Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Just remember everyone, when a tout mentions anything above 56%, does not have transparent records over the past several years ( not just one season ) and lines do not move with released picks, reconsider. DO NOT PAY FOR PICKS!
|
icover4u | 127 |
|
|
colts may cover but i wouldn't say its over just yet.
|
Cantiflas23 | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by 9wings: They lost to Denver by 7, they lost to Philly at home by 3, and they only hung 20 points on a struggling Ravens team. Their 2 blowout wins we against a Lockerless Tennessee, and Jax who is a practice squad at best. On the road with JJ Watt up in his grill, this is anything but a slam dunk. Ravens Struggling? I think the spread is 2.5 across most books despite public pounding colts is because colts faced a top 15 defense last week at home and had trouble scoring. We all know Texans have a decent defense and it will be hard for colts to score a lot here. If line bumps up go 3 or your buy the hook, + 3 at home is a solid bet IMO. GL everyone!
|
thatkidquade27 | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by crbravens33: Does anyone belong to lvwiseguys service? The site posts its , " best bet " record as something like 225-11-2. Can anyone comment on this if they have any knowledge or experience? The las vegas wise guys service appears to be legitimate, honest and transparent from my experience. I was just curious of others' experiences. GL to all!
|
crbravens33 | 7 |
|
|
throw out the opening line, line movement for now. lets look at the past 2 wks.
1. Chicago loses to Buffalo at home ( wk 1 20-23 ) who appears slightly improved from last year if not status quo IMO. 2. Chicago then goes to San Fran in wk 2 on SNF and look like they are about to get trounced by 49ers ( bc he they can't stop the run or run the ball themselves ) only to storm back on 3 pics by Kapernick in dramatic fashion. However, they lose a few starters on D during the comeback win ( Tillman out for year ). And Alshon Jeffrey played decent but isn't right and hampered by his hamstring. Chicago's run defense looks just as bad as it did last year and now a few starters will be out for tonights game. Chicago's offensive line is banged up as well. Garza, Slausen. They are having difficulty getting Forte and their running game going. Luckily San Fran's D looks weaker this year allowing Cutler to slice them up last wk. 1. Jets beat Oakland wk 1 at home 19-14 and didn't look all that impressive. 2. Jets jump all over Packers wk 2 in green bay and look like they are about to upset packers until they melted down in second half and made some questionable calls. *** Important point here is they got a lot of pressure on Rodgers and held GB in check first half. Not only bc of scheme but bc GB's O line is not healthy and not that great to begin with. Also, I don't care what anyone says, Geno Smith does look better SO FAR compared to last year. I'd say his bone head decisions have been cut in half thus far. And, Jets have been able to run ball well and stop run so far. So, what does all this mean…… Bears can not run the ball, can not stop the run, have several injuries on defense ( defensive backs ), offense ( o line , receivers ), had to travel to west coast last wk and now to east coast this wk. And they are playing a team that runs the ball well and stops the run well and brings pressure well when teams are forced to pass in their home stadium on prime time. The line opened at -3 and now has dipped to - 2.5, - 2 with a lot of public action on bears. I think the match ups, injury status ( i know decker and Millner are ? ) and home advantage all favor jets and the line should be - 4 IMHO. I love the Jets in this spot and hope the line drops to - 1 before kickoff. GL everyone. |
crbravens33 | 3 |
|
|
man, gray not even going to give them a chance. feel sorry for Bob Melvin. Billy Beane got too cute this year.
|
sidehustle | 7 |
|
|
Your garbage brain trust!
|
BrainTrustSyndicate | 47 |
|
|
God your a moron.
|
JohnAntonio | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by firedotcom: I like Milwaukee today ML n RL. Under 1sthalf in Oakland and Seattle games. But im not locking in until I hear from the respected on this forum. You know who you are, I dont know all yet is the problem, I know feartheweb is awsome and I like macwesties think he s underrated cause dont hear his name. Anyway I was on such a bad run I put it in the hands of the forum and for 2 days now im coming back. So please help again !!!!! There used to be a free website where it rated all the top free online forum handicappers but I can not find it anymore. It had FearTheWeb listed and a bunch of others. It was updated like every week. Anyone know the site?
|
firedotcom | 6 |
|
|
like whitesox a lot. I'm staying away from Toronto game. If Toronto didn't blow boston's sox off yesterday ( pun intended ) I might lean towards Toronto but despite Boston's season all but over, they may still want this one after getting embarrassed on national TV. De La Rosa pitches well at Fenway. This is coin flip IMO. GL tonight !
|
crbravens33 | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Tigermike1975: Solid perspective on these lines. Thanks Tiger. I was under impression De La Rosa had a few starts at Wrigley. Thanks for the info !! who do u like tonight ?
My two cents: Cleveland Line: The necessary home field that has to be priced into the line plus the unnatural love that the Oddsmakers have shown overpricing the Indians on many occasions is why we have this line. Colorado/Cubs - two crappy teams. De La Rosa not the same guy on the road as at home. De La Rosa has had only 1 start at Wrigley and that was in 2011. Colorado is not a good road team, Jackson is not a good pitcher Home field priced in, game is a pick, I don't see what else it should be. San Diego- Playing better baseball recently. We know they can't hit but the Cards bats have been know to go silent and going against a tough pitcher in a big ballpark, it certainly isn't a stretch for them to lose this match up. The line has moved from the opener so i would guess some money must agree with me, not that that means any kind of certainty. I don't see anything tricky here, just games I am not going to be involved in. Now if I could get 6.5 in San Diego I would have take a strong look at the under but at 6 I shall just let it go even though I really don't see that game getting to 7 or more for it to be a loser. Best of luck. |
crbravens33 | 5 |
|
|
I wanted to hear from others regarding these fishy lines IMO.
1. Seattle/ Iwakuma + 100 at Cleveland Bauer - 110. Seems awful low for Iwakuma. stats, trends show cleveland has played seattle well at home. 2. Colorado De La Rosa - 103 at CHC E. Jackson - 107. The better pitcher in De La Rosa a dog in this game ??? against Jackson who has horrible #s against Rockies despite being at home. De La Rosa has great # s in Wrigley. 3. St Louis Lynn - 105 at San Diego Ross - 115. The cards are overall the better team ( no news there ) and Lynn is no slouch but they r dogs to Ross and Padres at home. I love this play the most. I think Ross gets it done here. His numbers at home are awesome. What do u guys think? Books are setting traps left and right. Be careful !
|
crbravens33 | 5 |
|
|
Does anyone belong to lvwiseguys service? The site posts its , " best bet " record as something like 225-11-2. Can anyone comment on this if they have any knowledge or experience?
|
crbravens33 | 7 |
|
|
replied to
realalmanac 7/21 plays!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
in MLB Betting
love pirates and brewers today. motivational situational spots.
|
realalmanac | 14 |
|
|
VanDorbren, this sounds amazing. where can I send 50, 000 to be privy to this info? u r the best !!!! you must feel really good when u look in the mirror every day. thank u so much.
|
Tigermike1975 | 17 |
|
|
i like under as well. GL!
|
PapaShango | 39 |
|
|
seems low. it should of opened at - 120 NATS. hammel has good track record ag NATS but NATS getting hammered by public at 68 % and line only moved from -110 to - 114.
|
findawinner | 15 |
|
|
hope some took over. decent chance of hitting.
|
BigTimeSwimma | 27 |
|
|
Gauzman also let several base runners on last time out ag tampa and was able to get out of a bases loaded jam with 0 outs. I'm a huge Os fan and I'm staying away from this. I think the over is set high too so if anything I'd take over. GL everyone.
|
BigTimeSwimma | 27 |
|
|
didn't mean to be harsh. just take a breather.
|
brooklyndondada | 31 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.