Seahawks played five full quarters on SNF at Arizona. Their defense was on the field for 46 minutes and 21 seconds, which is a new NFL record. They were on the field for 90 defensive plays. Sherman couldn't walk without help after the game. Now they travel back to Seattle and will travel to NO next week to across two time zones and play an early east game at 11.00 AM their body clock time against a MUCH better offense than Arizona has along with a much better offensive line.
If this isn't enough for you, let me blow you away with this small sample-sized trend:
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
The Saints barely lost at KC, a tough venue to play in. They actually outgained the Chiefs by 0.2 per play on the road. 0-2 on turnovers were the key to success - Chiefs had a pick six off a tipped ball that was precisely thrown by Brees. The Saints are averaging 36 PPG in three home games now playing against a banged up Seattle defense and an OL that is an absolute mess. I see the Saints setting the tone on offense.
Cardinals / Panthers
I've circled this game as a classic playoff revenge spot for the Cards back in July, but the new circumstances make me go with the Panthers in this one. First of all, the tie trend also applies for the Cardinals. Secondly, the Panthers come into this game off their bye (!) week, sitting at 1-5. If they lose this game, their season will be over and more importantly, they finally lose their standing as a strong NFC team. If this team has any pride, they will go all in on this one. The bye week should have helped to get their heads clear.
Teams off their bye week playing vs. a team off an overtime game are 34-15 SU. Line opened at -2.5, gonna watch line movement.
Packers / Falcons
Packers off 9+ days off rest and Falcons off overtime game and have TNF vs. TB (triple revenge) on deck. Teams off 9+ rest vs teams off overtime game from the Sunday before are 46-17 SU & 38-23 ATS. As dogs, these teams are 21-5 ATS. This trend also applies to the Panthers.
Waiting for +3 at solid juice.
Raiders / Bucs
Very interesting. Raiders are on b2b road games, but their situation is much better than TB's. The Raiders stay at Central Florida and don't travel back home while the Bucs just come back from their west coast trip. No body clock issues for the Raiders. Also, pacific teams playing b2b east coast games are 21-6 ATS since 1989 and 7-1 ATS since 2002. Matchup-wise, I honestly don't see how the Bucs defense is going to stop this Raiders offense.
Line opened at +1 and is on his way up. Could be a sweet ML play.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Saints +3.5 -110 (2u)
Seahawks / Saints
Seahawks played five full quarters on SNF at Arizona. Their defense was on the field for 46 minutes and 21 seconds, which is a new NFL record. They were on the field for 90 defensive plays. Sherman couldn't walk without help after the game. Now they travel back to Seattle and will travel to NO next week to across two time zones and play an early east game at 11.00 AM their body clock time against a MUCH better offense than Arizona has along with a much better offensive line.
If this isn't enough for you, let me blow you away with this small sample-sized trend:
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
The Saints barely lost at KC, a tough venue to play in. They actually outgained the Chiefs by 0.2 per play on the road. 0-2 on turnovers were the key to success - Chiefs had a pick six off a tipped ball that was precisely thrown by Brees. The Saints are averaging 36 PPG in three home games now playing against a banged up Seattle defense and an OL that is an absolute mess. I see the Saints setting the tone on offense.
Cardinals / Panthers
I've circled this game as a classic playoff revenge spot for the Cards back in July, but the new circumstances make me go with the Panthers in this one. First of all, the tie trend also applies for the Cardinals. Secondly, the Panthers come into this game off their bye (!) week, sitting at 1-5. If they lose this game, their season will be over and more importantly, they finally lose their standing as a strong NFC team. If this team has any pride, they will go all in on this one. The bye week should have helped to get their heads clear.
Teams off their bye week playing vs. a team off an overtime game are 34-15 SU. Line opened at -2.5, gonna watch line movement.
Packers / Falcons
Packers off 9+ days off rest and Falcons off overtime game and have TNF vs. TB (triple revenge) on deck. Teams off 9+ rest vs teams off overtime game from the Sunday before are 46-17 SU & 38-23 ATS. As dogs, these teams are 21-5 ATS. This trend also applies to the Panthers.
Waiting for +3 at solid juice.
Raiders / Bucs
Very interesting. Raiders are on b2b road games, but their situation is much better than TB's. The Raiders stay at Central Florida and don't travel back home while the Bucs just come back from their west coast trip. No body clock issues for the Raiders. Also, pacific teams playing b2b east coast games are 21-6 ATS since 1989 and 7-1 ATS since 2002. Matchup-wise, I honestly don't see how the Bucs defense is going to stop this Raiders offense.
Line opened at +1 and is on his way up. Could be a sweet ML play.
I like the over in the Bills/Patriots game and the over in the Raiders/Bucs game. Like your point about the Seahawks/Saints and i'm leaning Saints. Even if Seattle gets some stops and a couple turnovers can their offense score enough?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
I like the over in the Bills/Patriots game and the over in the Raiders/Bucs game. Like your point about the Seahawks/Saints and i'm leaning Saints. Even if Seattle gets some stops and a couple turnovers can their offense score enough?
The Seahawks offense should be fresh though right? For being on the field for seemingly 5 minutes? And Saints don't have the defensive talent of Arizona to expose that horrible offensive line. But you make a lot of good points in your write up. Going to look long and hard at that one. Thanks for the post, great read!
0
The Seahawks offense should be fresh though right? For being on the field for seemingly 5 minutes? And Saints don't have the defensive talent of Arizona to expose that horrible offensive line. But you make a lot of good points in your write up. Going to look long and hard at that one. Thanks for the post, great read!
I have a small disagreement on the Cards. You had the game circled for a reason and it should stay circled Suuma. Add in the deflating tie yesterday which will make Ariens a slave driver this week. You're trading this is for a team going all in at 1-4 (and not a good one) against one that is 3-3-1 and still very much alive to win their division. That's a very tough trade-off Suuma. Disagreement aside, the info is great.
0
Seahawks info is tremendous.
I have a small disagreement on the Cards. You had the game circled for a reason and it should stay circled Suuma. Add in the deflating tie yesterday which will make Ariens a slave driver this week. You're trading this is for a team going all in at 1-4 (and not a good one) against one that is 3-3-1 and still very much alive to win their division. That's a very tough trade-off Suuma. Disagreement aside, the info is great.
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
This is a really dumb stat because if either of those field goal kickers last night made their little chip shot field goal you wouldn't have this stat here
You can't distinguish what stats mean something and garbage ridicuoulus stats that have nothing to do with anything
0
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
This is a really dumb stat because if either of those field goal kickers last night made their little chip shot field goal you wouldn't have this stat here
You can't distinguish what stats mean something and garbage ridicuoulus stats that have nothing to do with anything
To me Saints are the best one, laying pts on road, Saints should of won this past week, turnovers killed them. See a high scoring game 30-27 Saints win.
0
To me Saints are the best one, laying pts on road, Saints should of won this past week, turnovers killed them. See a high scoring game 30-27 Saints win.
Raiders 4-0 on road, Tampa is def good enough to put up 30 on Oakland, I have a small lean on Tampa as of today, Atl loses and Tampa wins, tampa in first place, extra motivation.
0
Raiders 4-0 on road, Tampa is def good enough to put up 30 on Oakland, I have a small lean on Tampa as of today, Atl loses and Tampa wins, tampa in first place, extra motivation.
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
This is a really dumb stat because if either of those field goal kickers last night made their little chip shot field goal you wouldn't have this stat here
You can't distinguish what stats mean something and garbage ridicuoulus stats that have nothing to do with anything
Not quite sure how these two relate...
That stat remains that stat, regardless of the outcome last night.....(it's a small sample size....but it still doesn't change anything).
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrScampy:
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
This is a really dumb stat because if either of those field goal kickers last night made their little chip shot field goal you wouldn't have this stat here
You can't distinguish what stats mean something and garbage ridicuoulus stats that have nothing to do with anything
Not quite sure how these two relate...
That stat remains that stat, regardless of the outcome last night.....(it's a small sample size....but it still doesn't change anything).
If you want to play against Seattle you site the fact they could only convert 3 out of 14 on 3rd down and were shut out till the 4th quarter and never scored a TD
All that's more important than the fact the final score of a game ended in a tie that means nothing
You really should think before you put these dumb stats out there that don't mean anything , you do it every week
0
If you want to play against Seattle you site the fact they could only convert 3 out of 14 on 3rd down and were shut out till the 4th quarter and never scored a TD
All that's more important than the fact the final score of a game ended in a tie that means nothing
You really should think before you put these dumb stats out there that don't mean anything , you do it every week
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
This is a really dumb stat because if either of those field goal kickers last night made their little chip shot field goal you wouldn't have this stat here
You can't distinguish what stats mean something and garbage ridicuoulus stats that have nothing to do with anything
Can someone please ban this MysticRich clown again?
Last response to you because I dont want that anyone gets this trend wrong:
You don't understand the logic. A tie means that this game went 5 FULL quarters and didnt stop after a short TD drive in OT.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrScampy:
Road teams off a tie are 0-7 SUATS, losing by 19.3 PPG
This is a really dumb stat because if either of those field goal kickers last night made their little chip shot field goal you wouldn't have this stat here
You can't distinguish what stats mean something and garbage ridicuoulus stats that have nothing to do with anything
Can someone please ban this MysticRich clown again?
Last response to you because I dont want that anyone gets this trend wrong:
You don't understand the logic. A tie means that this game went 5 FULL quarters and didnt stop after a short TD drive in OT.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.