duelich

I'll help you with list of current super imba dominating players in the nba

- Chris Wilcox, BOS - omg .714 FG%!
- Tyson Chandler, NYK .689
- Brandan Wright, DAL, .664
- Hasheem Thabet, OKC, .658
etc. etc. etc.

9-3 H team getting 7 points against 9-3 V team on b2b? You serious?

Utah has their best player (Mo Williams) missing and while it stays this way they don't have PG at all. Tinsley can destroy but can't create. Watson is bad. Everything can happen but Clippers' chances are great here (as long as they care and I think they will).

Nope. They draw, Chelsea has no chance.
UEFA Regulations:
7.06
If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (in descending order):
a) higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the teams in question;
b) superior goal difference from the group matches played among the teams in question.
Chelsea - Juventus 2:2, Juventus - Chelsea 3:0.

Also low limit allowed on this draw

This was published today so I post it today too

https://www.sports.ru/football/145075196.html

Head Marathon (biggest Russian bookmaker) expert shared his doubts about the Amkar - Anzhi game:
There was a very high flow of bets on Anzhi. Usually in Perm we have 40-50k rubles (nearly 1.500 usd) total of bets in a day, but the day before Amkar - Anzhi we had 2 million (65k usd) placed and the game day other 2 million.
There was a guy betting for the first time, he came with 500k rubles (16k usd) which is our max limit. He didn't care about the odds, he just asked "where can I place a bet on Anzhi".

emduece,
here are the facts https://www.sports.ru/tribuna/blogs/televizor3/392540.html
you can use google translate to get the translate in full, I will in short:
1)Kerimov is an owner of Anzhi. His group is also a sponsor of Amkar (100 million usd for next season)
2)Russian biggest bookmaker Marathon didn't allow this match for live betting.
Anzhi opened as -138 fav and closed as an -385.
3/4 of money on Anzhi came from bettors in Perm.
On 88 minute of the game (1:1 score by that time) with those bookmakers who had Live betting for the game you could bet Anzhi at even money even though usually at these conditions you can bet a team at +600.
3)Amkar left three key players on the bench (because of "if they get an yellow card they would miss next game", coach said)
4)shaky goal
If you read youtube comment (was highest by the time I posted the youtube link) there are 3 moments to watch there:
- defender gives easy pass to opposing team - there was no pressure on him, no rush as the draw could sure be a great result for Amkar
- other defender moves center leaving free space for Anzhi player to score unopposed
- Amkar goalie moves to the left bar effectively leaving all goal open

After all this is very classic for a fixed game when the team that is bound to lose opens the score (so you can bet against them in Live with juicy odds)

The decision if that screams 'fixed' is up to you of course.

On main page we have a thread with FIXED word in title, I think this belongs to this thread better though:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bdC37hr3Edw#!

Now this is really fixed, this is how Anzhi wins (if needed), this is why Terek is a home beast and this is why you rarely bet Russian Premiere League if you are not the one fixing stuff

somewhere in Vegas
- what game do we fix today boss?
- nothing yet. We are waiting for eddothebook to post
- I see, will refresh Covers forum like mad!

Happy Thanksgiving and GL

Well look at it this way, Detroit averages 22.7 points at home, Green Bay - 27.8 away. Detroit allows 22.3 points at home, Green Bay - 22.0 away. Being that simple we have 25.5-22 score as the prediction (which is 5 points under the projected total though). We also see that DET is 2-1 at home and GB is 2-2 away. Now, why should the line be different and what should it be in your opinion?

I used to check his site before he went tout. Even then he was pretty useless for me posting good chunk of his bets few minutes before a game or as the live bets.

lol

Haven't seen your posts for a while, hope you kill it. BOL.

Yay!

I second that

Soccer is a good show to watch if you pick right games (and these are rare). Like let's say Chelsea - Liverpool yesterday, it was a good one. If in the mix for game you have rivalry, you have history, you have skill and you have something to compete for - you get great game (and there are different leagues in Europe with different playstyles to suit and there are different teams style-wise in any league obviously).
Same goes for any other sport. I had money on three 13:00 games yesterday yet was watching Atlanta against New Orleans as this game was about what I love.

And yes 0:0 may still be a highly spectacular game in soccer, maybe both goalkeepers are godlike this day and the game itself is very fast with many opportunities for goal, you never know by scorebox. Easy example is https://www.uefa.com/uefaeuro/season=2000/matches/round=1460/match=65184/postmatch/report/index.html

Hey CrazyMilkMan, I just want to thank you for your write-ups. Covers has few gems and you are amongst them. I came here 2 years ago without knowing s**t about basketball and the next year I won my H2H Fantasy league on ESPN and now I think I start to understand basketball and that in large part because of very few Covers posters and you are amongst them (actually the only one other basketball poster I mark out is mtbaker - no offence to those who post nice picks, but you give a fish and these two guys teach to fish so all the kudos to them). BOL to you.

Let's hope they got enough positive and we see crystal clear fair game now

buffalo11 and bopkova007 hey I love ppl who spell their IQ in nickname, makes it really easy to understand each other