Went 5-2 last week, posting only on Twitter as I was on a trip to London and didn't have the time. Solid start into Football season, started 9-3 +4.88u in CFB, so 29-18 overall.
On to week five..
PHI -3 -105
Some will say this line is too
high considering it would be more than a TD for PHI at home. But this
team is the real deal and I see them winning this game by more than a FG
at Detroit. Philly is on two weeks rest and
Schwartz had these two weeks to prepare for his old QB. Phillys’ wide-9
causes havoc for most OLs this year and Schwartz can let 7 players drop
into coverage. DET’s OL will be overmatched by PHI’s front four.
Against GB, Stafford was able to exploit a soft
secondary in the "all in mode" because GB was blitzing a lot, but not this time. DET’s
defense has been a bottom-5 one so far, and Wentz & company should
be able to put points on the board. Won’t be another blowout, but I see
an easy Eagles win.
DEN U48 -115
I think this total is too high.
Denver is the first real passing defense the Falcons are facing. Unlike the
Panthers, the Broncos have a good secondary that can play man and will
successfully double-team Julio Jones. Successfully
means that he won’t have another crazy fantasy-esque week. Against the
Broncos, the Falcons will rely heavily on their OL with short passes and
the running game as the Broncos haven't been good at defending the run. Kyle Shanahan won’t give them many opportunities to
create turnovers. Short passes & runs = tick
tack. On the other side the Broncos will probably run a lot against a
soft front seven. If you discount the 14 defensive points vs. the Colts,
no game has gone over 46 total. You can't expect the Broncos to put up 30 points without defensive help. Seeing this as a 21-17/23-20 type of game.
SD +4 -110
One team is 1-3, the other one
is 3-1. The 1-3 team blew 3 huge 4Q-leads, the 3-1 team needed 2
4Q-comebacks. SD could be 4-0, OAK could be 1-3. That’s Football, where
nuances can decide games. I still have SD as
the better team and gladly grab 4 points with them in a game they
absolutely have to win. They will go all in, because their season will
be literally over after a loss. OAK might be a little bit sloppy after
B2B east games and of that 4Q-stunner (they were after that week one miracle). Raiders needed starts deep in Ravens territory to score their points, it was more of a Ravens fail than an actual good performance by Oakland. SD defense
is underrated whereas Rivers shouldn’t struggle moving the ball on
Oakland. Think about that: SD would have covered or pushed a +4 spread
after 60 minutes in all four games.
More throughout the week. BOL to all!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
20-15 +4.05u
Went 5-2 last week, posting only on Twitter as I was on a trip to London and didn't have the time. Solid start into Football season, started 9-3 +4.88u in CFB, so 29-18 overall.
On to week five..
PHI -3 -105
Some will say this line is too
high considering it would be more than a TD for PHI at home. But this
team is the real deal and I see them winning this game by more than a FG
at Detroit. Philly is on two weeks rest and
Schwartz had these two weeks to prepare for his old QB. Phillys’ wide-9
causes havoc for most OLs this year and Schwartz can let 7 players drop
into coverage. DET’s OL will be overmatched by PHI’s front four.
Against GB, Stafford was able to exploit a soft
secondary in the "all in mode" because GB was blitzing a lot, but not this time. DET’s
defense has been a bottom-5 one so far, and Wentz & company should
be able to put points on the board. Won’t be another blowout, but I see
an easy Eagles win.
DEN U48 -115
I think this total is too high.
Denver is the first real passing defense the Falcons are facing. Unlike the
Panthers, the Broncos have a good secondary that can play man and will
successfully double-team Julio Jones. Successfully
means that he won’t have another crazy fantasy-esque week. Against the
Broncos, the Falcons will rely heavily on their OL with short passes and
the running game as the Broncos haven't been good at defending the run. Kyle Shanahan won’t give them many opportunities to
create turnovers. Short passes & runs = tick
tack. On the other side the Broncos will probably run a lot against a
soft front seven. If you discount the 14 defensive points vs. the Colts,
no game has gone over 46 total. You can't expect the Broncos to put up 30 points without defensive help. Seeing this as a 21-17/23-20 type of game.
SD +4 -110
One team is 1-3, the other one
is 3-1. The 1-3 team blew 3 huge 4Q-leads, the 3-1 team needed 2
4Q-comebacks. SD could be 4-0, OAK could be 1-3. That’s Football, where
nuances can decide games. I still have SD as
the better team and gladly grab 4 points with them in a game they
absolutely have to win. They will go all in, because their season will
be literally over after a loss. OAK might be a little bit sloppy after
B2B east games and of that 4Q-stunner (they were after that week one miracle). Raiders needed starts deep in Ravens territory to score their points, it was more of a Ravens fail than an actual good performance by Oakland. SD defense
is underrated whereas Rivers shouldn’t struggle moving the ball on
Oakland. Think about that: SD would have covered or pushed a +4 spread
after 60 minutes in all four games.
The experience at Wembley was great once again, but it was terrible watching these two teams. Luck is completely lost behind this OL and coaching staff. This play-calling might be the worst of the league. Even is receivers weren't reliabel - when he made accurate throws under pressure, those guys dropped it.
Blake Bortles once again showed poor ball placement against a weak defense. This guy is awful.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
suuma
I got it....London, understandably
The experience at Wembley was great once again, but it was terrible watching these two teams. Luck is completely lost behind this OL and coaching staff. This play-calling might be the worst of the league. Even is receivers weren't reliabel - when he made accurate throws under pressure, those guys dropped it.
Blake Bortles once again showed poor ball placement against a weak defense. This guy is awful.
Welcome back, Summa. Always a fine read and good analysis. I can't argue with any of the picks. I personally don't play totals, but like your Denver <48, especially with the Den QB situation up in the air and their very stout D.
0
Welcome back, Summa. Always a fine read and good analysis. I can't argue with any of the picks. I personally don't play totals, but like your Denver <48, especially with the Den QB situation up in the air and their very stout D.
it's being pounded in LV at all books..either this is a gift, or one would assume a so called 'trap' the Lions are terrible, the spread could easily be -6.5 what's up?
look for a fluctuation, I can't even remotely see this line being -2.5 on game day...grab it early
0
suuma,
the line is now PHI-2.5 -vs- DET
it's being pounded in LV at all books..either this is a gift, or one would assume a so called 'trap' the Lions are terrible, the spread could easily be -6.5 what's up?
look for a fluctuation, I can't even remotely see this line being -2.5 on game day...grab it early
it's being pounded in LV at all books..either this is a gift, or one would assume a so called 'trap' the Lions are terrible, the spread could easily be -6.5 what's up?
look for a fluctuation, I can't even remotely see this line being -2.5 on game day...grab it early
Sharps are pounding the +3 home dog, but I don't care. I like my edge with the line being -3. Huge sharp plays were TB, Jets (my two losers), SF & Jags last week. They went 1-3. Sharps don't go 70% on the season, public gets their wins as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
suuma,
the line is now PHI-2.5 -vs- DET
it's being pounded in LV at all books..either this is a gift, or one would assume a so called 'trap' the Lions are terrible, the spread could easily be -6.5 what's up?
look for a fluctuation, I can't even remotely see this line being -2.5 on game day...grab it early
Sharps are pounding the +3 home dog, but I don't care. I like my edge with the line being -3. Huge sharp plays were TB, Jets (my two losers), SF & Jags last week. They went 1-3. Sharps don't go 70% on the season, public gets their wins as well.
yea, PHI line smells fishy here (a bit like the Cincy PK); I'll prolly lock in small bets on both tho early in the week and see what develops in the coming days.
0
yea, PHI line smells fishy here (a bit like the Cincy PK); I'll prolly lock in small bets on both tho early in the week and see what develops in the coming days.
suuma...are you not afraid that 84% is on eagles right now? and the line should be higher??? the same could be said about denver last week at tampa...kind of same situation 2.5spread and about 84% on denver but they still covered...you think the books are gonna hand out another free gift on this game as well?
0
suuma...are you not afraid that 84% is on eagles right now? and the line should be higher??? the same could be said about denver last week at tampa...kind of same situation 2.5spread and about 84% on denver but they still covered...you think the books are gonna hand out another free gift on this game as well?
The record for teams playing their next game on Thursday with rest<5 since 2006:
SU:
131-99-2 ATS:
105-122-5
Simple query. And by the way, I don't play on Denver. I play the total.
O k with the Denver game on the total i missed that
But Your still not getting iwhat i'm saying you took the ATS record with 10 rest after the Thursday game that's always an advantage
i'm talking about how the teams play on the Sunday before the Thursday night game there is no query , you don't have those stats
knowing they have to play in 4 days teams play bad coaches coach bad these team lose SU and ATS
A good example this year was the Miami pats game pats up 33-3 vs Miami patriots know their playing in 4 day they blow spread and just hold on to win game
We are talking the Sunday before Thursday game not after
i've been betting against these teams for years and making money if you did this the last two weeks your 4-0
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
The record for teams playing their next game on Thursday with rest<5 since 2006:
SU:
131-99-2 ATS:
105-122-5
Simple query. And by the way, I don't play on Denver. I play the total.
O k with the Denver game on the total i missed that
But Your still not getting iwhat i'm saying you took the ATS record with 10 rest after the Thursday game that's always an advantage
i'm talking about how the teams play on the Sunday before the Thursday night game there is no query , you don't have those stats
knowing they have to play in 4 days teams play bad coaches coach bad these team lose SU and ATS
A good example this year was the Miami pats game pats up 33-3 vs Miami patriots know their playing in 4 day they blow spread and just hold on to win game
We are talking the Sunday before Thursday game not after
i've been betting against these teams for years and making money if you did this the last two weeks your 4-0
Don't you think when a depleted Charger team is playing Oakland on Sunday its not in their heads they play Denver in 4 days ? it's Oakland or nothing in this game ,\
The other game i would never put money on Atlanta i just couldn't trust Atlanta
the under is probably good unless Denver gets defensive TDS and a bunch of short fields
if Denver gets a big lead they take out starters on defense and Atlanta gets a bunch of garbage points,
Just like what happened in the Miami Patriots game Patriots up 33-3 they stoped playing defense
0
Don't you think when a depleted Charger team is playing Oakland on Sunday its not in their heads they play Denver in 4 days ? it's Oakland or nothing in this game ,\
The other game i would never put money on Atlanta i just couldn't trust Atlanta
the under is probably good unless Denver gets defensive TDS and a bunch of short fields
if Denver gets a big lead they take out starters on defense and Atlanta gets a bunch of garbage points,
Just like what happened in the Miami Patriots game Patriots up 33-3 they stoped playing defense
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.