• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    WHY ARE ALL YOU RIGHTIES SO QUIET ABOUT jrs. E-MAILS.

    «First Previous 678 ... 789 Next Last»
    MoneySRH
    SarasotaSlim
    Crusher13
    wallstreetcappers
    darkhorse12
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 6565
    Posts: 203
    «First Previous 678 ... 789 Next Last»
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 7:28 PM ET #126

    Liberalism has destroyed the country. Debates in the U.S. house and senate used to be angry and vigorous and filled with personal attacks. I wish things today were how it was back then. Now the majority are effeminate beta males, who want "safe speech."

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Liberalism has destroyed the country. Debates in the U.S. house and senate used to be angry and vigorous and filled with personal attacks. I wish things today were how it was back then. Now the majority are effeminate beta males, who want "safe speech."

     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35486
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 7:35 PM ET #127

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    You seriously want to compare the two posters in how they treat the "opponent"? 

    I find it pathetic that you always have time to chime in to be critical and like some of your party folks here, will blindly support anyone that shares your political view even if they are angry, bitter and unpleasant...much like Trump.

    Money is one of the most angry, bitter, unpleasant posters in this forum. I dont mind someone disagreeing with me, no problem at all but the levels to which he despises others who do not share his viewpoint is just really pathetic.



    Did not compare ..............

    Only said the OP set the tone of the discussion..he's the one ( the OP) that should be targeted for criticism ..not the ones that answer to his touting thread post ...

    ..and yes 60 million people,,that voted for President Trump are angry, bitter and unpleasant at times ...much like Trump and for a good reason ...

    President Donald J.Trump won the election and now the left are crying ,,it's the refs fault ...BS.   Shake it off ..rub some dirt on it and lets move on..instead of constantly attacking the winning side which you are also guilt of.........of many times..
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    You seriously want to compare the two posters in how they treat the "opponent"? 

    I find it pathetic that you always have time to chime in to be critical and like some of your party folks here, will blindly support anyone that shares your political view even if they are angry, bitter and unpleasant...much like Trump.

    Money is one of the most angry, bitter, unpleasant posters in this forum. I dont mind someone disagreeing with me, no problem at all but the levels to which he despises others who do not share his viewpoint is just really pathetic.



    Did not compare ..............

    Only said the OP set the tone of the discussion..he's the one ( the OP) that should be targeted for criticism ..not the ones that answer to his touting thread post ...

    ..and yes 60 million people,,that voted for President Trump are angry, bitter and unpleasant at times ...much like Trump and for a good reason ...

    President Donald J.Trump won the election and now the left are crying ,,it's the refs fault ...BS.   Shake it off ..rub some dirt on it and lets move on..instead of constantly attacking the winning side which you are also guilt of.........of many times..
     
    Crusher13
    Crusher13
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 8038
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:07 PM ET #128

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Such an angry, bitter, disrespectful, unpleasant thing to say about the POTUS. Oh, the irony...


    Very TRUE...

    Mr. Wallstreet, the facts are that LIBERALS are the ones that CAN"T debate on substance..Liberalism is a disaster in our country, look no further than the states and cities governed by them....Illinois, CALIFORNIA, NYC..the list could go on..

    Then why did a "schmuck" win the presidency?? Obviously,  because  BOH and his administration did a terrible job running this once great country...even BOH campigned tirelessly to protect his "legacy"...how's that working out for him.now?? Just look at his failed policies..just terrible for this nation..

    I'm sorry you feel so harshly towards our 45th POTUS but when one preaches to us to be openminded, it's best for you as the Forum policeman to set the example for us all..Like SLIM noted, the OP created this divisive thread taunting his political opposition which he succeeded in inciting rabid replies that have been completely vindicated with factual replies...ie That Chalupa chick's involvement with Ukraine "colluding" with DNC..

    Debating SUBSTANCE instead of baiting others is my preference too...but, ironically, the liberals don't have anything to back their positions and focus on attacking and defaming their opposition..Pelosi, Chucky Schumer with the aid of their MSM friends...That is the REAL COLLUSION story....if only one of their "cliques" break ranks and investigate the "real crimes that have been commited"..they'd win a Pulitzer Prize for unearthing so much "treasure"
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Such an angry, bitter, disrespectful, unpleasant thing to say about the POTUS. Oh, the irony...


    Very TRUE...

    Mr. Wallstreet, the facts are that LIBERALS are the ones that CAN"T debate on substance..Liberalism is a disaster in our country, look no further than the states and cities governed by them....Illinois, CALIFORNIA, NYC..the list could go on..

    Then why did a "schmuck" win the presidency?? Obviously,  because  BOH and his administration did a terrible job running this once great country...even BOH campigned tirelessly to protect his "legacy"...how's that working out for him.now?? Just look at his failed policies..just terrible for this nation..

    I'm sorry you feel so harshly towards our 45th POTUS but when one preaches to us to be openminded, it's best for you as the Forum policeman to set the example for us all..Like SLIM noted, the OP created this divisive thread taunting his political opposition which he succeeded in inciting rabid replies that have been completely vindicated with factual replies...ie That Chalupa chick's involvement with Ukraine "colluding" with DNC..

    Debating SUBSTANCE instead of baiting others is my preference too...but, ironically, the liberals don't have anything to back their positions and focus on attacking and defaming their opposition..Pelosi, Chucky Schumer with the aid of their MSM friends...That is the REAL COLLUSION story....if only one of their "cliques" break ranks and investigate the "real crimes that have been commited"..they'd win a Pulitzer Prize for unearthing so much "treasure"
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58401
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:09 PM ET #129

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



    Did not compare ..............

    Only said the OP set the tone of the discussion..he's the one ( the OP) that should be targeted for criticism ..not the ones that answer to his touting thread post ...

    ..and yes 60 million people,,that voted for President Trump are angry, bitter and unpleasant at times ...much like Trump and for a good reason ...

    President Donald J.Trump won the election and now the left are crying ,,it's the refs fault ...BS.   Shake it off ..rub some dirt on it and lets move on..instead of constantly attacking the winning side which you are also guilt of.........of many times..

    That is quite telling about the average person. Yeah Clinton was horrible, no question about it...but the way you and others ignore the abhorrent things Trump did, does and will do is just absurd.

    It would be more respectful to hear from your aisle that Trump is a schmuck, his actions and behavior are indicative of that, BUT just admit that you are more interested in your own personal agenda and are accepting of Trump and his major flaws to forward your political position. 

    That would be at least admitting what a joke Trump is but that the issue for you is the forwarding of your agenda...I never hear that ever...rather people either deflect (as you do) or ignore (as you do) or rationalize (as you do) this awful person who represents your party and this country.

    If Clinton were elected I would and did say critical things about her, I didnt care for Clinton, but comparing the two choices we have, I'd still choose her over Trump. That is not saying much at all but that Trump is such an awful, disgusting person.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



    Did not compare ..............

    Only said the OP set the tone of the discussion..he's the one ( the OP) that should be targeted for criticism ..not the ones that answer to his touting thread post ...

    ..and yes 60 million people,,that voted for President Trump are angry, bitter and unpleasant at times ...much like Trump and for a good reason ...

    President Donald J.Trump won the election and now the left are crying ,,it's the refs fault ...BS.   Shake it off ..rub some dirt on it and lets move on..instead of constantly attacking the winning side which you are also guilt of.........of many times..

    That is quite telling about the average person. Yeah Clinton was horrible, no question about it...but the way you and others ignore the abhorrent things Trump did, does and will do is just absurd.

    It would be more respectful to hear from your aisle that Trump is a schmuck, his actions and behavior are indicative of that, BUT just admit that you are more interested in your own personal agenda and are accepting of Trump and his major flaws to forward your political position. 

    That would be at least admitting what a joke Trump is but that the issue for you is the forwarding of your agenda...I never hear that ever...rather people either deflect (as you do) or ignore (as you do) or rationalize (as you do) this awful person who represents your party and this country.

    If Clinton were elected I would and did say critical things about her, I didnt care for Clinton, but comparing the two choices we have, I'd still choose her over Trump. That is not saying much at all but that Trump is such an awful, disgusting person.
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:13 PM ET #130

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



    Did not compare ..............

    Only said the OP set the tone of the discussion..he's the one ( the OP) that should be targeted for criticism ..not the ones that answer to his touting thread post ...

    ..and yes 60 million people,,that voted for President Trump are angry, bitter and unpleasant at times ...much like Trump and for a good reason ...

    President Donald J.Trump won the election and now the left are crying ,,it's the refs fault ...BS.   Shake it off ..rub some dirt on it and lets move on..instead of constantly attacking the winning side which you are also guilt of.........of many times..

    Almost 63 million slim, almost 66 million for clinton.I believe we might be the only country in the world where 2nd place is the winner. 
    And "move on" , how well did you move on 8 of the last 9 years? 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



    Did not compare ..............

    Only said the OP set the tone of the discussion..he's the one ( the OP) that should be targeted for criticism ..not the ones that answer to his touting thread post ...

    ..and yes 60 million people,,that voted for President Trump are angry, bitter and unpleasant at times ...much like Trump and for a good reason ...

    President Donald J.Trump won the election and now the left are crying ,,it's the refs fault ...BS.   Shake it off ..rub some dirt on it and lets move on..instead of constantly attacking the winning side which you are also guilt of.........of many times..

    Almost 63 million slim, almost 66 million for clinton.I believe we might be the only country in the world where 2nd place is the winner. 
    And "move on" , how well did you move on 8 of the last 9 years? 
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:19 PM ET #131

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Wallstreetcappers - You are the covers safe space police. I’m not going to get into an argument with you. For me to do so would be forum poster suicide. I would love to engage in debate man to man at a covers gathering in Las Vegas sometime.

    ilsp2003 - 1. Did Natalia Veselnitskaya ever meet with/ever email Hillary Clinton campaign staff to help Presidential Candidate Clinton win the Election? No. Why would she? She works with and for pro-Hillary democrats. No need for her to meet when she already has ties to democrats.

    “Russian government attorney” Everything in Russia is state controlled. In other words, no one can do his or her own thing because the Russian government is in control of everything. Every attorney in Russia technically works for the government.

    2. Do you really know who Natalia Veselnitskaya is? Yes. She is an anti-trump, pro-Clinton, Russian-activist-lobbyist-lawyer, that lobbies against the Magnitsky Act, who hires democrats, who works with fusion GPS democrats, who was spotted at a congressional hearing sitting with Obama officials, and who was given a special waiver by Obama’s justice department and Loretta Lynch.

    3. Number is a bunch of pointless gibberish.


    You think she was anti trump pro clinton? Not very logical since putin blames clinton for russian protests against him during their election in 2012. If that were the case she would be worse off than magnitzky.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Wallstreetcappers - You are the covers safe space police. I’m not going to get into an argument with you. For me to do so would be forum poster suicide. I would love to engage in debate man to man at a covers gathering in Las Vegas sometime.

    ilsp2003 - 1. Did Natalia Veselnitskaya ever meet with/ever email Hillary Clinton campaign staff to help Presidential Candidate Clinton win the Election? No. Why would she? She works with and for pro-Hillary democrats. No need for her to meet when she already has ties to democrats.

    “Russian government attorney” Everything in Russia is state controlled. In other words, no one can do his or her own thing because the Russian government is in control of everything. Every attorney in Russia technically works for the government.

    2. Do you really know who Natalia Veselnitskaya is? Yes. She is an anti-trump, pro-Clinton, Russian-activist-lobbyist-lawyer, that lobbies against the Magnitsky Act, who hires democrats, who works with fusion GPS democrats, who was spotted at a congressional hearing sitting with Obama officials, and who was given a special waiver by Obama’s justice department and Loretta Lynch.

    3. Number is a bunch of pointless gibberish.


    You think she was anti trump pro clinton? Not very logical since putin blames clinton for russian protests against him during their election in 2012. If that were the case she would be worse off than magnitzky.
     
    Pdriver
    Pdriver
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 192
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:20 PM ET #132

    Trump didn't collude. But if there was collusion it was definitely the black guys fault.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Trump didn't collude. But if there was collusion it was definitely the black guys fault.
     
    Crusher13
    Crusher13
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 8038
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:33 PM ET #133

    Hey Trick Dicky..DJT never "tried" in CALI because he knew all the "lefties" that inhabite that state..Btw, financially, how's that working out for them.. He didn't care about their 5 million votes..

     Can't spend other people's money fast enough..

    Yes Wall, DJT has plenty of faults and weaknesses..I totally agree but he is also learning "on the job"..he isn't a politician and like I  originally stated in my initial "the Donald" thread I started back in 2015..he is left center on some issues( see him with Macron)..he will adjust when need be but his is rightly "very conservative" on others..immigration, national defense, fiscal policy....

    Facts are people need to get off their "duff" and go to work. Start taking iniative and improving their OWN lives. not being dependent on govt handouts...

    And yes commenting on Macron's wife's sexy legs and limbs COULD be considered sleazy...but..you got to remember DJT has ALWAYS   been fond of pretty woman ....after all..he has been doing the beauty contest  thing for quite some time..I, like him,thoroughly enjoy noticing a beautiful woman...especially when you can tell the difference 

    And yes it's not fair..it's all about the gene pool we are EACH blessed with
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hey Trick Dicky..DJT never "tried" in CALI because he knew all the "lefties" that inhabite that state..Btw, financially, how's that working out for them.. He didn't care about their 5 million votes..

     Can't spend other people's money fast enough..

    Yes Wall, DJT has plenty of faults and weaknesses..I totally agree but he is also learning "on the job"..he isn't a politician and like I  originally stated in my initial "the Donald" thread I started back in 2015..he is left center on some issues( see him with Macron)..he will adjust when need be but his is rightly "very conservative" on others..immigration, national defense, fiscal policy....

    Facts are people need to get off their "duff" and go to work. Start taking iniative and improving their OWN lives. not being dependent on govt handouts...

    And yes commenting on Macron's wife's sexy legs and limbs COULD be considered sleazy...but..you got to remember DJT has ALWAYS   been fond of pretty woman ....after all..he has been doing the beauty contest  thing for quite some time..I, like him,thoroughly enjoy noticing a beautiful woman...especially when you can tell the difference 

    And yes it's not fair..it's all about the gene pool we are EACH blessed with
     
    Pdriver
    Pdriver
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 192
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:34 PM ET #134

    if trump was indicted, tried and found guilty of election fraud, obstruction and a decade's worth of money laundering and resigned from office he still would have a 25-30% approval rating.
    The great propagandists are beloved by their base.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    if trump was indicted, tried and found guilty of election fraud, obstruction and a decade's worth of money laundering and resigned from office he still would have a 25-30% approval rating.
    The great propagandists are beloved by their base.
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58401
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:47 PM ET #135

    Trump isnt making anything better, not at all. He isnt going to improve anything because politicians serve corporations, Trump included.

    This country started down the wrong path long ago when we allowed corporations to control the process and offshore production without recourse and hide taxable monies legally without recourse.

    Look at the last decade of job numbers, look where the jobs are growing and look where they are not. I am not interested in the trades argument either, the trades sector is not large enough to support sustained job growth, nor does it fit the profile of the average person. Job growth is in low wage, high turnover service sector, what is Trump going to do to change that tsunami? It is impossible, the destruction of our country lies at the feet of our job base and tax base.

    Other countries highly penalize offshoring and tax offshore production/labor to disincentivize corporations from doing so...but we not only allow it, we pave the road with gold bricks making it easy to do so.

    Trump is a corporate manipulator and phony just as much as Jamie Dimon is or how Romney was/is..he is not an outsider to anything.

    The only outsider was Sanders, with all his flaws and socialist ideas he was really the only outsider we had to choose from.

    People who think Trump is an outsider or not just another elitist are asleep and in denial to support their political biases.

    No other rationale I can see to portray Trump for anything but what he is than base political partisan biases. People will vote for nearly any piece of garbage in front of them as long as their partisan biases stay intact.

    Pretty sad...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Trump isnt making anything better, not at all. He isnt going to improve anything because politicians serve corporations, Trump included.

    This country started down the wrong path long ago when we allowed corporations to control the process and offshore production without recourse and hide taxable monies legally without recourse.

    Look at the last decade of job numbers, look where the jobs are growing and look where they are not. I am not interested in the trades argument either, the trades sector is not large enough to support sustained job growth, nor does it fit the profile of the average person. Job growth is in low wage, high turnover service sector, what is Trump going to do to change that tsunami? It is impossible, the destruction of our country lies at the feet of our job base and tax base.

    Other countries highly penalize offshoring and tax offshore production/labor to disincentivize corporations from doing so...but we not only allow it, we pave the road with gold bricks making it easy to do so.

    Trump is a corporate manipulator and phony just as much as Jamie Dimon is or how Romney was/is..he is not an outsider to anything.

    The only outsider was Sanders, with all his flaws and socialist ideas he was really the only outsider we had to choose from.

    People who think Trump is an outsider or not just another elitist are asleep and in denial to support their political biases.

    No other rationale I can see to portray Trump for anything but what he is than base political partisan biases. People will vote for nearly any piece of garbage in front of them as long as their partisan biases stay intact.

    Pretty sad...
     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:47 PM ET #136

    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher13:



    Very TRUE...

    Mr. Wallstreet, the facts are that LIBERALS are the ones that CAN"T debate on substance..Liberalism is a disaster in our country, look no further than the states and cities governed by them....Illinois, CALIFORNIA, NYC..the list could go on..

    Then why did a "schmuck" win the presidency?? Obviously,  because  BOH and his administration did a terrible job running this once great country...even BOH campigned tirelessly to protect his "legacy"...how's that working out for him.now?? Just look at his failed policies..just terrible for this nation..

    I'm sorry you feel so harshly towards our 45th POTUS but when one preaches to us to be openminded, it's best for you as the Forum policeman to set the example for us all..Like SLIM noted, the OP created this divisive thread taunting his political opposition which he succeeded in inciting rabid replies that have been completely vindicated with factual replies...ie That Chalupa chick's involvement with Ukraine "colluding" with DNC..

    Debating SUBSTANCE instead of baiting others is my preference too...but, ironically, the liberals don't have anything to back their positions and focus on attacking and defaming their opposition..Pelosi, Chucky Schumer with the aid of their MSM friends...That is the REAL COLLUSION story....if only one of their "cliques" break ranks and investigate the "real crimes that have been commited"..they'd win a Pulitzer Prize for unearthing so much "treasure"

    Yeah, California is doing horribly. Especially that booming economy that thrived even during the recession. Then there's all of the culture, the fine universities, the opportunity. I can't figure out why soooo many people, from every other state, want to come here. I mean, it is gawd awful.
    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher13:



    Very TRUE...

    Mr. Wallstreet, the facts are that LIBERALS are the ones that CAN"T debate on substance..Liberalism is a disaster in our country, look no further than the states and cities governed by them....Illinois, CALIFORNIA, NYC..the list could go on..

    Then why did a "schmuck" win the presidency?? Obviously,  because  BOH and his administration did a terrible job running this once great country...even BOH campigned tirelessly to protect his "legacy"...how's that working out for him.now?? Just look at his failed policies..just terrible for this nation..

    I'm sorry you feel so harshly towards our 45th POTUS but when one preaches to us to be openminded, it's best for you as the Forum policeman to set the example for us all..Like SLIM noted, the OP created this divisive thread taunting his political opposition which he succeeded in inciting rabid replies that have been completely vindicated with factual replies...ie That Chalupa chick's involvement with Ukraine "colluding" with DNC..

    Debating SUBSTANCE instead of baiting others is my preference too...but, ironically, the liberals don't have anything to back their positions and focus on attacking and defaming their opposition..Pelosi, Chucky Schumer with the aid of their MSM friends...That is the REAL COLLUSION story....if only one of their "cliques" break ranks and investigate the "real crimes that have been commited"..they'd win a Pulitzer Prize for unearthing so much "treasure"

    Yeah, California is doing horribly. Especially that booming economy that thrived even during the recession. Then there's all of the culture, the fine universities, the opportunity. I can't figure out why soooo many people, from every other state, want to come here. I mean, it is gawd awful.
     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 8:57 PM ET #137

    And frankly, you can't throw out "LIBERALS" as a blanket term and accuse them of not being able debate on substance when the "CONSERVATIVES" elected a man President who spoke nothing of sunstance to any real issues and campaigned on name calling like it was an elementary school election. The one thing we know about Trump is that he can come up with a nick name. And i'm not even a liberal per sé or a POTUS basher. I'm just keeping it real. Don't be so hypocritical.
    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    And frankly, you can't throw out "LIBERALS" as a blanket term and accuse them of not being able debate on substance when the "CONSERVATIVES" elected a man President who spoke nothing of sunstance to any real issues and campaigned on name calling like it was an elementary school election. The one thing we know about Trump is that he can come up with a nick name. And i'm not even a liberal per sé or a POTUS basher. I'm just keeping it real. Don't be so hypocritical.
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 9:45 PM ET #138

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    You think she was anti trump pro clinton? Not very logical since putin blames clinton for russian protests against him during their election in 2012. If that were the case she would be worse off than magnitzky.
    The Magnitsky Act was opposed by Hillary Clinton.

    John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, wrote in emails published by Wiki Leaks that "with the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow."

    The reason you don’t know this already is the liberal media colludes with democrats to censor the truth.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    You think she was anti trump pro clinton? Not very logical since putin blames clinton for russian protests against him during their election in 2012. If that were the case she would be worse off than magnitzky.
    The Magnitsky Act was opposed by Hillary Clinton.

    John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, wrote in emails published by Wiki Leaks that "with the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow."

    The reason you don’t know this already is the liberal media colludes with democrats to censor the truth.

     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 9:50 PM ET #139

    The idea that Hillary is anti-Russia is a joke. She and her team is the most pro-Russia on earth.

    The disgusting irony of Clinton's accusations against the Trump campaign, is that she herself has direct, provable and inarguable links to the Russian government through various sources that are severe enough to be considered direct national security threats - and yet she claims Trump and co. are Russian agents.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The idea that Hillary is anti-Russia is a joke. She and her team is the most pro-Russia on earth.

    The disgusting irony of Clinton's accusations against the Trump campaign, is that she herself has direct, provable and inarguable links to the Russian government through various sources that are severe enough to be considered direct national security threats - and yet she claims Trump and co. are Russian agents.

     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 10:17 PM ET #140

    Crusher13 –

    My job is to deal with unruly people. I have a black belt in verbal judo. I tell everyone I come across with that my attitude is a direct reflection of your attitude. If you come at me with attacks, belittle me, talk down to me, mock me, I’m going to come right back at you.

    I’m just like the president. I’ll be calm, collected and respectful if you show me the same courtesy. If you test me, I’ll come swinging for the fences. Like I said in another thread, liberals love to dish it, but can’t take it when confronted in the same tone. I’m a defensive fighter. I only attack when provoked.

    And the reason for my hostility towards liberals is I see liberals in the US as American ISIS. Liberals are not even human beings to me. They are waging a liberal jihad on the country that I love. There are two jihads going on. One is Islamic jihad and the other is liberal jihad.

    “It does not hurt that in the current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists (democrats) in the war against crusaders (republicans).” - Osama Bin Laden

    It’s really hard to show respect to people allied with Osama Bin Laden. You have to chose a side. The liberals, democrats, and progressives are the enemy.

    I don't even like establishment republicans. They make me sick. I'm a radical republican. I only cheer on establishment republicans because I know they are not as bad as liberals.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Crusher13 –

    My job is to deal with unruly people. I have a black belt in verbal judo. I tell everyone I come across with that my attitude is a direct reflection of your attitude. If you come at me with attacks, belittle me, talk down to me, mock me, I’m going to come right back at you.

    I’m just like the president. I’ll be calm, collected and respectful if you show me the same courtesy. If you test me, I’ll come swinging for the fences. Like I said in another thread, liberals love to dish it, but can’t take it when confronted in the same tone. I’m a defensive fighter. I only attack when provoked.

    And the reason for my hostility towards liberals is I see liberals in the US as American ISIS. Liberals are not even human beings to me. They are waging a liberal jihad on the country that I love. There are two jihads going on. One is Islamic jihad and the other is liberal jihad.

    “It does not hurt that in the current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists (democrats) in the war against crusaders (republicans).” - Osama Bin Laden

    It’s really hard to show respect to people allied with Osama Bin Laden. You have to chose a side. The liberals, democrats, and progressives are the enemy.

    I don't even like establishment republicans. They make me sick. I'm a radical republican. I only cheer on establishment republicans because I know they are not as bad as liberals.

     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 10:39 PM ET #141

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    The Magnitsky Act was opposed by Hillary Clinton.

    John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, wrote in emails published by Wiki Leaks that "with the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow."

    The reason you don’t know this already is the liberal media colludes with democrats to censor the truth.


    The speech was 2010 the act was 2012. The speech had nothing to do with it since it was 2 years earlier.I suggest you dig for the real reason.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    The Magnitsky Act was opposed by Hillary Clinton.

    John Podesta, the chairman of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, wrote in emails published by Wiki Leaks that "with the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow."

    The reason you don’t know this already is the liberal media colludes with democrats to censor the truth.


    The speech was 2010 the act was 2012. The speech had nothing to do with it since it was 2 years earlier.I suggest you dig for the real reason.
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 10:41 PM ET #142

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Crusher13 –

    My job is to deal with unruly people. I have a black belt in verbal judo. I tell everyone I come across with that my attitude is a direct reflection of your attitude. If you come at me with attacks, belittle me, talk down to me, mock me, I’m going to come right back at you.

    I’m just like the president. I’ll be calm, collected and respectful if you show me the same courtesy. If you test me, I’ll come swinging for the fences. Like I said in another thread, liberals love to dish it, but can’t take it when confronted in the same tone. I’m a defensive fighter. I only attack when provoked.

    And the reason for my hostility towards liberals is I see liberals in the US as American ISIS. Liberals are not even human beings to me. They are waging a liberal jihad on the country that I love. There are two jihads going on. One is Islamic jihad and the other is liberal jihad.

    “It does not hurt that in the current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists (democrats) in the war against crusaders (republicans).” - Osama Bin Laden

    It’s really hard to show respect to people allied with Osama Bin Laden. You have to chose a side. The liberals, democrats, and progressives are the enemy.

    I don't even like establishment republicans. They make me sick. I'm a radical republican. I only cheer on establishment republicans because I know they are not as bad as liberals.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Crusher13 –

    My job is to deal with unruly people. I have a black belt in verbal judo. I tell everyone I come across with that my attitude is a direct reflection of your attitude. If you come at me with attacks, belittle me, talk down to me, mock me, I’m going to come right back at you.

    I’m just like the president. I’ll be calm, collected and respectful if you show me the same courtesy. If you test me, I’ll come swinging for the fences. Like I said in another thread, liberals love to dish it, but can’t take it when confronted in the same tone. I’m a defensive fighter. I only attack when provoked.

    And the reason for my hostility towards liberals is I see liberals in the US as American ISIS. Liberals are not even human beings to me. They are waging a liberal jihad on the country that I love. There are two jihads going on. One is Islamic jihad and the other is liberal jihad.

    “It does not hurt that in the current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists (democrats) in the war against crusaders (republicans).” - Osama Bin Laden

    It’s really hard to show respect to people allied with Osama Bin Laden. You have to chose a side. The liberals, democrats, and progressives are the enemy.

    I don't even like establishment republicans. They make me sick. I'm a radical republican. I only cheer on establishment republicans because I know they are not as bad as liberals.


     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 10:52 PM ET #143

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Crusher13 –

    My job is to deal with unruly people. I have a black belt in verbal judo. I tell everyone I come across with that my attitude is a direct reflection of your attitude. If you come at me with attacks, belittle me, talk down to me, mock me, I’m going to come right back at you.

    I’m just like the president. I’ll be calm, collected and respectful if you show me the same courtesy. If you test me, I’ll come swinging for the fences. Like I said in another thread, liberals love to dish it, but can’t take it when confronted in the same tone. I’m a defensive fighter. I only attack when provoked.

    And the reason for my hostility towards liberals is I see liberals in the US as American ISIS. Liberals are not even human beings to me. They are waging a liberal jihad on the country that I love. There are two jihads going on. One is Islamic jihad and the other is liberal jihad.

    “It does not hurt that in the current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists (democrats) in the war against crusaders (republicans).” - Osama Bin Laden

    It’s really hard to show respect to people allied with Osama Bin Laden. You have to chose a side. The liberals, democrats, and progressives are the enemy.

    I don't even like establishment republicans. They make me sick. I'm a radical republican. I only cheer on establishment republicans because I know they are not as bad as liberals.


    It's funny how people take random quote and twist then to fit their agenda. That qoute most likely was referring to socialist (Russians, Chinese, Koreans) and crusaders (Americans). Nice try though. You're clearly unhinged...and that's OK. This is covers after all. Who really cares besides Scal. The fact that you have a screw loose doesn't mean you're not right about somethings. Like the notion that Hillary Clinton is anti-russian being utterly insane. With that said, so much twisting and omitting of facts goes on in these threads, by "liberals" and "conservatives", just to further an agenda that I sometimes forget that this is a sports handicapping site.
    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Crusher13 –

    My job is to deal with unruly people. I have a black belt in verbal judo. I tell everyone I come across with that my attitude is a direct reflection of your attitude. If you come at me with attacks, belittle me, talk down to me, mock me, I’m going to come right back at you.

    I’m just like the president. I’ll be calm, collected and respectful if you show me the same courtesy. If you test me, I’ll come swinging for the fences. Like I said in another thread, liberals love to dish it, but can’t take it when confronted in the same tone. I’m a defensive fighter. I only attack when provoked.

    And the reason for my hostility towards liberals is I see liberals in the US as American ISIS. Liberals are not even human beings to me. They are waging a liberal jihad on the country that I love. There are two jihads going on. One is Islamic jihad and the other is liberal jihad.

    “It does not hurt that in the current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists (democrats) in the war against crusaders (republicans).” - Osama Bin Laden

    It’s really hard to show respect to people allied with Osama Bin Laden. You have to chose a side. The liberals, democrats, and progressives are the enemy.

    I don't even like establishment republicans. They make me sick. I'm a radical republican. I only cheer on establishment republicans because I know they are not as bad as liberals.


    It's funny how people take random quote and twist then to fit their agenda. That qoute most likely was referring to socialist (Russians, Chinese, Koreans) and crusaders (Americans). Nice try though. You're clearly unhinged...and that's OK. This is covers after all. Who really cares besides Scal. The fact that you have a screw loose doesn't mean you're not right about somethings. Like the notion that Hillary Clinton is anti-russian being utterly insane. With that said, so much twisting and omitting of facts goes on in these threads, by "liberals" and "conservatives", just to further an agenda that I sometimes forget that this is a sports handicapping site.
     
    Crusher13
    Crusher13
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 8038
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 11:01 PM ET #144

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:


    Yeah, California is doing horribly. Especially that booming economy that thrived even during the recession. Then there's all of the culture, the fine universities, the opportunity. I can't figure out why soooo many people, from every other state, want to come here. I mean, it is gawd awful.

    Cali is going through a Financial nightmare...you guys are almost as broke as Illinois...and BTW, why are so many Californians flocking here to Colorado?? COLO will never go red again especially with all the East coasters libs flocking here too


    Btw..I think CA is very special but I would NEVER want to live in a SANCTUARY state 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:


    Yeah, California is doing horribly. Especially that booming economy that thrived even during the recession. Then there's all of the culture, the fine universities, the opportunity. I can't figure out why soooo many people, from every other state, want to come here. I mean, it is gawd awful.

    Cali is going through a Financial nightmare...you guys are almost as broke as Illinois...and BTW, why are so many Californians flocking here to Colorado?? COLO will never go red again especially with all the East coasters libs flocking here too


    Btw..I think CA is very special but I would NEVER want to live in a SANCTUARY state 
     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22234
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2017 - 11:23 PM ET #145

    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher13:


    Cali is going through a Financial nightmare...you guys are almost as broke as Illinois...and BTW, why are so many Californians flocking here to Colorado?? COLO will never go red again especially with all the East coasters libs flocking here too


    Btw..I think CA is very special but I would NEVER want to live in a SANCTUARY state 
     California is doing fine. And make no mistake about it, the only reason people are flocking to Colorado is the marijuana industry. As much as I love my home state, I don't agree with it's status as a sanctuary state either.
    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher13:


    Cali is going through a Financial nightmare...you guys are almost as broke as Illinois...and BTW, why are so many Californians flocking here to Colorado?? COLO will never go red again especially with all the East coasters libs flocking here too


    Btw..I think CA is very special but I would NEVER want to live in a SANCTUARY state 
     California is doing fine. And make no mistake about it, the only reason people are flocking to Colorado is the marijuana industry. As much as I love my home state, I don't agree with it's status as a sanctuary state either.
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2017 - 1:02 AM ET #146

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    The speech was 2010 the act was 2012. The speech had nothing to do with it since it was 2 years earlier.I suggest you dig for the real reason.
    What? The John Podesta email was written in 2015 during the campaign to shut down the liberal media from choosing Hillary's support for the Magnitsky Act as a talking point.

    Hillary met with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in St. Petersburg in June 2012, citing that U.S.-Russia relations would suffer as a result of the Magnitsky Act. That’s why Hillary opposed it.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


    The speech was 2010 the act was 2012. The speech had nothing to do with it since it was 2 years earlier.I suggest you dig for the real reason.
    What? The John Podesta email was written in 2015 during the campaign to shut down the liberal media from choosing Hillary's support for the Magnitsky Act as a talking point.

    Hillary met with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in St. Petersburg in June 2012, citing that U.S.-Russia relations would suffer as a result of the Magnitsky Act. That’s why Hillary opposed it.

     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2017 - 1:27 AM ET #147

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:


    It's funny how people take random quote and twist then to fit their agenda. That qoute most likely was referring to socialist (Russians, Chinese, Koreans) and crusaders (Americans). Nice try though. You're clearly unhinged...and that's OK. This is covers after all. Who really cares besides Scal. The fact that you have a screw loose doesn't mean you're not right about somethings. Like the notion that Hillary Clinton is anti-russian being utterly insane. With that said, so much twisting and omitting of facts goes on in these threads, by "liberals" and "conservatives", just to further an agenda that I sometimes forget that this is a sports handicapping site.
    That's not possible. The Russians, Chinese, and Koreans have nothing to do with it. The Bin Laden manifesto was a call for jihad against the west. Nice try though.

    What makes me unhinged with a screw loose? That's quite the assumption. I’m not calling for war or anything. I believe in defeating the liberals in the voting booth.

    Politics isn’t a hobby for me. It’s an obsession. If you believe to have a superior political acumen, instead of insulting me, challenge me, I’ll destroy you just like I did in the other three threads.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:


    It's funny how people take random quote and twist then to fit their agenda. That qoute most likely was referring to socialist (Russians, Chinese, Koreans) and crusaders (Americans). Nice try though. You're clearly unhinged...and that's OK. This is covers after all. Who really cares besides Scal. The fact that you have a screw loose doesn't mean you're not right about somethings. Like the notion that Hillary Clinton is anti-russian being utterly insane. With that said, so much twisting and omitting of facts goes on in these threads, by "liberals" and "conservatives", just to further an agenda that I sometimes forget that this is a sports handicapping site.
    That's not possible. The Russians, Chinese, and Koreans have nothing to do with it. The Bin Laden manifesto was a call for jihad against the west. Nice try though.

    What makes me unhinged with a screw loose? That's quite the assumption. I’m not calling for war or anything. I believe in defeating the liberals in the voting booth.

    Politics isn’t a hobby for me. It’s an obsession. If you believe to have a superior political acumen, instead of insulting me, challenge me, I’ll destroy you just like I did in the other three threads.

     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35486
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2017 - 1:34 AM ET #148

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    That is quite telling about the average person. Yeah Clinton was horrible, no question about it...but the way you and others ignore the abhorrent things Trump did, does and will do is just absurd.

    It would be more respectful to hear from your aisle that Trump is a schmuck, his actions and behavior are indicative of that, BUT just admit that you are more interested in your own personal agenda and are accepting of Trump and his major flaws to forward your political position. 

    That would be at least admitting what a joke Trump is but that the issue for you is the forwarding of your agenda...I never hear that ever...rather people either deflect (as you do) or ignore (as you do) or rationalize (as you do) this awful person who represents your party and this country.

    If Clinton were elected I would and did say critical things about her, I didnt care for Clinton, but comparing the two choices we have, I'd still choose her over Trump. That is not saying much at all but that Trump is such an awful, disgusting person.


    "That is quite telling about the average person."

    That's right not everyone can be above the avg. person ,but I've noticed some of the ones that feel they are ..... love to talk down to those they think are not.  In fact you can find them in the politics forum and even in this thread ..

    Oh yeah, you say Clinton was horrible and you have posted that you don't like her , but that's as far as it goes ..you do not post why she was horrible or why you don't like her. I even recall you posting that you didn't like Obama..no reason why ..just you didn't like him ..

    With President Trump you really come clean on your reasons for disliking him  e.g. classless, loudmouth moron, small ego, selfish, childish person.,big mouth,total schmuck,egotistical jerk..what a joke Trump is..Trump is such an awful, disgusting person.

    So, I guess since you have said Hillary is horrible ( but not why) and you don't/didn't like her or Obama ( no name calling of either) ...you can take the spurious high road...and strike out at someone ( like above ) in an attempt to belittle them..

    So, I for one will play the same game, as you have been playing ..and say for the record  "I don't like President Trump ..he is a horrible person".... 

    However,the American people via the Electoral College voted Donald J.Trump with all his warts as the 45th president of the United States ...to change this country's direction..

    ..and IF it took a man like President Trump to defeat the Republican establishment,,,,beat Democrat Party and the Clinton machine along with the MSM so be it..believe me no one ,,no one else could have done it ..

    Trump was the instrument ( with all his flaws) that the American people,,not just Republicans ( with only R's he would have lost ) but Democrats, Indy's, women,non-white people,middle class workers..used to tell DC they wanted real change...so badly that they were willing to elect this horrible man as OUR leader..and not accept the status quo no mo..
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    That is quite telling about the average person. Yeah Clinton was horrible, no question about it...but the way you and others ignore the abhorrent things Trump did, does and will do is just absurd.

    It would be more respectful to hear from your aisle that Trump is a schmuck, his actions and behavior are indicative of that, BUT just admit that you are more interested in your own personal agenda and are accepting of Trump and his major flaws to forward your political position. 

    That would be at least admitting what a joke Trump is but that the issue for you is the forwarding of your agenda...I never hear that ever...rather people either deflect (as you do) or ignore (as you do) or rationalize (as you do) this awful person who represents your party and this country.

    If Clinton were elected I would and did say critical things about her, I didnt care for Clinton, but comparing the two choices we have, I'd still choose her over Trump. That is not saying much at all but that Trump is such an awful, disgusting person.


    "That is quite telling about the average person."

    That's right not everyone can be above the avg. person ,but I've noticed some of the ones that feel they are ..... love to talk down to those they think are not.  In fact you can find them in the politics forum and even in this thread ..

    Oh yeah, you say Clinton was horrible and you have posted that you don't like her , but that's as far as it goes ..you do not post why she was horrible or why you don't like her. I even recall you posting that you didn't like Obama..no reason why ..just you didn't like him ..

    With President Trump you really come clean on your reasons for disliking him  e.g. classless, loudmouth moron, small ego, selfish, childish person.,big mouth,total schmuck,egotistical jerk..what a joke Trump is..Trump is such an awful, disgusting person.

    So, I guess since you have said Hillary is horrible ( but not why) and you don't/didn't like her or Obama ( no name calling of either) ...you can take the spurious high road...and strike out at someone ( like above ) in an attempt to belittle them..

    So, I for one will play the same game, as you have been playing ..and say for the record  "I don't like President Trump ..he is a horrible person".... 

    However,the American people via the Electoral College voted Donald J.Trump with all his warts as the 45th president of the United States ...to change this country's direction..

    ..and IF it took a man like President Trump to defeat the Republican establishment,,,,beat Democrat Party and the Clinton machine along with the MSM so be it..believe me no one ,,no one else could have done it ..

    Trump was the instrument ( with all his flaws) that the American people,,not just Republicans ( with only R's he would have lost ) but Democrats, Indy's, women,non-white people,middle class workers..used to tell DC they wanted real change...so badly that they were willing to elect this horrible man as OUR leader..and not accept the status quo no mo..
     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42650
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2017 - 1:53 AM ET #149

    Donald J. Trump's presidential approval rating just hit another low, 36%, according to ABC News/Washington Post poll. Even the past lowest first 6 moth rating of Pres. Gerald Ford beats Trump by 3 points. Dude just win the champion belt in the limbo contest among all of our presidents, he exceptionally hits the new low.   

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/months-record-low-trump-troubles-russia-health-care/story?id=48639490

    Give Trump a few couple of months, the limbo bar could drop to twenties for him.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Donald J. Trump's presidential approval rating just hit another low, 36%, according to ABC News/Washington Post poll. Even the past lowest first 6 moth rating of Pres. Gerald Ford beats Trump by 3 points. Dude just win the champion belt in the limbo contest among all of our presidents, he exceptionally hits the new low.   

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/months-record-low-trump-troubles-russia-health-care/story?id=48639490

    Give Trump a few couple of months, the limbo bar could drop to twenties for him.
     
     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42650
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2017 - 1:54 AM ET #150

    *couple more
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    *couple more
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 678 ... 789 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,801 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,268 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,113 Covers arrow
    • 9/8 POD 🔥🔥???? 3,672 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,294 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/08/2026 981 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 94,883 Covers arrow
    • Wednesday 09/09/2026 500 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 226 Covers arrow
    • 2026 SIDE POT for 6-0, ROUND 1 180 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.