I like them all except for Oakland. Good point in the rare reverse cross country home/away east/west vortex that I'm not sure I've ever seen before, but this is a game that I just feel like the Bucs come out and make a statement with to show that they are a playoff team going forward. Plus I have a little giveaway/takeaway system I've been doing for years during weeks 5-10 or so, and TB was one fumble recovery or INT from being in my "system," so I'm really feeling TB this week.
GL this week man!
0
Good stuff, Suuma.
I like them all except for Oakland. Good point in the rare reverse cross country home/away east/west vortex that I'm not sure I've ever seen before, but this is a game that I just feel like the Bucs come out and make a statement with to show that they are a playoff team going forward. Plus I have a little giveaway/takeaway system I've been doing for years during weeks 5-10 or so, and TB was one fumble recovery or INT from being in my "system," so I'm really feeling TB this week.
The Redskins try an equal approach, but Marvin Lewis got instructions from Todd Bowles, about how to manage the London trip. Todd Bowles absolutely mastered the London trip last year. He was in touch with doctors and sleep experts. The Bengals depart on Thursday evening and Lewis cancelled Wi-Fi, movies and snacks. Bengals players get one big meal and then will have to sleep to make the flight a normal night. When they land Friday morning, they gonna practice like its just another day in the US.
On such a travel week, you want your roster as healthy as possible. The Redskins will be missing three key players: Josh Norman, Trent Williams & Brandon Scherff. All three are a long shot to play this week. Trent Williams has made four consecutive Pro Bowls. He graded out as the 2nd-best tackle by PFF this season (take it with a grain of salt). To miss an elite blind side tackle is bad for every QB in the league, but even more for a QB who isn't good under pressure - Kirk Cousins. Brandon Scherff graded out as the 6th-best guard thus far. This OL has really been gelling this year, it's just bad for Kirk Cousins to be without two of them. Also Jordan Reed is not yet cleared. He could miss another game. Maybe its best for the Redskins to get those players healthy over the bye week.
Bengals offense finally got Eifert back, even though on a limited count. he will see more action this week. The Dalton/Green connection is on fire and now they have their red zone target back. The only real bad matchup for the Bengals is RT Cedric Ogbuehi vs. Ryan Kerrigan. I think they will figure something out, maybe add a RB as an extra blocker often. Cincy have been moving the ball well the past few weeks. The Skins defense is bad and without Norman, I think the Bengals will put up 24+ points easily.
Strong leans: Bengals & Over
0
Redskins @ Bengals
The Redskins try an equal approach, but Marvin Lewis got instructions from Todd Bowles, about how to manage the London trip. Todd Bowles absolutely mastered the London trip last year. He was in touch with doctors and sleep experts. The Bengals depart on Thursday evening and Lewis cancelled Wi-Fi, movies and snacks. Bengals players get one big meal and then will have to sleep to make the flight a normal night. When they land Friday morning, they gonna practice like its just another day in the US.
On such a travel week, you want your roster as healthy as possible. The Redskins will be missing three key players: Josh Norman, Trent Williams & Brandon Scherff. All three are a long shot to play this week. Trent Williams has made four consecutive Pro Bowls. He graded out as the 2nd-best tackle by PFF this season (take it with a grain of salt). To miss an elite blind side tackle is bad for every QB in the league, but even more for a QB who isn't good under pressure - Kirk Cousins. Brandon Scherff graded out as the 6th-best guard thus far. This OL has really been gelling this year, it's just bad for Kirk Cousins to be without two of them. Also Jordan Reed is not yet cleared. He could miss another game. Maybe its best for the Redskins to get those players healthy over the bye week.
Bengals offense finally got Eifert back, even though on a limited count. he will see more action this week. The Dalton/Green connection is on fire and now they have their red zone target back. The only real bad matchup for the Bengals is RT Cedric Ogbuehi vs. Ryan Kerrigan. I think they will figure something out, maybe add a RB as an extra blocker often. Cincy have been moving the ball well the past few weeks. The Skins defense is bad and without Norman, I think the Bengals will put up 24+ points easily.
its for sure trent, brandon sherff and norman are out?
I said 'long shot'. I don't lock anything in before final news. From what I've read, it seems so. Trent Williams couldn't walk alone on Sunday, Norman entered the concussion protocol and needs to be cleared before departing to London, same as Reed. Scherff sounds like 50/50.
0
Quote Originally Posted by usikbasterd:
its for sure trent, brandon sherff and norman are out?
I said 'long shot'. I don't lock anything in before final news. From what I've read, it seems so. Trent Williams couldn't walk alone on Sunday, Norman entered the concussion protocol and needs to be cleared before departing to London, same as Reed. Scherff sounds like 50/50.
1.Jaguars
had a players/coaches/owner meeting. These meetings normally set up a
motivation boost for the first game afterwards. Just like
Bills vs. Cards in week 3.
2.2. Jaguars
have a decent defense, much better against the pass than against the
run though. The Titans have one of the worst first down
offenses. They create new first downs on first downs at the fewest rate
in the league, by far. They played several bottom-10 first down
defenses: CLE, IND, DET, OAK etc. JAX rank 14. MIN rank 3 and Titans
didn’t do much on offense. JAX have a top-10 pass D
by metrics. They can shut down that funny WR corps and stack the box
like CLE did. They held Murray to 3 yards per carry. CLE really could
have won that game. They shut down the running game but gave up one huge
run to Mariota and two long bombs to Kendall
Wright when I remember right. JAX have a much better secondary to go
man-to-man.
3.3. Mularkey laying 3.5 ? Come on.
4.Titans
are without Rashad Johnson and Perrish Cox. If they don’t get enough
pressure on Bortles, Robinson and Allen could finally have
a decent game
0
Jaguars +3.5 -110
Some quick thoughts:
1.Jaguars
had a players/coaches/owner meeting. These meetings normally set up a
motivation boost for the first game afterwards. Just like
Bills vs. Cards in week 3.
2.2. Jaguars
have a decent defense, much better against the pass than against the
run though. The Titans have one of the worst first down
offenses. They create new first downs on first downs at the fewest rate
in the league, by far. They played several bottom-10 first down
defenses: CLE, IND, DET, OAK etc. JAX rank 14. MIN rank 3 and Titans
didn’t do much on offense. JAX have a top-10 pass D
by metrics. They can shut down that funny WR corps and stack the box
like CLE did. They held Murray to 3 yards per carry. CLE really could
have won that game. They shut down the running game but gave up one huge
run to Mariota and two long bombs to Kendall
Wright when I remember right. JAX have a much better secondary to go
man-to-man.
3.3. Mularkey laying 3.5 ? Come on.
4.Titans
are without Rashad Johnson and Perrish Cox. If they don’t get enough
pressure on Bortles, Robinson and Allen could finally have
a decent game
1.Jaguars
had a players/coaches/owner meeting. These meetings normally set up a
motivation boost for the first game afterwards. Just like
Bills vs. Cards in week 3.
2.2. Jaguars
have a decent defense, much better against the pass than against the
run though. The Titans have one of the worst first down
offenses. They create new first downs on first downs at the fewest rate
in the league, by far. They played several bottom-10 first down
defenses: CLE, IND, DET, OAK etc. JAX rank 14. MIN rank 3 and Titans
didn’t do much on offense. JAX have a top-10 pass D
by metrics. They can shut down that funny WR corps and stack the box
like CLE did. They held Murray to 3 yards per carry. CLE really could
have won that game. They shut down the running game but gave up one huge
run to Mariota and two long bombs to Kendall
Wright when I remember right. JAX have a much better secondary to go
man-to-man.
3.3. Mularkey laying 3.5 ? Come on.
4.Titans
are without Rashad Johnson and Perrish Cox. If they don’t get enough
pressure on Bortles, Robinson and Allen could finally have
a decent game
Robinson and Allen are the same person, correct?
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Jaguars +3.5 -110
Some quick thoughts:
1.Jaguars
had a players/coaches/owner meeting. These meetings normally set up a
motivation boost for the first game afterwards. Just like
Bills vs. Cards in week 3.
2.2. Jaguars
have a decent defense, much better against the pass than against the
run though. The Titans have one of the worst first down
offenses. They create new first downs on first downs at the fewest rate
in the league, by far. They played several bottom-10 first down
defenses: CLE, IND, DET, OAK etc. JAX rank 14. MIN rank 3 and Titans
didn’t do much on offense. JAX have a top-10 pass D
by metrics. They can shut down that funny WR corps and stack the box
like CLE did. They held Murray to 3 yards per carry. CLE really could
have won that game. They shut down the running game but gave up one huge
run to Mariota and two long bombs to Kendall
Wright when I remember right. JAX have a much better secondary to go
man-to-man.
3.3. Mularkey laying 3.5 ? Come on.
4.Titans
are without Rashad Johnson and Perrish Cox. If they don’t get enough
pressure on Bortles, Robinson and Allen could finally have
a decent game
I said 'long shot'. I don't lock anything in before final news. From what I've read, it seems so. Trent Williams couldn't walk alone on Sunday, Norman entered the concussion protocol and needs to be cleared before departing to London, same as Reed. Scherff sounds like 50/50.
reed and norman traveled with the team to london
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I said 'long shot'. I don't lock anything in before final news. From what I've read, it seems so. Trent Williams couldn't walk alone on Sunday, Norman entered the concussion protocol and needs to be cleared before departing to London, same as Reed. Scherff sounds like 50/50.
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I love the Chargers as a Football team and they are going to finish 10-6 ATS or better, but this is a classic buy low / sell high spot for them.
In the first game two weeks ago, SD was an automatic play at +3.5 at home. Let's recap the situation then:
-Kubiak wasn't coaching the team all week and didn't make the trip to San Diego -Denver had to travel on a short week -Trevor Siemian was suffering from his shoulder injury -Hunter Henry had a good game
This time:
-Kubiak is with the team -Denver stays at home -San Diego are traveling b2b off an overtime comeback win from being down by 17 at some point -Siemian is healthy -Hunter Henry probably won't play
Last time the line indicated the Broncos would be -10 at home. That was garbage. Now they are laying only 4.5. Broncos have an HFA or 4 points in my opinion, so it's basically PK on a neutral. Leaning the Broncos in this spot.
0
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I love the Chargers as a Football team and they are going to finish 10-6 ATS or better, but this is a classic buy low / sell high spot for them.
In the first game two weeks ago, SD was an automatic play at +3.5 at home. Let's recap the situation then:
-Kubiak wasn't coaching the team all week and didn't make the trip to San Diego -Denver had to travel on a short week -Trevor Siemian was suffering from his shoulder injury -Hunter Henry had a good game
This time:
-Kubiak is with the team -Denver stays at home -San Diego are traveling b2b off an overtime comeback win from being down by 17 at some point -Siemian is healthy -Hunter Henry probably won't play
Last time the line indicated the Broncos would be -10 at home. That was garbage. Now they are laying only 4.5. Broncos have an HFA or 4 points in my opinion, so it's basically PK on a neutral. Leaning the Broncos in this spot.
i'm on the Pats too. only thing that worries me a bit is Rex Ryan has somehow find ways to cover as a home dogs last year with the Bills and during his time with the Jets. but i don't see how the Pats can't win at least by a TD with McCoy banged up my guess is he probably isn't going to suit up
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
GL Suuma
i'm on the Pats too. only thing that worries me a bit is Rex Ryan has somehow find ways to cover as a home dogs last year with the Bills and during his time with the Jets. but i don't see how the Pats can't win at least by a TD with McCoy banged up my guess is he probably isn't going to suit up
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
0
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
injuries are overrated and the lines considers them. Buy bad news, sell good news.
0
Quote Originally Posted by richwins81:
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
injuries are overrated and the lines considers them. Buy bad news, sell good news.
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
I think injuries in general are overrated, because good coaches know how to compensate. I always look at key injuries that affect a team's play in regard to the gameplan against the opposing side.
I think Booker will be fine, I don't really care about Anderson. In fact, Booker had a better run DVOA this year. Hunter Henry is a plus for Denver, no doubt. I digged a little into the Denver defense:
The Chargers game was the only game in which Denver gave up a significant stat line to TEs. So was it just an outliner? Henry scored the only TE TD on Denver this year. If I reduce their avg defense against TEs by the SD game, this is what they have been allowing to opposing TEs per game:
0 TD, 3.9 rec, 6.3 targets 39.9 yards
So my question is, will a matured defense like Denver with a great DC get busted twice by SD's TEs? I would tend to believe they will be better prepared this time than last time on a short week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by richwins81:
SUUMA - How about CJ Anderson not playing? Does this affect your view on Denver? Also, Hunter Henry is playing... How does this affect your view on Denver?
I am in a survival league and am leery on Denver... Think Dallas may be a better pick.
I think injuries in general are overrated, because good coaches know how to compensate. I always look at key injuries that affect a team's play in regard to the gameplan against the opposing side.
I think Booker will be fine, I don't really care about Anderson. In fact, Booker had a better run DVOA this year. Hunter Henry is a plus for Denver, no doubt. I digged a little into the Denver defense:
The Chargers game was the only game in which Denver gave up a significant stat line to TEs. So was it just an outliner? Henry scored the only TE TD on Denver this year. If I reduce their avg defense against TEs by the SD game, this is what they have been allowing to opposing TEs per game:
0 TD, 3.9 rec, 6.3 targets 39.9 yards
So my question is, will a matured defense like Denver with a great DC get busted twice by SD's TEs? I would tend to believe they will be better prepared this time than last time on a short week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.