@undermysac
Hmmmm thanks for that tidbit...good to know keenum and Diggs have chemistry
The one and only productive season in his entire career and they dumped him for Cousins anyways. Loving some Case Keenum payback. Why the hell not? It would be crazier if he tanked. He will ball.
The one and only productive season in his entire career and they dumped him for Cousins anyways. Loving some Case Keenum payback. Why the hell not? It would be crazier if he tanked. He will ball.
NFL 45-33-4 (+21.03)
Giants -6(-110) *2.20/2.00
Browns +4(-105) *1.05/1.00
Commanders +11(-110) *1.50/1.36
Seahawks +2.5(+100) *1.00
Steelers ML(+120) *1.00/1.20
If not now, then when? Pitt coming off their bye, and Nola on a short week. That MNF game was physical, and it reminded me of a trend(my own) that I used to follow. And that was simply to fade a team following a Ravens game. The results were good and TW hates me.
The Saints injury report was long enough to begin with, now add linebacker Peter Werner and DE Marcus Davenport to the list. Both left the game yesterday.
Did you know: the Saints have played 7 of their 9 games in a dome this year? Playing in Pitt in November is not fun, especially for an indoor team.
That 24-0 win vs the Raiders is not aging well.
If not for a miracle in week 1 vs the Falcons, the Saints could be 2-7.
The Steelers have had the hardest sos to date. Not just in general, but on both sides of the ball. At footballoutsiders you can view a teams dvoa by offense, and defense. There they discern sos by quality of defenses an offense has faced, and visa versa. Pitt's sos is #1 for both. I've never seen that before.
If Pitt can't get their run game going here, then they never will this season. The Saints can be run on, and this should take pressure off Pickett. I'd look for them to give Jaylen Warren more carries as he's looked much better than Harris.
I have Tomlin, extra rest, home field, the out doors vs a dome team who's been inside 78% of the year, vs a team on short rest, vs a banged up team, vs a lesser team than they've seen all year.
As bad as the Steelers have been, and the shit I talked about them including Pickett, this is not a spot I want to fade them.
NFL 45-33-4 (+21.03)
Giants -6(-110) *2.20/2.00
Browns +4(-105) *1.05/1.00
Commanders +11(-110) *1.50/1.36
Seahawks +2.5(+100) *1.00
Steelers ML(+120) *1.00/1.20
If not now, then when? Pitt coming off their bye, and Nola on a short week. That MNF game was physical, and it reminded me of a trend(my own) that I used to follow. And that was simply to fade a team following a Ravens game. The results were good and TW hates me.
The Saints injury report was long enough to begin with, now add linebacker Peter Werner and DE Marcus Davenport to the list. Both left the game yesterday.
Did you know: the Saints have played 7 of their 9 games in a dome this year? Playing in Pitt in November is not fun, especially for an indoor team.
That 24-0 win vs the Raiders is not aging well.
If not for a miracle in week 1 vs the Falcons, the Saints could be 2-7.
The Steelers have had the hardest sos to date. Not just in general, but on both sides of the ball. At footballoutsiders you can view a teams dvoa by offense, and defense. There they discern sos by quality of defenses an offense has faced, and visa versa. Pitt's sos is #1 for both. I've never seen that before.
If Pitt can't get their run game going here, then they never will this season. The Saints can be run on, and this should take pressure off Pickett. I'd look for them to give Jaylen Warren more carries as he's looked much better than Harris.
I have Tomlin, extra rest, home field, the out doors vs a dome team who's been inside 78% of the year, vs a team on short rest, vs a banged up team, vs a lesser team than they've seen all year.
As bad as the Steelers have been, and the shit I talked about them including Pickett, this is not a spot I want to fade them.
The plot thickens, love it
The plot thickens, love it
@BIGDTITLE
I actually bet the raiders before kickoff of the jags game....look ahead line was -3.5, and i was actually expecting them to get their shit together and thought I was getting a steal at -3.5, and I swore I bought the half point down to 3,
But, I hit submit before I bought it
And then the line goes to -6, but not because of the reasons I thought it would lol
So technically I got a really good price completely by accident, and I have a feeling the colts rally and I lose anyway
McDaniels has lost that locker room
@BIGDTITLE
I actually bet the raiders before kickoff of the jags game....look ahead line was -3.5, and i was actually expecting them to get their shit together and thought I was getting a steal at -3.5, and I swore I bought the half point down to 3,
But, I hit submit before I bought it
And then the line goes to -6, but not because of the reasons I thought it would lol
So technically I got a really good price completely by accident, and I have a feeling the colts rally and I lose anyway
McDaniels has lost that locker room
cant remember the last time i had the house to myself,,,,,,can u get a hooker and coke at 830 am in a hurricane?,,,,,is that bad degenerate etiquette?,,,,,,,
You need a hooker who brings the coke.
One stop shopping
cant remember the last time i had the house to myself,,,,,,can u get a hooker and coke at 830 am in a hurricane?,,,,,is that bad degenerate etiquette?,,,,,,,
You need a hooker who brings the coke.
One stop shopping
EnEffEl
Bears -3 (2.00)
Colts/Raiders U42.5 (1.90)
EnEffEl
Bears -3 (2.00)
Colts/Raiders U42.5 (1.90)
That shit will be cut with baby exlax ....not her personal bag though .....ummmm thats what I heard
That shit will be cut with baby exlax ....not her personal bag though .....ummmm thats what I heard
Week 11 look ahead bets:
Cowboys -1.5(-110) *2.50/2.27
They are at Minnesota.
Jets +4.5(-110) *1.00/.91
At New England. Both teams off a bye.
Bears +4(-110) *1.00/.91
At Atlanta.
Week 11 look ahead bets:
Cowboys -1.5(-110) *2.50/2.27
They are at Minnesota.
Jets +4.5(-110) *1.00/.91
At New England. Both teams off a bye.
Bears +4(-110) *1.00/.91
At Atlanta.
@undermysac
Some people are raised with honor, there is only one way to treat a blind prostitute, I imagine Biscuit knows the rules:
1) Never let her drive (this is mostly for our own protection)
2) Always open the door (there are only so many hours in a day and she takes forever to find the handle)
3) Most importantly, always pay with singles and insist they're really $100s. (That ear to ear smile always warms my heart when I hand her a stack of 15 dollar bills---ignorance is bliss)
@undermysac
Some people are raised with honor, there is only one way to treat a blind prostitute, I imagine Biscuit knows the rules:
1) Never let her drive (this is mostly for our own protection)
2) Always open the door (there are only so many hours in a day and she takes forever to find the handle)
3) Most importantly, always pay with singles and insist they're really $100s. (That ear to ear smile always warms my heart when I hand her a stack of 15 dollar bills---ignorance is bliss)
EnEffEl
Bears -3 (2.00)
Colts/Raiders U42.5 (1.90)
Browns +3.5 (1.90)
EnEffEl
Bears -3 (2.00)
Colts/Raiders U42.5 (1.90)
Browns +3.5 (1.90)
If Baker plays 70% of the snaps for Carolina the Panthers would give up a conditional 4th Round Pick to the Browns, otherwise it's a 5th Round Pick
If Baker plays 70% of the snaps for Carolina the Panthers would give up a conditional 4th Round Pick to the Browns, otherwise it's a 5th Round Pick
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.