Hey Guys...Tim Tebow Still Sucks

The point I'm making is that, if your opponent has a good enough offense to score on Denver's defense, the game won't be close enough for Tebow to win.

Tebow CANNOT win a game in a shootout. The defense is HIS savior. If the game is close...he can do what he does on the final drive. If he faces an offense that will score 3 TDs in a half...he won't be able to drive his team to a win unless McGehee does all the work like he did against Oakland.

I see you guys are clearly annoyed that I'm actually fighting this with intellecutal responses which is why all you guys have to say now is "just admit you're wrong".

And, once again, I'll admit that I'm wrong IF he beats the Bears AND Patriots. If he doesn't do that...than he's not "WINNING" against good teams.

Winning games is different when the competition gets better.

I don't get what you're saying.

Those 6 quarterbacks were 6 of the best quarterbacks going into this season and they have won 9 of the last 10 superbowls. The only other team to have won in that span was the 2002 Bucs who had one of the better defenses of all time.

Brilliant response. You certainly cleared everything up.

Quote Originally Posted by HawaiianWarrior:

It's critics like you that drives the kid........It's all good cuz TEBOW backers are making money.....And in this game that my friend is what it's all about.....

Congrats to everyone who has made money on him. That's not what I am arguing.

It's official. I just keep repeating myself. It's irrelevant at this point because only after the Bears and Patriots game will my point be made.

So I won't be posting here until than unless I feel it's necessary.

This will give Tebow's Cult time to figure out how to fight back after a few L's.

You keep arguing about sample size.

So if he wins those games he is great but if he loses, he sucks?

Good/great quarterbacks lose games too ya know.

I also have seen nothing even close to intellectual from you this entire thread.

I noticed how you skipped this question.

You claim Denver is mostly winning games because of their runningbacks and Defense. Why couldn't those same players win with Kyle Orton?

Maybe because McGahee had to shed off some rust after coming off his lowest carry attempt season of his career as a strict backup.

Maybe because Elivs Dumervil started the season hurt and DJ Williams missed his first 2 games.

Maybe because Eric Decker had a hang-nail for the first few weeks.

Maybe because Matt Prater didn't get enough sleep.

Maybe because Brian Dawkins stubbed his toe.

...I really hope your 61,812 previous posts were not as TERRIBLE as this one.

So you think that Dumervil and Williams being hurt had nothing to do with the defense starting the season poorly?

You must not know too much about football other than what you hear on ESPN I guess.

I don't watch ESPN.

Those players being hurt for 2 weeks didn't affect the Broncos sucking for 6 or 7 weeks.

Orton also had the option of handing to Moreno or Mcgahee.

Remember when Tebow won and his only back was Ball?

No prob not, because that would hurt your point so you choose not to acknowledge that

Lol.

Josh McDaniels traded up to draft Tebow in the first round.

My guess is he went like 22nd or 23rd pick, but thats a guess off the top of my head.

He was DEFINITELY a first round draft pick.

Of course it did. If you don't have a threat like Dumervil to rush the QB...they'll score all over you. Why don't you make a thread saying Dumervil's injury meant nothing to the Broncos' defense starting slow and see how much heat YOU get.

And yes...that game when Ball was his only back...Ball had almost more rushing yards than Tebow had total yards. That was against the Chiefs.

And the game when it was Ball/Moreno...he lost to the Lions.

Keep digging yourself a hole.