@nostradumbass I dont swim in the crazy conspiracy pool you and many Trump zombies do. I do not share your view that it is 1984 and the government controls our brains and all/any content. I think there is more than enough opportunity to seek out information and I dont give a crap about comment sections on main media outlets. The high likely reason why they shut it off is from wack jobs that spew hate, racist disgusting messages and they are no longer interested in moderating idiots. Reading message boards on large sized sites is like swimming in a pool of razors it cuts you up and drains your life, it is the worst view of humanity that there is. It is the same to a very small degree here, watching people stewing in their hate and conspiracy, despising others and not being concerned for anything but their scizo mind conspiracy theories, caring more about their tangents than anyone or anything around them. There cannot be truth in extremism on either side, if anything your warped view of reality is more of a danger than centrist MSM attempts to guide you in buying their ads and products. ZH is a thought cancer, it is an open place where angry, bitter, warped right wing wackos can say almost anything they want and think they are correct and of course they are not. If you want a conspiracy completely biased deranged viewpoint on politics then you are right in your element there.
i hear ya. point taken
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@nostradumbass I dont swim in the crazy conspiracy pool you and many Trump zombies do. I do not share your view that it is 1984 and the government controls our brains and all/any content. I think there is more than enough opportunity to seek out information and I dont give a crap about comment sections on main media outlets. The high likely reason why they shut it off is from wack jobs that spew hate, racist disgusting messages and they are no longer interested in moderating idiots. Reading message boards on large sized sites is like swimming in a pool of razors it cuts you up and drains your life, it is the worst view of humanity that there is. It is the same to a very small degree here, watching people stewing in their hate and conspiracy, despising others and not being concerned for anything but their scizo mind conspiracy theories, caring more about their tangents than anyone or anything around them. There cannot be truth in extremism on either side, if anything your warped view of reality is more of a danger than centrist MSM attempts to guide you in buying their ads and products. ZH is a thought cancer, it is an open place where angry, bitter, warped right wing wackos can say almost anything they want and think they are correct and of course they are not. If you want a conspiracy completely biased deranged viewpoint on politics then you are right in your element there.
US attorney David Weiss, who has led the Hunter Biden criminal probe, has offered to testify at a public congressional hearing this fall, according to a letter sent to lawmakers on Monday.
House Republicans have demanded that Weiss – a Donald Trump appointee – answer questions about allegations from two IRS whistleblowers that the tax investigation was tainted by political interference.
The new letter from the Justice Department proposes several dates in September and October when Weiss would be willing to testify to the House Judiciary Committee, which is led by GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio
2
Let the inquiry begin ...
Like the Spanish inquiry of non believers
CNN
—
US attorney David Weiss, who has led the Hunter Biden criminal probe, has offered to testify at a public congressional hearing this fall, according to a letter sent to lawmakers on Monday.
House Republicans have demanded that Weiss – a Donald Trump appointee – answer questions about allegations from two IRS whistleblowers that the tax investigation was tainted by political interference.
The new letter from the Justice Department proposes several dates in September and October when Weiss would be willing to testify to the House Judiciary Committee, which is led by GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio
I cannot accept the plea agreement today, said District Judge Maryellen Noreika.
Noreika said she had “concerns” about the parties seemingly linking the tax plea agreement to resolving a felony gun charge. During the proceedings, prosecutors confirmed that the investigation into Biden was ongoing.
After negotiations, the president’s son then agreed to plead guilty to the two tax charges in a deal that only includes conduct related to tax offenses, drug use and gun possession. The two sides agreed that this deal does not shield him from potential future charges. But the judge wasn’t satisfied.
“What if it is unconstitutional?” she asked. “I’m trying to exercise due deliverance and consideration to make sure we don’t make a misstep.”
After the discussion, Hunter Biden entered a not guilty plea.
I cannot accept the plea agreement today, said District Judge Maryellen Noreika.
Noreika said she had “concerns” about the parties seemingly linking the tax plea agreement to resolving a felony gun charge. During the proceedings, prosecutors confirmed that the investigation into Biden was ongoing.
After negotiations, the president’s son then agreed to plead guilty to the two tax charges in a deal that only includes conduct related to tax offenses, drug use and gun possession. The two sides agreed that this deal does not shield him from potential future charges. But the judge wasn’t satisfied.
“What if it is unconstitutional?” she asked. “I’m trying to exercise due deliverance and consideration to make sure we don’t make a misstep.”
After the discussion, Hunter Biden entered a not guilty plea.
Yes judge wouldn't accept hunter Biden tax evasion and gun felonies plea deal. Trump judge states ," I cannot accept the plea agreement today, said District Judge Maryellen Noreika. Noreika said she had “concerns” about the parties seemingly linking the tax plea agreement to resolving a felony gun charge. During the proceedings, prosecutors confirmed that the investigation into Biden was ongoing. After negotiations, the president’s son then agreed to plead guilty to the two tax charges in a deal that only includes conduct related to tax offenses, drug use and gun possession. The two sides agreed that this deal does not shield him from potential future charges. But the judge wasn’t satisfied. “What if it is unconstitutional?” she asked. “I’m trying to exercise due deliverance and consideration to make sure we don’t make a misstep.” After the discussion, Hunter Biden entered a not guilty plea.
Are you reading from CNN, AP, NYT, maybe USA Today??
YOU FORGOT THIS PART;
At one point, Noreika asked Justice Department prosecutor Leo Wise whether there is an "ongoing investigation here?"
There is," Wise said, adding that he could not tell the judge what the investigation was.
Noreika asked if the government could potentially bring a charge related to the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), to which Wise replied: "Yes."
Defense attorney Chris Clark said he did not agree with that.
Then there’s no deal," Wise said.
Clark countered, "As far as I’m concerned, the plea deal is null and void."
1
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Yes judge wouldn't accept hunter Biden tax evasion and gun felonies plea deal. Trump judge states ," I cannot accept the plea agreement today, said District Judge Maryellen Noreika. Noreika said she had “concerns” about the parties seemingly linking the tax plea agreement to resolving a felony gun charge. During the proceedings, prosecutors confirmed that the investigation into Biden was ongoing. After negotiations, the president’s son then agreed to plead guilty to the two tax charges in a deal that only includes conduct related to tax offenses, drug use and gun possession. The two sides agreed that this deal does not shield him from potential future charges. But the judge wasn’t satisfied. “What if it is unconstitutional?” she asked. “I’m trying to exercise due deliverance and consideration to make sure we don’t make a misstep.” After the discussion, Hunter Biden entered a not guilty plea.
Are you reading from CNN, AP, NYT, maybe USA Today??
YOU FORGOT THIS PART;
At one point, Noreika asked Justice Department prosecutor Leo Wise whether there is an "ongoing investigation here?"
There is," Wise said, adding that he could not tell the judge what the investigation was.
Noreika asked if the government could potentially bring a charge related to the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), to which Wise replied: "Yes."
Defense attorney Chris Clark said he did not agree with that.
Then there’s no deal," Wise said.
Clark countered, "As far as I’m concerned, the plea deal is null and void."
As some have noted, why on earth would any prosecutor agree to waive a felony gun charge & agree to misdemeanors without getting anything in return? What did HB do to deserve any consideration like this..........be "the big guy's" son?
KJP (), when pressed about changing the language of DJ "not knowing anything about his son's business ventures" to "he wasn't involved in any of his business ventures", replied that "HB is a private citizen". Then wtf does he get a SS escort to court?
Dems are always crying "WE NEED MORE GUNS LAWS!", but we're not hearing a peep out of anyone about Biden getting excused on this charge, which carries a 10 year sentence. Yeah, we need more gun laws to selectively ignore.
Thank goodness the judge saw through all this BS.
1
@UNIMAN
As some have noted, why on earth would any prosecutor agree to waive a felony gun charge & agree to misdemeanors without getting anything in return? What did HB do to deserve any consideration like this..........be "the big guy's" son?
KJP (), when pressed about changing the language of DJ "not knowing anything about his son's business ventures" to "he wasn't involved in any of his business ventures", replied that "HB is a private citizen". Then wtf does he get a SS escort to court?
Dems are always crying "WE NEED MORE GUNS LAWS!", but we're not hearing a peep out of anyone about Biden getting excused on this charge, which carries a 10 year sentence. Yeah, we need more gun laws to selectively ignore.
I see it this way Mugg. Trump asks Zelensky to look into corruption including Biden. He didn't threatened any holdbacks, just asked. And the Dems went nuts and tried to impeach him. There sits Bill Barr with the Hunter investigation. Barr pawns it off to Delaware and Weiss. So here is Weiss saying thanks for the hot potato! So let's check the score so to speak.
-Shokin seizes Burisma owners property and gets fired by a United States Democrat named Biden.
-Trump asks Zelensky to investigate what when on at Burisma, Shokin's firing and the Bidens. Trump is sent through bullshit impeachment proceedings by democrats.
-Democrat President and control of the Senate and here is Weiss holding that hot potato.
Weiss is in self-preservation mode. He would be accused of being a "Trump man" if he actually upheld the law even though he is not. So, he comes up with watered down plea deal and the White House says; "He was appointed by Trump!"
I like the Senate Republicans who warned McCarthy not to cheapen the impeachment process like the democrats did. Trying to save some dignity for this country.
1
@THEMUGG
I see it this way Mugg. Trump asks Zelensky to look into corruption including Biden. He didn't threatened any holdbacks, just asked. And the Dems went nuts and tried to impeach him. There sits Bill Barr with the Hunter investigation. Barr pawns it off to Delaware and Weiss. So here is Weiss saying thanks for the hot potato! So let's check the score so to speak.
-Shokin seizes Burisma owners property and gets fired by a United States Democrat named Biden.
-Trump asks Zelensky to investigate what when on at Burisma, Shokin's firing and the Bidens. Trump is sent through bullshit impeachment proceedings by democrats.
-Democrat President and control of the Senate and here is Weiss holding that hot potato.
Weiss is in self-preservation mode. He would be accused of being a "Trump man" if he actually upheld the law even though he is not. So, he comes up with watered down plea deal and the White House says; "He was appointed by Trump!"
I like the Senate Republicans who warned McCarthy not to cheapen the impeachment process like the democrats did. Trying to save some dignity for this country.
So, I've been I've been asked this question a million times. The answer is not going to change. The answer remains the same. The president was never in business with his son. I just don't have anything else to add."
No, no no, The ANSWER has always been "I have (The president has) never discussed my (his) son's business dealings with him."
Nice slight of hand or should I say mouth.
0
Jean-Pierre;
So, I've been I've been asked this question a million times. The answer is not going to change. The answer remains the same. The president was never in business with his son. I just don't have anything else to add."
No, no no, The ANSWER has always been "I have (The president has) never discussed my (his) son's business dealings with him."
@nostradumbass You can continue to swim in your conspiracy kiddie pool, nobody will ever stop you from thinking the government is controlling your mind...only you can. Corps in the US are not running their businesses to the dictates of government control, even icky democrat liberal slimeball ones, businesses keep their doors open by bringing in revenues and making a profit. Message boards for a news business is a massive time sucking money losing prop..their revenues and profits do not come from letting goof balls bash articles and fight with each other, that adds ZERO value to the top or bottom line. When considering a capitalist company, the first directive is revenue and profits. They took away your playground because too many of your kid friends cant control their traps and thus you make it a disincentive to even have the feature. You are the microcosm of why it is gone.
u are so far off. these corporations best play along or they will get cancelled by the elites. that's why tucker, the most popular news show in US history, got cancelled from Fox. the elites don't want people to hear the truth, like the footage of capital police escorting 'rioters' into the chambers of congress, because that hurts their agenda. to get richer! it's also why they tried to ostracize elon and interfere with his purchase of twitter because he might find the truth and fortunately he was too wealthy. so we all got to read the twitter files or let me guess, you don't believe the truth about every branch of the government conspiring to protect the lies of the people/elites u trust. and then you call me/us conspiracy theorists.
ROFL
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@nostradumbass You can continue to swim in your conspiracy kiddie pool, nobody will ever stop you from thinking the government is controlling your mind...only you can. Corps in the US are not running their businesses to the dictates of government control, even icky democrat liberal slimeball ones, businesses keep their doors open by bringing in revenues and making a profit. Message boards for a news business is a massive time sucking money losing prop..their revenues and profits do not come from letting goof balls bash articles and fight with each other, that adds ZERO value to the top or bottom line. When considering a capitalist company, the first directive is revenue and profits. They took away your playground because too many of your kid friends cant control their traps and thus you make it a disincentive to even have the feature. You are the microcosm of why it is gone.
u are so far off. these corporations best play along or they will get cancelled by the elites. that's why tucker, the most popular news show in US history, got cancelled from Fox. the elites don't want people to hear the truth, like the footage of capital police escorting 'rioters' into the chambers of congress, because that hurts their agenda. to get richer! it's also why they tried to ostracize elon and interfere with his purchase of twitter because he might find the truth and fortunately he was too wealthy. so we all got to read the twitter files or let me guess, you don't believe the truth about every branch of the government conspiring to protect the lies of the people/elites u trust. and then you call me/us conspiracy theorists.
Tucker is not a US corporation, Tucker was an employee of a US corporation, he got canned for being brazen and stupid by stepping over the line speaking about his employers and some in upper management amongst other things. Trump did not tell YOU the truth about why Tucker got the boot. Some employees think they are so key and critical that they are more important than the ownership and upper management. He got what was coming for him and unfortunately he did not learn anything and will keep having a superiority complex even after this obvious dismissal.
I do not share your Orwellian view of the US, I would even consider you more bent than Orwell was.
0
@nostradumbass
Tucker is not a US corporation, Tucker was an employee of a US corporation, he got canned for being brazen and stupid by stepping over the line speaking about his employers and some in upper management amongst other things. Trump did not tell YOU the truth about why Tucker got the boot. Some employees think they are so key and critical that they are more important than the ownership and upper management. He got what was coming for him and unfortunately he did not learn anything and will keep having a superiority complex even after this obvious dismissal.
I do not share your Orwellian view of the US, I would even consider you more bent than Orwell was.
@nostradumbass Tucker is not a US corporation, Tucker was an employee of a US corporation, he got canned for being brazen and stupid by stepping over the line speaking about his employers and some in upper management amongst other things. Trump did not tell YOU the truth about why Tucker got the boot. Some employees think they are so key and critical that they are more important than the ownership and upper management. He got what was coming for him and unfortunately he did not learn anything and will keep having a superiority complex even after this obvious dismissal. I do not share your Orwellian view of the US, I would even consider you more bent than Orwell was.
I guess you missed the part about Tucker being the most popular news show in US history, and then in another sentence you say corporations are all about the bottom line. which one is it...are they trying to make money or they trying to silence the truth (to make money)? Which one you going with? I would say you have your answer because Tucker got fired for making them a lot of money. So the correct answer is, they want the truth silenced! Hmmm.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@nostradumbass Tucker is not a US corporation, Tucker was an employee of a US corporation, he got canned for being brazen and stupid by stepping over the line speaking about his employers and some in upper management amongst other things. Trump did not tell YOU the truth about why Tucker got the boot. Some employees think they are so key and critical that they are more important than the ownership and upper management. He got what was coming for him and unfortunately he did not learn anything and will keep having a superiority complex even after this obvious dismissal. I do not share your Orwellian view of the US, I would even consider you more bent than Orwell was.
I guess you missed the part about Tucker being the most popular news show in US history, and then in another sentence you say corporations are all about the bottom line. which one is it...are they trying to make money or they trying to silence the truth (to make money)? Which one you going with? I would say you have your answer because Tucker got fired for making them a lot of money. So the correct answer is, they want the truth silenced! Hmmm.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @nostradumbass Tucker is not a US corporation, Tucker was an employee of a US corporation, he got canned for being brazen and stupid by stepping over the line speaking about his employers and some in upper management amongst other things. Trump did not tell YOU the truth about why Tucker got the boot. Some employees think they are so key and critical that they are more important than the ownership and upper management. He got what was coming for him and unfortunately he did not learn anything and will keep having a superiority complex even after this obvious dismissal. I do not share your Orwellian view of the US, I would even consider you more bent than Orwell was.I guess you missed the part about Tucker being the most popular news show in US history, and then in another sentence you say corporations are all about the bottom line. which one is it...are they trying to make money or they trying to silence the truth (to make money)? Which one you going with? I would say you have your answer because Tucker got fired for making them a lot of money. So the correct answer is, they want the truth silenced! Hmmm.
Nothing about Tucker's show on Fox was news. It was purely biased infotainment. I guess you missed the part about Fox needing to pay out $1 billion dollars in lawsuits because of Tucker's infotainment lies. So in the end he lost Murdoch money by pushing election and January 6th lies. Guess you didn't pay attention to the lawsuit documents?? Not surprising because you only pay attention to what Tucker tells you too.
2
Quote Originally Posted by nostradumbass:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @nostradumbass Tucker is not a US corporation, Tucker was an employee of a US corporation, he got canned for being brazen and stupid by stepping over the line speaking about his employers and some in upper management amongst other things. Trump did not tell YOU the truth about why Tucker got the boot. Some employees think they are so key and critical that they are more important than the ownership and upper management. He got what was coming for him and unfortunately he did not learn anything and will keep having a superiority complex even after this obvious dismissal. I do not share your Orwellian view of the US, I would even consider you more bent than Orwell was.I guess you missed the part about Tucker being the most popular news show in US history, and then in another sentence you say corporations are all about the bottom line. which one is it...are they trying to make money or they trying to silence the truth (to make money)? Which one you going with? I would say you have your answer because Tucker got fired for making them a lot of money. So the correct answer is, they want the truth silenced! Hmmm.
Nothing about Tucker's show on Fox was news. It was purely biased infotainment. I guess you missed the part about Fox needing to pay out $1 billion dollars in lawsuits because of Tucker's infotainment lies. So in the end he lost Murdoch money by pushing election and January 6th lies. Guess you didn't pay attention to the lawsuit documents?? Not surprising because you only pay attention to what Tucker tells you too.
I think you forgot your original narrative speaking about how the government controls MSM, my reply was that MSM is US corps, US corps do not run their business based on government dictate. In communism that is what happens, government calls the shots on most all aspects of production and economic decisions. Then you replied with Tucker being silenced, well Tucker is an employee who signed a contract with his employer, he is not the corp even if he was their highest doobie he is not the owner of the business, he is not the CEO or even in the top several layers of management. He broke the terms of his contract, he got fired. It happens every day to even little fish not just the big brazen altitude attitude people like Tucker. I dont care if he made Fox money, congrats whatever and that has nothing to do with the original narrative, it has nothing to do with the fact that ANY employee can be fired, he got fired that is all there is to it. He had a contract, most states allow corps to fire someone because they feel like it and have little recourse for doing so.
Tucker got fired for not knowing his place, he felt he could break his employee contract BECAUSE he made so much money and those over him felt otherwise, he got canned and it was deserved.
1
@nostradumbass
I think you forgot your original narrative speaking about how the government controls MSM, my reply was that MSM is US corps, US corps do not run their business based on government dictate. In communism that is what happens, government calls the shots on most all aspects of production and economic decisions. Then you replied with Tucker being silenced, well Tucker is an employee who signed a contract with his employer, he is not the corp even if he was their highest doobie he is not the owner of the business, he is not the CEO or even in the top several layers of management. He broke the terms of his contract, he got fired. It happens every day to even little fish not just the big brazen altitude attitude people like Tucker. I dont care if he made Fox money, congrats whatever and that has nothing to do with the original narrative, it has nothing to do with the fact that ANY employee can be fired, he got fired that is all there is to it. He had a contract, most states allow corps to fire someone because they feel like it and have little recourse for doing so.
Tucker got fired for not knowing his place, he felt he could break his employee contract BECAUSE he made so much money and those over him felt otherwise, he got canned and it was deserved.
They did not need to call it breach of contract, just because they did not classify it as such does not mean they do not consider it so. Read what I wrote, he got fired because he did not know his proper place and boundaries, he did not show appropriate respect for people above him and that actually is written in most contracts, you have a code of conduct about how you act, things you say, how you represent the company.
Yes I do not know what I am talking about...you better believe that Fox made the decision knowing they were legally in the proper position to fire him and you also better believe that any large asset employee who has a contract agrees to terms of ethics and representation of the company. No question Fox fired him knowing they had legal grounds and those grounds are based on the contract he signed. My second point was that in many states corps can fire even with little reason, but in his case Tucker got fired for his words and actions which the corp felt was serious enough to let him go.
0
@UNIMAN
LOL
They did not need to call it breach of contract, just because they did not classify it as such does not mean they do not consider it so. Read what I wrote, he got fired because he did not know his proper place and boundaries, he did not show appropriate respect for people above him and that actually is written in most contracts, you have a code of conduct about how you act, things you say, how you represent the company.
Yes I do not know what I am talking about...you better believe that Fox made the decision knowing they were legally in the proper position to fire him and you also better believe that any large asset employee who has a contract agrees to terms of ethics and representation of the company. No question Fox fired him knowing they had legal grounds and those grounds are based on the contract he signed. My second point was that in many states corps can fire even with little reason, but in his case Tucker got fired for his words and actions which the corp felt was serious enough to let him go.
Rolling Stone; The letter comes a week after Fox sent Carlson a letter informing him that his new show, Tucker on Twitter, violates his contract with the network. The two parted ways in April, but Carlson is still collecting checks, with his contract running through the end of 2024.
He is still collecting checks, he still has a contract.
Search after search says Tucker fired!!!!! Yet he was just yanked off the air, silenced, cancelled.
0
Rolling Stone; The letter comes a week after Fox sent Carlson a letter informing him that his new show, Tucker on Twitter, violates his contract with the network. The two parted ways in April, but Carlson is still collecting checks, with his contract running through the end of 2024.
He is still collecting checks, he still has a contract.
Search after search says Tucker fired!!!!! Yet he was just yanked off the air, silenced, cancelled.
It does not matter they did not FIRE him, the reasons are what I stated, he did not know his place and show the proper respect to the company. So benching him vs firing him who the crap cares?
My source...well of course my source is the most left biased source I can find. I have a plug in on my Chrome to make sure my top sources for content are the most leftie leftist left I can find, it is very important that I find the most liberal government loving source of course of course.
Good work, benched vs firing, me thinks he is not currently broadcasting and representing the organization...but kudos that he is getting paid. I wonder why that is?
0
@UNIMAN
It does not matter they did not FIRE him, the reasons are what I stated, he did not know his place and show the proper respect to the company. So benching him vs firing him who the crap cares?
My source...well of course my source is the most left biased source I can find. I have a plug in on my Chrome to make sure my top sources for content are the most leftie leftist left I can find, it is very important that I find the most liberal government loving source of course of course.
Good work, benched vs firing, me thinks he is not currently broadcasting and representing the organization...but kudos that he is getting paid. I wonder why that is?
It appears as though Biden is in a real pickle now. His original claim of "I know nothing of my son's biz deals" has evolved all the way to "my son never received any money from China" ....... although HB said he did.
Hunter Biden admitted to a federal judge Wednesday that he received over $600,000 from a Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-backed company, contradicting President Biden’s insistence that nobody from his family "made money from China."
Prosecutors said in their proposed plea agreement with Hunter that he received $664,000 from a "Chinese infrastructure investment company," according to the official court transcript.
1
Gentlemen........let's try to stay on topic here.
It appears as though Biden is in a real pickle now. His original claim of "I know nothing of my son's biz deals" has evolved all the way to "my son never received any money from China" ....... although HB said he did.
Hunter Biden admitted to a federal judge Wednesday that he received over $600,000 from a Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-backed company, contradicting President Biden’s insistence that nobody from his family "made money from China."
Prosecutors said in their proposed plea agreement with Hunter that he received $664,000 from a "Chinese infrastructure investment company," according to the official court transcript.
@nostradumbass I think you forgot your original narrative speaking about how the government controls MSM, my reply was that MSM is US corps, US corps do not run their business based on government dictate. In communism that is what happens, government calls the shots on most all aspects of production and economic decisions. Then you replied with Tucker being silenced, well Tucker is an employee who signed a contract with his employer, he is not the corp even if he was their highest doobie he is not the owner of the business, he is not the CEO or even in the top several layers of management. He broke the terms of his contract, he got fired. It happens every day to even little fish not just the big brazen altitude attitude people like Tucker. I dont care if he made Fox money, congrats whatever and that has nothing to do with the original narrative, it has nothing to do with the fact that ANY employee can be fired, he got fired that is all there is to it. He had a contract, most states allow corps to fire someone because they feel like it and have little recourse for doing so. Tucker got fired for not knowing his place, he felt he could break his employee contract BECAUSE he made so much money and those over him felt otherwise, he got canned and it was deserved.
ummm ok, but no tucker got fired because he pushed the boundaries to deliver the facts. the rich guys felt threatened that his brazenry might lose them substantial amounts of money or even break them (you know off to prison!) if the narrative changed.
anyway, please explain why the capital police were escorting "rioters" thru the white house. I mean if it was an "Insurrection" then why would police be doing such a thing for a unarmed "rioter"? LMFRO dude that is checkmate and I will hear crickets on that one because it shatters your house of cards that are built on lies. It also got Tucker fired and that story silenced (for now).
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@nostradumbass I think you forgot your original narrative speaking about how the government controls MSM, my reply was that MSM is US corps, US corps do not run their business based on government dictate. In communism that is what happens, government calls the shots on most all aspects of production and economic decisions. Then you replied with Tucker being silenced, well Tucker is an employee who signed a contract with his employer, he is not the corp even if he was their highest doobie he is not the owner of the business, he is not the CEO or even in the top several layers of management. He broke the terms of his contract, he got fired. It happens every day to even little fish not just the big brazen altitude attitude people like Tucker. I dont care if he made Fox money, congrats whatever and that has nothing to do with the original narrative, it has nothing to do with the fact that ANY employee can be fired, he got fired that is all there is to it. He had a contract, most states allow corps to fire someone because they feel like it and have little recourse for doing so. Tucker got fired for not knowing his place, he felt he could break his employee contract BECAUSE he made so much money and those over him felt otherwise, he got canned and it was deserved.
ummm ok, but no tucker got fired because he pushed the boundaries to deliver the facts. the rich guys felt threatened that his brazenry might lose them substantial amounts of money or even break them (you know off to prison!) if the narrative changed.
anyway, please explain why the capital police were escorting "rioters" thru the white house. I mean if it was an "Insurrection" then why would police be doing such a thing for a unarmed "rioter"? LMFRO dude that is checkmate and I will hear crickets on that one because it shatters your house of cards that are built on lies. It also got Tucker fired and that story silenced (for now).
Gentlemen........let's try to stay on topic here. It appears as though Biden is in a real pickle now. His original claim of "I know nothing of my son's biz deals" has evolved all the way to "my son never received any money from China" ....... although HB said he did. Hunter Biden admitted to a federal judge Wednesday that he received over $600,000 from a Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-backed company, contradicting President Biden’s insistence that nobody from his family "made money from China." Prosecutors said in their proposed plea agreement with Hunter that he received $664,000 from a "Chinese infrastructure investment company," according to the official court transcript.
this is just the tip of the iceberg. obviously joe is involved and so is obama (ukraine and crimea both on their watch so it was financially motivated) but this web of lies just goes on and on. if we could only untangle it, I hope they find the straw that breaks the camels back....but they will probably escape because theyre so well connected and backed by brainwashed fools that believe them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Gentlemen........let's try to stay on topic here. It appears as though Biden is in a real pickle now. His original claim of "I know nothing of my son's biz deals" has evolved all the way to "my son never received any money from China" ....... although HB said he did. Hunter Biden admitted to a federal judge Wednesday that he received over $600,000 from a Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-backed company, contradicting President Biden’s insistence that nobody from his family "made money from China." Prosecutors said in their proposed plea agreement with Hunter that he received $664,000 from a "Chinese infrastructure investment company," according to the official court transcript.
this is just the tip of the iceberg. obviously joe is involved and so is obama (ukraine and crimea both on their watch so it was financially motivated) but this web of lies just goes on and on. if we could only untangle it, I hope they find the straw that breaks the camels back....but they will probably escape because theyre so well connected and backed by brainwashed fools that believe them.
can we all just wait for wall st to explain the unarmed "INSURRECTIONS" getting a police escort thru the white house. that guy is in jail and here we have people defending liars!
BUT PLEASE, lets hold him to that because he will silence me.
0
can we all just wait for wall st to explain the unarmed "INSURRECTIONS" getting a police escort thru the white house. that guy is in jail and here we have people defending liars!
BUT PLEASE, lets hold him to that because he will silence me.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.