I think the AZ defense steps up after being embarrassed.... then winning the shootout.....
GL TO ALL!
For the most part I agree. I just don't see a shootout. Bring on the hate b/c I think NO is going to struggle to score. For fun im going to do a small parlay with ari -7, ml, and the under.
These two qbs are pretty comparable. Anyone who says that Warner is not, at least, near Brees's level is an idiot. So you have a red hot Warner vs. a Drew Brees led offense that is coming in off of 2 weeks of rest and prior to that 2 weeks where they couldn't put up 20 pts. Im not confident that this team can just flip on a light.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:
Arizona ML for me
Warner looked perfect Sunday night...
I think the AZ defense steps up after being embarrassed.... then winning the shootout.....
GL TO ALL!
For the most part I agree. I just don't see a shootout. Bring on the hate b/c I think NO is going to struggle to score. For fun im going to do a small parlay with ari -7, ml, and the under.
These two qbs are pretty comparable. Anyone who says that Warner is not, at least, near Brees's level is an idiot. So you have a red hot Warner vs. a Drew Brees led offense that is coming in off of 2 weeks of rest and prior to that 2 weeks where they couldn't put up 20 pts. Im not confident that this team can just flip on a light.
For the most part I agree. I just don't see a shootout. Bring on the hate b/c I think NO is going to struggle to score. For fun im going to do a small parlay with ari -7, ml, and the under.
These two qbs are pretty comparable. Anyone who says that Warner is not, at least, near Brees's level is an idiot. So you have a red hot Warner vs. a Drew Brees led offense that is coming in off of 2 weeks of rest and prior to that 2 weeks where they couldn't put up 20 pts. Im not confident that this team can just flip on a light.
BROTHER FROM ME ? AND DA REST OF DA WHODATNATION? WHY NOT MAKE YA PLAY LG. TO YA LOCAL BOYS/GIRLS CLUB. SAINTS BLOWOUT!!!!!!!!! COME ON MAN !!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by JerryWrasse:
For the most part I agree. I just don't see a shootout. Bring on the hate b/c I think NO is going to struggle to score. For fun im going to do a small parlay with ari -7, ml, and the under.
These two qbs are pretty comparable. Anyone who says that Warner is not, at least, near Brees's level is an idiot. So you have a red hot Warner vs. a Drew Brees led offense that is coming in off of 2 weeks of rest and prior to that 2 weeks where they couldn't put up 20 pts. Im not confident that this team can just flip on a light.
BROTHER FROM ME ? AND DA REST OF DA WHODATNATION? WHY NOT MAKE YA PLAY LG. TO YA LOCAL BOYS/GIRLS CLUB. SAINTS BLOWOUT!!!!!!!!! COME ON MAN !!!!!!!
I was the loser in a bet against the Dallas game with BloodyShreder, I believe in week 14. It was a bet where if the Saints lose, I not only take the Cap Lock button off my MAC but also not post for the next 2 weeks after, until the playoffs. I thought it was a great bet and a friendly one at that. I kept my word and was happy to do so." A BET IS A BET ". Congrats to SHRED by the way.
I propose the same bet to anyone on this forum. I say if the Saints win and cover ATS, those who think otherwise may not post just for 1 week in any game and vise versa.. Those that want to participate may post their interest into this friendly wager and I will post who is on Saints and who is on the Cards. Put your keyboard where your mouth is sorta speak. Its all about typing rights not bragging rights.
If you want to participate, please type " Typing rights" and who you pick with the spread. At this time it is Saints -7 os Cards +7.
My pick of course is SAINTS -7
(808ALLDAYINDAWHODATNATION)
0
Quote Originally Posted by 808pickyboy:
" NO POST BET "
I was the loser in a bet against the Dallas game with BloodyShreder, I believe in week 14. It was a bet where if the Saints lose, I not only take the Cap Lock button off my MAC but also not post for the next 2 weeks after, until the playoffs. I thought it was a great bet and a friendly one at that. I kept my word and was happy to do so." A BET IS A BET ". Congrats to SHRED by the way.
I propose the same bet to anyone on this forum. I say if the Saints win and cover ATS, those who think otherwise may not post just for 1 week in any game and vise versa.. Those that want to participate may post their interest into this friendly wager and I will post who is on Saints and who is on the Cards. Put your keyboard where your mouth is sorta speak. Its all about typing rights not bragging rights.
If you want to participate, please type " Typing rights" and who you pick with the spread. At this time it is Saints -7 os Cards +7.
Just came online to this site and thread, to glean any further bits by (proven) knowledgeable cappers to either confirm or deny my info before placing my bet on 'Zona. During the season,especially during the playoffs all these threads are filled with all these "homers" always trying to assault my integrity when my opinion backed up by stats, research, and other info should dare differ from theirs........ I'M TALKING TO YOU - "PICKYBOY"! I said the Under in this game was clearly a prime bet, with possible leans on 'Zona getting +7. Based on fact the Cards (at seasons end) were playing better "D" than NO. For me, one of my main concerns in the playoffs, among many, is looking toward stronger defensive teams. While I can respect what kind of firepower that Brees brings to the table, overall I was not impressed by the Saints performance in the second half of the season.
0
Just came online to this site and thread, to glean any further bits by (proven) knowledgeable cappers to either confirm or deny my info before placing my bet on 'Zona. During the season,especially during the playoffs all these threads are filled with all these "homers" always trying to assault my integrity when my opinion backed up by stats, research, and other info should dare differ from theirs........ I'M TALKING TO YOU - "PICKYBOY"! I said the Under in this game was clearly a prime bet, with possible leans on 'Zona getting +7. Based on fact the Cards (at seasons end) were playing better "D" than NO. For me, one of my main concerns in the playoffs, among many, is looking toward stronger defensive teams. While I can respect what kind of firepower that Brees brings to the table, overall I was not impressed by the Saints performance in the second half of the season.
Butta my man you are just on the money of how this game is going to end up. "Old Fashion VooDoo Whoop Ass". Love it. I personally think that the Saints will come out and score on their first possession and they wont stop their.
On "D" they will have Twity Bird (Warner) in a cage flopin around while Sylvester the the cat ( Will Smith and Co.) clawing from every angle and they will pluck his feathers. Yes he does have experience and I think this is the game that will have him retire. I see the Saints pull ahead in the 1st and 2nd quarter and wont look back.It is going to be a madhouse in this motha. Have you ever seen a bird in distress? They quiver in fear and die from shock. Last stop for the Cards. Might as well spend some time in NO and hit up Bourbon Street. Butta, can you buy a round of beers for these guys for me? Thanx man.
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
NO 14 10 14 10 = 48
AZ 7 3 10 7 = 27
(808ALLDAYINDAWHODATNATIOBABY)
0
Quote Originally Posted by buttafooco42:
TYPEING RIGHTS N.O.-10
Butta my man you are just on the money of how this game is going to end up. "Old Fashion VooDoo Whoop Ass". Love it. I personally think that the Saints will come out and score on their first possession and they wont stop their.
On "D" they will have Twity Bird (Warner) in a cage flopin around while Sylvester the the cat ( Will Smith and Co.) clawing from every angle and they will pluck his feathers. Yes he does have experience and I think this is the game that will have him retire. I see the Saints pull ahead in the 1st and 2nd quarter and wont look back.It is going to be a madhouse in this motha. Have you ever seen a bird in distress? They quiver in fear and die from shock. Last stop for the Cards. Might as well spend some time in NO and hit up Bourbon Street. Butta, can you buy a round of beers for these guys for me? Thanx man.
So "PICKYBOY", and this includes BUTTAFUOCCO from 'ol Miss. I'd thought I be generous with you guys and give you a handicapping lesson: 1st off aprox. 60% of the teams cover after a bye week. That also implies that 40 % do not! Unless you keep records you wouldn't know what a team is capable of.
New Orleans: Wk# 8 - home vs Atl - Win & No Cover,Wk # 9 home vs Carolina - Win & No Cover,Wk # 10 -road vs STL - Win & No Cover,Wk # 11- road vs TB- WIN & Cover,Wk # 12- home vs NE- Win & Cover,Wk #13- road vs WASH- Win & No Cover,WK #14- road vs ATL- Win & No Cover (AGAIN!), Wk # 15- home vs Dall- Lose & No Cover,Wk #16-home vs TB- Lose & No Cover, Wk # 17- road vs Carolina- Lose & No Cover. ........... So for the record let's see what we got here. In 10 straight games they managed to cover at grand total of 20 %. In 10 games they complied a wonderful record of beating up on teams with losing records while compiling at 1-1 SU & ATS against winning teams - NE & Dallas. So I know I can't bet them on the ML. And while I did state that NO might win, I also said not by 7 pts! When I have a current spread record of 80 % in my favor, plus past revenge "hard ons" by ' Zona ( whom excels in revenge situations-of course, I forgot you guys don't keep records), plus other info that I will not divulge- I guess I'll take -- 'ZONA +7 (end of lesson) And by the way I'll take that wager that you made with Breaka Bookie. I'll be gunnin' for your hide, pal!
0
So "PICKYBOY", and this includes BUTTAFUOCCO from 'ol Miss. I'd thought I be generous with you guys and give you a handicapping lesson: 1st off aprox. 60% of the teams cover after a bye week. That also implies that 40 % do not! Unless you keep records you wouldn't know what a team is capable of.
New Orleans: Wk# 8 - home vs Atl - Win & No Cover,Wk # 9 home vs Carolina - Win & No Cover,Wk # 10 -road vs STL - Win & No Cover,Wk # 11- road vs TB- WIN & Cover,Wk # 12- home vs NE- Win & Cover,Wk #13- road vs WASH- Win & No Cover,WK #14- road vs ATL- Win & No Cover (AGAIN!), Wk # 15- home vs Dall- Lose & No Cover,Wk #16-home vs TB- Lose & No Cover, Wk # 17- road vs Carolina- Lose & No Cover. ........... So for the record let's see what we got here. In 10 straight games they managed to cover at grand total of 20 %. In 10 games they complied a wonderful record of beating up on teams with losing records while compiling at 1-1 SU & ATS against winning teams - NE & Dallas. So I know I can't bet them on the ML. And while I did state that NO might win, I also said not by 7 pts! When I have a current spread record of 80 % in my favor, plus past revenge "hard ons" by ' Zona ( whom excels in revenge situations-of course, I forgot you guys don't keep records), plus other info that I will not divulge- I guess I'll take -- 'ZONA +7 (end of lesson) And by the way I'll take that wager that you made with Breaka Bookie. I'll be gunnin' for your hide, pal!
So "PICKYBOY", and this includes BUTTAFUOCCO from 'ol Miss. I'd thought I be generous with you guys and give you a handicapping lesson: 1st off aprox. 60% of the teams cover after a bye week. That also implies that 40 % do not! Unless you keep records you wouldn't know what a team is capable of.
New Orleans: Wk# 8 - home vs Atl - Win & No Cover,Wk # 9 home vs Carolina - Win & No Cover,Wk # 10 -road vs STL - Win & No Cover,Wk # 11- road vs TB- WIN & Cover,Wk # 12- home vs NE- Win & Cover,Wk #13- road vs WASH- Win & No Cover,WK #14- road vs ATL- Win & No Cover (AGAIN!), Wk # 15- home vs Dall- Lose & No Cover,Wk #16-home vs TB- Lose & No Cover, Wk # 17- road vs Carolina- Lose & No Cover. ........... So for the record let's see what we got here. In 10 straight games they managed to cover at grand total of 20 %. In 10 games they complied a wonderful record of beating up on teams with losing records while compiling at 1-1 SU & ATS against winning teams - NE & Dallas. So I know I can't bet them on the ML. And while I did state that NO might win, I also said not by 7 pts! When I have a current spread record of 80 % in my favor, plus past revenge "hard ons" by ' Zona ( whom excels in revenge situations-of course, I forgot you guys don't keep records), plus other info that I will not divulge- I guess I'll take -- 'ZONA +7 (end of lesson) And by the way I'll take that wager that you made with Breaka Bookie. I'll be gunnin' for your hide, pal!
Bet takin
Vue my man. I'm sure you have all these stats in fronts of you but my records show that you should not out of all people should not be giving capping lessons. I'm sure its not jus me that thinks so, but to each his own. Good Luck Mr. Vue cause you and BreakaBookie is going to need it. As a matter of fact send whatever luck you have left to Kurt Warner. He He He.
(808PICKBOYALLDAYINDAWHODATNATION)
0
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:
So "PICKYBOY", and this includes BUTTAFUOCCO from 'ol Miss. I'd thought I be generous with you guys and give you a handicapping lesson: 1st off aprox. 60% of the teams cover after a bye week. That also implies that 40 % do not! Unless you keep records you wouldn't know what a team is capable of.
New Orleans: Wk# 8 - home vs Atl - Win & No Cover,Wk # 9 home vs Carolina - Win & No Cover,Wk # 10 -road vs STL - Win & No Cover,Wk # 11- road vs TB- WIN & Cover,Wk # 12- home vs NE- Win & Cover,Wk #13- road vs WASH- Win & No Cover,WK #14- road vs ATL- Win & No Cover (AGAIN!), Wk # 15- home vs Dall- Lose & No Cover,Wk #16-home vs TB- Lose & No Cover, Wk # 17- road vs Carolina- Lose & No Cover. ........... So for the record let's see what we got here. In 10 straight games they managed to cover at grand total of 20 %. In 10 games they complied a wonderful record of beating up on teams with losing records while compiling at 1-1 SU & ATS against winning teams - NE & Dallas. So I know I can't bet them on the ML. And while I did state that NO might win, I also said not by 7 pts! When I have a current spread record of 80 % in my favor, plus past revenge "hard ons" by ' Zona ( whom excels in revenge situations-of course, I forgot you guys don't keep records), plus other info that I will not divulge- I guess I'll take -- 'ZONA +7 (end of lesson) And by the way I'll take that wager that you made with Breaka Bookie. I'll be gunnin' for your hide, pal!
Bet takin
Vue my man. I'm sure you have all these stats in fronts of you but my records show that you should not out of all people should not be giving capping lessons. I'm sure its not jus me that thinks so, but to each his own. Good Luck Mr. Vue cause you and BreakaBookie is going to need it. As a matter of fact send whatever luck you have left to Kurt Warner. He He He.
Whom ever loses may not post on any forum for a week.
808PICKYBOY NO SAINTS -7
VS
BREAKABOOGIE AZ CARDS +7
BUTTAFOOCO NO SAINTS -7
VS
VUE99nevamine AZ CARDS +7
If anyone else wants to get someone off the forum for a week, post who you want to challenge and if bet is takin, I will add to the list. Just a friendly wager for typing rights.
0
"NO POST BET CONTENDERS"
Whom ever loses may not post on any forum for a week.
808PICKYBOY NO SAINTS -7
VS
BREAKABOOGIE AZ CARDS +7
BUTTAFOOCO NO SAINTS -7
VS
VUE99nevamine AZ CARDS +7
If anyone else wants to get someone off the forum for a week, post who you want to challenge and if bet is takin, I will add to the list. Just a friendly wager for typing rights.
Talk radio is bringing up the fact that AZ has to fly across the country. Cross country? They fly over 2 states! I think the Saints have played their best games and AZ can score and is getting 7 points. It's hard not to take AZ. If the Saints win i think it maybe a FG at the end. If the game reaches OT, the Cards win. (The most you can score in OT is 6)
AZ Cards +7.0
Good teams win games, Great teams cover the spread!
0
Talk radio is bringing up the fact that AZ has to fly across the country. Cross country? They fly over 2 states! I think the Saints have played their best games and AZ can score and is getting 7 points. It's hard not to take AZ. If the Saints win i think it maybe a FG at the end. If the game reaches OT, the Cards win. (The most you can score in OT is 6)
Arizona is the play. This season 6-0 ats as a underdog, winning outright in 5 of those games. Saints are 3-3 this season as a favorite between 5.5 -10 points. Aizona is 4-1 ats against teams with a wining record. Saints 4-8 ats in conference. All that and the injuries to the saints Charles Grant 16 game starter at DE is out, Darren Sharper coming off a knee injury may be a step slow and against Warner & these receivers you can't be a step slow. Pierre Thomas, Lance Moore their injuries don't hurt so bad since they have been in and out of the lineup all season.
Arozona +7 most likely win outright
0
Arizona is the play. This season 6-0 ats as a underdog, winning outright in 5 of those games. Saints are 3-3 this season as a favorite between 5.5 -10 points. Aizona is 4-1 ats against teams with a wining record. Saints 4-8 ats in conference. All that and the injuries to the saints Charles Grant 16 game starter at DE is out, Darren Sharper coming off a knee injury may be a step slow and against Warner & these receivers you can't be a step slow. Pierre Thomas, Lance Moore their injuries don't hurt so bad since they have been in and out of the lineup all season.
This is the highest total in many years in the NFL playoffs......that was an aboration last week in the desert. People are acting like it is the norm with Zona?? 57 is the number!!!!
Now it certainly could blow by that with these two teams on the field, but I believe Vegas believes the public is all over the over and the Cards.....so they give you a pile of points and a ridiculous total to get over.......and so far, I'd say 70% of the public is on both of those and the numbers aren't moving.......
That means the desert likes the Saints to play well and understands that the Cards are a Jekel and Hyde team and can't be counted on. I'll go against the herd here and take the Saints and the under in this one. GL everyone!!
0
This is the highest total in many years in the NFL playoffs......that was an aboration last week in the desert. People are acting like it is the norm with Zona?? 57 is the number!!!!
Now it certainly could blow by that with these two teams on the field, but I believe Vegas believes the public is all over the over and the Cards.....so they give you a pile of points and a ridiculous total to get over.......and so far, I'd say 70% of the public is on both of those and the numbers aren't moving.......
That means the desert likes the Saints to play well and understands that the Cards are a Jekel and Hyde team and can't be counted on. I'll go against the herd here and take the Saints and the under in this one. GL everyone!!
I believe that the bucs have surprised a lot of other teams as well. Now, as for why the Cards wont beat the Saints:
1) Well rested against beat up for 4 quarters and over time
2)Saints in full force on both sides of the ball. I expect the Saints "D" of early season. They were ranked #4 then.
3) If the GB Packers can score 45 on Zona, how much do you think the Saints will put up in the Dome
4) Any team coming off a bye week is most likely to perform 30-40% better than the last few games on both sides of the ball
5) Bucs I believe won from a special team TD return late in the game. At that game also were the Saints not in full force as they will be in this game.
6) Saints is 7/10 agaist the Cards and 7-2-1 ATS
7) Most of all, it is the playoffs and Sean Peyton has had his players hyped and mentally, physically and emotionally ready for this game and games ahead.
8) Just take the bet as posted and see who wins Bookieboy. I like your capping more than most, but i am absolutely sure that you are on the wrong team on this one.
MANY MORE REASONS THE SAINTS WILL WIN BUT DONT NEEED TO WRITE THEM DOWN (808ALLDAY)
The Saints got lucky all season,THE WASHINGTON Redskins owned this team.Believe in your heart and wallet in the saints and I promise at the end of the game they will have even you calling them the "AINTS" again.Espect the Cardinals to keep Brees and Co off the field with the run game here.
CARDS + 7 and Under
0
Quote Originally Posted by 808pickyboy:
I believe that the bucs have surprised a lot of other teams as well. Now, as for why the Cards wont beat the Saints:
1) Well rested against beat up for 4 quarters and over time
2)Saints in full force on both sides of the ball. I expect the Saints "D" of early season. They were ranked #4 then.
3) If the GB Packers can score 45 on Zona, how much do you think the Saints will put up in the Dome
4) Any team coming off a bye week is most likely to perform 30-40% better than the last few games on both sides of the ball
5) Bucs I believe won from a special team TD return late in the game. At that game also were the Saints not in full force as they will be in this game.
6) Saints is 7/10 agaist the Cards and 7-2-1 ATS
7) Most of all, it is the playoffs and Sean Peyton has had his players hyped and mentally, physically and emotionally ready for this game and games ahead.
8) Just take the bet as posted and see who wins Bookieboy. I like your capping more than most, but i am absolutely sure that you are on the wrong team on this one.
MANY MORE REASONS THE SAINTS WILL WIN BUT DONT NEEED TO WRITE THEM DOWN (808ALLDAY)
The Saints got lucky all season,THE WASHINGTON Redskins owned this team.Believe in your heart and wallet in the saints and I promise at the end of the game they will have even you calling them the "AINTS" again.Espect the Cardinals to keep Brees and Co off the field with the run game here.
We all know who's the Saint's fan here but AZ is the pick, love the under here. This game will not be like how GB played, back and forth. This will be decided on Defense. GL to all and win happy this week! Bring me the MONEY CARDS
0
We all know who's the Saint's fan here but AZ is the pick, love the under here. This game will not be like how GB played, back and forth. This will be decided on Defense. GL to all and win happy this week! Bring me the MONEY CARDS
This is the highest total in many years in the NFL playoffs......that was an aboration last week in the desert. People are acting like it is the norm with Zona?? 57 is the number!!!!
Now it certainly could blow by that with these two teams on the field, but I believe Vegas believes the public is all over the over and the Cards.....so they give you a pile of points and a ridiculous total to get over.......and so far, I'd say 70% of the public is on both of those and the numbers aren't moving.......
That means the desert likes the Saints to play well and understands that the Cards are a Jekel and Hyde team and can't be counted on. I'll go against the herd here and take the Saints and the under in this one. GL everyone!!
Right on Bro ! U nailed it. Smart man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Irisheyez:
This is the highest total in many years in the NFL playoffs......that was an aboration last week in the desert. People are acting like it is the norm with Zona?? 57 is the number!!!!
Now it certainly could blow by that with these two teams on the field, but I believe Vegas believes the public is all over the over and the Cards.....so they give you a pile of points and a ridiculous total to get over.......and so far, I'd say 70% of the public is on both of those and the numbers aren't moving.......
That means the desert likes the Saints to play well and understands that the Cards are a Jekel and Hyde team and can't be counted on. I'll go against the herd here and take the Saints and the under in this one. GL everyone!!
yea i was liking all the dogs. i also missed that az bus ride to a perfect weekend. shoulda faded that guy but it was close in the end. all the az backers were nervous when that coin toss favored gb. i know i was doin my version of the runnin man in my living room as i was laughing away, only to follow it up with some profanity. f f f f f. lol gl to all this weekend anyway.
0
yea i was liking all the dogs. i also missed that az bus ride to a perfect weekend. shoulda faded that guy but it was close in the end. all the az backers were nervous when that coin toss favored gb. i know i was doin my version of the runnin man in my living room as i was laughing away, only to follow it up with some profanity. f f f f f. lol gl to all this weekend anyway.
There's no way there will be 17 penalties in this game to move the chains like last week....and no way N.O. gets out to a big lead to force AZ to throw to get back in it like AZ did against GB.....
57 is too high.....and N.O. hasn't won a game in a month
0
AZ + 7 and UNDER
There's no way there will be 17 penalties in this game to move the chains like last week....and no way N.O. gets out to a big lead to force AZ to throw to get back in it like AZ did against GB.....
57 is too high.....and N.O. hasn't won a game in a month
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.