Been getting my fair share of 3rd down TD's...
All of Seattles TD's yesterday were on 3rd and long, and the Pack first one on 3rd.
That's how you cover spreads.
Been getting my fair share of 3rd down TD's...
All of Seattles TD's yesterday were on 3rd and long, and the Pack first one on 3rd.
That's how you cover spreads.
Nah. I have enough already. If it gets to 10.5 I will have to add.
Nah. I have enough already. If it gets to 10.5 I will have to add.
Couldve had a miracle there, but didn't deserve it in all honesty...
Razor thin once again.
And the Dez Bryant thing was clearly not a catch. You can hate on the rule, but that is the rule.
On to the Colts.
Couldve had a miracle there, but didn't deserve it in all honesty...
Razor thin once again.
And the Dez Bryant thing was clearly not a catch. You can hate on the rule, but that is the rule.
On to the Colts.
Andrew Lucks interceptions so far have been really smart interceptions.
Both on 3rd down, and both for like 40 yards so same as a punt.
No impact.
Andrew Lucks interceptions so far have been really smart interceptions.
Both on 3rd down, and both for like 40 yards so same as a punt.
No impact.
Lots of reasons point me to the Colts. I use a lot of adjusted stats - and I can make a decent argument that their rushing stats are not that bad. They are never going to win a game on the ground - but I don't think they need to here. The pick is mostly that Denvers offense wont score over 21 in this game. This total shift in philosophy - and Manning not being able to really throw the ball - has me very skeptical. The Bengals game was a great example of it.
7 points is a lot in the NFL and a playoff game. Just have lots of stats that I can make a case with - and my gut is screaming Colts.
I don't normally bet totals - but I did make one of the few (I think 4 total this year) bets on the Colts / Broncos under. I couldn't argue with your analysis of Pats / Ravens - should be high scoring - unless Flacco is sitting on his behind all day because he is getting pressured. That is the key to this one I feel. Could see the Pack / Cowboys going under, and something tells me Seattle is going to put up a big number on Carolina.
Anyway - no total betting for me except for a small play on Colts Broncos under. Very small.
Hate to repost this and pat myself on the back....
But I rarely get so much right in a single post.
That's crystal ball material.
Lots of reasons point me to the Colts. I use a lot of adjusted stats - and I can make a decent argument that their rushing stats are not that bad. They are never going to win a game on the ground - but I don't think they need to here. The pick is mostly that Denvers offense wont score over 21 in this game. This total shift in philosophy - and Manning not being able to really throw the ball - has me very skeptical. The Bengals game was a great example of it.
7 points is a lot in the NFL and a playoff game. Just have lots of stats that I can make a case with - and my gut is screaming Colts.
I don't normally bet totals - but I did make one of the few (I think 4 total this year) bets on the Colts / Broncos under. I couldn't argue with your analysis of Pats / Ravens - should be high scoring - unless Flacco is sitting on his behind all day because he is getting pressured. That is the key to this one I feel. Could see the Pack / Cowboys going under, and something tells me Seattle is going to put up a big number on Carolina.
Anyway - no total betting for me except for a small play on Colts Broncos under. Very small.
Hate to repost this and pat myself on the back....
But I rarely get so much right in a single post.
That's crystal ball material.
What?
Who said they were the Seahawks?
And "last year I was convinced the Chargers had no chance in Cincy"???? What does that even mean?
Don't be a sore loser dude. Sometimes you get them right, and sometimes you don't. Today I got the Colts right. Why come in my thread and tell me about a loss from a year ago I don't even remember, or that even though I said I thought the Broncos wouldn't score 21 - that they weren't as good as the seahawks?!??
WTF?
What?
Who said they were the Seahawks?
And "last year I was convinced the Chargers had no chance in Cincy"???? What does that even mean?
Don't be a sore loser dude. Sometimes you get them right, and sometimes you don't. Today I got the Colts right. Why come in my thread and tell me about a loss from a year ago I don't even remember, or that even though I said I thought the Broncos wouldn't score 21 - that they weren't as good as the seahawks?!??
WTF?
2-2, up 1.275 units
Finally back from family vaca. The best days of family vaca are the day you get there, and the day you leave.
Picks for this weekend. All current bettable lines.
1. Balt +6.5 +105 (1.5 units)
2. Sea -11 -102 (3 units)
3. Packers -5.5 -105 (2 units)
4. Colts +7 -108 (3 units)
I am here to discuss, and should be around for the weekend.
Peace.
Alright...
2-0 yesterday, 1-1 today even though by gametime there was lots of GB-5 and even some -4.5 out there... But I will mark it as a loss here.
So overall 5-3 in playoffs, up 6.725 units (including juice)
2-2, up 1.275 units
Finally back from family vaca. The best days of family vaca are the day you get there, and the day you leave.
Picks for this weekend. All current bettable lines.
1. Balt +6.5 +105 (1.5 units)
2. Sea -11 -102 (3 units)
3. Packers -5.5 -105 (2 units)
4. Colts +7 -108 (3 units)
I am here to discuss, and should be around for the weekend.
Peace.
Alright...
2-0 yesterday, 1-1 today even though by gametime there was lots of GB-5 and even some -4.5 out there... But I will mark it as a loss here.
So overall 5-3 in playoffs, up 6.725 units (including juice)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.