Just getting back to covers and this thread...
They made me cringe because I also had the ML. I couldn't resist - got +350 by gametime. Needless to say, the result is sickening - because it was all avoidable. An unbelievable series of events in the last 5 minutes of that game, then the coinflip, then the OT - it was really incredible. At the time of the GB interception with about 5 mins left I would have said it was about 1000-1.
But if I had time to write up the game, I would have said that Seattle is surprisingly not great at QB sacks and QB hurries. The perception is that they are at the top of the league - but their defense is best from back to front - with their line and pass rush being the real weakness (if it can be called that). I just thought that Rodgers would have time and his injury wouldn't matter.
The other game was a wire to wire blowout - which also didn't surprise me too much. Never would have predicted it, but not entirely surprised.
Was really hoping that GB would have made the SB, because my guess is that NE would have been -3, and I would be betting the Pack real big. It is a good matchup for them.
Anyway....
That being said - the way you beat the Patriots is by hurrying Brady and being able to cover and shut down the short hot routes. Really, it is that simple - but very hard to execute. This to me - at a very high level - is the key to handicapping this one.
I do like a side, but will do a full writeup and pick soon.
So far in the playoffs 7-3 (including GB marked as a loss against Dallas), +14.225 units (including juice)
GL all.
Just getting back to covers and this thread...
They made me cringe because I also had the ML. I couldn't resist - got +350 by gametime. Needless to say, the result is sickening - because it was all avoidable. An unbelievable series of events in the last 5 minutes of that game, then the coinflip, then the OT - it was really incredible. At the time of the GB interception with about 5 mins left I would have said it was about 1000-1.
But if I had time to write up the game, I would have said that Seattle is surprisingly not great at QB sacks and QB hurries. The perception is that they are at the top of the league - but their defense is best from back to front - with their line and pass rush being the real weakness (if it can be called that). I just thought that Rodgers would have time and his injury wouldn't matter.
The other game was a wire to wire blowout - which also didn't surprise me too much. Never would have predicted it, but not entirely surprised.
Was really hoping that GB would have made the SB, because my guess is that NE would have been -3, and I would be betting the Pack real big. It is a good matchup for them.
Anyway....
That being said - the way you beat the Patriots is by hurrying Brady and being able to cover and shut down the short hot routes. Really, it is that simple - but very hard to execute. This to me - at a very high level - is the key to handicapping this one.
I do like a side, but will do a full writeup and pick soon.
So far in the playoffs 7-3 (including GB marked as a loss against Dallas), +14.225 units (including juice)
GL all.
Thanks.
Although adding value to this site is not a high bar
Thanks.
Although adding value to this site is not a high bar
Thanks for the nice words.
Think I might be out in Vegas for the SB! Still have some strings to pull but it might happen.
But the contest for sure next year.
Thanks for the nice words.
Think I might be out in Vegas for the SB! Still have some strings to pull but it might happen.
But the contest for sure next year.
Agree with every word of this.
Agree with every word of this.
Hey mafia - I know you have participated in my threads all season - thanks for that. Hope at some point you were tailing me. It was a good year.
GL in the SB. Will post my pick soon.
Hey mafia - I know you have participated in my threads all season - thanks for that. Hope at some point you were tailing me. It was a good year.
GL in the SB. Will post my pick soon.
1. NE might not have to run it at all. I agree they will have trouble running the ball - but their pass will set up their run. They are not in a run to pass situation here - they will need to consistently be hitting their short routes for the run to work. Will they be able to do that?
2. It only makes NE one dimensional if they cant throw. I think your analysis is correct - but backwards - in that I don't think NE will come out and try to "establish the run". They will run if the pass is working early.
3. Seattles running game gets progressively better during the game than any team in the NFL. Seattle will do the opposite of NE - they will run to pass - and the barrage gets better and better as the game goes on. Can NE withstand it?
I am going to write up my thoughts soon....
GL
1. NE might not have to run it at all. I agree they will have trouble running the ball - but their pass will set up their run. They are not in a run to pass situation here - they will need to consistently be hitting their short routes for the run to work. Will they be able to do that?
2. It only makes NE one dimensional if they cant throw. I think your analysis is correct - but backwards - in that I don't think NE will come out and try to "establish the run". They will run if the pass is working early.
3. Seattles running game gets progressively better during the game than any team in the NFL. Seattle will do the opposite of NE - they will run to pass - and the barrage gets better and better as the game goes on. Can NE withstand it?
I am going to write up my thoughts soon....
GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.