"The defensive line is somewhat beat up. Stroud had offseason surgery on his ankle, Hayward is coming off a torn Achilles' tendon, Henderson hurt his shoulder before the last preseason game and Spicer missed most of training camp and the preseason with a back injury."
An improved running game would be a big boost for Harrington, who faced constant pressure against the Vikings. Sacks, though, are not a new problem for Atlanta, which yielded 47 in 2006.
"I'm not overly concerned," said Harrington, who has posted a 53.6 quarterback rating while losing both of his career starts against the Jaguars. "I'm not overly worried, and most importantly I'm not overly bruised."
"The defensive line is somewhat beat up. Stroud had offseason surgery on his ankle, Hayward is coming off a torn Achilles' tendon, Henderson hurt his shoulder before the last preseason game and Spicer missed most of training camp and the preseason with a back injury."
An improved running game would be a big boost for Harrington, who faced constant pressure against the Vikings. Sacks, though, are not a new problem for Atlanta, which yielded 47 in 2006.
"I'm not overly concerned," said Harrington, who has posted a 53.6 quarterback rating while losing both of his career starts against the Jaguars. "I'm not overly worried, and most importantly I'm not overly bruised."
Great work so far everyone ....
I really appreciate the contributions !
This is brainstorming ...I'll try to condense on key points before the weekend ...
Great work so far everyone ....
I really appreciate the contributions !
This is brainstorming ...I'll try to condense on key points before the weekend ...
Why not just parlay STL w/ Over and SF w/ Under? I mean you could lose both but good chance that you make money if one hits as it is a good bet.
Why not just parlay STL w/ Over and SF w/ Under? I mean you could lose both but good chance that you make money if one hits as it is a good bet.
Why not just parlay STL w/ Over and SF w/ Under? I mean you could lose both but good chance that you make money if one hits as it is a good bet.
that is about the most ignorant thing ive ever heard
Why not just parlay STL w/ Over and SF w/ Under? I mean you could lose both but good chance that you make money if one hits as it is a good bet.
that is about the most ignorant thing ive ever heard
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in road games when playing with 6 or less days rest over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 7-0 ATS in September games over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in road games when playing with 6 or less days rest over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 7-0 ATS in September games over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points over the last 3 seasons. |
Why not just parlay STL w/ Over and SF w/ Under? I mean you could lose both but good chance that you make money if one hits as it is a good bet.
Well, the "could lose both" part is why.
That would also be akin to hedging a bet and if I put my hard earned money on something (not to mention the time, energy, number crunching, mental strain, etc.) then it is only because I have confidence in the bet. If I have confidence and made the bet for good and logical reason, why would I "protect" that bet? If you have enough doubt to look for a way to hedge, don't lay the bet in the first place.
Lastly, even if I did parlay both and hit one of them, I make half the money as if I just make the right call to begin with.
What I would do if I had a very strong lean on a side or a total, is place that bet and then likely put 1/2 unit or something on the side or over/under that coincides with the trend above (i.e. if I LOVED the niners then I would also lay a little on the under........if i loved the over, i would lay a little on the Rams, etc.).
Great thread---nice work once again Roberto
Why not just parlay STL w/ Over and SF w/ Under? I mean you could lose both but good chance that you make money if one hits as it is a good bet.
Well, the "could lose both" part is why.
That would also be akin to hedging a bet and if I put my hard earned money on something (not to mention the time, energy, number crunching, mental strain, etc.) then it is only because I have confidence in the bet. If I have confidence and made the bet for good and logical reason, why would I "protect" that bet? If you have enough doubt to look for a way to hedge, don't lay the bet in the first place.
Lastly, even if I did parlay both and hit one of them, I make half the money as if I just make the right call to begin with.
What I would do if I had a very strong lean on a side or a total, is place that bet and then likely put 1/2 unit or something on the side or over/under that coincides with the trend above (i.e. if I LOVED the niners then I would also lay a little on the under........if i loved the over, i would lay a little on the Rams, etc.).
Great thread---nice work once again Roberto
San Diego at New England
The Chargers are 1-0 vs. the spread overall this season and were 4-4 against the number on the road last season. …
San Diego is 12-1-2 against the spread in its last 15 games as a dog and has covered its last four night contests. …
The Chargers are 9-0-2 vs. the number in their last 11 games as a road dog and have covered their last seven contests as a road dog of between 3.5 and seven points. …
San Diego is 32-14-3 vs. the spread in its last 49 regular-season games. …
The Patriots are 1-0 against the number overall this season and were 3-5-1 against the spread at home last season. …
New England has covered its last four regular-season games, and six of its last eight regular-season home contests have stayed under the total. …
he Patriots have covered one of their last five night games, including playoffs, but are 6-1-1 against the spread in their last eight games following a double-digit victory, including playoffs.
San Diego at New England
The Chargers are 1-0 vs. the spread overall this season and were 4-4 against the number on the road last season. …
San Diego is 12-1-2 against the spread in its last 15 games as a dog and has covered its last four night contests. …
The Chargers are 9-0-2 vs. the number in their last 11 games as a road dog and have covered their last seven contests as a road dog of between 3.5 and seven points. …
San Diego is 32-14-3 vs. the spread in its last 49 regular-season games. …
The Patriots are 1-0 against the number overall this season and were 3-5-1 against the spread at home last season. …
New England has covered its last four regular-season games, and six of its last eight regular-season home contests have stayed under the total. …
he Patriots have covered one of their last five night games, including playoffs, but are 6-1-1 against the spread in their last eight games following a double-digit victory, including playoffs.
I can make stuff up too if I wanted too, why don't you try putting some proof of that statement.
YO r-b. the last game to fit tis trend was in 2005 when GB lost to CLEVE outright. save your money chic fan!!
Roberto- you're right I misread and thought you already choce KC as one of your pics.. I'll stay out and just read unless I see something I really think you should consider.. In this case I really think you'd be happy with the result if you took the bears this week. Last season there was a trend for the bears that went, they go 2-0 AST and then 0-1 AST, and that pattern repeated all season. Anyways Goodluck Roberto
I can make stuff up too if I wanted too, why don't you try putting some proof of that statement.
YO r-b. the last game to fit tis trend was in 2005 when GB lost to CLEVE outright. save your money chic fan!!
Roberto- you're right I misread and thought you already choce KC as one of your pics.. I'll stay out and just read unless I see something I really think you should consider.. In this case I really think you'd be happy with the result if you took the bears this week. Last season there was a trend for the bears that went, they go 2-0 AST and then 0-1 AST, and that pattern repeated all season. Anyways Goodluck Roberto
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in road games when playing with 6 or less days rest over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 7-0 ATS in September games over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points over the last 3 seasons. |
Good to see you added this in your thread.
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in road games when playing with 6 or less days rest over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 7-0 ATS in September games over the last 3 seasons. |
CINCINNATI is 9-1 ATS in all games where the total is between 35.5 and 42 points over the last 3 seasons. |
Good to see you added this in your thread.
I would never claim to be anything near Roberto's status, but since I know he is very busy and being asked a lot of specific questions, I figured I would field this one to take some off of RF's shoulders.
This is what I came up with in Regard to Seattle as road fav's.
Since 1996 the Hawks are 11-19-1 as a road favorite. Scale that down to times they have been a road fav of 4 or LESS, they are 8-14-1 ATS.
The last 14 games as a road fav of 3.5 or less, the Hawks are 4-10 ATS
The last 11 as a road fav of 3 or less, the Hawks are 3-8 ATS.
The last 3 as RF AT Arizona, the Hawks are 0-2-1 and both ATS losses were also SU losses. Last year the Hawks went to Arizona in week 14 as a 3.5 road fav and the Cards won straight up 27-21.
I would never claim to be anything near Roberto's status, but since I know he is very busy and being asked a lot of specific questions, I figured I would field this one to take some off of RF's shoulders.
This is what I came up with in Regard to Seattle as road fav's.
Since 1996 the Hawks are 11-19-1 as a road favorite. Scale that down to times they have been a road fav of 4 or LESS, they are 8-14-1 ATS.
The last 14 games as a road fav of 3.5 or less, the Hawks are 4-10 ATS
The last 11 as a road fav of 3 or less, the Hawks are 3-8 ATS.
The last 3 as RF AT Arizona, the Hawks are 0-2-1 and both ATS losses were also SU losses. Last year the Hawks went to Arizona in week 14 as a 3.5 road fav and the Cards won straight up 27-21.
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS Team Trends | |||
ATS | SU | O/U | |
Description | Win-Loss-Push | Win-Loss-Push | Over-Under-Push |
Click on description to see Predictions on next game | Click on records | Click on records | Click on records |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Favourite- With Total between 41.5 and 44 | 18-15-2 | 14-21-0 | 22-12-1 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Favourite- Vs NFC West Division | 6-6-0 | 8-4-0 | 7-5-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- On Grass Surface | 14-20-1 | 18-17-0 | 27-8-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- With a Spread between 0 and 3.5 | 9-15-1 | 13-12-0 | 16-9-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Favourite- With a Spread between 0 and 3.5 | 13-14-3 | 13-17-0 | 18-12-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- With Total between 41.5 and 44 | 17-12-1 | 22-8-0 | 21-9-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Favourite- Vs ARIZONA CARDINALS | 2-3-0 | 2-3-0 | 4-1-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Team- Vs ARIZONA CARDINALS | 3-4-0 | 3-4-0 | 4-3-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Team- in the month of September | 28-16-2 | 23-23-0 | 12-32-2 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- in the month of September | 22-16-2 | 24-16-0 | 14-26-0 |
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS Team Trends | |||
ATS | SU | O/U | |
Description | Win-Loss-Push | Win-Loss-Push | Over-Under-Push |
Click on description to see Predictions on next game | Click on records | Click on records | Click on records |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Favourite- With Total between 41.5 and 44 | 18-15-2 | 14-21-0 | 22-12-1 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Favourite- Vs NFC West Division | 6-6-0 | 8-4-0 | 7-5-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- On Grass Surface | 14-20-1 | 18-17-0 | 27-8-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- With a Spread between 0 and 3.5 | 9-15-1 | 13-12-0 | 16-9-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Favourite- With a Spread between 0 and 3.5 | 13-14-3 | 13-17-0 | 18-12-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- With Total between 41.5 and 44 | 17-12-1 | 22-8-0 | 21-9-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Favourite- Vs ARIZONA CARDINALS | 2-3-0 | 2-3-0 | 4-1-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Team- Vs ARIZONA CARDINALS | 3-4-0 | 3-4-0 | 4-3-0 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Road Team- in the month of September | 28-16-2 | 23-23-0 | 12-32-2 |
When SEATTLE SEAHAWKS played as Home or Away Team- in the month of September | 22-16-2 | 24-16-0 | 14-26-0 |
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.