Correcting the record. My daughter's annual responsibility was $8,800. Not $10,200.
Does anybody believe for one second that the scumbag DC Dems would wait until the election is over before filling the seat if the roles were reversed? The same Dems that spied on an incoming opposition party, pushed a false Russian collusion narrative, pushed through a "somber" impeachment and worked with the MSM to push a 24/7 negative (and often dishonest) news cycle? The Republicans dont owe them shit at this point.
Does anybody believe for one second that the scumbag DC Dems would wait until the election is over before filling the seat if the roles were reversed? The same Dems that spied on an incoming opposition party, pushed a false Russian collusion narrative, pushed through a "somber" impeachment and worked with the MSM to push a 24/7 negative (and often dishonest) news cycle? The Republicans dont owe them shit at this point.
I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes. I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump. So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party. The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office. Talk about hypocrisy.
I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes. I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump. So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party. The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office. Talk about hypocrisy.
This is my new favorite post ever. Congrats uncoolbear.
So just to understand, you asked some random 'friends' if they cared what Biden did after elected and then concluded that all people who support Biden wouldn't care what he did if elected. Absolutely priceless.
Just a comparison, I asked my Trump supporting friend Mitch if he would care if Trump killed a peaceful protestor and he said no., Therefore, I cannot believe you would support Trump killing a peaceful protestor.
You might want to use a smaller brush when you paint.
This is my new favorite post ever. Congrats uncoolbear.
So just to understand, you asked some random 'friends' if they cared what Biden did after elected and then concluded that all people who support Biden wouldn't care what he did if elected. Absolutely priceless.
Just a comparison, I asked my Trump supporting friend Mitch if he would care if Trump killed a peaceful protestor and he said no., Therefore, I cannot believe you would support Trump killing a peaceful protestor.
You might want to use a smaller brush when you paint.
Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties. Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost". When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail). So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?
Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties. Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost". When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail). So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?
Well why didn't you say so. If I had known that in addition to your few liberal friends, some unknown person on twitter thinks Biden will step down and let Harris take over, I never would have commented on your logical fallacy (it is actually numbers 3-15 of logical fallacies, see below).
I have answered this before. I don't fault Trump for appointing a Justice. In fact, I have said I believe he is required to do so. My point has always been that no Republican who argued that they needed to wait until the 2016 election to replace Scalia can support the appointment now without being labelled a hypocrite. I realize that doesn't bother you which is fine.
https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/
Well why didn't you say so. If I had known that in addition to your few liberal friends, some unknown person on twitter thinks Biden will step down and let Harris take over, I never would have commented on your logical fallacy (it is actually numbers 3-15 of logical fallacies, see below).
I have answered this before. I don't fault Trump for appointing a Justice. In fact, I have said I believe he is required to do so. My point has always been that no Republican who argued that they needed to wait until the 2016 election to replace Scalia can support the appointment now without being labelled a hypocrite. I realize that doesn't bother you which is fine.
https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/
Smug, arrogant liberals are my favorite. They are so much smarter than anyone yet they seem to be wrong about pretty much everything. Just do us a favor and post a picture of your face when they announce the election results so us dumb, uneducated Trump voters can point and laugh.... again.
Smug, arrogant liberals are my favorite. They are so much smarter than anyone yet they seem to be wrong about pretty much everything. Just do us a favor and post a picture of your face when they announce the election results so us dumb, uneducated Trump voters can point and laugh.... again.
Interesting. You haven't done anything to distinguish yourself here so I cannot say what your politics are, other than the post you made above. I also didn't make any comment about your lack of education; rather you did. Don't be insecure! I am certain you have far exceeded expectations.
As for me, I must be doing something right when those on the right call me liberal and those on the left call me conservative. Right where I want to be. Thanks for checking in.
Interesting. You haven't done anything to distinguish yourself here so I cannot say what your politics are, other than the post you made above. I also didn't make any comment about your lack of education; rather you did. Don't be insecure! I am certain you have far exceeded expectations.
As for me, I must be doing something right when those on the right call me liberal and those on the left call me conservative. Right where I want to be. Thanks for checking in.
I guess I just don't understand what "moderators" are supposed to do. Covers employees seem to be guilty of behaviors that require moderating. Maybe they just need more moderators? 2020 is so confusing.
I guess I just don't understand what "moderators" are supposed to do. Covers employees seem to be guilty of behaviors that require moderating. Maybe they just need more moderators? 2020 is so confusing.
I’m sure this post was necessary as opposed to discussing the topic at hand
I’m sure this post was necessary as opposed to discussing the topic at hand
Thanks for that recap, fubah2. It just might be tight Senate races that keep us political junkies up late on November 3rd.
Go Blue Tsunami!
Thanks for that recap, fubah2. It just might be tight Senate races that keep us political junkies up late on November 3rd.
Go Blue Tsunami!
Agreed. Will be a very long night.
But here is something interesting I posted in a thread on Monday:
speculation is we likely won't know the winner for days, and possibly weeks.
And if trump refuses to conceed he lost, then it could be tied up in the courts.
OR, if the Dems contest the results in the courts, likewise it could be tied up for MONTHS!
The article stated something I did not relize: if there is no president declared by Inauguration Day
then by default the Speaker of the House becomes interim president.
Agreed. Will be a very long night.
But here is something interesting I posted in a thread on Monday:
speculation is we likely won't know the winner for days, and possibly weeks.
And if trump refuses to conceed he lost, then it could be tied up in the courts.
OR, if the Dems contest the results in the courts, likewise it could be tied up for MONTHS!
The article stated something I did not relize: if there is no president declared by Inauguration Day
then by default the Speaker of the House becomes interim president.
Absolutely!!
We need 9 Justices and now, unfortunately, there is a vacancy.
FILL THE SEAT!!!
Absolutely!!
We need 9 Justices and now, unfortunately, there is a vacancy.
FILL THE SEAT!!!
Obviously.
But having the votes or not is NOT the motive to confirm a nomination for the bench.
It is because there is a vacancy on the bench. Having 9 is customary and there is a vacancy.
We worry about "getting the votes" later.
FILL THE SEAT!!!
Obviously.
But having the votes or not is NOT the motive to confirm a nomination for the bench.
It is because there is a vacancy on the bench. Having 9 is customary and there is a vacancy.
We worry about "getting the votes" later.
FILL THE SEAT!!!
It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election.
It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election.
possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left .
rump wants it before the election for two reasons
one, he can claim a victory of sorts
and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory !
dems know this . so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known and it is indisputable by any lawsuits .
yes the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat .
i say hunker down
and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices
confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces
possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left .
rump wants it before the election for two reasons
one, he can claim a victory of sorts
and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory !
dems know this . so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known and it is indisputable by any lawsuits .
yes the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat .
i say hunker down
and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices
confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces
Yeah but first thing first, let's see if Dems could sweep the Nov. election. 12 justices probably won't cut it, Dems need the tie breaker, increase SCOTUS to 13 justices if Dems should sweep. 7-6 will break the tie.
Yeah but first thing first, let's see if Dems could sweep the Nov. election. 12 justices probably won't cut it, Dems need the tie breaker, increase SCOTUS to 13 justices if Dems should sweep. 7-6 will break the tie.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.