Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
First time posting in a few years so hopefully can start where I left off...in the winning column. A couple of picks I wanted some input on that I am making:
UNC -6.5 1h I'm on a strong lean with this pick as I believe UNC will stay disciplined with their elite ball handling and boards even against a tough defense. I know UNC got off to a slow start last game, but I think we see them overwhelm this Washington team from the get go. Your thoughts?
Duke/UCF 1h Under 67 This is where I typically do not make a play. Can't say I love playing O/U in basketball. However, UCF plays in a manner of constant pressure while forcing you to make a tough play/shot. To me this feels like a slow 1h with Duke playing disciplined/safe in order to wear UCF down. Over the course of the game I think you see Duke run away with this, however I can't help but think we see a somewhat boring 1h. This is a tough one for me. Thoughts on this?
|
GoCapYourself | 1 |
|
|
You could be right, but was Just a discussion on a podcast that made sense to me. Stafford practiced in full all week so eventhough he isnt 100% i dont think there was ever worry he wasnt playing. With or without the Stafford talk, Its still a play for me. GL this week |
GoCapYourself | 6 |
|
|
In my opinion you are seeing a battle of sharps on both sides with the public pushing the GB line up. Typically you see the sharps battle very close to game time (if they are even battling), but like you said, I would not have been surprised to see a line of GB -6.5. A couple things on this game for me; I think Minnesota's defense at home is legit and Rodgers won't have a cake walk. Minnesota's offense has been fairly better than I believe most people would think with Keenum, but there game plans have worked well. Both of these teams know each other extremely well and while I do think that Diggs being out is a big deal, I believe home field advantage coupled with the Vikes playing for top spot in their division is why you are seeing the close line in the books. I'm staying away from it all together. |
honky | 8 |
|
|
Last cover: Denver -12 I hate double digit spreads in the NFL. It seems to go against me when I pull the trigger, but this game is as if the Deer is putting the rifle in my hand for me. I think we are all on the same page here as the Giants are in a very dark, deep, and ugly hole. They've lost all of their weapons and have little ground game at all. Their defense has been a bright spot of sorts but was just ran all over. There's not much to say here. Denver is coming off a bye with the best defense in the NFL and holding opponents to 18 points per game. I don't even have one clue on how Eli will score against this defense at home with virtually no weapons or way to move the ball. I'm forced to play Denver here and also the unders. There is nothing to keep me away or to play the Giants, so coming from a Chiefs fan, I'll say let's go Broncos! |
GoCapYourself | 6 |
|
|
Chargers ML or points- Yes Rivers gives everyone headaches and so do the Chargers with their horrible record. But Oakland has not impressed me in any shape or form. Carr or not, Oakland's defense is always suspect to get shredded and a QB that has thrown for multiple TDs in 10 of his last 12 games won't help that either. Now I'm not saying I'm loading up on the Chargers but they are in play for me. In Oakland the Chargers are 10-4 ATS and while I know the Raiders are playing for their season, I don't think the Chargers are giving up just yet. Just a small play for me, but one of the better games with a chance at a cover or SU win this week. Rams ML or points- Consistency. That's really what we look for in blah games. I will be one of the first to stand firm on the fact that I believe the Jags defense is for real. They have been a powerhouse but this is the perfect spot for a let down. They will still play well, but consistency will win this game. Goff has surprised the world this year with his complete 180 from last season. But overall you could not ask for a more consistent QB. His passes are sharp and on point, He is playing smart and making wise decisions, and he's got the advantage of a struggling QB on the other side of the field. Blake Bottles is proving his case to me about being more and more like Bad Andy Dalton. Some days are great and the others are horrid. So what does Jacksonville have him do? Throw the ball a whopping 14 times. I think we see some of the same here and I believe the Rams can hold off this offense while Goff does just enough to win.
Think twice before you bet those Pats: Here's all I have been hearing from write ups to large betting friends: "If you give Belichek 10 days to prepare say good night NYJ" or "The Jets aren't as good as their record and it will be proven here I get it. I want to load up on the Patriots here also because a mere 9 points should be a cake walk for the GOAT right? I remember only a few large bets that have completely went sour on me and ruined my weekend. A few of those are going large on the Pats vs the Jets. Maybe that has something to do with the fact that the Pats are 0-4 ATS in New York. I'm staying away from this one as yes I think the Pats should try and make a statement here, but I legitimately believe that there is something seriously wrong with their defense. If anything, I think the over is the play as it at least carries an attractive 11-4 record. |
GoCapYourself | 6 |
|
|
It's been a few years since I've posted but after reading these last few weeks, I thought I would throw out my thoughts for this week. Feel free to comment or let me know your locks for the week. GL all...lets make some bank.
Covers- Saints -4 I'm a believe of stats and also a believer of bye weeks. I have seen quite a few write ups that back the Lions here as even I am impressed with their play so far. However, I firmly believe that they have too much going against them here. Stafford isn't going to be 100% and the Saints have had a surprisingly stingy defense lately. Most importantly, the Saints are coning off a bye week and playing at home. A 21-5 ATS stat coming off a bye is no joke as the Saints always play up to expectations in the dome. In taking Saints -4 as I believe we seen the sharps already pound the line to push it all the way to -5.5 at some books. Now that the public has brought it back to -4, I see incredible value in following the big money.
Ravens -6.5 Here's my side of this game as I see quite a few people that want in on the Bears here. I know the Bears' defense has stepped up more than we expected and yes Tribusky did have a few bright spots in his game. But, I am going to be playing the Ravens for a few reasons here. The Ravens defense, although not exciting, are very steady and have a few ball hawkers with a decent pass rush that can force Tribusky into a few key mistakes. On the other side of the ball, The Ravens do not have a sexy offense, but a steady one. I see this being a lackluster type of game that Baltimore grinds down the Bears and covers the spread. Slow and steady wins the race. Harbaugh is not 9-0 against rookie QBs for nothing. |
GoCapYourself | 6 |
|
|
Cyborg in round 2 seems like a very legitimate bet imo. Just the raw toughness in her opponent accompanied by the fact that Cyborg is working on making better decisions from what I read, makes me think that round 2 and even 3 are extremely possible even though most think it will be over quickly.
I think there's a lot of value in backing Lamas as well. The step up in competition is real and Lamas doesn't make many mistake. His losses being to those of the elite in the division give me enough optimism that he is the better fighter. Other Dogs- Cerrone, Ortega, and Shelton are all live imo |
PapaShango | 102 |
|
|
I don't see a cover here for the Bills at all. History is far in favor of Brady vs the Bills along with the stat that Belichek has not been swept by any team since 2000. Thats a stretch you have to continue to bet IMO.
|
Winston704 | 20 |
|
|
Another important and crazy stat is that Belichek has not been swept by any team since 2000. I'll stick with that 16 year run until proven otherwise. BOL
|
Jimkellybeer | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Kaumana808: Chargers get it done! I can see a 38-35 type of game hopefully in favor of the chargers. My pick Chargers + points and over! GL I'm on this with you. With 10 days to prepare for the Falcons, I'll take Rivers in a shootout. ATL likes to play down to their competition so the points will be nice to have in what I think will be a closer game than most think.
|
Kaumana808 | 17 |
|
|
With Flacco getting in a full practice, that bodes well for the Ravens. If Pittsburgh loses at home vs New England, a Ravens win puts them tied for the lead with the Steelers. I don't have nearly enough trust in NYJs horrible defense and I certainly have none towards Geno Smith. If I would be forced to pick here, I would say Flacco finds a way. GL with your wager.
|
Kazual12 | 4 |
|
|
3-1
Happy to come back on the right foot
|
GoCapYourself | 7 |
|
|
We shall see!
|
GoCapYourself | 7 |
|
|
As I said in my last post, I'm just getting back into this, but hopefully we can do as good as we were doing a few years back. GL to all
Wisconsin +10.5 - In all honesty, I see quite a few home dogs I like this week, but not going to post tons of plays and hope I hit half of them. Now, OSU has a great traveling team and also the best offense in the Big Ten. However, it's hard for me to imagine that even as good as OSU is, that Wisky will just roll over on their home field when they are boasting close to a top 10 defense in the nation. When looking at OSU's schedule, I can see why they are ranked so high in the offensive department with some of the horrible defenses they have played. Give me Wisky to put up a fight at home. Arkansas +7.5 - Maybe I am missing something with Ole Miss. I don't see a good enough gap to favor more than a TD spread. I have seen this line jump back and forth depending where I look from 7 and 7.5. Either way, Arkansas has taken the last two games between the two and Ole Miss shows us little defense. With a rowdy home crowd, I expect Arkansas to keep this one closer. Pitt -3.5 - There are plenty of stats and ATS that we can throw out for this game, but the difference here is the depth of Pitts running game. James Connor should have no trouble finding room against Virginia's lowly defense that gives up over 160 yards per game. Minus the run game, Pitt is extremely well balanced and Virginia doesn't look like they hang all that well giving up over 470 yards per game. I am a little skeptical about Pitts defense, but I see Pitt completely controlling the game and time of possession, leaving Virginia minimal time to cover. (Hate taking road favorites in conference play, but the stats are just too much to ignore) Not for the faint of heart: Texas Tech ML- I can probably go through this site and find at least 10 people backing WV in there picks and I understand. This is obviously my least favorite play of the 4, but here's my reasoning: This is the first time WV is traveling this year and if anyone remembers, they were terrible on the road last season. (For stat purposes, 4 of their 5 losses were road games, they are 1-6 ATS on the road and 0-4 ATS against Texas Tech) So here's the way I see it- Offenses are very similar with TT ranked 2nd in the nation. Defenses are both non-factors as neither has one. There are a mere 30 yards away from each other on yards against. So in terms of game flow, each team will be able to counter what the other brings them. In a coin-flip type of game, I will take the home team vs a team that has shown to be shaky on the road. |
GoCapYourself | 7 |
|
|
Texas Tech's defense should not be the only one that "has no defense" West Virginia's defense is only better by less than 30 yards this year. TT ranked 2nd in total offense. So I wouldn't run your money to the window for WV. I think this is an overs or nothing bet.
|
hillardoh1 | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by djmay00: Be careful, don't base your picks off the triangle. ex. Team A beats Team B. Team C beats Team A, so you would think Team B can't possibly beat Team C right??? Very dangerous way to pick games. Truth
|
rebsandzags2 | 17 |
|
|
You really wouldn't be shocked if the Browns upset New England at home? I'm fairly certain that would be quite the shocker.
|
footballlifer | 11 |
|
|
GL today bro....Like the plays
|
vankiep_0007 | 19 |
|
|
Don't mind this teaser at all:
Nebraska -10 Navy +17 Texas +12
|
GoCapYourself | 5 |
|
|
KState and Texas would be two worth looking at
|
MEANGREEN | 36 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.