This is a quite simple fix. Regardless of what you believe are the veracity of polygraph testing, have Kavanaugh take one administered by an impartial tester and confirm the woman's test again with another impartial tester. If they both pass, Kavanaugh is innocent. If they both fail, Kavanaugh is innocent. If the woman passes, and Kavanaugh doesn't, well.........
If he has nothing to hide what does he have to lose? He says he was drunk and didn't remember that night so there's a good chance he passes.
Don't be stealing my mantra!
The accuser Christine Blasey Ford says she doesn’t remember many details of the event, such as how she got home, the exact year it took place, or how the gathering was put together.
How convenient!
There are therapist notes from that time (2012) she say's to prove the allegation, only they don’t name Kavanaugh, and they say four boys were involved, not two.
If,she goes before the grilling of the Congressional Senators..they will show,that this woman is not stable.........This should make for good entertainment..
Why come forward? What could she possibly gain? What did Anita Hill gain when she came out about Clarence Thomas?
Maybe she would feel guilty if she didn't come forward about someone seeking such a high position in our country.
We've heard very little from her so far, so why not hear her out? If she's a fraud, her career will be ruined. If she's truthful, she'll be a hero for speaking out.
Don't be stealing my mantra!
Judge has already admitted to sexual assault of the kind that this woman is alleging in his memoirs. If he were to testify he would sell out Kavanaugh faster than you can say Manafort. He could easily say the only reason this woman wasn't raped was because he drunkenly stumbled on both of them allowing the woman to run to the bathroom and lock the doors. I'm sure the Democrats are combing through Kavanaugh's social circles as we speak and if there is even one witness who can credibly place Kavanaugh at said party, his nomination would be toast and it couldn't happen to a nicer guy either.
There are stories that Ford sent a similar letter during Gorsuch nomination. If she did it is over.
The entire episode is a delay tactic. The event as described in the letter isn't even a crime. The FBI is not going to investigate the incident. She either attends or has her Soros backed attorney show up and answer questions.
There are stories that Ford sent a similar letter during Gorsuch nomination. If she did it is over.
The entire episode is a delay tactic. The event as described in the letter isn't even a crime. The FBI is not going to investigate the incident. She either attends or has her Soros backed attorney show up and answer questions.
Katz, a longtime Democratic donor known for representing sexual harassment accusers, also has a history of downplaying or dismissing accusations made by women against Democratic politicians -- including former President Bill Clinton and former Minnesota Sen. Al Franken.
“Paula Jones' suit is very, very, very weak,” Katz said on CNN’s “Talkback Live” in March 1998 in a discussion about Jones’ claims against Clinton, according to a show transcript. “She's alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”
Katz, speaking to the newspaper, added, ''If it's one time, it has to be severe, almost a sexual assault, not just a touching of somebody's breast or buttocks or even forceful kissing.”
In more recent years, Katz also downplayed the wave of sexual misconduct allegations against Franken, who denied some of the allegations but eventually resigned from the Senate over them.
"Context is relevant,” Katz said of Franken, who was a comedian before his election to the Senate. “He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
