Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
You still taking hou? |
MrBator | 147 |
|
|
Post some more picks. You and puck will be on my auto fade
|
KINLAW77 | 20 |
|
|
Det f5 loser. Bos f5 most likely a loser. And u hate on 714cuzzin's bet on the padres which looks to be a very good dog bet. Lol ur a joke
|
KINLAW77 | 20 |
|
|
Lol lastchance. Congrats on ur winning but thats terrible bankroll management
|
KCole23 | 35 |
|
|
Beat_yur_bookie go away. The people who continue to follow this guy could care less what his other account may be. His record doesnt lie and has been pretty damn accurate in his write ups. Ill tail him until he loses and im pretty sure thats what other ppl will do too
|
KCole23 | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ct1016: Jeff van gundy said it best Lbj has an EVERY GAME PRESSURE that no player in the history of the NBA has ever had # look at the haters in this thread # He put that pressure on himself with the whole announcement of going to Miami and winning multiple championships. Spurs are daring him to shoot and he keeps passing it up. LOL at the people that compare him to Jordan.
|
gatorsneil75 | 48 |
|
|
You got a terrible line for the astros game. Its at +220 on 5dimes
|
cashaholic | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HoosierBettor: Get real son. LeBron is absolutely a champion and has the ring to show it. In fact, one could argue he's more of a champion right now than anyone on the Spurs because he is a reigning champ and the Spurs are not. Could any of the Spurs players have won a ring by themselves like Bron was criticized for when he left Cleveland? Not a chance. They needed to have all 3 of those guys (and/or D Rob) to win a ring, no different than the Heat trio. Lol Duncan has 4 rings. Parker and Ginobli have 3. Other than the amount of rings, the other difference is that all 3 started with the same team. They didnt collaborate to all join one team like your hero lebron.
|
BWS77 | 33 |
|
|
Htown that is some real dumb reasoning. The spurs dont even play the heat till next week. I dont have a side in this game but your reasoning is just really dumb
|
huskerdu25 | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: What are you seeing that makes you think Tate had any possession of the ball? because he had his arm tangled up in between Jennings arms? That's possession to you? So catching a ball with 1 hand then wrapping it into ur arm isnt a catch anymore?? Tate had forearm and hand wrapped around the side of the ball
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Stromisle: When did Tate ever have possession Van? Jennings caught the bal and maintained possession 100 percent of the way to the ground. Tate got possession when Jennings caught the ball then proceeded to bring it towards his chest where Tate's hand/arm was the entire time. THERE YOU GO!!!!!!
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Stromisle: EXACTLY he caought it at the HIGHEST POINT and maintaiend it securely all the way to the ground You obviously had money on GB and completely delusional. If he secured the ball then there wouldnt even be a debate. Once both players hit the ground and 4 hands are on the ball, that IS simultaneous possession. It doesnt matter who had the ball near his chest.
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Stromisle: If you look at the point of contact where the ball touches a human hand it is Jennings' hands that actually CATCH the ball. Tate gets his hand in and touches the ball but he is not actually "catching" it. Again, look at he POINT OF CONTACT and tell me Tate is catching it. ZOOM IN, SLOW IT DOWN and look at the point of contact. It was not simultaneous possession. Got to be kidding me. Point of possession isnt made at the point of contact. It also isnt just made when a player gets two feet on the ground. Remember that possession must also be contained once they hit the ground and at that point 4 hands were on the ball.
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by YouWish: https://twitter.com/mcarter0399/status/250458173822087169 this picture doesn't have anything to do with simultaneous possession.. no amount of words can dispute what this picture shows.. they got it wrong.. historic game.. That picture is so dumb to use. Clearly he has his right hand on the ball and most likely has his left. 2 hands on a ball is possession. It doesnt matter if your holding it up against your chest or not.
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser: If you think Seattle had simultaneous possession you're fade material. Lol coming from the guy that was fade material during the basketball season. I remember you coming onto a person's thread that was on a run and being a complete tool. I also remember going through your posts and seeing nothing but losing picks.
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: You clearly don't know what possession means that's your issue here. Having one hand on the ball does not constitute as having possession. That is black and white. Not sure how you don't understand this Can you please find in the rule book the specifics of having possession on that play. Thanks
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
For those saying it was one hand it was more like 1 whole arm. Jennings didnt have the ball to his chest because Tate's arm was there wrapped around the ball. If Tate only had 1 hand on the ball then Jennings would of easily been able to rip the ball away. But since Tate got his arm and his right hand on the ball (simultaneous possesion) it has to be awarded to the offensive player.
And for those wanting that pass interference, what about that one on Woodson that woulda put the ball around the 20 yard line??
|
vanzack | 479 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by nickeydyme: No championship has ever been one by one superstar, the only team i can remember winning without any superstars was the 04 pistons and that team's entire starting lineup was all-stars and had a HOF coach. Kobe would not have 5 rings without Shaq leaving Orlando, Pau coming in a ridiculous trade, and Phil Jackson coaching him, not to mention a great group of role players on those teams. Jordan was 1-9 in playoff games until Pippen was drafted and Lebron is still younger than Jordan when he won his first ring, Jordan was in his 7th year and 28, Lebron just finished his 9th year (he was so good he didn't need college) and is only 27. He's about to enter his prime for the next 5 years. He almost scores as much as Jordan did, much better passer, and rebounder. His teammates love him and he doesn''t need to be a dick the way Kobe and MJ were to motivate his guys. Not to mention he seems to be a legit good guy unlike the other two who both are repeat cheaters on their spouses. You sound like a big Lebron nuthugger. So Jordan was a year older but it took him 2 less years to win a championship so I dont see your argument there. As for the motivation thing, how many times have you seen Lebron yelling at his teammates when they make a mistake?? Right now Lebron is by far the best player in the NBA. However, if he doesnt improve his shooting he wont be the best for long.
|
nickeydyme | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dytide: you're honestly comparing that to punching a woman ??? You must be dumb if you dont understand the post. Obviously doing physical harm to an individual is bad. People will look at that situation and say man what a terrible thing to do and sure it will change their opinion of Kobe. The thing with Lebron's comment is that it was basically a personal attack to a lot of people. It was a im rich, youre poor and youre gonna have to deal with it everyday comment. After these playoffs theres no doubt in my mind that LBJ is the best basketball player. But he is still an arrogant prick.
|
HutchEmAll | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mellow_wolf: What nonsense. Just a throwaway comment by James. Not even mildly inflammatory by most reasonable standards. Far worse has been uttered by many an athlete or celebrity, but most of them simply don't have the national exposure LBJ does, that's all. Whatever you think of him, it is decidedly clear that LBJ has shown tremendous self-restraint and composure considering the heavy scrutiny and consistent barrage of criticism he has been under for several years now. So he says a few innocuous words that apparently "offend" you? Who cares? I don't. He should be commended on his extremely patient and non-confrontational handling of critics these last few years, not vilified. Did you forget the amount of money this guy makes?? Give me that kind of money and you can make fun of me all you want. Im not denying that the guy is a great player. Im just putting out the reason why so many people probably hate/don't like the guy. You put on a show about your decision and predict multiple championships, then you should be ready for some criticism IF you fail. You may not care about his comments but obviously some people didn't like it.
|
HutchEmAll | 26 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.