Today, the federal court ruled that the ORANGE DOTARD JACKASS does not enjoy the same privileges that the King of England enjoyed, because this is a democracy. It’s not a fascist nation (despite some MAGA fascist incitements), no matter what the ORANGE USEFUL IDIOT lies about tomorrow. We all know he lies on the daily, it’s only the dregs of society that deny it. Go visit a clinic dregs, we can help get you right.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Today, the federal court ruled that the ORANGE DOTARD JACKASS does not enjoy the same privileges that the King of England enjoyed, because this is a democracy. It’s not a fascist nation (despite some MAGA fascist incitements), no matter what the ORANGE USEFUL IDIOT lies about tomorrow. We all know he lies on the daily, it’s only the dregs of society that deny it. Go visit a clinic dregs, we can help get you right.
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office.
0
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office.
Today, the federal court ruled that the ORANGE DOTARD JACKASS does not enjoy the same privileges that the King of England enjoyed, because this is a democracy. We all know he lies on the daily, it’s only the dregs of society that deny it.
@Sidehatch
No doubt trump is pouting about this ruling, especially the "this is a democracy" part which he clearly does not understand.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:
Today, the federal court ruled that the ORANGE DOTARD JACKASS does not enjoy the same privileges that the King of England enjoyed, because this is a democracy. We all know he lies on the daily, it’s only the dregs of society that deny it.
@Sidehatch
No doubt trump is pouting about this ruling, especially the "this is a democracy" part which he clearly does not understand.
Republican Cheney and democrat Schitts warn that if Trump is re-elected, he won't voluntarily leave office. Afterall, he would lose presidential immunity against crimes. The most corrupt administration in US history is expected to undermine legal norms and rule of laws.
0
Republican Cheney and democrat Schitts warn that if Trump is re-elected, he won't voluntarily leave office. Afterall, he would lose presidential immunity against crimes. The most corrupt administration in US history is expected to undermine legal norms and rule of laws.
Please don’t call them Democrat shits . Since when has it been deemed nice to call someone a piece of poop ?
you can simply refer to them by name as you did the Republican Cheney . My goodness . We’re going backwards as a society .
what’s next ? Let me guess , you’re going to refer to them as dotards and say you hate rhymes but that you love rap music ?
or you’re going to start a thread that never should have been made in the first place and instead could have been lumped into any one of the other Anti-Trump threads currently littering this forum ?
it’s like Tent City in here with all these vagabond threads . One after another , all in a row . No one cares about each other anymore . Everyone is way too selfish . Put your cockamamie differences aside , and Please start helping …..
third your thoughts ?
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
Please don’t call them Democrat shits . Since when has it been deemed nice to call someone a piece of poop ?
you can simply refer to them by name as you did the Republican Cheney . My goodness . We’re going backwards as a society .
what’s next ? Let me guess , you’re going to refer to them as dotards and say you hate rhymes but that you love rap music ?
or you’re going to start a thread that never should have been made in the first place and instead could have been lumped into any one of the other Anti-Trump threads currently littering this forum ?
it’s like Tent City in here with all these vagabond threads . One after another , all in a row . No one cares about each other anymore . Everyone is way too selfish . Put your cockamamie differences aside , and Please start helping …..
Can't wait til Joe is out of office so we can charge him with a slew of crimes! Open borders, cocaine in the White House, deaths of innocent Palestians, skys the limit!
0
Can't wait til Joe is out of office so we can charge him with a slew of crimes! Open borders, cocaine in the White House, deaths of innocent Palestians, skys the limit!
Can't wait til Joe is out of office so we can charge him with a slew of crimes! Open borders, cocaine in the White House, deaths of innocent Palestians, skys the limit!
"After that, I'm not a dictator, OK?" the Republican presidential frontrunner told Fox News host Sean Hannity before a very friendly crowd in Davenport, Iowa.
Trump declined to discuss his pledges of "retribution" against political opponents, including threats to investigate President Joe Biden and others who have criticized him.
"I'll only be a dictator on day one".... go get 'em Donnie
America First
1
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Can't wait til Joe is out of office so we can charge him with a slew of crimes! Open borders, cocaine in the White House, deaths of innocent Palestians, skys the limit!
"After that, I'm not a dictator, OK?" the Republican presidential frontrunner told Fox News host Sean Hannity before a very friendly crowd in Davenport, Iowa.
Trump declined to discuss his pledges of "retribution" against political opponents, including threats to investigate President Joe Biden and others who have criticized him.
"I'll only be a dictator on day one".... go get 'em Donnie
Can't wait til Joe is out of office so we can charge him with a slew of crimes! Open borders, cocaine in the White House, deaths of innocent Palestians, skys the limit!
Despite months of investigations, House GOP committee has failed to find real evidence of any crime by Joe Biden. US south border is among the most secured in the world because of thousands of officers and extensive barriers. But republicans just want restrictions to reduce both legal and illegal migration. No evidence that Bidens are linked to cocaine found in the white house. Israel military is responsible for civilian casualties in Gaza and not the US.
2
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Can't wait til Joe is out of office so we can charge him with a slew of crimes! Open borders, cocaine in the White House, deaths of innocent Palestians, skys the limit!
Despite months of investigations, House GOP committee has failed to find real evidence of any crime by Joe Biden. US south border is among the most secured in the world because of thousands of officers and extensive barriers. But republicans just want restrictions to reduce both legal and illegal migration. No evidence that Bidens are linked to cocaine found in the white house. Israel military is responsible for civilian casualties in Gaza and not the US.
Today, the federal court ruled that the ORANGE DOTARD JACKASS does not enjoy the same privileges that the King of England enjoyed, because this is a democracy. It’s not a fascist nation (despite some MAGA fascist incitements), no matter what the ORANGE USEFUL IDIOT lies about tomorrow. We all know he lies on the daily, it’s only the dregs of society that deny it. Go visit a clinic dregs, we can help get you right.
tell me you’re 12yo without telling me you’re 12yo……….
Freedom road was a one-way street
1
Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:
Today, the federal court ruled that the ORANGE DOTARD JACKASS does not enjoy the same privileges that the King of England enjoyed, because this is a democracy. It’s not a fascist nation (despite some MAGA fascist incitements), no matter what the ORANGE USEFUL IDIOT lies about tomorrow. We all know he lies on the daily, it’s only the dregs of society that deny it. Go visit a clinic dregs, we can help get you right.
tell me you’re 12yo without telling me you’re 12yo……….
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office.
@thirdperson I believe Trump team has appealed this ruling too.
2
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office.
@thirdperson I believe Trump team has appealed this ruling too.
@thirdperson US south border is among the most secured in the world because of thousands of officers and extensive barriers. This is obviously nonsense or there would not be so many illegals getting through it.
Most illegal migrants enter US legally by land, water and air but overstay their temporary time limit. For decades, congress has failed to pass immigration reforms despite agreeing to international law to accept asylum seekers. Restricting number allowed has created huge backlogs in processing claims.
3
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@thirdperson US south border is among the most secured in the world because of thousands of officers and extensive barriers. This is obviously nonsense or there would not be so many illegals getting through it.
Most illegal migrants enter US legally by land, water and air but overstay their temporary time limit. For decades, congress has failed to pass immigration reforms despite agreeing to international law to accept asylum seekers. Restricting number allowed has created huge backlogs in processing claims.
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. I believe Trump team has appealed this ruling too.
Prosecutors have strong cases against Trump. Without any good defensive argument, Trump lawyers can only resort to weak delay tactics. But justice delayed is justice denied.
3
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. I believe Trump team has appealed this ruling too.
Prosecutors have strong cases against Trump. Without any good defensive argument, Trump lawyers can only resort to weak delay tactics. But justice delayed is justice denied.
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @thirdperson US south border is among the most secured in the world because of thousands of officers and extensive barriers. This is obviously nonsense or there would not be so many illegals getting through it. Most illegal migrants enter US legally by land, water and air but overstay their temporary time limit. For decades, congress has failed to pass immigration reforms despite agreeing to international law to accept asylum seekers. Restricting number allowed has created huge backlogs in processing claims.
Focus. You sound silly when you continuously try to deflect on the points.
STOP the illegals that are crossing AND STOP the ones overstaying their visas.
Just because you have multiple problems it does NOT mean you have to focus on just one of them. Clearly one is way worse than the other.
You do NOT need reforms -- that is a lazy intellectual copout -- simply enforce the laws you have.
The Leftist myth that they are legitimate asylum seekers is another laughable deflection as well.
2
@thirdperson
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @thirdperson US south border is among the most secured in the world because of thousands of officers and extensive barriers. This is obviously nonsense or there would not be so many illegals getting through it. Most illegal migrants enter US legally by land, water and air but overstay their temporary time limit. For decades, congress has failed to pass immigration reforms despite agreeing to international law to accept asylum seekers. Restricting number allowed has created huge backlogs in processing claims.
Focus. You sound silly when you continuously try to deflect on the points.
STOP the illegals that are crossing AND STOP the ones overstaying their visas.
Just because you have multiple problems it does NOT mean you have to focus on just one of them. Clearly one is way worse than the other.
You do NOT need reforms -- that is a lazy intellectual copout -- simply enforce the laws you have.
The Leftist myth that they are legitimate asylum seekers is another laughable deflection as well.
Court: Trump’s “Absolute Immunity” is “Absolute BS”
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office.
Getting back to the topic of THIS thread...
Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events.
4
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Court: Trump’s “Absolute Immunity” is “Absolute BS”
Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office.
Getting back to the topic of THIS thread...
Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events.
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Court: Trump’s “Absolute Immunity” is “Absolute BS” Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office. Getting back to the topic of THIS thread... Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events.
get outside man you might actually enjoy it.
Freedom road was a one-way street
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Court: Trump’s “Absolute Immunity” is “Absolute BS” Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office. Getting back to the topic of THIS thread... Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events.
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Court: Trump’s “Absolute Immunity” is “Absolute BS” Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office. Getting back to the topic of THIS thread... Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events.
True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Court: Trump’s “Absolute Immunity” is “Absolute BS” Federal appeals court rules that Trump isn't entitled to presidential immunity against lawsuits seeking to hold him accountable for violence at capitol during January 6 attack. Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Former presidents lack the immunity of a sitting president. Absurd to allow former presidents to escape liability for crimes committed while in office. Getting back to the topic of THIS thread... Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events.
True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs
Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs
Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs
Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses.
@thirdperson
Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses.
@thirdperson
Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses. @thirdperson Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.
scotus was initially scheduled to rreview the case on wednesday this week
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses. @thirdperson Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.
scotus was initially scheduled to rreview the case on wednesday this week
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses.
third alotta the guys here give me a hard time cuz they say “ spock you really don’t talk politics , and you don’t really add to the thread discussions “
now I’m not saying that hurts my feelings , because I’ve been pelted with rocks before and got up quick and ran , thus escaping “ a stoning “ in my life once or twice already , so metaphorically speaking I’m wearing a big fuzzy furry coat of “ I don’t give a fuck anymore “…..
and I really feel that things can’t squash me , or injure me , after that debacle of human decency of epic proportions , so the empty words divvied out by a few of our esteemed members here don’t really have an effect on me ya dig ?
but what do you think kemosabe , isn’t everything politics anyway ? I mean just the fact that members here won’t speak to each other is “ politics “ in and of itself , right ?
it’s always been like that I guess , for as long as I can remember anyway , even as a young being on this planet I understood that , so this isn’t surprising in the least , unlike that beatdown that the niners took from the ravens on Sunday night , now that got my toes curled ninety degrees ya heard ?
What do you think ?
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses.
third alotta the guys here give me a hard time cuz they say “ spock you really don’t talk politics , and you don’t really add to the thread discussions “
now I’m not saying that hurts my feelings , because I’ve been pelted with rocks before and got up quick and ran , thus escaping “ a stoning “ in my life once or twice already , so metaphorically speaking I’m wearing a big fuzzy furry coat of “ I don’t give a fuck anymore “…..
and I really feel that things can’t squash me , or injure me , after that debacle of human decency of epic proportions , so the empty words divvied out by a few of our esteemed members here don’t really have an effect on me ya dig ?
but what do you think kemosabe , isn’t everything politics anyway ? I mean just the fact that members here won’t speak to each other is “ politics “ in and of itself , right ?
it’s always been like that I guess , for as long as I can remember anyway , even as a young being on this planet I understood that , so this isn’t surprising in the least , unlike that beatdown that the niners took from the ravens on Sunday night , now that got my toes curled ninety degrees ya heard ?
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses. @thirdperson Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.
This will be another big test and hopefully partisanship will be left out of it.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses. @thirdperson Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.
This will be another big test and hopefully partisanship will be left out of it.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses. @thirdperson Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.scotus was initially scheduled to rreview the case on wednesday this week
Haven't yet read a word about this or if they are even addressing it today.
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Also judge rejects exoneration by senate. Interesting that the judge would add that rejection as well. I understand it, and agree, just that it seems more like an intent to foreshadow coming events. True but I wonder if that was appropriate by the judge. I mean the senate has its authority and judges have theirs Generally, judges should be more honest than politicians. Job requires judges to consider evidence and law. Whereas members of congress can make decisions based on politics while ignoring evidences and witnesses. @thirdperson Can't disagree with that, and it does look like the Supreme Court is going to weigh in on this by end of next week.scotus was initially scheduled to rreview the case on wednesday this week
Haven't yet read a word about this or if they are even addressing it today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.