I think you have to take the stale greenbay line unless I was trying for first place, I had a situation in 2010 I was in top 10 and I went against a few of the terrible lines in week 17, minny line was off that was the snow game the week before so they had a terrible minny number vs Detroit. I pushed and should of won and gained nothing. Unless I was a game or 1.5 back would I not take the greenbay line it looks like a winner 7.5 swing is probably good. I realized when I did it in 2010 it was a mistake, I should of not played the game, either way it didn't work out, horrible 3 weeks for me sitting at 46 pts with gb seattle dallas patriots and san diego.
0
I think you have to take the stale greenbay line unless I was trying for first place, I had a situation in 2010 I was in top 10 and I went against a few of the terrible lines in week 17, minny line was off that was the snow game the week before so they had a terrible minny number vs Detroit. I pushed and should of won and gained nothing. Unless I was a game or 1.5 back would I not take the greenbay line it looks like a winner 7.5 swing is probably good. I realized when I did it in 2010 it was a mistake, I should of not played the game, either way it didn't work out, horrible 3 weeks for me sitting at 46 pts with gb seattle dallas patriots and san diego.
did a interview with the wallstreet journal and took some photos today with bruce gilden for a story on the supercontest, should be pretty cool comes out in a couple of weeks.
0
did a interview with the wallstreet journal and took some photos today with bruce gilden for a story on the supercontest, should be pretty cool comes out in a couple of weeks.
I think you have to take the stale greenbay line unless I was trying for first place, I had a situation in 2010 I was in top 10 and I went against a few of the terrible lines in week 17, minny line was off that was the snow game the week before so they had a terrible minny number vs Detroit. I pushed and should of won and gained nothing. Unless I was a game or 1.5 back would I not take the greenbay line it looks like a winner 7.5 swing is probably good. I realized when I did it in 2010 it was a mistake, I should of not played the game, either way it didn't work out, horrible 3 weeks for me sitting at 46 pts with gb seattle dallas patriots and san diego.
I did not take GB for the same reason I didn't bet Pittsburgh last week. I need more games. I need to extend the season.
I am 4 points out of first - and by not taking GB - I essentially have 6 games this week instead of 5. Yes - the shitty bears -4.5 are my 6th game - but I do have 6 games to make up ground on the leaders.
It only matters if the Packers cover 4.5 AND my last of my 5 games loses. Last week - I would have eliminated the Jets to take the Steelers - so it had no impact on me.
This week I would have eliminated the Titans -7.
Hopefully, the shitty bears and shitty jay cutler come to play.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by roastedpeanuts:
I think you have to take the stale greenbay line unless I was trying for first place, I had a situation in 2010 I was in top 10 and I went against a few of the terrible lines in week 17, minny line was off that was the snow game the week before so they had a terrible minny number vs Detroit. I pushed and should of won and gained nothing. Unless I was a game or 1.5 back would I not take the greenbay line it looks like a winner 7.5 swing is probably good. I realized when I did it in 2010 it was a mistake, I should of not played the game, either way it didn't work out, horrible 3 weeks for me sitting at 46 pts with gb seattle dallas patriots and san diego.
I did not take GB for the same reason I didn't bet Pittsburgh last week. I need more games. I need to extend the season.
I am 4 points out of first - and by not taking GB - I essentially have 6 games this week instead of 5. Yes - the shitty bears -4.5 are my 6th game - but I do have 6 games to make up ground on the leaders.
It only matters if the Packers cover 4.5 AND my last of my 5 games loses. Last week - I would have eliminated the Jets to take the Steelers - so it had no impact on me.
This week I would have eliminated the Titans -7.
Hopefully, the shitty bears and shitty jay cutler come to play.
did a interview with the wallstreet journal and took some photos today with bruce gilden for a story on the supercontest, should be pretty cool comes out in a couple of weeks.
Link it for us when it comes out.
GL today. Great season.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by roastedpeanuts:
did a interview with the wallstreet journal and took some photos today with bruce gilden for a story on the supercontest, should be pretty cool comes out in a couple of weeks.
Thanks everyone else for the kind words and well wishes.
Its a big day today.
After calculations - I do have paths to win the whole thing. I was worried that I would be mathematically eliminated - but I do have some paths - even slim - but I do have a chance.
So GL everyone today.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Thanks everyone else for the kind words and well wishes.
Its a big day today.
After calculations - I do have paths to win the whole thing. I was worried that I would be mathematically eliminated - but I do have some paths - even slim - but I do have a chance.
Wow, this is the first I saw this thread. Congrats on being in contention If you don't mind, which one are you in the standings? I'm sure it is posted somewhere in the thread, but don't want to go back through every post to find it.
0
Wow, this is the first I saw this thread. Congrats on being in contention If you don't mind, which one are you in the standings? I'm sure it is posted somewhere in the thread, but don't want to go back through every post to find it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
