Although I use the "Gambler's fallacy" myself, we both know that in reality, you shouldn't use it because no event is ever "due." And when we win, it wasn't due to the theory, other factors came into play that we don't know of. If you don't know what the "Gambler's fallacy" is, according to wikipedia:
"Perhaps the most famous example of the gambler's fallacy occurred in a game of at the on August 18, 1913, when the ball fell in black 26 times in a row. This was an extremely uncommon occurrence, with a probability of around 1 in 136.8 million. Gamblers lost millions of francs betting against black, reasoning incorrectly that the streak was causing an imbalance in the randomness of the wheel, and that it had to be followed by a long streak of red.
Although I use the "Gambler's fallacy" myself, we both know that in reality, you shouldn't use it because no event is ever "due." And when we win, it wasn't due to the theory, other factors came into play that we don't know of. If you don't know what the "Gambler's fallacy" is, according to wikipedia:
"Perhaps the most famous example of the gambler's fallacy occurred in a game of at the on August 18, 1913, when the ball fell in black 26 times in a row. This was an extremely uncommon occurrence, with a probability of around 1 in 136.8 million. Gamblers lost millions of francs betting against black, reasoning incorrectly that the streak was causing an imbalance in the randomness of the wheel, and that it had to be followed by a long streak of red.
The point I was trying to make is that in the world of probability, the Browns can lose consecutively for an indefinite amount of time.. Just something to think about.. Scal, looks like you're trying to use the "due factor" to justify a Brown's win here which is a big no no for our hobby...
The point I was trying to make is that in the world of probability, the Browns can lose consecutively for an indefinite amount of time.. Just something to think about.. Scal, looks like you're trying to use the "due factor" to justify a Brown's win here which is a big no no for our hobby...
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
It it seems too good to be true, and you're speaking of the browns... seek professional help.
This thread is cringeworthy
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
It it seems too good to be true, and you're speaking of the browns... seek professional help.
This thread is cringeworthy
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
It it seems too good to be true, and you're speaking of the browns... seek professional help.
This thread is cringeworthy
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.
It it seems too good to be true, and you're speaking of the browns... seek professional help.
This thread is cringeworthy
Im sure this is and will be one of your favorite wins ever Scal. If you capped this game assuming Tyrod Taylor would be your guy for 4 quarters, you should be on your knees begging to blow Baker Mayfield
Im sure this is and will be one of your favorite wins ever Scal. If you capped this game assuming Tyrod Taylor would be your guy for 4 quarters, you should be on your knees begging to blow Baker Mayfield
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.