Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
How do you select which games to bet? |
HEDGEHAWK | 38 |
|
|
The referees were truly terrible throughout the 4th quarter. They called 4 fouls on mike Conley alone.
Good bet LC. Hard for the grizz to win playing 5 on 8
|
LeagueCapper | 78 |
|
|
Thanks for sharing! Waiting for your picks. |
HonestD | 30 |
|
|
Like these both too. YOu looking at any others? |
Moneyline99 | 12 |
|
|
Hey all,
I'm looking for a way to use one of the databases (basketball reference, nba.com, etc.) to research how playing back to back games should change how we handicap teams. But I'm not finding the right filter or menu. Is there anyone familiar with these sites that could point me to how to find this data?
|
Euphemism_for_ | 1 |
|
|
I agree with you about the Detroit – Cavaliers spread. But I’m not touching it one way or the other. As bad as the Cavaliers have looked I could see this being a blowout, also because this is the second game of the back to back. |
WhiteWidow710 | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
That's called "taking a shot" at your book in the industry and you risk being booted doing that. Do not bet into this obvious line errors and expect good things to happen to you.
OK! Thanks, still pretty new to this. Fortunately didn't go all-in. |
Euphemism_for_ | 8 |
|
|
In alternate lines:
Utah +9.5 +275 (This one's wrong) and Uta -5.5 +250 Jump on it if you like it.
|
Euphemism_for_ | 8 |
|
|
I'm thinking NO -6.5, I don't think the clips can hang - they've gotten a Denver team that hasn't figured out it's offense. Houston without Chris Paul, and OKC without Westbrook. Doesn't add up to a good defense... Leaning DEN vs. SAC under. DEN seems to have good D and plays slow. SAC 3rd consecutive road game in front of a crowd that just beat GSW. But, thinking SAC +11. They are young, big, and athletic and could cause problems for Denver frontline on D. Not biting on NOP v. LAC over. NOP shooting will cool down, played HOU and SAC - two bad defenses... maybe LAC def is for real??
|
Moneyline99 | 83 |
|
|
I’m pretty new to this forum, but I’m wondering if there’s a reason why I don’t see anyone posting player props. Is there a general consensus that these are a terrible bet?
It seems with some knowledge of rosters, research into injuries, and noting usage/offensive/defensive tendencies, player props could be pretty winnable. Anyway, just wondering what the community has to say about the.
|
Euphemism_for_ | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.