Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() Something smells rotten in Denmark
Maybe i'm just over analyzing this....
Thoughts??
I agree with you on packers, its been the Rodgers show since he said they would run the table. Plus six is like printing money. That said I still think you have to be wary of the last minute score, Falcons ML and the Patriots minus up to 6 $250 parlay
BOL |
EastsideBangers | 6 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Why you should back the Pack but worry about backing the Pats: Playoff Write-ups
in NFL Betting I hear ya BB but what Edelman said was worse in my eyes. His direct shot at the entire Steelers organization was sad. insinuating that the Steelers are a poor run organization and that they condone that type of behavior was hypocrital. Edelman comes from a team that has been caught cheating and has been in the news for taking shortcuts from time to time. Whether it's all true or not, nobody knows but to open his mouth coming from that kind of environment....it was out of line and bs. He should have not said anything rather than put himself out there allowing the steelers their motivation. Again I think it's all fluff but if we are talking bout brown here, let's talk about Edelman.....
You really think brown wilts? You think the anxiety starts to mount? I have to laugh at that brotha. I respect ya man but really? If anything, I think the Steelers use it and the lack of prep time tomlin speaks of as motivation to overcome foxboro and the patriots in the AFC championship game. My opinion. I can say this though BB: Edelman better have his head on a swivel after his comments
Listen here,, what Brown did was violate every man code and sports code.. what Edelman "said" NA.. Patriots in a route! |
begginerboy | 77 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Why you should back the Pack but worry about backing the Pats: Playoff Write-ups
in NFL Betting ![]() |
begginerboy | 77 |
|
![]() |
The reason line opened 4 and may seem low is because the masses of ave joe's think just like you, they love to back proven winners while fading guys who've never won or lost more in playoffs past.
The books know the masses will back Rodgers.
If you do your homework backing proven winners is foolsgold, backing the better team by effiency indicators will give you a far better record in the long run then backing proven winners and that'd be Falcons .
And you will get far better value with non proven winners because this deep in playoffs the line gets shaded to proven winners as we see here.
When proven winners win again it's because they play on teams better in effiency indicators and when proven winners no longer play on the better teams in these indicators like Seattle they get beaten and many times badly.
Where people get confused about proven winners is when the play on better teams and win then they say, see, see I told you the proven winner will win, well yea he played on the better team.
A much truer test of a proven winner is when he does not play on the better team and those results do not bode well for proven winners.
Had you back Rodgers as an unproven winner to win SB it would have taken you 2 trips to playoffs to win.
Had you backed him as a proven winner to win SB , 5 years later he still has not won it again or made it back again.
He even lost in his opening playoff game as a proven winner after going 15-1 in regular season but playing on a team which was out-gained in total yards in regular season which is again, a very poor indicator as a potential SB winner.
Bye teams that get out-gained in total yards you can kiss their arses goodbye in the playoffs, are you listening KC ?
And there's a 15-1 team with a proven winning QB who could not win a game in playoffs but could win as a unproven winner as a wild card 10-6 team that need the final game to make playoffs but was strong in total yards
My head hurts after reading that....So are you saying Falcons are the play? |
bpickin | 34 |
|
![]() |
Dont take it personal, it will cloud future judgement. If i had all the money back i bet against the steelers over the years i could buy a brand new car.. just a nickels worth of free advice.. BOL |
RGBRGB | 7 |
|
![]() |
But Philly has been bad vs EVERYBODY in their last 10 matchups vs teams..... How anyone can trust their money with those Knicks jokers is beyond me. No play is the best play... I wouldnt bet this game with monopoly $...I am a true Knick Homer..would be up over 5Gs the last 2 seasons if i would have just stayed away! what would happen to one of us if we didnt show up for work??? no call? no text? just disappear? and now its all good...they are dysfunctional and its a shame... I hope Hornacek can get some winners back in NY.. No Play the Rockets line looks a little funny, no ? |
Krisamons | 29 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Fishman13 | 1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Boom_Boom | 131 |
|
![]() |
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO |
Boom_Boom | 131 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
masterkush | 37 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
masterkush | 37 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
BostonCelticFTW | 1020 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Jerseyboy89 | 49 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Jerseyboy89 | 49 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Jerseyboy89 | 49 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Jerseyboy89 | 46 |
|
![]() |
I split tonight. Nets ML Hawks plus 7.5 100 each. Even.
I would definitely earn if i could stay away from playing or against.. Knicks, Nets, Jets, Giants, Mets, Yankees...
|
JamesWynsAllDay | 29 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
JamesWynsAllDay | 29 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:
Washington ML |
JamesWynsAllDay | 29 |
|
![]() |
![]() Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:
Yep. Game Over. ![]() most TNT games = one-sided easy winners; no come-back possible Counted my loss already. Bulls couldn't handle Minnesota's speed and now they face another hungry young team. Hindsight, huh. I don't want to see the Warriors win by 15 points tonight. Either they blow out the Knicks or the Knicks win straight-up w/o Rose & Melo. |
HappyKane | 41 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.