Carolinax0

easily one of the best yet simple comments that ive ever seen on this forum.

it looks like everybody and their mother is on fsu today. rightfully so as i do think they are the better team. I understand that if you arent a Notre Dame fan you most likely hate Notre Dame. I cant get around why there is all this overwhelming support for FSU though. ND has probably the brightest offensive mind in the country in Brian Kelly. Hes had 30 days to prepare for the FSU defense which is playing out of its mind. But i want everybody to look at how we struggled against teams that spread is out like clemson and wake did. We blitz. We blitz alot. i think this game comes down to how Notre Dame o line picks it up and how their QB is gonna react. If we get beat on the blitz time and time again its going to be a long day (Clemson). FSU offense pretty much NEEDS the defense to create turnovers and shorten the field mainly bc with 4 true freshman offensive lineman its going to be difficult to sustain long drives down the field over and over again. Not to mention that EJ Manuel is an average QB at best. Im sorry, but i dont buy into him. Sure hes better than Trickett but being leader of the retards still means you are one. My point is that i think FSU will win but i dont think its as cut and dry as everyone thinks. look at my last couple posts about FSU and they usually are right on. Im not gloating, but they are my team and ive watched every game this year.  good luck to all that take my school, but be weary a let down wouldnt surprise me. SCALP EM!!!

Couldnt have said it better myself. i think thats the thing lane kiffin is firing them up for. their only chance to play on a national game all year. lets not forgte they lost to washington and stanford on time expiring field goals. yes their D is horrible but their offense is great. barkley has throw for 800+ yards with 8 TD 0 INT in his last 2. Biggest game of the year for the Trojans. im going over and usc moneyline. BOL

very aware prince is out but i honestly believe he is horrible and not having him is the same as having him. ucla qb plays factored 0% into my decision because i dont believe that if UCLA does cover it will be based on qb play BOL tonight its gonna be a good one spread wise

Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:

I have never seen so many rookie cappers trying to try to carve out a scenario for which UCLA will manage to keep this game somewhat competitive.

thanks for your input to all, it makes my pick much more obvious

im not really sure what makes you think you are a "professional" capper. im not even sure there are many of those that exist because its so up and down. not to mention im SURE they dont read this website,but regardless if you are going to bash me stay off my threat and shut your mouth , i dont bash you nor anyone because these games are played on the field not in this fucking forum you moron. and btw mich st is overrated and they blow. feel free to play a tougher non conference than fau, northern colorado , western michigan and notre dame(who you beat on the luckiest play fucking ever @home) prick

thats what i was a fraid of but didnt want it to go down anymore on gameday. that or im just not patient haha

9? so corners will be by themselves?i dont know a coach in the country that will leave two 21 yr old corners by themselves on a field with zero help. oregon doesnt have darrelle revis and asomugha. i think 8 is the number you are talking about. read your thread tho. we have a differing opinion on this one. BOL

i was trying to figure out who to take in this game and i decided to look at the rushing off/def for both teams. not their total rank in rushing defense or offense but the numbers per game these teams put up and the competition they are putting them up against.

oregons D is seceptible to the run. except for games against port; st and new mexico (who are god awful and i didnt even factor into this) the oregon D has given up :  91 Wazzu

                                                 177 stanford

                                                 182 tenn

                                                  210 arizona st

obvioisly wazzu is horrendous aswell. i know ucla's D had been worse and oregon is the best big play team in the country.

but heres UCLA's rushing stats(up until last week was 10th in the country. so what did CAL do to hold them up?) : Kstate 193

                                                                      Wazzu  437

                                                                      Texas   264

                                                                      Houston 266

                                                                      Stanford  177

                                                                       CAL 26???

im dont get what happened in the Cal game. hopefully CalBear reads this and fills me in on the defensive scheme. My point is that UCLA can run and running takes time off the clock. Hell, running is all they can do. they have a superior Oline to Oregons Dline as far as size and i think this becomes a running clock game. My bet is based on the fact i think UCLA can put up 21 at least. this forces Oregon to score 46 to push at the line I have. And i know oregon can score fast. but if UCLA is taking chunks off the clock and forcing the ducks to play D i think this line will be hard to cover.  Thats my personal opinion. In no way do i think UCLA has a chnace to win but i do think they have  a good shot at 25.  so  UCLA +25

so guys, darkchuggin or this guy for biggest douche on the forum? its tough, yet debatable.. who ya got?