Going from +105 at +6.5 to +7 at -110 isn't BUYING POINTS.
You are in effect SELLING points to get the +6.5 at + juice simply because the site is offering it. The standard line is +7 -110 and you move from there.
5Dimes is famous for putting up lines outside of the -110 range on the cover page of their betting lines page. It doesn't mean people are buying points when they move off 5 Dimes' proposed number.
Train is correct.
Yes, but you aren't going to find that half point from +6.5 to +7 for 15 cents.
Lets talk real world...
That half point is almost always 20 to 25 cents. And in the case that I posted the 6.5, it is a reduced juice market. A 10 cent market vs a 20 cent market on the +7.
I try to make it simple when I post plays here - with lines that everyone can get. So if I post a +7 line that is overpriced vs a 6.5 line that is cheap, I am doing a disservice just to protect a pick for my covers reputation or whatever.
If I personally had the choice of taking Det +6.5 -100 or Det +7 -125 I would take the +6.5 -100.
Now I am absolutely sure that all of this talk almost guarantees that the Cowboys will win by exactly 7.....
Going from +105 at +6.5 to +7 at -110 isn't BUYING POINTS.
You are in effect SELLING points to get the +6.5 at + juice simply because the site is offering it. The standard line is +7 -110 and you move from there.
5Dimes is famous for putting up lines outside of the -110 range on the cover page of their betting lines page. It doesn't mean people are buying points when they move off 5 Dimes' proposed number.
Train is correct.
Yes, but you aren't going to find that half point from +6.5 to +7 for 15 cents.
Lets talk real world...
That half point is almost always 20 to 25 cents. And in the case that I posted the 6.5, it is a reduced juice market. A 10 cent market vs a 20 cent market on the +7.
I try to make it simple when I post plays here - with lines that everyone can get. So if I post a +7 line that is overpriced vs a 6.5 line that is cheap, I am doing a disservice just to protect a pick for my covers reputation or whatever.
If I personally had the choice of taking Det +6.5 -100 or Det +7 -125 I would take the +6.5 -100.
Now I am absolutely sure that all of this talk almost guarantees that the Cowboys will win by exactly 7.....
That 'write-up' is forgetting one key aspect about that game.
Ahmad Bradshaw isn't mentioned and he accounted for almost 100 yards of offense.
Colts have absolutely no running game and Bradshaw is long gone.
This a one-dimensional team, a great one-dimensional team, but one-dimensional at that.
That 'write-up' is forgetting one key aspect about that game.
Ahmad Bradshaw isn't mentioned and he accounted for almost 100 yards of offense.
Colts have absolutely no running game and Bradshaw is long gone.
This a one-dimensional team, a great one-dimensional team, but one-dimensional at that.
Yes, but you aren't going to find that half point from +6.5 to +7 for 15 cents.
Lets talk real world...
That half point is almost always 20 to 25 cents. And in the case that I posted the 6.5, it is a reduced juice market. A 10 cent market vs a 20 cent market on the +7.
I try to make it simple when I post plays here - with lines that everyone can get. So if I post a +7 line that is overpriced vs a 6.5 line that is cheap, I am doing a disservice just to protect a pick for my covers reputation or whatever.
If I personally had the choice of taking Det +6.5 -100 or Det +7 -125 I would take the +6.5 -100.
Now I am absolutely sure that all of this talk almost guarantees that the Cowboys will win by exactly 7.....
I didn't see that line at -7 -125. I saw it at -7 -110 and wrote from there but I believe those were your lines.
Yes, but you aren't going to find that half point from +6.5 to +7 for 15 cents.
Lets talk real world...
That half point is almost always 20 to 25 cents. And in the case that I posted the 6.5, it is a reduced juice market. A 10 cent market vs a 20 cent market on the +7.
I try to make it simple when I post plays here - with lines that everyone can get. So if I post a +7 line that is overpriced vs a 6.5 line that is cheap, I am doing a disservice just to protect a pick for my covers reputation or whatever.
If I personally had the choice of taking Det +6.5 -100 or Det +7 -125 I would take the +6.5 -100.
Now I am absolutely sure that all of this talk almost guarantees that the Cowboys will win by exactly 7.....
I didn't see that line at -7 -125. I saw it at -7 -110 and wrote from there but I believe those were your lines.
Hello covers degenerates.
2015 is here. Hope it is peaceful and prosperous to everyone.
Here are my picks I will be betting for wildcard weekend: (all current lines as of posting at 5d)
1. AZ +6.5 +105 (2 units)
2. Pitt -3 -115 (1.5 units)
3. Colts -3.5 -100 (3 units)
4. Lions +6.5 +100 (2 units)
I am on vaca with the family until Monday, so wont be around much to discuss, but will try to respond if possible.
GL all.
0-2 yesterday, 2-0 today and won some money overall.
That Detroit game was razor thin.
On to next week.
Hello covers degenerates.
2015 is here. Hope it is peaceful and prosperous to everyone.
Here are my picks I will be betting for wildcard weekend: (all current lines as of posting at 5d)
1. AZ +6.5 +105 (2 units)
2. Pitt -3 -115 (1.5 units)
3. Colts -3.5 -100 (3 units)
4. Lions +6.5 +100 (2 units)
I am on vaca with the family until Monday, so wont be around much to discuss, but will try to respond if possible.
GL all.
0-2 yesterday, 2-0 today and won some money overall.
That Detroit game was razor thin.
On to next week.
Anyone know why Chris Christie loves the Cowboys?
That fat f uck might get in trouble at home for rooting out of state.
Anyone know why Chris Christie loves the Cowboys?
That fat f uck might get in trouble at home for rooting out of state.
Anyone know why Chris Christie loves the Cowboys?
That fat f uck might get in trouble at home for rooting out of state.
Anyone know why Chris Christie loves the Cowboys?
That fat f uck might get in trouble at home for rooting out of state.
Anyone know why Chris Christie loves the Cowboys?
That fat f uck might get in trouble at home for rooting out of state.
Anyone know why Chris Christie loves the Cowboys?
That fat f uck might get in trouble at home for rooting out of state.
You know if he runs for President you will see those clips of his jigglyness all over the place.
I can never understand a grown man acting like that unless he had money on it.
You know if he runs for President you will see those clips of his jigglyness all over the place.
I can never understand a grown man acting like that unless he had money on it.
2-2, up 1.275 units
Finally back from family vaca. The best days of family vaca are the day you get there, and the day you leave.
Picks for this weekend. All current bettable lines.
1. Balt +6.5 +105 (1.5 units)
2. Sea -11 -102 (3 units)
3. Packers -5.5 -105 (2 units)
4. Colts +7 -108 (3 units)
I am here to discuss, and should be around for the weekend.
Peace.
2-2, up 1.275 units
Finally back from family vaca. The best days of family vaca are the day you get there, and the day you leave.
Picks for this weekend. All current bettable lines.
1. Balt +6.5 +105 (1.5 units)
2. Sea -11 -102 (3 units)
3. Packers -5.5 -105 (2 units)
4. Colts +7 -108 (3 units)
I am here to discuss, and should be around for the weekend.
Peace.
Talk to me about the Colts. They have the worst running attack left in the playoffs and Denver gave up the 2nd fewest rushing ypg (detroit). Obviously some of that was due to Denver being up most games and teams passing....Is this a partial fade of Manning and his ever weakening arm?
Any thoughts on totals? Only game I like Over is Balt/NE. I see no reason both teams cant hit mid 20s. I think either Seattle wins 31-3 or is a 20-13 game. With Rodgers hurt, I expect an extra dose of Lacy, which will mean far fewer plays than normal, and the cold will slow the Boys down somewhat. I also think CJ Anderson, much like Lacy, will see more action than normal as Peyton isnt the qb he was 5 years ago. If Luck cant hit TY deep, the Colts are gonna have problems moving the ball all game without a strong running attack
Talk to me about the Colts. They have the worst running attack left in the playoffs and Denver gave up the 2nd fewest rushing ypg (detroit). Obviously some of that was due to Denver being up most games and teams passing....Is this a partial fade of Manning and his ever weakening arm?
Any thoughts on totals? Only game I like Over is Balt/NE. I see no reason both teams cant hit mid 20s. I think either Seattle wins 31-3 or is a 20-13 game. With Rodgers hurt, I expect an extra dose of Lacy, which will mean far fewer plays than normal, and the cold will slow the Boys down somewhat. I also think CJ Anderson, much like Lacy, will see more action than normal as Peyton isnt the qb he was 5 years ago. If Luck cant hit TY deep, the Colts are gonna have problems moving the ball all game without a strong running attack
2-2, up 1.275 units
Finally back from family vaca. The best days of family vaca are the day you get there, and the day you leave.
Picks for this weekend. All current bettable lines.
1. Balt +6.5 +105 (1.5 units)
2. Sea -11 -102 (3 units)
3. Packers -5.5 -105 (2 units)
4. Colts +7 -108 (3 units)
I am here to discuss, and should be around for the weekend.
Peace.
2-2, up 1.275 units
Finally back from family vaca. The best days of family vaca are the day you get there, and the day you leave.
Picks for this weekend. All current bettable lines.
1. Balt +6.5 +105 (1.5 units)
2. Sea -11 -102 (3 units)
3. Packers -5.5 -105 (2 units)
4. Colts +7 -108 (3 units)
I am here to discuss, and should be around for the weekend.
Peace.
Talk to me about the Colts. They have the worst running attack left in the playoffs and Denver gave up the 2nd fewest rushing ypg (detroit). Obviously some of that was due to Denver being up most games and teams passing....Is this a partial fade of Manning and his ever weakening arm?
Any thoughts on totals? Only game I like Over is Balt/NE. I see no reason both teams cant hit mid 20s. I think either Seattle wins 31-3 or is a 20-13 game. With Rodgers hurt, I expect an extra dose of Lacy, which will mean far fewer plays than normal, and the cold will slow the Boys down somewhat. I also think CJ Anderson, much like Lacy, will see more action than normal as Peyton isnt the qb he was 5 years ago. If Luck cant hit TY deep, the Colts are gonna have problems moving the ball all game without a strong running attack
Lots of reasons point me to the Colts. I use a lot of adjusted stats - and I can make a decent argument that their rushing stats are not that bad. They are never going to win a game on the ground - but I don't think they need to here. The pick is mostly that Denvers offense wont score over 21 in this game. This total shift in philosophy - and Manning not being able to really throw the ball - has me very skeptical. The Bengals game was a great example of it.
7 points is a lot in the NFL and a playoff game. Just have lots of stats that I can make a case with - and my gut is screaming Colts.
I don't normally bet totals - but I did make one of the few (I think 4 total this year) bets on the Colts / Broncos under. I couldn't argue with your analysis of Pats / Ravens - should be high scoring - unless Flacco is sitting on his behind all day because he is getting pressured. That is the key to this one I feel. Could see the Pack / Cowboys going under, and something tells me Seattle is going to put up a big number on Carolina.
Anyway - no total betting for me except for a small play on Colts Broncos under. Very small.
Talk to me about the Colts. They have the worst running attack left in the playoffs and Denver gave up the 2nd fewest rushing ypg (detroit). Obviously some of that was due to Denver being up most games and teams passing....Is this a partial fade of Manning and his ever weakening arm?
Any thoughts on totals? Only game I like Over is Balt/NE. I see no reason both teams cant hit mid 20s. I think either Seattle wins 31-3 or is a 20-13 game. With Rodgers hurt, I expect an extra dose of Lacy, which will mean far fewer plays than normal, and the cold will slow the Boys down somewhat. I also think CJ Anderson, much like Lacy, will see more action than normal as Peyton isnt the qb he was 5 years ago. If Luck cant hit TY deep, the Colts are gonna have problems moving the ball all game without a strong running attack
Lots of reasons point me to the Colts. I use a lot of adjusted stats - and I can make a decent argument that their rushing stats are not that bad. They are never going to win a game on the ground - but I don't think they need to here. The pick is mostly that Denvers offense wont score over 21 in this game. This total shift in philosophy - and Manning not being able to really throw the ball - has me very skeptical. The Bengals game was a great example of it.
7 points is a lot in the NFL and a playoff game. Just have lots of stats that I can make a case with - and my gut is screaming Colts.
I don't normally bet totals - but I did make one of the few (I think 4 total this year) bets on the Colts / Broncos under. I couldn't argue with your analysis of Pats / Ravens - should be high scoring - unless Flacco is sitting on his behind all day because he is getting pressured. That is the key to this one I feel. Could see the Pack / Cowboys going under, and something tells me Seattle is going to put up a big number on Carolina.
Anyway - no total betting for me except for a small play on Colts Broncos under. Very small.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.