All Forums | Penalty Box

Super Bowl 53 Patriots/Rams Thoughts and Plays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6054
Posts: 98
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 2904
Posted: #51

Couldn't agree with you more Achilles as the administrators and generals of this site do very very little to clean it up and keep it professional, Informative and worth being a respected member of.peace

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 627
Posted: #52
In addition to the 6 + 6 + 6 = 18......1+8 = 9 ...which is a Universal Power Number....

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by justliketoplay:

Couldn't agree with you more Achilles as the administrators and generals of this site do very very little to clean it up and keep it professional, Informative and worth being a respected member of.peace


You said it bud. A few more days! Street lights, cross walks, storefronts and bicycles....yet the shmucks get free reign in the room with the padded walls. Just another day on covers I guess.....ha!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 3461
Posted: #54

Sidelines Better look for you ...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2018
Posts: 1180
Posted: #55

Something to add. I mentioned the Illuminati angle previously. Today, I came across something on the ESPN website:

 
For those who know about Illuminati symbols, you know that the pyramid and the all-seeing eye are probably their most important. Just look on the back of your 1 dollar bill.
 
Anyhow, Peyton Manning is analyzing the QBs for the SB.
 
Check the link below, and you will clearly see the Illuminati all-seeing eye on the cover, with Peyton--in the word "detail".  The letter "A" is the pyramid, and the football is the ALL-SEEING EYE---right there in plain sight for all to see, as the Illuminati likes to do it. No denying it. Stay woke..........
 
https://www.espn.com/watch/?id=1f0c9cea-8093-426f-9c12-f90101111f0f
 
Very real, guys......
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by bigdude:

Sidelines Better look for you ...


Couldn’t contain yourself huh? Still mad about your stolen juice box dingleberry? Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 426
Posted: #57

People are wearing their Pats goggles.  The Rams played 7 playoff teams in the regular season, more than any other team that qualified for the playoffs...and they still had the best record in the league.  Top to bottom the Rams have the better roster.  Position by position, the Rams have the better player (You want TE?  I'll give it to you.  Let's see if Gronk finishes the game).

Then again...I would've said that in 2001 too.  That being said.   Lightning doesn't strike twice.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5154
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

People are wearing their Pats goggles.  The Rams played 7 playoff teams in the regular season, more than any other team that qualified for the playoffs...and they still had the best record in the league.  


I don't care about that because Patriots weren't very good in the regular season. They're great now, they solved their internal issues. This team would've been undefeated if they had been playing like they are in the playoffs all year/
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

People are wearing their Pats goggles.  The Rams played 7 playoff teams in the regular season, more than any other team that qualified for the playoffs...and they still had the best record in the league.  Top to bottom the Rams have the better roster.  Position by position, the Rams have the better player (You want TE?  I'll give it to you.  Let's see if Gronk finishes the game).

Then again...I would've said that in 2001 too.  That being said.   Lightning doesn't strike twice.


According to the Great Outdoors, Lightning CAN strike twice. Matter or fact it can strike 66 times. Right Reg?! Great analysis above though. In the HISTORY of sports no team with the “top to bottom better roster” has lost. Oh and the “position by position” thing....can I have some of what you are having please? I welcome your opinion chief but I couldn’t disagree more. Let me know what you’d like to wager on Gronk finishing the game or not, ok? All the best to ya “fballguy”. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5154
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

Top to bottom the Rams have the better roster.  Position by position, the Rams have the better player (You want TE?  I'll give it to you.  Let's see if Gronk finishes the game).

Then again...I would've said that in 2001 too.  That being said.   Lightning doesn't strike twice.


Do they really? 

QB vs QB -> Big advantage NE
RB vs RB -> Michel/Burkhead/White vs Gurley/Anderson I guess you'd have to say slight/moderate advantage Rams but NE has a killer RB squad of their own
WR1 vs WR1 -> Nearly equal, Julien is great in big games
WR2 vs WR2 -> Big advantage Rams, Patriots are lacking here
WR3 vs WR3 -> About equal
TE vs TE -> Huge advantage Patriots
NE O-line vs Rams D-line -> About equal because NE's line is so dominant but Rams have Donald/Suh. Might still be in favor of NE because they're that good with the greatest offensive line coach
Rams O-line vs NE D-line -> major advantage Rams
NE has 2 great corners to shadow Cooks/Wood. The NE secondary seems like a bad matchup for the Rams offense. They have the perfect personnel to deal with Cooks and Robert Wood. And Rams don't have a good TE to exploit the linebackers 

NE completely paralyzed the LAC & KC running games. I don't expect that to happen again, but I'm sure they're capable of seriously slowing down the Rams running game. And once that happens there should be too much pressure on Goff's shoulders, I'm not sure if he's ready to carry a team to a Superbowl victory.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 426
Posted: #61

QB:  You forget that the GOAT lost the game against the Chiefs with his picks I guess?  Brady owes Dee Ford a few beers.  And the Chiefs have the worst defense in the league.

RB:  Slight edge to Rams?  Wow.  Who is the Pats All-Pro RB again?

Offensive weapons in general...Rams have a huge edge.  The Rams scored 11 regular season TDs from the WR3 position.  Who is WR3 for the Pats?

TE:  Before the AFC Championship Game, Gronk had 5 catches in his last 3 games.  Enjoy.

OL: Rams

DL:  Rams

LB:  Rams

DB: Rams

ST:  Rams

If you want to be on the wrong side along with 80%+ of the public, have at it.  ;)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

QB:  You forget that the GOAT lost the game against the Chiefs with his picks I guess?  Brady owes Dee Ford a few beers.  And the Chiefs have the worst defense in the league.

RB:  Slight edge to Rams?  Wow.  Who is the Pats All-Pro RB again?

Offensive weapons in general...Rams have a huge edge.  The Rams scored 11 regular season TDs from the WR3 position.  Who is WR3 for the Pats?

TE:  Before the AFC Championship Game, Gronk had 5 catches in his last 3 games.  Enjoy.

OL: Rams

DL:  Rams

LB:  Rams

DB: Rams

ST:  Rams

If you want to be on the wrong side along with 80%+ of the public, have at it.  ;)


You are trying really hard. I commend you for it. You seem nervous though beneath all these antics. Take a deep breath. You have popped up out of nowhere with the nice lil avatar and you are selling hard in here. I see ya bud. I do. Valiant effort here. My pick has little to do with your positional who is better stuff. You don’t get it and that’s fine. Brady owes Dee Ford a few beers huh? Well....then the Rams owe the league what after the biggest gift this league has ever seen? Enjoy the game Sunday. I got nothing for ya going forward. Your intentions are clear as day to ME. All good.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:


Do they really? 

QB vs QB -> Big advantage NE
RB vs RB -> Michel/Burkhead/White vs Gurley/Anderson I guess you'd have to say slight/moderate advantage Rams but NE has a killer RB squad of their own
WR1 vs WR1 -> Nearly equal, Julien is great in big games
WR2 vs WR2 -> Big advantage Rams, Patriots are lacking here
WR3 vs WR3 -> About equal
TE vs TE -> Huge advantage Patriots
NE O-line vs Rams D-line -> About equal because NE's line is so dominant but Rams have Donald/Suh. Might still be in favor of NE because they're that good with the greatest offensive line coach
Rams O-line vs NE D-line -> major advantage Rams
NE has 2 great corners to shadow Cooks/Wood. The NE secondary seems like a bad matchup for the Rams offense. They have the perfect personnel to deal with Cooks and Robert Wood. And Rams don't have a good TE to exploit the linebackers 

NE completely paralyzed the LAC & KC running games. I don't expect that to happen again, but I'm sure they're capable of seriously slowing down the Rams running game. And once that happens there should be too much pressure on Goff's shoulders, I'm not sure if he's ready to carry a team to a Superbowl victory.

Rams slight advantage in the running game? Huh? Have people not seen what the Patriots have done the last two games when it’s mattered most? They dominated the line of scrimmage. Pick your running back! Gurley sits out in the NFC championship, had an awful last month of play before that yet he’s all the sudden gonna ball out in the biggest game of the year? Ok.....And if he doesn’t play well, is chubby gonna be a force come Sunday. He doesn’t catch the ball either. 

Have people not seen the Rams defense against the run? They are giving up 5 yards a carry. It’s not even close as to whose running game is clicking on all cylinders. I said this earlier in this thread....IF THE PATRIOTS ARE ABLE TO RUN, THIS GAME IS OVER. The Rams know it too. Double tight end, extra lineman.....Brady said it himself. They’ve controlled the pace in the playoffs. I could seriously argue that the LA CHARGERS defense as a whole is better than the Rams yet what did they do? Nothing. The Rams will make their top priority stopping the run yet they’ll need to bring extra guys. When that happens, White and Gronk will dominate. 

Offensive line? Brady has been hit a total of 3 times in 2 games. Rams aren’t close there. Sorry. Patriots better there too. People keep talking about the defensive line of the Rams yet nobody is talking about the offensive line of the Patriots. It’s baffling to me. If people think that Belly and McDaniels don’t know about what the Rams D line COULD do, they are high. It’s ALLLLL about that defensive line in LA and if they aren’t good, the Rams will get blown out. Anybody who watches football will tell you that. 

Lastly, and the clowns and fakes won’t touch on this: Goff will be given things he has never seen before. Belly and Flores know what his tendencies are and they know what his weaknesses are. Watch the d@mn Bears game. People want to talk about the weather? Please! Goff looked like a pop warner player back there. Oh....and how did that d line of the Rams do that night? One sack and it wasn’t like the Bears were keeping extra guys in there! 

Brady knows he was given two mulligans. One was in the Chiefs game with Fore being offsides and the other.....he gets another shot to redeem his late fumble that cost his team another ring. If people honestly believe that this guy won’t be ready and this his teammates won’t be there either, they are high. The line invites Patriots money for the spread but that doesn’t mean they can’t win still without covering. Not many talking about this......

Ninja....this is nothing towards you. It’s more towards the character above with the move lil avatar. Sooooo cute. The guy is here for a reason. See it or don’t Chief. It’s obvious why he’s here 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 426
Posted: #64

Oh and I forgot...The Rams emerged with that league best record while playing in the superior conference.

The Rams are 8-0 against the AFC under McVay.

But how can 80%+ of the public be wrong.an_wink

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 426
Posted: #65

Stellar analysis...Experience is huge.  Just look at least years result.  Or when the Giants played the Pats in the SB.  Or when the Pats played the Rams in 2001. 

Oh wait...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

Oh and I forgot...The Rams emerged with that league best record while playing in the superior conference.

The Rams are 8-0 against the AFC under McVay.

But how can 80%+ of the public be wrong.an_wink


What’s your goal? Tell me. Let’s cut to the chase here. You like the Rams. We get it. Now what? Anything else? TRYING SOOOOO HARD. It’s wednesday Chief. We have almost 5 full days until kickoff. And here’s how I know what kind of character you are. If you truly believe that the % above is legit, you need help. I’m not being an a$$....I’m being real. Help me help you: Newsflash to you and everybody else out there: no free site, especially not ESPN or some of the other cookie cutter sites, will give you the correct numbers as to where all the money is. No way in h@ll. This is a new age chief where information is king so why would the free sites just hand it out? Come on man (Randy Moss voice). The books are always a step ahead so rather than show one of their two cards in hold em, they are gonna keep both face down and let you think yiubknow what they are holding. New times brotha. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 426
Posted: #67

So the Rams went from 1 pt favs to 3 pt underdogs because people are betting on the Rams?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 3461
Posted: #68

Everybody’s intentions are clear as day to you ??  Da fuq you sayin ...

The Outcome should be Income ..

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by bigdude:

Everybody’s intentions are clear as day to you ??  Da fuq you sayin ...

The Outcome should be Income ..


It must be clown day. No idea why you are here. Stfu, get some tissue and go cry elsewhere. You are old news puddin. Done here.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by bigdude:

Everybody’s intentions are clear as day to you ??  Da fuq you sayin ...

The Outcome should be Income ..


Not that I give a crap or that it carries any weight but who do you have in Sunday’s game? You spend more time trolling and crying yet I never see your pick. Who you got Chief? Tell the world. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by bigdude:

Everybody’s intentions are clear as day to you ??  Da fuq you sayin ...

The Outcome should be Income ..


Of course there is silence. No surprise here. Trolling, whining.....yet when I asked you below....silence. Typical. “The outcome is income”. I may throw up.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 23104
Posted: #72
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 12504
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by Beningo88:


To you as well bud. As you can see the clowns and fakes have flocked into my thread. Enjoy the game.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2018
Posts: 1940
Posted: #74

Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

QB:  You forget that the GOAT lost the game against the Chiefs with his picks I guess?  Brady owes Dee Ford a few beers.  And the Chiefs have the worst defense in the league. RB:  Slight edge to Rams?  Wow.  Who is the Pats All-Pro RB again? Offensive weapons in general...Rams have a huge edge.  The Rams scored 11 regular season TDs from the WR3 position.  Who is WR3 for the Pats? TE:  Before the AFC Championship Game, Gronk had 5 catches in his last 3 games.  Enjoy. OL: Rams DL:  Rams LB:  Rams DB: Rams ST:  Rams If you want to be on the wrong side along with 80%+ of the public, have at it.  ;)

I was going to chime in to the discussion but it is pointless to discuss when there is no rationality and objectivity. Rams DBs  better than the Patriots. That is a gem for the ages. 

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5154
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by Fballguy:

QB:  You forget that the GOAT lost the game against the Chiefs with his picks I guess?  Brady owes Dee Ford a few beers.  And the Chiefs have the worst defense in the league.

RB:  Slight edge to Rams?  Wow.  Who is the Pats All-Pro RB again?

Offensive weapons in general...Rams have a huge edge.  The Rams scored 11 regular season TDs from the WR3 position.  Who is WR3 for the Pats?

TE:  Before the AFC Championship Game, Gronk had 5 catches in his last 3 games.  Enjoy.

OL: Rams

DL:  Rams

LB:  Rams

DB: Rams

ST:  Rams

If you want to be on the wrong side along with 80%+ of the public, have at it.  ;)


This is what happens when you're too biased for a certain team. I'm completely unbiased and just trying to figure out who wins this game for profit.

1) I was actually betting 5 units on KC and I came away from that game very impressed by Brady's performance. The silly interception in the end zone was a trash play call and begging for something like that to happen. Then Edelman tipped the ball with his fingers creating an easy interception for the defenders. Brady actually had a nice game and converted three 3rd & 10s in overtime to make an amazing TD drive. Those things aren't going to happen against the Rams.

2) I guess you haven't heard of Sony Michel? He's a rookie, he's a very talented RB I have him ranked as one of the best in the NFL. He has been tearing it up. James White is an awesome pass catcher and Burkhead is effective at coming in for a few plays when those guys are tired and getting something good done

3) Rams don't have Cooper Kupp anymore, it's Josh Reynolds. If anything I'd say Dorsett/Patterson are slightly better than him but I'll give benefit of the doubt and say equal

4) Gronk is fine he's just beat up so they had been using him way more in a blocking role where he's still very effective. They haven't really needed him in the passing game, he was pretty good against KC and I expect them to use him as much as necessary in the passing game against a Rams team that can't cover tight ends. They don't have to worry about resting him anymore, it's the last game. He said he's feeling great too

5) Patriots offensive line is still at least as good if not better than the Rams D line sorry.

6) Yes agreed Rams O line is clearly superior to NE's D line

7) Both teams mediocre at LB, maybe a small advantage to Rams here

8) To say Rams are better at DB just shows how biased you are. No way

9) Safety again maybe a small advantage Rams
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.