How do you feel about the total 47.5 in the Jax/Chargers game?
Lean under. Explained above. Jags matchup issues on offense, and LAC short passing game keeps clock running.
Lean under. Explained above. Jags matchup issues on offense, and LAC short passing game keeps clock running.
Lean under. Explained above. Jags matchup issues on offense, and LAC short passing game keeps clock running.
Oh, I will have plenty on the ML.
GL
Oh, I will have plenty on the ML.
GL
Explained above in post 25, but I actually agree with you.
For the Ravens to cover - they need to hold the Bengals to <24. I think they have a decent chance to do it.
Explained above in post 25, but I actually agree with you.
For the Ravens to cover - they need to hold the Bengals to <24. I think they have a decent chance to do it.
Widely available CURRENT numbers. Lowvig is an American facing book.
Widely available CURRENT numbers. Lowvig is an American facing book.
As a basic principle... I wish I would have taken ANY team before ANY line move because you have instant options available to you.
In the case of this one - yes - of course.
As a basic principle... I wish I would have taken ANY team before ANY line move because you have instant options available to you.
In the case of this one - yes - of course.
I am running out of time right now... But will get back to this tomorrow....
Basically - every single stat points to the Giants. Every single narrative points to them also. I cannot make a case to bet the Vikings.
Dont misinterpret that as saying the Vikings CANT win or cover. I just cant make the case. Interested to hear if you can.
I am running out of time right now... But will get back to this tomorrow....
Basically - every single stat points to the Giants. Every single narrative points to them also. I cannot make a case to bet the Vikings.
Dont misinterpret that as saying the Vikings CANT win or cover. I just cant make the case. Interested to hear if you can.
I joined covers around 15 years ago....even after 15 years.. this guy vanzack is one of the few solid one as they come. man....times flys ... and covers used to be so much more active then it is now... alot of great cappers back then.
I joined covers around 15 years ago....even after 15 years.. this guy vanzack is one of the few solid one as they come. man....times flys ... and covers used to be so much more active then it is now... alot of great cappers back then.
Van, you've been smokin all season, and I hesitate to disagree. But I'm struck by the coaching mismatch between Staley of the Chargers and Pederson of the Jags. Staley made the dumbest coaching move this year last week by playing his starters. And that's saying something because I watched Nathaniel Can't Hackett coach the Broncos this year. OTOH Pederson has coached up Lawrence into playing like the top draft choice that he was. I think coaching really matters in the playoffs.
Van, you've been smokin all season, and I hesitate to disagree. But I'm struck by the coaching mismatch between Staley of the Chargers and Pederson of the Jags. Staley made the dumbest coaching move this year last week by playing his starters. And that's saying something because I watched Nathaniel Can't Hackett coach the Broncos this year. OTOH Pederson has coached up Lawrence into playing like the top draft choice that he was. I think coaching really matters in the playoffs.
Best of luck Van, I'm with you on the Saturday plays. Might sit out the rest this weekend, tho I was leaning Minn - thinking the G's are trending down & out...but going to take another look at it
Best of luck Van, I'm with you on the Saturday plays. Might sit out the rest this weekend, tho I was leaning Minn - thinking the G's are trending down & out...but going to take another look at it
copy that lol. def great advice!
copy that lol. def great advice!
thank you so much for letting me know
thank you so much for letting me know
Van---you are a truly unique guy. You do all the hard, numbers-crunching work and share with the rest of us. I've loitered around your posts for a long time. Year in and year out you are better than the for-sale touts on Covers. Win or lose the rest of the way, thank you.
Van---you are a truly unique guy. You do all the hard, numbers-crunching work and share with the rest of us. I've loitered around your posts for a long time. Year in and year out you are better than the for-sale touts on Covers. Win or lose the rest of the way, thank you.
Well, so my analysis is kind of simple: I feel like there is overstated confidence in the NYG. This is a team that is 3-6-1 in their last 10 games (granted their final loss to PHI shouldnt count) but still, this is a mediocre team that had a nice run in the beginning and middle of the season. On the other hand MIN is a very good home team with an 8-1 record and a victory margin of ~5.5 in home games this year. The sole loss at home on the year for MIN was when they got taken apart by DAL, 40-3. But from a situations perspective that 40-3 game was not surprising as it was a classic 'let down' after the emotional win in BUF the week before. Coincidentally, the non-cover, straight up victory of MIN over NYG at home in Week 16 was also immediately after the huge comeback game against IND - my point being that MIN had a bit of a letdown game against NYG and still won. I feel like there wont be a let down this week and a focused MIN team that plays excellent at home, led by a mediocre to decent QB in cousins is going be better than a marginal NYG team on the road led by a pedestrian QB in Jones. My analysis is heavily bolstered by my perception that there is a lot of public support on NYG as road dogs and Im just not seeing the justification.
Well, so my analysis is kind of simple: I feel like there is overstated confidence in the NYG. This is a team that is 3-6-1 in their last 10 games (granted their final loss to PHI shouldnt count) but still, this is a mediocre team that had a nice run in the beginning and middle of the season. On the other hand MIN is a very good home team with an 8-1 record and a victory margin of ~5.5 in home games this year. The sole loss at home on the year for MIN was when they got taken apart by DAL, 40-3. But from a situations perspective that 40-3 game was not surprising as it was a classic 'let down' after the emotional win in BUF the week before. Coincidentally, the non-cover, straight up victory of MIN over NYG at home in Week 16 was also immediately after the huge comeback game against IND - my point being that MIN had a bit of a letdown game against NYG and still won. I feel like there wont be a let down this week and a focused MIN team that plays excellent at home, led by a mediocre to decent QB in cousins is going be better than a marginal NYG team on the road led by a pedestrian QB in Jones. My analysis is heavily bolstered by my perception that there is a lot of public support on NYG as road dogs and Im just not seeing the justification.
Hmm...given VZ's read on the SD/Jax game, I was thinking of throwing some beer money on Herbert over 37.5 attempts. Should I upgrade to some Vodka?
Hmm...given VZ's read on the SD/Jax game, I was thinking of throwing some beer money on Herbert over 37.5 attempts. Should I upgrade to some Vodka?
@vanzack
Specifically - Jax passing has been carrying them - and they have struggled to run. The Chargers weakness is their run defense
Van, not disagreeing at all, but I see the Bolts weakness is their Run Offense on the road. Because of this it will be very reasonable to predict Jax to stuff the Bolts run and make them completely one dimensional. Glad to see you on Big Blue
@vanzack
Specifically - Jax passing has been carrying them - and they have struggled to run. The Chargers weakness is their run defense
Van, not disagreeing at all, but I see the Bolts weakness is their Run Offense on the road. Because of this it will be very reasonable to predict Jax to stuff the Bolts run and make them completely one dimensional. Glad to see you on Big Blue
Haha yes 100%
Haha yes 100%
Van, my book gives you -105 on all games up to a $500 bet. Sounds just as good as Lowvig over a season of betting.
Van, my book gives you -105 on all games up to a $500 bet. Sounds just as good as Lowvig over a season of betting.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.