the only way the americans can apparently get to the japanese and fight
them on the ground is to climb this ridge using the rope ladder. the
japanese know the rope ladder is there and have control over the top of
it. why wouldn't they cut it down. problem solved. well here is a picture of the face of the
Maeda Escarpment. looks pretty close to as depicted in the movie BUT, you are correct about NO rope "boarding ladder" up the face. how would they get one up there in the first place ??? looks like they just used long ladders like the Army Rangers at
Pointe du Hoc on D-day which was a similar assault
picture >>>
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/181832903676151084
Posted: 7/26/2017 10:02:58 AM
a few things. don't read this if you haven't watched the movie yet but plan to.
first,
he wasn't terrible but casting vince vaughn as some tough sergeant is a
stretch. he still has that swingers persona about him. but the
weirdest part of that is, at some point in the movie, he throws out the
line: "We're not in Kansas anymore" which was really a stupid
unnecessary linje at that point in the movie. or any point, really.
but it's an exact line from the movie swingers (although it was said by
the jon favereau character). why cast the guy from swingers as the
sergeant who still has that swingers personality and then have him say a
line directly from swingers that really adds nothing to this movie.
did none of the editors catch that? have none of these people seen full
metal jacket? that's how you cast the mean sergeant.
as for the realism,
1.
the court martial ending was ridiculous. this kid is seconds away from
being courtmartialed but the ultimate opinion saying he's actually
innocent (which was fairly simple yet no one in the hearing had a clue
about that law apparently) comes from a general but rather than the
general actually calling or sending an official to the hearing to make
sure an innocent solider isn't put in prison, the general just write a
letter and gives it to the kid's dad who the general knows is not
allowed in the hearing. so as far as the general would know, a solider
is about to get wrongfully convicted and sent to prison and the general
is letting it happen by merely giving a letter explaining the injustice
to someone who can't get into the hearing.
2. the kid is being
chased by the japanese and they follow him to some tunnel, that the
japanese made and don't follow him into the tunnel and somehow the kid
walks all over the tunnel and never gets caught although he actually
does run into one japanese solder but that guy doesn't seem to have a
problem with an enemy solider being in their tunnel. that's some
indiana jones garbage right there.
3. the only way the
americans can apparently get to the japanese and fight them on the
ground is to climb this ridge using the rope ladder. the japanese know
the rope ladder is there and have control over the top of it. why
wouldn't they cut it down. problem solved.
4. you know this is
coming. at the end when the japanese thrown grenades at the american
soldiers and the kid does a linle messi with one and a bruce lee on the
other. not even indiana jones could do that. i need to come up with a
movie reference for that one. maybe enter the dragon.
so this movie was a combination of swingers, forrest gump, indiana jones and enter the dragon. should have been a comedy.
anyway,
i couldn't get past these parts of the movie. which is a shame because
it is an interesting story. we'll have to agree to disagree on this
one.
i'm not sure if i saw we were soldiers but it was a good bookyou would remember
We Were Soldiers (2002) about the the Battle of the Ia Drang Valley in Vietnam November of 1965 IF you had seen it. outstanding war-action movie I also give
of four. been playing every so often on various movie channels lately