theyve got a taste of rodgers and eli is not worse but not slightly not as good same with a shittier defense. bears win by 4 or more, cutler has atleast better weapons and a better back eli isnt shit but there run game isssssssssssssssss more reasons to sack eli and pick his sorry ass off
0
theyve got a taste of rodgers and eli is not worse but not slightly not as good same with a shittier defense. bears win by 4 or more, cutler has atleast better weapons and a better back eli isnt shit but there run game isssssssssssssssss more reasons to sack eli and pick his sorry ass off
Its funny..... you keep on sayin this RJ Sizzle but I never see you post the games u win.... you just bitch at everyones pick.... you have been on here for less than 5 months.....
You are a douchebag..... i will say it day in and day out.... people like you are the shitty gamblers... look at my posts.... i put my winnings and losses and they far my winnings far outweigh my losses...
go suck a cock bud
0
Its funny..... you keep on sayin this RJ Sizzle but I never see you post the games u win.... you just bitch at everyones pick.... you have been on here for less than 5 months.....
You are a douchebag..... i will say it day in and day out.... people like you are the shitty gamblers... look at my posts.... i put my winnings and losses and they far my winnings far outweigh my losses...
Its funny..... you keep on sayin this RJ Sizzle but I never see you post the games u win.... you just bitch at everyones pick.... you have been on here for less than 5 months.....
You are a douchebag..... i will say it day in and day out.... people like you are the shitty gamblers... look at my posts.... i put my winnings and losses and they far my winnings far outweigh my losses...
go suck a cock bud
Let me get this straight -- You have your reasons to back the Bears. You called those who sided with the Giants "names" (not just RJ) and you mocked them for their reasonings. You now are offended?? That doesn't seem right.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wilk704:
Its funny..... you keep on sayin this RJ Sizzle but I never see you post the games u win.... you just bitch at everyones pick.... you have been on here for less than 5 months.....
You are a douchebag..... i will say it day in and day out.... people like you are the shitty gamblers... look at my posts.... i put my winnings and losses and they far my winnings far outweigh my losses...
go suck a cock bud
Let me get this straight -- You have your reasons to back the Bears. You called those who sided with the Giants "names" (not just RJ) and you mocked them for their reasonings. You now are offended?? That doesn't seem right.
wtf, you actually believe VY is a better qb than Jay Cutler..cmon
The fact the Bears didnt sack Rodgers means nothing! I think causing a dozen holding calls is better than a few sacks. Fact is Peppers was held all nite as he was beating that hick o-lineman like he was nothing.
Nope, just said he moves better than cutler. The giants have to account for VY's legs and CJ...not with Cutler and the bears. And just becuase the bears forced a dozen holding calls doesn't mean they can do it again. The bears were at home, now the giants will be at home...and there is holding on every play so its not like holding should ever really be an issue.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Flutiemaniac341:
wtf, you actually believe VY is a better qb than Jay Cutler..cmon
The fact the Bears didnt sack Rodgers means nothing! I think causing a dozen holding calls is better than a few sacks. Fact is Peppers was held all nite as he was beating that hick o-lineman like he was nothing.
Nope, just said he moves better than cutler. The giants have to account for VY's legs and CJ...not with Cutler and the bears. And just becuase the bears forced a dozen holding calls doesn't mean they can do it again. The bears were at home, now the giants will be at home...and there is holding on every play so its not like holding should ever really be an issue.
Nope, just said he moves better than cutler. The giants have to account for VY's legs and CJ...not with Cutler and the bears. And just becuase the bears forced a dozen holding calls doesn't mean they can do it again. The bears were at home, now the giants will be at home...and there is holding on every play so its not like holding should ever really be an issue.
Cutler moves better than you think. VY is undeniably faster, but Cutler moves out of the pocket well and can run on occasion. Only 3 games in and I am sure this won't hold, but Cutler has 63 yards on 13 carries while Young has 48 yards on 12 carries. Just stating the facts there FWIW.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The_Ace:
Nope, just said he moves better than cutler. The giants have to account for VY's legs and CJ...not with Cutler and the bears. And just becuase the bears forced a dozen holding calls doesn't mean they can do it again. The bears were at home, now the giants will be at home...and there is holding on every play so its not like holding should ever really be an issue.
Cutler moves better than you think. VY is undeniably faster, but Cutler moves out of the pocket well and can run on occasion. Only 3 games in and I am sure this won't hold, but Cutler has 63 yards on 13 carries while Young has 48 yards on 12 carries. Just stating the facts there FWIW.
Cutler may not move like VY but thats ok cause hes been one of the most accurate qbs when he rolls outta the pocket...at least he was last few seasons...
Im not going to say Bears whip on the Gmen but ive watched both teams this season and Bears look like they got their shit together more than the Gmen..i guess people watched the Monday night game and came away thinking Cutler was lucky not have a few more INTs???Does it not matter that on one of those passes he was nailed in the chin as he threw or the fact that the WR was blocked away from the ball on another pass??
Why arent we talking about how Rodgers moves compared to Eli??Do you see Eli running and avoiding pressure the way Rodgers did?
0
Cutler may not move like VY but thats ok cause hes been one of the most accurate qbs when he rolls outta the pocket...at least he was last few seasons...
Im not going to say Bears whip on the Gmen but ive watched both teams this season and Bears look like they got their shit together more than the Gmen..i guess people watched the Monday night game and came away thinking Cutler was lucky not have a few more INTs???Does it not matter that on one of those passes he was nailed in the chin as he threw or the fact that the WR was blocked away from the ball on another pass??
Why arent we talking about how Rodgers moves compared to Eli??Do you see Eli running and avoiding pressure the way Rodgers did?
Have you seen the injury report for the Giants/Bears today
Giants= Mario Manningham most likely wont play
Sean O'Hara is definitely out for Sundays game
Ramses Barden Out
I also hear that the Giants will atleast be out 1 LB and most likely the will lose another if the team doctors have anything to say about it
I hear both the LBs who sat out vs Tenn will sit as well..Blackburn and Dillard
Bears= Major Wright
oh and you can add Keith Bullock and Rocky Bernard to this injurt report..... so the Giants by be out 3 LBs, their 2nd best performing WR, and their best Interior Lineman. I know the DE's are good but if they lose Bernard that will hurt alot....
0
Have you seen the injury report for the Giants/Bears today
Giants= Mario Manningham most likely wont play
Sean O'Hara is definitely out for Sundays game
Ramses Barden Out
I also hear that the Giants will atleast be out 1 LB and most likely the will lose another if the team doctors have anything to say about it
I hear both the LBs who sat out vs Tenn will sit as well..Blackburn and Dillard
Bears= Major Wright
oh and you can add Keith Bullock and Rocky Bernard to this injurt report..... so the Giants by be out 3 LBs, their 2nd best performing WR, and their best Interior Lineman. I know the DE's are good but if they lose Bernard that will hurt alot....
I love coming on these forums...reading every page and every entry and who to pick...and going against it......The Giants will not win this game....Bears will find away to get it done just like they did against the 70% backed GB Packers.....To me capping these games has nothing to do with the players on the teams....all you have to do is go against the public and although you will not win everytime...you will win more than you lose...Hence why the built an oasis in the desert with all public money
0
I love coming on these forums...reading every page and every entry and who to pick...and going against it......The Giants will not win this game....Bears will find away to get it done just like they did against the 70% backed GB Packers.....To me capping these games has nothing to do with the players on the teams....all you have to do is go against the public and although you will not win everytime...you will win more than you lose...Hence why the built an oasis in the desert with all public money
I love coming on these forums...reading every page and every entry and who to pick...and going against it......The Giants will not win this game....Bears will find away to get it done just like they did against the 70% backed GB Packers.....To me capping these games has nothing to do with the players on the teams....all you have to do is go against the public and although you will not win everytime...you will win more than you lose...Hence why the built an oasis in the desert with all public money
To bad the public is on the Bears
0
Quote Originally Posted by JohnQ10:
I love coming on these forums...reading every page and every entry and who to pick...and going against it......The Giants will not win this game....Bears will find away to get it done just like they did against the 70% backed GB Packers.....To me capping these games has nothing to do with the players on the teams....all you have to do is go against the public and although you will not win everytime...you will win more than you lose...Hence why the built an oasis in the desert with all public money
I love coming on these forums...reading every page and every entry and who to pick...and going against it......The Giants will not win this game....Bears will find away to get it done just like they did against the 70% backed GB Packers.....To me capping these games has nothing to do with the players on the teams....all you have to do is go against the public and although you will not win everytime...you will win more than you lose...Hence why the built an oasis in the desert with all public money
If you want to know who the public is,all everyone on covers has to do is look into a mirror,we are the public.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JohnQ10:
I love coming on these forums...reading every page and every entry and who to pick...and going against it......The Giants will not win this game....Bears will find away to get it done just like they did against the 70% backed GB Packers.....To me capping these games has nothing to do with the players on the teams....all you have to do is go against the public and although you will not win everytime...you will win more than you lose...Hence why the built an oasis in the desert with all public money
If you want to know who the public is,all everyone on covers has to do is look into a mirror,we are the public.
im a huge giants fan (hence the avatar) and im leaning toward taking the bears moneyline at +170.
this year's team does not have the heart that they usually have to win games especially at home where they normally play like sh*t. i turned down many tickets for this game bc i didnt wanna pay to watch them get smoked at home.
take the bears with the points at least otherwise ML is the way to go.
0
im a huge giants fan (hence the avatar) and im leaning toward taking the bears moneyline at +170.
this year's team does not have the heart that they usually have to win games especially at home where they normally play like sh*t. i turned down many tickets for this game bc i didnt wanna pay to watch them get smoked at home.
take the bears with the points at least otherwise ML is the way to go.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.