Houston (Myers) vs. Philly (Halladay) - Under 7 -125

San Fran (Sanchez) vs. LA (Billingsley) Under 7 -115

Boston (Lester) vs. Texas (wilson) Under 8.5 +105

Seaatle (Hernandez) vs Oakland (Cahill) Under 6.5 -115

That's according to last years ratings. I think it's only those 4 games. Lets see how well it works


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 4357
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by JoshLewis:

Guys, I cant believe ya!

This system is tony stoffo's worthless, bs underdog system. It doesnt work. You will end season breakeven or loss. Dont believe in 70k hoax!

also, even if you're using system, you can't start now because top20 list is not available. (last season's list is available) you should wait at least every starter has 3 games under belt.

thats what i been saying, carlos silva and ubaldo had under 1.0 era after 3 starts in 2010. both of them had their era rise. so in theory if carlos and ubaldo met on game four we would know what to do/not do, its just the first damn GAME. haha

you cant use this theory/method the first week or 2nd week unless your basing it off of last years stats.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 1998
Posted: #146
Quote Originally Posted by She7154:

i think it's a solid system. i think timing is everything here. i would say 2-3 weeks into the season thru the all star break would be most profitable. (in my opinion.)

i'll definitely be following this system and possibly even tweeking it at little bit. i'll post as much as possible, but i'm sure if i don't others will.. or people can just figure it all out on their own. shouldn't take more than 15 minutes.

thanks for your input. 

there's a detailed outline of this system with proof that it works here 

this article is exactly the same system.. if you don't understand what the poster has said the you must read this.

thanks she7154

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 627
Posted: #147
texas +115

kc +147

pretty sure they both fit...im starting now
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2643
Posted: #148
GL Man. Go check out my nba forum you can learn something.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 4357
Posted: #149
texas rangers $$$
always bet against the cards this year,they effing stink like shiet
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 54
Posted: #150

Thanks for your help, I started early and it's been working pretty well.

 

All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.