All Forums | NFL Betting

And, now you bang the Giants

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13719
Posts: 164
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6867
Posted: #51
Giants will win on Sunday BOOK IT.  Bears just beat their rivals on Monday night and they will be a little drained emotionally from it. Gmen are mad because they have played lousy so far. Giants at home only giving 3 to a team that will not be able to match the their intensity is 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:

Giants were -3 at home vs. Tenn and got pummeled.  I understand what you guys are saying, but they're going to lay 3 again against a better team?  Hard to see.  I'm going to more like -2/2.5/ML -125.  Something like that. 


They also got a ton of yards, like 380 for Manning through the air. And I bet the Titans there, but they are a way better team than Chicago, who IMO should be 1-2 or 0-3 and is the flukiest 3-0 team I have ever seen, so it is time to take advantage of that fact.

I say exploit this fluke record for all it is worth because Chicago is going down and IMHO will still struggle to make the playoffs even being spotted three games.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

yep, and this totally fluke 3-0 record the refs and faves helped Chicago get will now force the books to put out a short line on New York. Loving that.
dont do it BP...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6867
Posted: #54
Cutler should have had 3 int's tonight. Ya I know there are a lot of should of's and could of's but he will not get away with it week after week.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by michaelpaul1:

dont do it BP...
I think New York sucks too bro, dont get me wrong. i am fading them most of this yer. But to me the Bears are even worse despite the tremendous record difference. I expect the Giants to have a 7-9 type year and the Bears 8-8 based on the fluke 3-0.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 7967
Posted: #56

The Giants are going to get slayed. They're gonna get worked just like the Cowgirls did.

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2004
Posts: 13258
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by peanutt612:

I'm With You On Giants Sunday And GB Will Win Also Along With Minnie So The North Will All Be 3-1 And The Lions Will Be Dead Last Like Usual. In NFL We TRUST
cept ur QUEENS are 1-2 and going into a bye so it'll b a little hard for them to be 3-1, only good thing bout chicago being 3-0 is that it only seals the queens fate even more, a 7-9 will get them an early vacation
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 611
Posted: #58
Line is 3 and 43.5 or 44 here in Vegas, I hope it comes down, but it won't matter, giants bury this team Jay porkchop Cutlet throws 3 ints.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 2859
Posted: #59
Jobs are on the line just like Dallas was and Bears are overrated. You better believe it baby.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 330
Posted: #60
How could you put your hard-earned money on a team melting down?  They have no run game, I don't care about the x-headed monster in the running game.  They can't control the clock, the blitz might send Eli to the hospital.

Bears just beat what some people thought to be the best team in the NFL in the pack.  I'd stay away from betting against chicago with the fairy dust they seem to be playing with, and fade the G-men in most other games until they turn some shit around and prove something.

IMO, I don't bet on what I think teams are GOING to become, but rather what they've shown thus far.

niners, giants, bills, cards--FADE EM UNTIL THEY HAVE NO VALUE AT ALL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 130
Posted: #61
wow, it sucks to be the book in this spot. Giants just got box score routed but moved the ball well. In a must win Sunday night game. Playing a team on a short week off an incredibly intense game. Hell I would open it Giants -4.5. You would never get split action but anything less and I see a lot of high dollar players on the G-Men.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3329
Posted: #62

Giants as a dog would be great spot.....but not as a favorite.

In fact Bears might be the contrarian pick here.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 917
Posted: #63
I also couldn't agree more, been thinking it all day... hoping the bears would win... love giants at home off 2 straight losses, vs. a chicago team that finally got over the GB hump and is the only NFC undefeated.  Shaping up to be Giants by DD, ok.. ok.. atleast a TD

Also agree with Stuckey on the -3 line
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 13911
Posted: #64
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 8951
Posted: #65

Quote Originally Posted by NFLKiller:

How could you put your hard-earned money on a team melting down?  They have no run game, I don't care about the x-headed monster in the running game.  They can't control the clock, the blitz might send Eli to the hospital.

Bears just beat what some people thought to be the best team in the NFL in the pack.  I'd stay away from betting against chicago with the fairy dust they seem to be playing with, and fade the G-men in most other games until they turn some shit around and prove something.

IMO, I don't bet on what I think teams are GOING to become, but rather what they've shown thus far.

niners, giants, bills, cards--FADE EM UNTIL THEY HAVE NO VALUE AT ALL

Couldnt agree more here...why are you guys bitching the Bears got lucky??Cause GB got a ton of penalties?Isnt that what they do..#1 in the league last season...were those not penalties...dirty hits,holds,pass intf...they all looked legit to me...lets not forget they missed a FG and went for it on 4th and goal and it was dropped...

 

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 7186
Posted: #66
Bet with your wallet,not your heart
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5856
Posted: #67
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 261
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by NFLKiller:

How could you put your hard-earned money on a team melting down?  They have no run game, I don't care about the x-headed monster in the running game.  They can't control the clock, the blitz might send Eli to the hospital.

Bears just beat what some people thought to be the best team in the NFL in the pack.  I'd stay away from betting against chicago with the fairy dust they seem to be playing with, and fade the G-men in most other games until they turn some shit around and prove something.

IMO, I don't bet on what I think teams are GOING to become, but rather what they've shown thus far.

niners, giants, bills, cards--FADE EM UNTIL THEY HAVE NO VALUE AT ALL




Yeah, what he said.




 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 27228
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by FadeOnly:

Chicago ML

 

--- think Broncos early last season ---


I bet SD at home -3 against Denver and lost more money then i EVER want to think about again 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #70
You people begging to back Chicago are clueless


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 11534
Posted: #71
NYG early on could be the situation play of the week. Always like to fade teams coming off big win on MNF travelling the next week. SF though, while I had a big win with them @ home vs N.O. 2 weeks ago, they have been atrocious O.T.R. No sir, I can't back this team ( I had 'em vs KC I will admit) as a visitor until they prove to me otherwise. ATL is a better team than SEA and KC IMO. Like the  way you think tho' with that CHI/NYG game. Good Luck!
"I'm afraid all we may have done is awakened a sleeping giant."
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 2398
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:

I see nothing at Greek/cris/pinny....nobody beats those books to a line.  Who has it?
Vegas is getting better.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2002
Posts: 67006
Posted: #73
You guys really think NYG -3-120 is a good value?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 2398
Posted: #74

Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:

You guys really think NYG -3-120 is a good value?

I wouldn't bang the giants if they were passed out on GHB

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 212
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by Johny_Utah:

I agree Bears very over rated. I just can't bet a lot on that Giants team. Turnover machine Eli and that D fense.


Guess you have not watched too many Games then. Eli has what 6-7 INT 4-5 were right off the hands of the WRs not his fault lack of concentration from the WR. Not saying I am playing the Gmen still have not seen a line but just stating a fact about Eli
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.