Denver at Oakland (12/06/2012)

If you feel you have to buy points on any bet, you probably shouldn't bet the game... 4.5% vig is enough to be giving.

Reason: angle  Comments:  Since 2010, home dogs of 7.5 points and higher, have covered at the phenomenal rate of 82.4 % ATS. As always, LISTEN TO THE DOCTOR, and please fade me_I need your money!

OAKLAND  + 10.5

Ok Vue We're going to follow you with Oakland. Even if your 3-17 in your last picks. You're the Man !! Although, it's hard to bet against my man Manning and that Denver D might only give up 10 points. And you say Over ?? Ok my man, you're the Best Bro Ever !! Even if the Unders have been hitting strong in the last two weeks? Ok my Man. 

Gold Sheet Runs with "Suspicious" Denver:

Denver 32 at Oakland 15  "Any takers for Oakland? Raiders' SU and spread losing streak...now at 5, with rumors that Mark Davis might channel his late papa AL and hit the "eject" button on first-year HC Dennis Allen, whose familiarity with former employer Denver (where he was defensive coordinator LY) sure didn't help in Oakland's 36-6 loss at Invesco Field Sept. 30.

Leaky Raider secondary (24 TDP allowed) becomes even bigger liability vs. on-fire Peyton Manning, who was 30 for 39 for 338 YP in the first meeting, when he had enough time in the pocket to film another Buick commercial.  Denver remains motivated for chance at first-round playoff bye.  TV--NFL NETWORK"

That's nice. Real nice.  But "on-fire" Manning now 0-3 vs. point spread last three games.  And Peyton Manning passing for 995 yards and putting up six touchdowns in one game, isn't worth a nickel in Chinese money.  If Denver was a 38 point favorite, the only thing that matters is them winning the game by 39 points!  True, Manning might bury the spread tomorrow night by 27 points, but I won't be watching to find out.

Binger1's comment above is 100% correct!  She was even brave enough to say she lost both games on Denver, something only one in 50,000 people are willing to do.  And both of those games were suspicious!  Denver was "frozen solid" for two hours at 17 to 9 in the KC game...and the game ended right there, two points under the spread!  I feel for binger1 because she had her hard-earned money stolen from her...as far as I'm concerned!

And with San Diego, Denver "froze itself solid" at 31 points. And with less than two minutes in the game, San Diego scored a touchdown and covered the spread...by one half of a point.  Denver favored by 7.5 lost by exactly 7 points. 

Respectfully disagree with mgmprofits in post #43, above, that it's 100% fixed.  But mgmprofits no "conspiracy theorist."  He knows exactly what he's talking about!  And there are two, three or four teams that must be put on a "No Bet" list. And Denver's one of them.

Vegas line people don't carry football lines in one hand and Bibles in the other.  Their goal is to take the public down for tens of billions of dollars.  And a sports bettor's goal is to dodge their bullets, and try to pick winners.  And that's not easy.

BOL to ALL                    

Look people last week all the games but one fell to a 4 team teaser you could have had either side (the bengals were the one) just something to think about when you call THE MAN.

TEASERES

2team move 3pt  3 team move 6pt  4 team move 12pt