Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
Army is the play here. They're: -Getting double digits at home -Getting double digits in what should be a low scoring game -The triple option is tough to defend, especially w/ one less day to prepare -Freshman QB's rarely cover double digit spreads on the road especially in their first road game ever -Army has just enough offense to keep it close -Rutgers is a has been program already, no Ray Rice... no dice My initial reaction was to take Rutgers but after a little research I think Army will keep this under a touchdown ARMY +10.5 -The triple option is tough to defend, especially w/ one less day to prepare wtf was your point here?? Rutgers has one less day to prepare to defend for the triple option right? One less day than what?? They have a week just like most teams play once a week. Perhaps you didn't know that....idiot! That's my point...if you didn't get it... |
Covers | 129 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
Army is the play here. They're: -Getting double digits at home -Getting double digits in what should be a low scoring game -The triple option is tough to defend, especially w/ one less day to prepare -Freshman QB's rarely cover double digit spreads on the road especially in their first road game ever -Army has just enough offense to keep it close -Rutgers is a has been program already, no Ray Rice... no dice My initial reaction was to take Rutgers but after a little research I think Army will keep this under a touchdown ARMY +10.5 Army is the team that has one less day to prepare. Please dont post inaccurate information to others. The last time Rutgers played was on Friday 10/16. People...plz research before making any statements... |
Covers | 129 |
|
|
anyone cares to respond???
|
hacmao | 3 |
|
|
would someone in Covers Team please respond...thanks
|
hacmao | 3 |
|
|
Whats up with this? The % picks in there are bogus...they stay the same for whole week. Can someone please update this info or don't post inaccurate information.
Thanks Covers team.
|
hacmao | 3 |
|
|
you will go 4-2
|
Time_Is_Money | 22 |
|
|
i just sent mine in...is the login your BetPhoenix account number??
|
Betphoenix | 179 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by seanpsu124:
NC ST lost to So. Florida 41-10 @ NC ST and Rutgers beat So. Florida 49-16 @ So. Florida. Looking at that Rutgers is pick.
Rutgers -7
What about NCST won at NC 41-10 and Rutgers lost to NC at home 12-44??? Come on people, if you're gonna look at common opponents, please look at all of them...not just to the ones that favors your picks... But based on those common opponents, the games all went over...so just go with the over! |
Mr_Covers | 145 |
|
|
guys, help me out here...what are the rules??? shouldn't it be at the spot of the fault???
|
wallstreetcappers | 19 |
|
|
1st half wf -1
game over 44
gla
|
Mr_Covers | 144 |
|
|
what a perfect day
|
Mr_Covers | 254 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by hacmao:
In Covers, the first thing i noticed in recent games between these two teams is they always scored more points the 2nd time they play each other. First time they met this year was 44 points total, therefore, u gotta like the over in this game. Looking more into the games this year, of the 7 games on the road, Indy has won 5 times ATS in the 2nd half but didn't do too well in the 1st half...seems like they start out slow on the road. For Jac, they lost 5 out of 7 games at home ATS both in the 1st and 2nd half. Indy is heading in the right direction and jax is not...your choice! Lets hope i'm right...over whole game and Indy -7 2nd half |
Mr_Covers | 254 |
|
|
In Covers, the first thing i noticed in recent games between these two teams is they always scored more points the 2nd time they play each other. First time they met this year was 44 points total, therefore, u gotta like the over in this game. Looking more into the games this year, of the 7 games on the road, Indy has won 5 times ATS in the 2nd half but didn't do too well in the 1st half...seems like they start out slow on the road. For Jac, they lost 5 out of 7 games at home ATS both in the 1st and 2nd half. Indy is heading in the right direction and jax is not...your choice! |
Mr_Covers | 254 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jackal7130:
3,4,4,3,4. That is the margin of victory respectively in the Colts 5 road wins ( stuck in there are 2 losses ). I don't see how this is a GIMME! Granted Jax has sucked, and I mentioned last week it looked like they had quit. I also stated that it was not in Del Rios vocabulary. It could be Jax's SUPER BOWL . Just playing devils advocate here but it is still not a gimme because these two teams HATE each other. I think if you like the Colts you have to like the under also because every Colts cover last ten have gone under. Every Jags cover has gone over ( odd huh ?).Well BOL to all Absolutely wrong info...IND @ PIT was OVER and ind won 24-20. IND @ HOU and covered 31-27 and that was OVER. Those are the two games that came to me right away when i saw your post...Please do not post wrong stats! |
Mr_Covers | 254 |
|
|
3 MIN LEFT...damn...i got UL and over 2nd half
|
primo99 | 74 |
|
|
where r u guys watching this game??
|
primo99 | 74 |
|
|
punt for 1 yard???? wtf!!
|
primo99 | 74 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zippys:
liking the pics bibendi! taking you up on alabama 1k and OU for 2k. jus going bigger on OU cuz its home team and they been making me money all season long! OU's offense wont stop scoring til the last seconds of the game. mizz plays OK on a neutral field...if it matters |
bibendi23 | 173 |
|
|
did you watch that whole game??? If you did and you didn't see anything then it's pointless to even discuss. It was not just a bad call. Everything in that game were favored SD. And the final scores dont have to be exactly 10-11 for SD to cover...so one ref doesn't have to keep the score 10-11...do u understand that? The final score could be anything as long as SD covers.
|
JeffSmith70 | 69 |
|
|
"REFS make 42,295 - 120,998 for four months of work one day a week, thats damn good if you ask me."
So you're saying if you make a certain amount, then you don't need anymore money??
"And about it being about the ref, so what."
Are you agreeing that the ref cheated???
"Palamalou had no business trying to run it back anyway"
Why wouldn't he? Thats the basic instinct as a player. You always try to score.
"Had he dove on the ball like he was supposed to, GAME OVER, no fix talk."
Exactly! The ref will be happy because thats what he wanted. But the fact is Polamalu didn't just fall on the ball, so the ref had to go out of his way trying to make a bad call for his own interest.
You are an idiot to think nothing went wrong at the end of that game.
|
JeffSmith70 | 69 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.